Zebra ZT41142-T0100A0Z vs Zebra ZT41142-T01E0A0Z: Specification Comparison
Both the ZT41142-T0100A0Z and ZT41142-T01E0A0Z are Zebra ZT411-series 4-inch industrial thermal printers targeting warehouse, manufacturing, and distribution label-print applications. They share the same print engine speed, print-width, resolution options, symbology support, memory, and weight. The primary documented difference between the two SKUs is the Bluetooth generation—4.1/MFi versus 5.3—which carries downstream implications for wireless range, throughput, and iOS/MFi ecosystem compatibility. Buyers cross-shopping these units are essentially choosing between an established Bluetooth 4.1 platform and the newer Bluetooth 5.3 radio.
In This Guide
- How do the wireless connectivity specs differ between the ZT41142-T0100A0Z and ZT41142-T01E0A0Z?
- Are print speed, resolution, and media-handling specs equivalent across both models?
- Do the ZT41142-T0100A0Z and ZT41142-T01E0A0Z differ in barcode or RFID capability?
- Which should you choose: the ZT41142-T0100A0Z or the ZT41142-T01E0A0Z?
- Side-by-Side Specs
- FAQ
How do the wireless connectivity specs differ between the ZT41142-T0100A0Z and ZT41142-T01E0A0Z?
Both units ship with Ethernet, Wi-Fi, and Bluetooth as standard interfaces, and both include USB and Serial in the package contents. The meaningful distinction is in Bluetooth generation: the ZT41142-T0100A0Z specifies Bluetooth 4.1 with MFi certification, while the ZT41142-T01E0A0Z specifies Bluetooth 5.3. Bluetooth 5.3 offers greater nominal range and higher data throughput headroom compared to 4.1 per the Bluetooth SIG specification, though neither datasheet quantifies operational range in meters or throughput in Mbps.
The MFi (Made for iPhone/iPad) designation is explicitly stated for the ZT41142-T0100A0Z. The ZT41142-T01E0A0Z datasheet excerpt notes Bluetooth 5.3 but does not explicitly carry the MFi label in the provided spec fields, though one marketing bullet references 'MFi' parenthetically. Buyers with strict Apple MFi program certification requirements should verify MFi status for the T01E0A0Z directly with Zebra before committing. For fixed Ethernet-only deployments, this distinction is operationally moot.
Are print speed, resolution, and media-handling specs equivalent across both models?
Per the provided specifications, print speed is identical at 14 ips for both SKUs. Both list the same resolution options: 203 dpi, 300 dpi, and 600 dpi. Print width is documented at 4 inches for both, with a secondary reference to 6 inches appearing in the structured spec fields of both—this apparent inconsistency exists in the source data for both models equally and should be confirmed against the full Zebra ZT411 datasheet.
Memory is the same at 256 MB SDRAM on both units. Weight is identically documented at 36 lbs./16.33 kg (or 40 lbs./18.14 kg in a secondary field) for both. No differences in media handling, ribbon type, or maximum label dimensions are surfaced in the provided specs. From a pure print-engine standpoint, the two SKUs appear mechanically equivalent as documented.
Do the ZT41142-T0100A0Z and ZT41142-T01E0A0Z differ in barcode or RFID capability?
Both units support an identical symbology set: 1D (Code 128, Code 39, UPC, EAN) and 2D (QR Code, Data Matrix, PDF417). No differences in barcode capability are documented in the provided specs.
On RFID, both units reference integrated RFID encoding capability. The ZT41142-T0100A0Z spec notes 'Integrated encoding capability' while the ZT41142-T01E0A0Z spec states 'Built-in RFID encoding for asset tracking.' Neither spec provides RFID protocol details (e.g., EPC Gen2, UHF frequency band, read/write range) in the fields provided. Buyers requiring specific RFID protocol compliance should consult the full Zebra ZT411 RFID datasheet for each SKU. The provided specs do not document any difference in RFID capability between the two models.
Which should you choose: the ZT41142-T0100A0Z or the ZT41142-T01E0A0Z?
Our take: The ZT41142-T01E0A0Z is the stronger choice when Bluetooth generation matters—its Bluetooth 5.3 radio supersedes the 4.1 found in the ZT41142-T0100A0Z, offering greater nominal range and throughput headroom per the Bluetooth SIG specification. On every other documented dimension—14 ips print speed, 203/300/600 dpi resolution options, 4-inch print width, identical 1D/2D symbology support, 256 MB SDRAM, and equivalent weight—the two SKUs are spec-identical as documented. The ZT41142-T0100A0Z carries an explicit Bluetooth 4.1/MFi designation; the T01E0A0Z's MFi status is not unambiguously confirmed in the provided spec fields and warrants direct verification with Zebra for iOS-dependent deployments. For fixed Ethernet-only environments, the Bluetooth delta is irrelevant and either unit serves equally. For mobile or wireless-primary workflows, the T01E0A0Z's newer Bluetooth 5.3 is the specifiable advantage.
Side-by-Side Comparison
Spec-for-spec, from manufacturer data.
| Specification | Zebra ZT41142-T0100A0Z | Zebra ZT41142-T01E0A0Z |
|---|---|---|
| Product Type | Industrial Thermal Printer | Industrial Thermal Printer |
| Print Speed | 14 ips | 14 ips |
| Print Width | 4 inches | 4 inches |
| Resolution Options | 203, 300, 600 dpi | 203, 300, 600 dpi |
| Bluetooth Version | Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| MFi Certified (Apple) | Yes (explicitly stated) | Not explicitly confirmed in provided specs |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet | Yes | Yes |
| USB & Serial | Yes (package contents) | Yes (package contents) |
| RFID | Integrated encoding capability | Built-in RFID encoding |
| 1D Symbologies | Code 128; Code 39; UPC; EAN | Code 128; Code 39; UPC; EAN |
| 2D Symbologies | QR Code; Data Matrix; PDF417 | QR Code; Data Matrix; PDF417 |
| Memory | 256 MB SDRAM | 256 MB SDRAM |
| Weight | 36 lbs. / 16.33 kg | 36 lbs. / 16.33 kg |
| Warranty | 1-year | 1-year |
| Print Technology | Thermal | Direct thermal |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which should you choose: the ZT41142-T0100A0Z or the ZT41142-T01E0A0Z?
The ZT41142-T01E0A0Z is the stronger choice when Bluetooth generation matters—its Bluetooth 5.3 radio supersedes the 4.1 found in the ZT41142-T0100A0Z, offering greater nominal range and throughput headroom per the Bluetooth SIG specification. On every other documented dimension—14 ips print speed, 203/300/600 dpi resolution options, 4-inch print width, identical 1D/2D symbology support, 256 MB SDRAM, and equivalent weight—the two SKUs are spec-identical as documented. The ZT41142-T0100A0Z carries an explicit Bluetooth 4.1/MFi designation; the T01E0A0Z's MFi status is not unambiguously confirmed in the provided spec fields and warrants direct verification with Zebra for iOS-dependent deployments. For fixed Ethernet-only environments, the Bluetooth delta is irrelevant and either unit serves equally. For mobile or wireless-primary workflows, the T01E0A0Z's newer Bluetooth 5.3 is the specifiable advantage.
Is the ZT41142-T0100A0Z or ZT41142-T01E0A0Z better for mobile iOS label printing?
The ZT41142-T0100A0Z explicitly carries Bluetooth 4.1/MFi certification in its documented specs, which confirms Apple MFi program compliance. The ZT41142-T01E0A0Z specifies Bluetooth 5.3 but the MFi designation is not unambiguously stated in the provided spec fields. If MFi certification is a hard requirement for your iOS deployment, verify the T01E0A0Z's MFi status directly with Zebra before purchasing.
Do these two printers print at the same speed and quality?
Yes, based on the provided specifications. Both the ZT41142-T0100A0Z and ZT41142-T01E0A0Z are documented at 14 ips print speed, offer the same resolution options (203, 300, and 600 dpi), share a 4-inch print width, and support the same 1D and 2D symbology set including Code 128, Code 39, QR Code, Data Matrix, PDF417, UPC, and EAN. No print-engine differences are documented in the specs provided.
Which model should I choose if I'm running a fixed Ethernet-connected label station?
For fixed Ethernet-connected deployments, the Bluetooth generation difference—4.1 on the ZT41142-T0100A0Z versus 5.3 on the ZT41142-T01E0A0Z—is operationally irrelevant. Both units include Ethernet as a standard interface and are spec-identical on print speed, resolution, media width, symbologies, RFID capability, memory, and weight as documented. Selection in a fixed-Ethernet context would appropriately come down to pricing, availability, and any software or firmware ecosystem factors not captured in the provided specs.
More Label Printer Comparisons
- Honeywell PX940 vs Sato WWCLP3B01-WAR
- Honeywell PX940 vs Sato WWCLP3801-NAR
- Honeywell PX940 vs Sato WWCLP3801-WAR
- Honeywell PX940 vs Wasp WPL408
- Honeywell PX940 vs Honeywell PX4654-020
- Honeywell PX940 vs Honeywell PX6654-000
Label Printer Buying Guides
Get a Second Opinion on Your Camera Choice
Share your site layout, coverage goals, and budget. Our team will validate the camera selection, flag anything we would change, and recommend products that match the use case.