Altronix NETWAYSP8WP vs Altronix NETWAYSP8PL2: Specification Comparison
Both the Altronix NETWAYSP8WP and NETWAYSP8PL2 are 8-port PoE/PoE+ switches with integrated battery backup and dual SFP fiber uplink ports, targeting physical-security installers who need network edge switching with power resilience. The comparison centers on three axes most critical to deployment decisions: PoE power budget and port throughput; enclosure rating and mounting options; and management features with connectivity type. Neither is an accessory or ancillary unit—both are standalone managed PoE switches in the same Altronix NETWAY family.
In This Guide
Which switch delivers more PoE power and higher per-port throughput?
The NETWAYSP8PL2 provides a 240W PoE budget across its 8 Gigabit PoE ports—double the NETWAYSP8WP's 120W integrated supply. On a fully loaded 8-port deployment, the PL2 averages 30W per port, while the WP averages 15W, a meaningful gap when powering PTZ cameras, 802.3bt devices, or multi-function intercoms.
Port-speed also diverges. The NETWAYSP8WP has a mixed configuration: 2 ports at 1G PoE/PoE+ and 6 ports at 10/100 PoE/PoE+. The NETWAYSP8PL2 specifies all 8 ports as Gigabit PoE. If every edge device needs Gigabit throughput—high-resolution cameras streaming to cloud or NVR at sustained rates—the PL2's uniform Gigabit fabric is the cleaner design. The WP's 6-port 10/100 fabric is adequate for most standard IP cameras but becomes a bottleneck for 4K or multi-sensor units on those ports.
Both models are rated PoE+ (802.3at, 30W per port max). The WP spec further notes Hi-PoE capability up to 2×60W on its two 1G ports, which can feed PoE++ or dual-powered devices on those two ports specifically. No Hi-PoE or 802.3bt spec is listed for the PL2.
Which switch is built for harsher outdoor or industrial environments?
The NETWAYSP8WP is explicitly rated for outdoor deployment: its enclosure carries IP66 and NEMA 4/4X certifications in a stainless steel housing. IP66 means total dust exclusion and protection against powerful water jets; NEMA 4/4X adds resistance to windblown rain, hose-directed water, and corrosion. The WP is pole-mount capable, consistent with outdoor perimeter and parking-structure installations.
The NETWAYSP8PL2 lists no IP rating, no NEMA rating, and no outdoor environment designation in the provided specifications. Its mounting is DIN-Rail, which is characteristic of indoor panel or cabinet installation. Deploying the PL2 outdoors or in a wet environment would require a separate weatherproof enclosure—an added cost and installation step not required by the WP.
For any deployment where the switch must live outside a conditioned, protected enclosure—perimeter poles, rooftop risers, parking garages—the WP's self-contained IP66/NEMA 4/4X housing is the only option between these two models. The PL2 is the appropriate choice where the switch will reside in a dry indoor cabinet or IDF closet.
Which switch offers more network management and integration features?
The NETWAYSP8WP includes LINQ supervision, Altronix's proprietary remote monitoring and management capability. LINQ enables network-level supervision of the switch and connected PoE devices through Altronix's platform. No VLAN or QoS specification is listed for the WP in the provided specs.
The NETWAYSP8PL2 specifies VLAN, QoS, and port management as management features. These are standard Layer 2 managed-switch capabilities that allow traffic segmentation (isolating camera VLANs from access control), prioritization of latency-sensitive video or voice traffic, and per-port control. No LINQ capability is listed for the PL2.
The fiber connectivity type also differs: the PL2 explicitly specifies Single-Mode Fiber SFP ports. The WP lists dual 1G SFP ports but does not specify single-mode or multi-mode in the provided specs. Single-mode fiber supports longer runs—typically beyond 550 m—making the PL2 the documented choice for campus-scale or long-haul fiber backbone links. Both models carry a lifetime warranty.
Which should you choose: the NETWAYSP8WP or the NETWAYSP8PL2?
Our take: The NETWAYSP8WP is the stronger choice when the switch must be installed outdoors or in an unprotected enclosure, as it is the only model here with a rated IP66, NEMA 4/4X stainless steel housing and pole-mount support; the PL2 has no listed environmental rating. Conversely, the NETWAYSP8PL2 is the stronger choice for indoor-cabinet deployments demanding higher power capacity and managed network features: its 240W PoE budget is double the WP's 120W, all 8 ports run at Gigabit versus the WP's 6-port 10/100 fabric, and it adds VLAN, QoS, and port management absent from the WP spec. The WP's LINQ supervision and 2×60W Hi-PoE ports retain value for Altronix-integrated sites or deployments with a small number of high-draw devices. Choose the WP for outdoor-edge or pole-mounted nodes on an Altronix LINQ platform; choose the PL2 for indoor IDF cabinets running dense, high-bandwidth camera arrays where Layer 2 management and maximum PoE headroom matter.
Side-by-Side Comparison
Spec-for-spec, from manufacturer data.
| Specification | Altronix NETWAYSP8WP | Altronix NETWAYSP8PL2 |
|---|---|---|
| PoE Budget | 120W | 240W |
| Total PoE Ports | 8 | 8 |
| Port Speed — PoE Ports | 2× 1G + 6× 10/100 | 8× Gigabit |
| PoE Standard | PoE+ (802.3at) | PoE+ (802.3at) |
| Hi-PoE | 2× 60W (on 1G ports) | — |
| SFP Uplink Ports | 2× 1G SFP | 2× SFP |
| Fiber Type Specified | — | Single-Mode |
| Enclosure Rating | IP66, NEMA 4/4X | — |
| Housing Material | Stainless Steel | — |
| Environment Rating | Outdoor | — |
| Mount Type | Pole | DIN-Rail |
| Battery Backup | Yes | Yes |
| Supervision / Management | LINQ capable | VLAN, QoS, Port Management |
| Number of Outputs | 8 | 8 |
| Warranty | Lifetime | Lifetime |
| Form Factor | Switch | Switch |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which should you choose: the NETWAYSP8WP or the NETWAYSP8PL2?
The NETWAYSP8WP is the stronger choice when the switch must be installed outdoors or in an unprotected enclosure, as it is the only model here with a rated IP66, NEMA 4/4X stainless steel housing and pole-mount support; the PL2 has no listed environmental rating. Conversely, the NETWAYSP8PL2 is the stronger choice for indoor-cabinet deployments demanding higher power capacity and managed network features: its 240W PoE budget is double the WP's 120W, all 8 ports run at Gigabit versus the WP's 6-port 10/100 fabric, and it adds VLAN, QoS, and port management absent from the WP spec. The WP's LINQ supervision and 2×60W Hi-PoE ports retain value for Altronix-integrated sites or deployments with a small number of high-draw devices. Choose the WP for outdoor-edge or pole-mounted nodes on an Altronix LINQ platform; choose the PL2 for indoor IDF cabinets running dense, high-bandwidth camera arrays where Layer 2 management and maximum PoE headroom matter.
Is the NETWAYSP8WP or NETWAYSP8PL2 better for outdoor perimeter camera installations?
The NETWAYSP8WP is the documented choice for outdoor use. It carries IP66 and NEMA 4/4X ratings in a stainless steel enclosure and supports pole mounting. The NETWAYSP8PL2 lists no IP or NEMA rating and uses DIN-Rail mounting, indicating it is designed for indoor protected-cabinet installation. Using the PL2 outdoors would require a separate rated enclosure.
Which switch can handle more PoE devices or higher-power endpoints like PTZ cameras and 802.3at access points?
The NETWAYSP8PL2 provides a 240W PoE budget across 8 Gigabit ports, averaging 30W per port at full load. The NETWAYSP8WP provides 120W total, averaging 15W per port across all 8. Both are rated PoE+ (802.3at, 30W max per port). The WP additionally specifies Hi-PoE up to 2×60W on its two 1G ports for high-draw devices on those specific ports. For maximum aggregate power across all 8 ports, the PL2's 240W budget is the larger headroom.
Does either switch support VLAN segmentation and QoS for separating camera and access-control traffic?
Yes—the NETWAYSP8PL2 specifies VLAN, QoS, and port management features, which enable traffic segmentation and prioritization. The NETWAYSP8WP does not list VLAN or QoS in its provided specifications; it instead lists LINQ supervision for Altronix-platform monitoring. If Layer 2 managed-switch features are required by the network design, the PL2 is the model with those capabilities documented.
More Network Switch Comparisons
- Vivotek IHT-1271 vs TP-Link SG3210XHP-M2
- Vivotek IHT-1271 vs TP-Link S4500-8GP2F
- Vivotek IHT-1271 vs TP-Link SG1210P
- Vivotek IHT-1271 vs Allied Telesis AT-x530L-10GHXm-10
- Vivotek IHT-1271 vs Vivotek GEV-108A-130
- Vivotek IHT-1271 vs Vivotek IHT-1000
Network Switch Buying Guides
Get a Second Opinion on Your Camera Choice
Share your site layout, coverage goals, and budget. Our team will validate the camera selection, flag anything we would change, and recommend products that match the use case.