Altronix NETWAYSP4BTWPX vs Vivotek GET-083A-120: Specification Comparison
Both the Altronix NETWAYSP4BTWPX and the Vivotek AW-GET-083A-120 are outdoor-rated, 4-port PoE Gigabit Ethernet switches designed for edge surveillance deployments where network and power must be delivered in a weatherproof enclosure. Each provides dual SFP fiber uplinks, operates across an extended temperature range, and is aimed at installers needing a self-contained outdoor switching node. The comparison centers on PoE power delivery, enclosure protection and ruggedness, and management/integration capability — the three axes that determine which unit fits a given site requirement.
In This Guide
- Which switch delivers more PoE power, and which PoE standard does each support?
- How do the enclosures, environmental ratings, and mechanical protection compare?
- What management interfaces, switching capacity, and ecosystem integrations does each offer?
- Which should you choose: the NETWAYSP4BTWPX or the GET-083A-120?
- Side-by-Side Specs
- FAQ
Which switch delivers more PoE power, and which PoE standard does each support?
The Altronix NETWAYSP4BTWPX provides a 240W total PoE budget across 4 ports, rated at up to 90W per port under IEEE 802.3bt (PoE++, also called 4PPoE). This supports high-draw endpoints such as PTZ cameras, multi-sensor cameras, and access-control readers with electric strikes — device classes that exceed the 30W ceiling of older standards.
The Vivotek AW-GET-083A-120 provides a 120W total PoE budget across its 4 PoE ports, rated at 30W per port under IEEE 802.3af/at (PoE+). Its total budget is exactly half that of the Altronix unit, and its per-port ceiling is one-third (30W vs 90W). For standard IP cameras rated below 25W, the Vivotek's budget is adequate across all four ports simultaneously (4 × 30W = 120W). The Vivotek also includes 2 additional non-PoE GbE RJ45 ports, giving it 6 copper ports total versus the Altronix's 4 PoE-only copper ports.
The Vivotek specifies per-port surge protection of 6 KV and 40 KV on the AC input — protection values not stated in the Altronix specification. The Altronix specification does not list per-port surge ratings.
How do the enclosures, environmental ratings, and mechanical protection compare?
The Altronix NETWAYSP4BTWPX is housed in a NEMA 4/4X IP66-rated enclosure with stainless and powder-coat construction, dimensioned at 17.53" × 15.3" × 6.67" (approx. 445 × 389 × 169 mm). NEMA 4X adds corrosion resistance relevant to coastal or chemical-wash environments. The operating temperature range is -40°C to 60°C; storage is -30°C to 85°C. The enclosure supports wall, pole, and rack mounting. An integrated LiFePO4 battery charger circuit is included for backup power connectivity, though battery capacity is not specified in the provided specs.
The Vivotek AW-GET-083A-120 carries an IP67 rating — meaning it is fully dust-tight and rated for temporary immersion up to 1 m — which is one ingress-protection step above IP66. It also carries an IK10 vandal-resistance rating, meaning it is tested to withstand 20 joules of impact per IEC 62262. The operating temperature range is -40°C to 65°C, slightly wider at the upper end than the Altronix (60°C). Dimensions are 315.4 × 245.8 × 118 mm. Conduit entries are via M16 × 4 and M25 × 2 glands. The Vivotek specification lists vibration (IEC 60068-2-6), shock (IEC 60068-2-27), and freefall (IEC 60068-2-32) certifications; the Altronix specification does not include these certifications.
The Altronix specification does not state an IK impact rating. The Vivotek specification does not list a NEMA rating or corrosion-resistance designation.
What management interfaces, switching capacity, and ecosystem integrations does each offer?
The Altronix NETWAYSP4BTWPX specifies LINQ cloud/software integration and standard SNMP-based managed-switch CLI access. LINQ is Altronix's proprietary remote monitoring and management platform, relevant to installations already using Altronix power infrastructure. Switching capacity figures (bandwidth in Gbps, forwarding rate in Mpps) are not stated in the provided specification.
The Vivotek AW-GET-083A-120 specifies a switching bandwidth of 16 Gbps and a forwarding capacity of 11.904 Mpps, with an 8K MAC address table and jumbo frame support up to 9,216 bytes. It supports Auto-MDI/MDI-X and auto-negotiation on all copper ports. The specification does not mention a proprietary management platform, cloud integration, or SNMP management capability — management interfaces beyond basic switching are not stated.
The Altronix unit specifies dual 1G SFP uplinks for single-mode fiber backbone. The Vivotek unit likewise specifies 2× 1G SFP slots. Both provide fiber uplink capability, but the Altronix specification explicitly calls out single-mode SFP support; the Vivotek specification lists SFP slots without specifying supported fiber type.
Which should you choose: the NETWAYSP4BTWPX or the GET-083A-120?
Our take: The NETWAYSP4BTWPX is the stronger choice when deployments include high-power PoE++ endpoints — PTZ cameras, multi-sensor units, or access-control hardware requiring more than 30W per port — or when battery backup capability is required at the edge. It delivers 240W total versus the AW-GET-083A-120's 120W, and supports 90W per port (IEEE 802.3bt) versus 30W per port (IEEE 802.3af/at). It also adds NEMA 4X corrosion resistance and LINQ management integration. The AW-GET-083A-120 is the stronger choice when physical security of the enclosure is a priority: its IP67 rating exceeds IP66, its IK10 impact rating (20J) is not matched by any Altronix-stated spec, and its upper operating temperature (65°C vs 60°C) provides a marginally wider thermal envelope. It also adds 2 non-PoE GbE copper ports and specifies quantified surge protection per port. Choose the Altronix for high-power PoE++ edge nodes on Altronix-managed infrastructure; choose the Vivotek for lower-power camera nodes in high-vandalism or immersion-risk outdoor environments.
Side-by-Side Comparison
Spec-for-spec, from manufacturer data.
| Specification | Altronix NETWAYSP4BTWPX | Vivotek GET-083A-120 |
|---|---|---|
| PoE Ports | 4x PoE++ (802.3bt) | 4x PoE+ (802.3af/at) |
| Additional Copper Ports | — | 2x GbE RJ45 (non-PoE) |
| SFP Uplinks | 2x 1G SFP (single-mode stated) | 2x 1G SFP (fiber type not stated) |
| Total PoE Budget | 240W | 120W |
| Max PoE Per Port | 90W | 30W |
| Switching Bandwidth | — | 16 Gbps |
| Forwarding Capacity | — | 11.904 Mpps |
| MAC Table | — | 8K |
| Ingress Protection | IP66 / NEMA 4/4X | IP67 |
| Impact Rating (IK) | — | IK10 |
| Operating Temperature | -40°C to 60°C | -40°C to 65°C |
| Storage Temperature | -30°C to 85°C | -40°C to 75°C |
| Per-Port Surge Protection | — | 6 KV |
| AC Input Surge Protection | — | 40 KV |
| Battery Backup Charger | Yes (LiFePO4) | — |
| Warranty | Lifetime | 24 months |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which should you choose: the NETWAYSP4BTWPX or the GET-083A-120?
The NETWAYSP4BTWPX is the stronger choice when deployments include high-power PoE++ endpoints — PTZ cameras, multi-sensor units, or access-control hardware requiring more than 30W per port — or when battery backup capability is required at the edge. It delivers 240W total versus the AW-GET-083A-120's 120W, and supports 90W per port (IEEE 802.3bt) versus 30W per port (IEEE 802.3af/at). It also adds NEMA 4X corrosion resistance and LINQ management integration. The AW-GET-083A-120 is the stronger choice when physical security of the enclosure is a priority: its IP67 rating exceeds IP66, its IK10 impact rating (20J) is not matched by any Altronix-stated spec, and its upper operating temperature (65°C vs 60°C) provides a marginally wider thermal envelope. It also adds 2 non-PoE GbE copper ports and specifies quantified surge protection per port. Choose the Altronix for high-power PoE++ edge nodes on Altronix-managed infrastructure; choose the Vivotek for lower-power camera nodes in high-vandalism or immersion-risk outdoor environments.
Can either switch power a PTZ camera that requires more than 30W?
Only the Altronix NETWAYSP4BTWPX can do this. It supports IEEE 802.3bt (PoE++) at up to 90W per port. The Vivotek AW-GET-083A-120 is rated to IEEE 802.3af/at with a maximum of 30W per port, which is insufficient for PoE++ endpoints.
Is the Vivotek AW-GET-083A-120 more weather-resistant than the Altronix NETWAYSP4BTWPX?
On two specific metrics, yes. The Vivotek is rated IP67 (temporary immersion) versus the Altronix's IP66 (powerful water jets). The Vivotek also carries an IK10 vandal-resistance rating (20J impact); no IK rating is stated in the Altronix specification. The Altronix NEMA 4X designation adds corrosion resistance that the Vivotek specification does not mention.
Does either switch include battery backup?
The Altronix NETWAYSP4BTWPX specification states it includes an integrated LiFePO4 battery charger circuit, indicating battery backup capability. Battery capacity and runtime are not stated in the provided specification. The Vivotek AW-GET-083A-120 specification does not mention battery backup or a charger circuit.
More Network Switch Comparisons
- Vivotek GET-083A-120 vs TP-Link SG1005P
- Vivotek GET-083A-120 vs Axis T8504-E
- Vivotek GET-083A-120 vs Axis D8004
- Vivotek GET-083A-120 vs Ubiquiti N-SW
- TP-Link SG1005P vs Axis T8504-E
- TP-Link SG1005P vs Axis D8004
Network Switch Buying Guides
Get a Second Opinion on Your Camera Choice
Share your site layout, coverage goals, and budget. Our team will validate the camera selection, flag anything we would change, and recommend products that match the use case.