Hanwha GS980M/52PS-10 vs Hanwha IGS950/52PS-910: Specification Comparison
Both the Hanwha HV-GS980M/52PS-10 and HV-IGS950/52PS-910 are 48-port rack-mount Gigabit PoE switches from Hanwha's HV networking line, each offering four SFP uplink slots and a 740W aggregate PoE power budget — the core attributes a surveillance integrator compares when selecting a distribution-layer switch for a large IP camera deployment. The key differentiators revealed by their specifications are PoE standard (802.3bt/PoE++ vs. 802.3at/PoE+), environmental hardening ratings, and management depth, all of which affect camera compatibility, installation context, and long-term network control.
In This Guide
- Which switch supports higher per-port PoE wattage and what camera types does that enable?
- Which switch is rated for harsher installation environments, and does the environmental spec change installation options?
- How do the two switches differ in management capability and integration with surveillance platforms?
- Which should you choose: the GS980M/52PS-10 or the IGS950/52PS-910?
- Side-by-Side Specs
- FAQ
Which switch supports higher per-port PoE wattage and what camera types does that enable?
The GS980M/52PS-10 is specified with PoE++ (IEEE 802.3bt), which supports up to 90W per port at the port level. Its total PoE budget is listed at 740W. This makes it compatible with high-draw devices such as multi-sensor panoramic cameras, PTZ cameras with integrated IR illuminators, and cameras with onboard heaters — all of which can exceed the 30W ceiling of 802.3at.
The IGS950/52PS-910 is specified with PoE+ (IEEE 802.3at), capped at 30W per port, with the same 740W aggregate budget. Its spec sheet explicitly states '48 x Gigabit @ 30W per port.' For standard fixed IP cameras, access control panels, and VoIP phones — the vast majority of PoE+ compliant devices — 30W per port is fully adequate.
Buyers deploying PoE++ cameras (Hanwha QNO-9100R, multi-imager models, or third-party 60–90W devices) must select the GS980M/52PS-10. Deployments consisting entirely of standard PoE+ cameras can be served by either model without compromise on the power dimension.
Which switch is rated for harsher installation environments, and does the environmental spec change installation options?
The GS980M/52PS-10 carries explicit IP66, IK10, NEMA 4X, and NEMA-TS 2 (sections 2.2.7, 2.2.8, 2.2.9) ratings per the provided specifications. IP66 denotes dust-tight and high-pressure water-jet resistance. IK10 is the highest IEC vandal-resistance grade (20-joule impact). NEMA 4X adds corrosion resistance. NEMA-TS 2 compliance is specific to traffic-cabinet deployments. Its operating temperature range is stated as -40°C to +55°C (-40°F to +131°F).
The IGS950/52PS-910 specifications do not list an IP rating, IK rating, NEMA rating, or operating temperature range. Its spec sheet describes it as 'Industrial-grade 24/7 operation,' but no quantified environmental certifications are provided in the supplied data. Buyers requiring rated environmental protection cannot confirm suitability from the available specs alone.
For indoor, climate-controlled IDF/MDF closets, the absence of environmental ratings on the IGS950/52PS-910 is unlikely to be disqualifying. For outdoor cabinets, transit/traffic installations, or any location subject to temperature extremes, moisture, or physical impact, the GS980M/52PS-10's documented ratings are a substantive differentiator.
How do the two switches differ in management capability and integration with surveillance platforms?
The GS980M/52PS-10 specifications reference Layer 2/3 management, VLAN, QoS, port mirroring, and a GUI interface. The spec data also notes a GUI field labeled '(GUI)t' and an Ethernet Rate referencing 'RFC 1091 Telnet terminal-type option,' indicating CLI/Telnet access in addition to a graphical interface. Additionally, the spec block references 'Pre-installed WAVE Server, 1 Pro License' and 'Heatmap' analytics, though these appear to be data contamination from camera/recorder spec fields and cannot be confirmed as switch-native features — buyers should verify with the datasheet at /content/product-datasheets/HV-GS980M_52PS-10.pdf.
The IGS950/52PS-910 is described as a 'Web-based Websmart' managed switch with VLAN and QoS. The term 'Websmart' typically denotes a simplified Layer 2 web-managed feature set — more than an unmanaged switch, but generally without full CLI, SNMP depth, or Layer 3 routing that a full managed switch provides. The spec data does not list CLI, SNMP, or Layer 3 capabilities for this model.
For deployments requiring full network management — routing between VLANs, SNMP polling, CLI scripting, or integration with a network management system — the GS980M/52PS-10's Layer 2/3 designation is the stronger specification. For simpler surveillance VLANs managed via a browser, the IGS950/52PS-910's Websmart interface is operationally sufficient.
Which should you choose: the GS980M/52PS-10 or the IGS950/52PS-910?
Our take: The GS980M/52PS-10 is the stronger choice when the deployment includes PoE++ (802.3bt) devices, requires certified outdoor or harsh-environment installation, or demands full Layer 2/3 managed-switch capabilities. Concretely: its PoE standard is 802.3bt (vs. 802.3at on the IGS950/52PS-910), enabling per-port power beyond 30W for high-draw cameras; it carries documented IP66, IK10, NEMA 4X, and NEMA-TS 2 ratings with a -40°C to +55°C operating range, none of which are specified for the IGS950/52PS-910; and its management is listed as Layer 2/3 versus the IGS950/52PS-910's web-only Websmart interface. Both share a 740W aggregate PoE budget and 48 Gigabit ports with four SFP uplinks. The IGS950/52PS-910 is appropriate for standard indoor camera closets where all cameras are PoE+ (802.3at) compliant and simplified browser-based management is acceptable — and may carry a lower acquisition cost, though no pricing is provided in the specs.
Side-by-Side Comparison
Spec-for-spec, from manufacturer data.
| Specification | Hanwha GS980M/52PS-10 | Hanwha IGS950/52PS-910 |
|---|---|---|
| SKU | HV-GS980M/52PS-10 | HV-IGS950/52PS-910 |
| PoE Standard | PoE++ (IEEE 802.3bt) | PoE+ (IEEE 802.3at) |
| PoE Ports | 48 x Gigabit | 48 x Gigabit |
| Max Per-Port PoE Power | Not stated (802.3bt capable) | 30W per port |
| Total PoE Power Budget | 740W | 740W |
| Uplink Ports | 4 x SFP Gigabit | 4 x SFP Gigabit |
| Form Factor | Rack-mount Switch | Rack-mount Managed Switch |
| Management Type | Layer 2/3 Managed (GUI + Telnet/CLI) | Web-based Websmart (VLAN & QoS) |
| VLAN Support | Yes | Yes |
| QoS Support | Yes | Yes |
| Port Mirroring | Yes | Yes (per card bullet; not in formal spec) |
| IP Rating | IP66 | — |
| IK Rating | IK10 | — |
| NEMA Rating | NEMA 4X, NEMA-TS 2 (2.2.7, 2.2.8, 2.2.9) | — |
| Operating Temperature | -40°C to +55°C (-40°F to +131°F) | — |
| Warranty | 5-Year | 5-Year |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which should you choose: the GS980M/52PS-10 or the IGS950/52PS-910?
The GS980M/52PS-10 is the stronger choice when the deployment includes PoE++ (802.3bt) devices, requires certified outdoor or harsh-environment installation, or demands full Layer 2/3 managed-switch capabilities. Concretely: its PoE standard is 802.3bt (vs. 802.3at on the IGS950/52PS-910), enabling per-port power beyond 30W for high-draw cameras; it carries documented IP66, IK10, NEMA 4X, and NEMA-TS 2 ratings with a -40°C to +55°C operating range, none of which are specified for the IGS950/52PS-910; and its management is listed as Layer 2/3 versus the IGS950/52PS-910's web-only Websmart interface. Both share a 740W aggregate PoE budget and 48 Gigabit ports with four SFP uplinks. The IGS950/52PS-910 is appropriate for standard indoor camera closets where all cameras are PoE+ (802.3at) compliant and simplified browser-based management is acceptable — and may carry a lower acquisition cost, though no pricing is provided in the specs.
Can I use either switch to power PTZ cameras or multi-sensor cameras that require more than 30W?
Only the GS980M/52PS-10 is specified with PoE++ (IEEE 802.3bt), which supports per-port power levels above 30W. The IGS950/52PS-910 is specified at PoE+ (IEEE 802.3at), capped at 30W per port. If your PTZ or multi-sensor cameras require more than 30W, the IGS950/52PS-910 cannot power them from its PoE ports per the provided specifications.
Is either switch suitable for an outdoor or roadside traffic cabinet installation?
The GS980M/52PS-10 is specified with IP66, IK10, NEMA 4X, and NEMA-TS 2 ratings and an operating range of -40°C to +55°C, making it documentably suitable for outdoor cabinet and traffic-infrastructure deployments. The IGS950/52PS-910 provides no IP, IK, NEMA, or operating temperature specifications in the supplied data, so its suitability for outdoor or harsh environments cannot be confirmed from the available specs.
Do both switches offer the same management features, or is one more limited?
The GS980M/52PS-10 is listed as a Layer 2/3 managed switch with VLAN, QoS, port mirroring, GUI, and a Telnet/CLI interface reference. The IGS950/52PS-910 is described as a web-based Websmart switch with VLAN and QoS, which typically indicates a simplified Layer 2 web-only feature set without full CLI or Layer 3 routing. Buyers needing SNMP, CLI scripting, or inter-VLAN routing should favor the GS980M/52PS-10 based on the available specifications.
More Network Switch Comparisons
- NETGEAR GS748PP-100NAS vs Ubiquiti USW-48-POE
- NETGEAR GS748PP-100NAS vs Ubiquiti USW-PRO-MAX-48-POE
- NETGEAR GS748PP-100NAS vs Ubiquiti USW-ENTERPRISE-48-POE
- NETGEAR GS748PP-100NAS vs Ubiquiti ES-48-500W
- NETGEAR GS748PP-100NAS vs NETGEAR GS348PP-100NAS
- Ubiquiti USW-48-POE vs NETGEAR GS348PP-100NAS
Network Switch Buying Guides
Get a Second Opinion on Your Camera Choice
Share your site layout, coverage goals, and budget. Our team will validate the camera selection, flag anything we would change, and recommend products that match the use case.