Geovision APOE081-301U vs Geovision APOE0811: Specification Comparison
Both products are 8-port 802.3at PoE+ Gigabit switches from Geovision, each featuring two dedicated Gigabit uplink ports, targeted at IP camera deployments. The 84-APOE081-301U is positioned as an unmanaged access-layer switch, while the GV-APOE0811 adds a managed feature set — VLAN, QoS, and Port Mirroring — along with a published 140W total power budget. Buyers cross-shopping these two are typically choosing between a simpler, lower-cost edge switch and a managed switch with greater traffic-shaping control for more demanding surveillance network segments.
In This Guide
- How much PoE power is available, and will the switch support all 8 cameras simultaneously?
- Does either switch offer traffic management features such as VLAN, QoS, or port mirroring?
- What are the physical installation options, dimensions, and warranty terms?
- Which should you choose: the APOE081-301U or the APOE0811?
- Side-by-Side Specs
- FAQ
How much PoE power is available, and will the switch support all 8 cameras simultaneously?
The GV-APOE0811 carries an explicitly stated total PoE power budget of 140W across its 8 ports. At the IEEE 802.3at maximum of 30W per port, 140W supports approximately 4–5 ports at full draw simultaneously, or 8 ports at modest draw (17.5W each). This is a concrete, plannable number for camera budgeting.
The 84-APOE081-301U specifies 30W per port (802.3at) but does not provide a total power budget figure in the supplied specs. Installers cannot calculate worst-case simultaneous draw without consulting the datasheet directly, which introduces uncertainty during the design phase. This is a meaningful gap when sizing a deployment.
Does either switch offer traffic management features such as VLAN, QoS, or port mirroring?
The GV-APOE0811 is explicitly specified as a Managed Network Switch, with VLAN, QoS, and Port Mirroring listed as management features. VLAN allows surveillance traffic to be isolated from corporate LAN segments. QoS enables prioritization of video streams over lower-priority traffic. Port Mirroring supports network troubleshooting and monitoring. ONVIF Profile S compatibility is also noted, confirming interoperability with ONVIF-compliant cameras.
The 84-APOE081-301U provides no management feature data in the supplied specs — no VLAN, no QoS, no port mirroring, and no ONVIF compatibility statement. The card bullets reference compatibility with Axis, Hikvision, and Dahua cameras, but this is stated as IEEE 802.3af/at physical interoperability, not protocol-level management. For flat, small-site installations this may be entirely sufficient; for segmented or multi-VLAN environments it is a disqualifying gap.
What are the physical installation options, dimensions, and warranty terms?
The GV-APOE0811 provides full physical specifications: dimensions of 12.00 x 8.00 x 3.00 inches, weight of 3.75 lb, wall or rack-mount form factor, white housing, and a stated 3-Year Warranty. These details allow installers to plan enclosure space, mounting hardware, and service contract expectations before procurement.
The 84-APOE081-301U does not supply dimensions, weight, mounting options, housing color, or warranty duration in the provided specs. Its cable category is listed as 'Accessories,' which is a cataloging classification and does not describe the unit's physical installation profile. Installers would need to consult the linked datasheet (/content/product-datasheets/84-APOE081-301U.pdf) for this information before committing to a rack or enclosure design.
Which should you choose: the APOE081-301U or the APOE0811?
Our take: The GV-APOE0811 is the stronger choice when the deployment requires managed switching, a known power budget, or documented physical installation planning. It provides a published 140W total PoE budget versus no stated budget for the 84-APOE081-301U, a full managed feature set (VLAN, QoS, Port Mirroring) versus none confirmed on the 301U, and concrete physical specs (12 x 8 x 3 in, 3.75 lb, wall/rack mount, 3-year warranty) versus no equivalent data available for the 301U. The 84-APOE081-301U may be appropriate for simple, flat single-VLAN edge installations where per-port 30W 802.3at delivery is the only requirement and a lower unit cost is the primary driver — but buyers should verify its total power budget and warranty from the datasheet before specifying it in any multi-camera design.
Side-by-Side Comparison
Spec-for-spec, from manufacturer data.
| Specification | Geovision APOE081-301U | Geovision APOE0811 |
|---|---|---|
| MPN | 84-APOE081-301U | GV-APOE0811 (Dist. SKU: 140-APOE81W-000) |
| PoE+ Ports | 8 (802.3at) | 8 (802.3at) |
| Max Power per Port | 30W | 30W |
| Total PoE Power Budget | — | 140W |
| Port Speed | 1000 Mbps | 10/100/1000 Mbps |
| Uplink Ports | 2 Gigabit | 2 Gigabit |
| Switch Type | — | Managed |
| VLAN Support | — | Yes |
| QoS | — | Yes |
| Port Mirroring | — | Yes |
| ONVIF Compatibility | — | ONVIF Profile S |
| Form Factor / Mount | — | Wall or rack-mount |
| Dimensions (in) | — | 12.00 x 8.00 x 3.00 |
| Weight | — | 3.75 lb |
| Housing Color | — | White |
| Warranty | — | 3-Year |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which should you choose: the APOE081-301U or the APOE0811?
The GV-APOE0811 is the stronger choice when the deployment requires managed switching, a known power budget, or documented physical installation planning. It provides a published 140W total PoE budget versus no stated budget for the 84-APOE081-301U, a full managed feature set (VLAN, QoS, Port Mirroring) versus none confirmed on the 301U, and concrete physical specs (12 x 8 x 3 in, 3.75 lb, wall/rack mount, 3-year warranty) versus no equivalent data available for the 301U. The 84-APOE081-301U may be appropriate for simple, flat single-VLAN edge installations where per-port 30W 802.3at delivery is the only requirement and a lower unit cost is the primary driver — but buyers should verify its total power budget and warranty from the datasheet before specifying it in any multi-camera design.
Which switch — the APOE081-301U or the APOE0811 — is better suited for a segmented network with a dedicated camera VLAN?
The GV-APOE0811 is the appropriate choice. It is specified as a Managed Network Switch with VLAN support explicitly listed. The 84-APOE081-301U has no management features stated in its specifications, so VLAN capability cannot be confirmed for that model.
Can the GV-APOE0811 power all 8 cameras at the same time, and how does that compare to the APOE081-301U?
The GV-APOE0811 has a stated 140W total power budget across 8 802.3at ports (30W max per port). At 15W per camera — typical for a fixed IP camera — all 8 ports can run simultaneously with headroom to spare. The 84-APOE081-301U does not publish a total power budget in the available specifications, so simultaneous full-load capacity cannot be confirmed without consulting its datasheet.
Does either switch include a warranty, and does that affect long-term installation planning?
The GV-APOE0811 carries a stated 3-Year Warranty. No warranty term is provided in the specifications for the 84-APOE081-301U. For commercial or government installations where a documented warranty period is required for contract compliance or maintenance planning, the GV-APOE0811 offers a confirmed figure; the 84-APOE081-301U would require datasheet or vendor confirmation.
More Network Switch Comparisons
- Vivotek IHT-1271 vs TP-Link SG3210XHP-M2
- Vivotek IHT-1271 vs TP-Link S4500-8GP2F
- Vivotek IHT-1271 vs TP-Link SG1210P
- Vivotek IHT-1271 vs Allied Telesis AT-x530L-10GHXm-10
- Vivotek IHT-1271 vs Vivotek GEV-108A-130
- Vivotek IHT-1271 vs Vivotek IHT-1000
Network Switch Buying Guides
Get a Second Opinion on Your Camera Choice
Share your site layout, coverage goals, and budget. Our team will validate the camera selection, flag anything we would change, and recommend products that match the use case.