Vertiv GXT5LI-5000MVRT3UXLN vs Vertiv GXT5LI-5KL630RT3UXLN: Specification Comparison
Both the GXT5LI-5000MVRT3UXLN and GXT5LI-5KL630RT3UXLN are Vertiv GXT5 lithium-ion, double-conversion online UPS units rated at 5000VA in a 3U rackmount form factor. They share the same physical footprint, battery chemistry, and operating-temperature envelope. The critical differentiator for installers and IT buyers is input/output voltage configuration and wiring: one targets mixed 120/208V North American environments via a NEMA L14-30P plug, while the other is configured exclusively for 200–240V single-phase service via an L6-30P input.
In This Guide
- Which model matches your facility's input voltage and outlet infrastructure?
- Is there a meaningful difference in real watt capacity and certifications between the two models?
- How do the two models differ in remote monitoring, connectivity, and runtime scalability?
- Which should you choose: the GXT5LI-5000MVRT3UXLN or the GXT5LI-5KL630RT3UXLN?
- Side-by-Side Specs
- FAQ
Which model matches your facility's input voltage and outlet infrastructure?
The GXT5LI-5000MVRT3UXLN accepts 120V/240V input via a NEMA L14-30P twist-lock plug and delivers dual-voltage output: 120V and 208V, with 120V/240V user-configurable. This makes it the correct choice for North American data closets fed by a split-phase 240V circuit or a 120/208V panel, where downstream loads are a mix of standard 120V devices and 208V equipment.
The GXT5LI-5KL630RT3UXLN accepts 200–240V input exclusively via an L6-30P plug (specified as two L6-30P inputs in the product title) and outputs 208VAC by default, adjustable across 200–240VAC. It has no 120V output path per the provided specs. This unit suits environments with a dedicated 208V or 240V single-phase feed and loads that operate entirely in that voltage range—common in high-density rack deployments, international installations, or facilities with a dedicated UPS distribution panel.
Installers must verify panel circuit type before ordering. The L14-30P on Product A requires a 120/240V split-phase circuit; the L6-30P on Product B requires a 208V or 240V single-phase circuit. Mixing these will require a panel modification or PDU intermediary not reflected in either unit's specs.
Is there a meaningful difference in real watt capacity and certifications between the two models?
At the VA level both units are identical: 5000VA. However, the watt ratings diverge. The GXT5LI-5000MVRT3UXLN is rated at 5000W (a 1.0 power factor), while the GXT5LI-5KL630RT3UXLN is rated at 4900W. For loads operating at or near full capacity, the 100W difference could be a tiebreaker in dense rack builds where every watt of headroom matters.
Topology is confirmed as double-conversion online for Product A. Product B's topology is not explicitly stated in the provided specs, though its IEC 62040-2 agency approval is consistent with online UPS classification. Buyers requiring explicit double-conversion confirmation for SLA documentation should request Product B's datasheet for that detail.
Product A carries Energy Star 2.0 certification, which can matter for data center efficiency mandates, green-building requirements, or utility rebate programs. Product B's provided specs do not list Energy Star. Both units list FCC Part 15 Class A and UL 1778. Product A additionally lists UL 1642 and UL 1973 (Li-Ion cell and pack standards) plus CSA 22.2 No. 107.3. Product B lists IEC 62619, IEC 62040-1, IEC 62040-2, IEC 61000-3-2, IEC 61000-3-12, and CISPR 22—a broader IEC suite relevant for international compliance or facilities following IEC-aligned standards.
How do the two models differ in remote monitoring, connectivity, and runtime scalability?
The GXT5LI-5000MVRT3UXLN lists three interface options explicitly: Serial Port, RJ-45 network (via the RDU101 card), and USB. This gives integrators a documented path for SNMP/network management using Vertiv's RDU101 intelligence card, serial connectivity for legacy systems, and USB for direct host shutdown software.
The GXT5LI-5KL630RT3UXLN's provided specs do not list any interface or connectivity options. Buyers who require network management, SNMP integration, or remote monitoring must verify interface card availability with Vertiv or the distributor before purchasing Product B.
Neither product's provided specs include runtime figures or extended-battery module (EBM) compatibility details, so runtime scalability cannot be compared from the data at hand. Both SKUs carry 'XL' or 'UXLN' designations in their model names, which in Vertiv's GXT5 line typically indicate extended-battery capability, but this cannot be confirmed from the specs provided and should not be assumed without consulting the respective datasheets.
Which should you choose: the GXT5LI-5000MVRT3UXLN or the GXT5LI-5KL630RT3UXLN?
Our take: The GXT5LI-5000MVRT3UXLN is the stronger choice when the installation requires dual-voltage 120V/208V output, a NEMA L14-30P split-phase feed, documented network management via the RDU101 card, and Energy Star 2.0 compliance. Concretely: it delivers 5000W versus 4900W on Product B, carries Energy Star 2.0 certification absent from Product B's specs, and explicitly documents Serial, USB, and RJ-45 management interfaces where Product B lists none. Conversely, the GXT5LI-5KL630RT3UXLN is the correct unit for facilities fed exclusively by a 208V or 240V single-phase L6-30P circuit with no 120V load requirement, and its IEC 62040-1/62040-2 and IEC 62619 listings give it a compliance advantage in internationally-aligned or IEC-audited environments. Platform qualifier: specify Product A for mixed-voltage North American server rooms; specify Product B for dedicated high-voltage single-phase racks or IEC-compliance-sensitive deployments.
Side-by-Side Comparison
Spec-for-spec, from manufacturer data.
| Specification | Vertiv GXT5LI-5000MVRT3UXLN | Vertiv GXT5LI-5KL630RT3UXLN |
|---|---|---|
| Power Rating (VA) | 5000 VA | 5000 VA |
| Power Rating (W) | 5000 W | 4900 W |
| Topology | Double-Conversion Online | Not specified in provided specs |
| Input Voltage Range | 120V / 240V | 200V–240V |
| Input Plug | NEMA L14-30P | L6-30P |
| Output Voltage | 120V / 208V (120V/240V user-configurable) | 208VAC default; 200–240VAC |
| Form Factor | Rackmount (3U) | Rackmount (3U) |
| Weight | 104.9 lbs | 103 lbs |
| Height | 5.2 in | 5.25 in |
| Width | 16.9 in | 16.9 in |
| Depth | 35 in | 35 in |
| Operating Temperature | 32°F–104°F (0°C–40°C); 10% derate at 50°C | 32°F–104°F (0°C–40°C); 10% derate at 50°C |
| Management Interfaces | Serial, USB, RJ-45 (RDU101) | Not specified in provided specs |
| Energy Star | Energy Star 2.0 | Not listed in provided specs |
| North American Listings | UL 1778, UL 1642, UL 1973, CSA 22.2 No. 107.3, c-UL, FCC Part 15 Class A | UL 1778, FCC Part 15 Class A |
| IEC / International Listings | Not listed in provided specs | IEC 62040-1, IEC 62040-2, IEC 62619, IEC 61000-3-2, IEC 61000-3-12, CISPR 22 Class A |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which should you choose: the GXT5LI-5000MVRT3UXLN or the GXT5LI-5KL630RT3UXLN?
The GXT5LI-5000MVRT3UXLN is the stronger choice when the installation requires dual-voltage 120V/208V output, a NEMA L14-30P split-phase feed, documented network management via the RDU101 card, and Energy Star 2.0 compliance. Concretely: it delivers 5000W versus 4900W on Product B, carries Energy Star 2.0 certification absent from Product B's specs, and explicitly documents Serial, USB, and RJ-45 management interfaces where Product B lists none. Conversely, the GXT5LI-5KL630RT3UXLN is the correct unit for facilities fed exclusively by a 208V or 240V single-phase L6-30P circuit with no 120V load requirement, and its IEC 62040-1/62040-2 and IEC 62619 listings give it a compliance advantage in internationally-aligned or IEC-audited environments. Platform qualifier: specify Product A for mixed-voltage North American server rooms; specify Product B for dedicated high-voltage single-phase racks or IEC-compliance-sensitive deployments.
Can I use either model on a standard 208V three-phase panel drop?
The GXT5LI-5KL630RT3UXLN accepts 200–240V input via L6-30P and is the natural fit for a single-phase 208V drop from a three-phase panel. The GXT5LI-5000MVRT3UXLN uses an L14-30P plug and accepts 120V/240V input; connecting it to a 208V single-phase circuit requires verifying that the unit's input range covers that voltage—its spec states 120V/240V, so compatibility with 208V should be confirmed with Vertiv before ordering.
Is the GXT5LI-5000MVRT3UXLN or GXT5LI-5KL630RT3UXLN better for a deployment that must pass an IEC-based data center audit?
Based on the provided specs, the GXT5LI-5KL630RT3UXLN holds a broader IEC certification suite—IEC 62040-1, IEC 62040-2, IEC 62619, IEC 61000-3-2, IEC 61000-3-12, and CISPR 22—making it the better-documented choice for IEC-audited facilities. The GXT5LI-5000MVRT3UXLN's provided specs do not list those IEC standards, though its UL 1642 and UL 1973 listings are specific to lithium-ion battery safety under North American standards.
Which model supports network SNMP monitoring out of the box?
Only the GXT5LI-5000MVRT3UXLN explicitly lists a network interface—RJ-45 via the Vertiv RDU101 card—along with Serial and USB options. The GXT5LI-5KL630RT3UXLN's provided specs include no interface or management connectivity details. Buyers requiring SNMP or remote monitoring on Product B should confirm card availability and compatibility directly with Vertiv before purchase.
More UPS Comparisons
- APC by Schneider Electric SRT5KRMXLIM vs Vertiv GXT5LI-5000MVRT3UXLN
- APC by Schneider Electric SRT5KRMXLIM vs CyberPower PR5000LCDRTXL5U
- APC by Schneider Electric SRT5KRMXLIM vs Vertiv GXT5LI-5KL630RT3UXLN
- APC by Schneider Electric SRT5KRMXLIM vs APC by Schneider Electric SRT5KRMXLT-IEC
- APC by Schneider Electric SRT5KRMXLIM vs APC by Schneider Electric SRT5KXLT-IEC
- APC by Schneider Electric SRT5KRMXLT-IEC vs Vertiv GXT5LI-5000MVRT3UXLN
UPS Buying Guides
Get a Second Opinion on Your Camera Choice
Share your site layout, coverage goals, and budget. Our team will validate the camera selection, flag anything we would change, and recommend products that match the use case.