TP-Link S5500-24GP4XF vs TP-Link SG3428XPP-M2: Specification Comparison
Both the TP-Link S5500-24GP4XF and the SG3428XPP-M2 are 1U rackmount L2+ managed switches offering 24 copper PoE ports plus four 10GE SFP+ uplinks — the core form factor enterprise installers and IT buyers evaluate when scaling camera, AP, and VoIP infrastructure. The key divergence is generation: the S5500-24GP4XF delivers 24-port Gigabit copper with 802.3at PoE+ and a 240 W budget under the Omada Pro umbrella, while the SG3428XPP-M2 steps up to 24-port 2.5GBASE-T copper with 802.3bt PoE++ and a 770 W budget under the standard Omada platform. This comparison covers port throughput and PoE delivery, power architecture and physical environment, and management integration.
In This Guide
Which switch delivers more bandwidth and PoE power per port?
The S5500-24GP4XF provides 24 Gigabit (1 Gbps) RJ45 ports with 802.3af/at PoE+, capped at 30 W per port per the provided specs. Its four SFP+ slots operate at 10 Gbps each, and total switching capacity is listed as 160 Gbps. PoE budget is 240 W across all 24 ports, meaning average available power per port is 10 W under full load.
The SG3428XPP-M2 equips all 24 copper ports at 2.5 GBASE-T — 2.5× the per-port throughput of the S5500-24GP4XF — and supports 802.3bt PoE++ at up to 90 W per port. Its four SFP+ slots are also 10 Gbps, but total switching capacity reaches 200 Gbps. The PoE budget is 770 W, yielding an average of approximately 32 W per port under full load — more than triple the S5500-24GP4XF's per-port average. The SG3428XPP-M2 also lists 148.80 Mpps forwarding rate; a comparable figure is not provided for the S5500-24GP4XF.
How do the two switches compare on power draw, physical size, and operating environment?
The S5500-24GP4XF draws a maximum of 384 W and measures 17.3 × 7.1 × 1.7 in (440 × 180 × 44 mm). Its operating temperature range is 0 °C to 45 °C (32 °F to 113 °F). Both units accept 100–240 V AC 50/60 Hz input.
The SG3428XPP-M2 draws a maximum of 500 W — 116 W more than the S5500-24GP4XF — reflecting its higher PoE++ budget. It is physically deeper at 17.3 × 13.0 × 1.7 in (440 × 330 × 44 mm), requiring more rack depth. Its operating temperature floor is lower at −5 °C (23 °F) versus 0 °C (32 °F), providing a slight cold-environment advantage. Both units occupy 1U. Memory is 32 MB Flash for the S5500-24GP4XF; the SG3428XPP-M2 specifies 32 MB Flash and 256 MB DRAM — the S5500-24GP4XF's DRAM figure is not provided in the supplied specs.
The SG3428XPP-M2 also lists wall and ceiling mount options in addition to rack, versus rack-only for the S5500-24GP4XF per the provided specs.
What management platforms and protocols do these switches support?
The S5500-24GP4XF operates under TP-Link's Omada Pro platform. The provided specs reference CLI, SNMP v1/v2c/v3, and RMON for network management. Layer 2+ features include static routing, 802.1Q VLAN, QinQ, STP/RSTP/MSTP, IGMP snooping, ACL, 802.1X port authentication, and LACP. Dynamic PoE allocation is noted in the product bullets.
The SG3428XPP-M2 operates under TP-Link's standard Omada platform (cloud-managed or standalone per the provided specs). Layer 2+ features listed include store-and-forward switching, static routing, VLAN, ACL, QoS, IGMP snooping, OAM, and DDM. The SG3428XPP-M2 also lists ONVIF compliance — a spec not provided for the S5500-24GP4XF — which is relevant for IP camera and VMS interoperability. Both switches share the same 32 MB Flash storage figure; management protocol details beyond Omada affiliation are not enumerated for the SG3428XPP-M2 in the provided specs.
Which should you choose: the S5500-24GP4XF or the SG3428XPP-M2?
Our take: The SG3428XPP-M2 is the stronger choice when deployments demand high per-port power delivery, multi-gig edge bandwidth, or cold-environment tolerance. Its 770 W PoE++ budget versus the S5500-24GP4XF's 240 W — a 530 W delta — allows it to simultaneously power 90 W 802.3bt devices such as high-end PTZ cameras or Wi-Fi 6E APs without budget-splitting. Its 2.5 GBASE-T copper ports deliver 2.5× the edge throughput of the S5500-24GP4XF's Gigabit ports, a practical advantage as multi-gig endpoints proliferate. Its lower cold-floor (−5 °C vs 0 °C) suits lightly conditioned IDF closets. The S5500-24GP4XF is appropriate where PoE+ (30 W) endpoints are the standard, rack depth or weight budgets are tight (it is 5.9 in shallower), total power draw must stay under 384 W, and the Omada Pro management tier is required. Buyers standardized on standard Omada with ONVIF-aware management should favor the SG3428XPP-M2.
Side-by-Side Comparison
Spec-for-spec, from manufacturer data.
| Specification | TP-Link S5500-24GP4XF | TP-Link SG3428XPP-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| SKU / MPN | S5500-24GP4XF | SG3428XPP-M2 |
| Copper Port Count | 24 | 24 |
| Copper Port Speed | 1 Gbps (Gigabit) | 2.5 Gbps (2.5GBASE-T) |
| SFP+ Uplink Slots | 4 × 10 Gbps | 4 × 10 Gbps |
| PoE Standard | 802.3af/at (PoE+) | 802.3af/at/bt (PoE++) |
| Max PoE per Port | 30 W | 90 W |
| Total PoE Budget | 240 W | 770 W |
| Switching Capacity | 160 Gbps | 200 Gbps |
| Forwarding Rate | — | 148.80 Mpps |
| Max Power Draw | 384 W | 500 W |
| Flash Memory | 32 MB | 32 MB |
| DRAM | — | 256 MB |
| Operating Temp | 0 °C to 45 °C | −5 °C to 45 °C |
| Dimensions (W×D×H) | 17.3 × 7.1 × 1.7 in | 17.3 × 13.0 × 1.7 in |
| Mount Options | Rack | Rack, Wall, Ceiling |
| ONVIF | — | Yes |
| Management Platform | Omada Pro | Omada (cloud or standalone) |
| Power Supply Input | 100–240 V AC 50/60 Hz | 100–240 V AC 50/60 Hz |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which should you choose: the S5500-24GP4XF or the SG3428XPP-M2?
The SG3428XPP-M2 is the stronger choice when deployments demand high per-port power delivery, multi-gig edge bandwidth, or cold-environment tolerance. Its 770 W PoE++ budget versus the S5500-24GP4XF's 240 W — a 530 W delta — allows it to simultaneously power 90 W 802.3bt devices such as high-end PTZ cameras or Wi-Fi 6E APs without budget-splitting. Its 2.5 GBASE-T copper ports deliver 2.5× the edge throughput of the S5500-24GP4XF's Gigabit ports, a practical advantage as multi-gig endpoints proliferate. Its lower cold-floor (−5 °C vs 0 °C) suits lightly conditioned IDF closets. The S5500-24GP4XF is appropriate where PoE+ (30 W) endpoints are the standard, rack depth or weight budgets are tight (it is 5.9 in shallower), total power draw must stay under 384 W, and the Omada Pro management tier is required. Buyers standardized on standard Omada with ONVIF-aware management should favor the SG3428XPP-M2.
Is the S5500-24GP4XF or SG3428XPP-M2 better for powering high-wattage devices like 802.3bt cameras or Wi-Fi 6E access points?
The SG3428XPP-M2 is the clear choice. It supports 802.3bt PoE++ at up to 90 W per port and carries a 770 W total budget. The S5500-24GP4XF tops out at 802.3at PoE+ (30 W per port per the provided specs) with a 240 W total budget, which is insufficient for 802.3bt devices and limits simultaneous high-wattage port use.
Will either switch fit a shallow rack or wall-mount enclosure?
The S5500-24GP4XF is shallower at 7.1 in (180 mm) depth versus the SG3428XPP-M2's 13.0 in (330 mm), making it significantly more compatible with shallow-depth wall-mount or compact rack enclosures. The SG3428XPP-M2 also lists wall and ceiling mount options in the provided specs, but its greater depth may still be a constraint depending on the enclosure. Verify enclosure depth before specifying either unit.
Do both switches work with the same TP-Link Omada management software?
Both are Omada-platform switches but sit under different tiers per the provided specs: the S5500-24GP4XF is labeled Omada Pro, while the SG3428XPP-M2 is labeled standard Omada (cloud-managed or standalone). Whether these tiers share a unified controller instance or require separate management infrastructure is not determinable from the provided specs alone — confirm with TP-Link's Omada compatibility matrix before mixing tiers in a single managed domain.
More Network Switch Comparisons
- TP-Link S5500-24GP4XF vs NETGEAR GS728TP-300NAS
- TP-Link S5500-24GP4XF vs Comnet CNGE24FX12TX12MSPOE
- TP-Link S5500-24GP4XF vs Ubiquiti USW-24
- TP-Link S5500-24GP4XF vs Ubiquiti USW-ENTERPRISEXG-24
- TP-Link S5500-24GP4XF vs TP-Link SL2428P
- TP-Link SL2428P vs NETGEAR GS728TP-300NAS
Network Switch Buying Guides
Get a Second Opinion on Your Camera Choice
Share your site layout, coverage goals, and budget. Our team will validate the camera selection, flag anything we would change, and recommend products that match the use case.