Ubiquiti USW-PRO-MAX-48-POE vs Hanwha GS980M/52PS-10: Specification Comparison
Both the Ubiquiti USW-PRO-MAX-48-POE and the Hanwha HV-GS980M/52PS-10 are 48-port managed PoE switches targeting enterprise and large-scale surveillance deployments. The comparison covers switching capacity and port architecture, PoE power budget and operating environment, and Layer 2/3 management and VLAN capabilities. Buyers evaluating either unit are typically deploying 40-plus IP cameras or wireless access points and need reliable simultaneous full-port PoE delivery, uplink flexibility, and VLAN segmentation without external power injectors.
In This Guide
- Which switch delivers more switching capacity, uplink flexibility, and throughput for high-density deployments?
- Which switch offers a higher PoE power budget and a wider operating temperature range for demanding installation environments?
- Which switch provides stronger Layer 2/3 management, VLAN depth, and platform integration for a mixed-vendor or single-vendor security deployment?
- Which should you choose: the USW-PRO-MAX-48-POE or the GS980M/52PS-10?
- Side-by-Side Specs
- FAQ
Which switch delivers more switching capacity, uplink flexibility, and throughput for high-density deployments?
The USW-PRO-MAX-48-POE provides 48 × 1G RJ-45 access ports supplemented by 8 × 2.5G ports and 2 × 10G SFP+ uplinks, yielding a switching capacity of 224 Gbps and a non-blocking throughput of 112 Gbps at a forwarding rate of 167 Mpps. The multi-speed port mix (1G/2.5G/10G) makes it suitable for environments that include both standard IP cameras and higher-bandwidth devices such as multi-sensor cameras or Wi-Fi 6 access points.
The HV-GS980M/52PS-10 provides 48 × 1000 Mbps access ports with 4 SFP uplink ports for fiber connectivity. Switching capacity, forwarding rate, and non-blocking throughput figures are not stated in the provided specifications. The 4 SFP uplinks support fiber redundancy but the uplink speed rating is not specified. Buyers requiring verified throughput numbers or multi-gigabit access ports will find those figures absent from the Hanwha spec sheet as provided.
Which switch offers a higher PoE power budget and a wider operating temperature range for demanding installation environments?
The USW-PRO-MAX-48-POE carries a 720W simultaneous PoE++ (802.3bt) budget across all 48 ports, sourced from an internal 870W AC supply (100–240V, 50/60 Hz). Base power draw without PoE output is 100W. Operating temperature is rated -5°C to 40°C, placing it firmly in conditioned indoor environments such as server rooms and IDF closets. Enclosure is SGCC steel.
The HV-GS980M/52PS-10 specifies a 740W PoE budget — 20W higher than the Ubiquiti unit — and also supports PoE++ (802.3bt). Critically, its operating temperature range is specified as -40°C to +55°C, a dramatically wider envelope than the Ubiquiti's -5°C to 40°C. This qualifies the Hanwha switch for outdoor enclosures, transportation infrastructure, and industrial settings where ambient temperatures routinely exceed or fall well below standard indoor ranges. A NEMA 4X and NEMA-TS 2 rating is listed, indicating suitability for wet or harsh environments. Internal supply wattage, input voltage range, and base power draw are not specified.
Which switch provides stronger Layer 2/3 management, VLAN depth, and platform integration for a mixed-vendor or single-vendor security deployment?
The USW-PRO-MAX-48-POE is managed via Ubiquiti's UniFi controller ecosystem (GUI-based, Ethernet management interface) and supports up to 1,000 VLANs. No additional management protocols (SNMP version, RSTP, LACP, CLI access method) are enumerated in the provided specifications beyond Ethernet management. The switch is NDAA-compliant and holds CE, FCC, IC, and Anatel certifications. VLAN depth at 1,000 is explicitly stated and is a strong figure for segmenting large multi-tenant or multi-zone surveillance networks.
The HV-GS980M/52PS-10 is described as supporting Layer 2/3 management with VLAN, QoS, and port mirroring. A GUI management interface and RFC 1091 Telnet terminal-type option are noted. Specific VLAN count, SNMP support, spanning-tree variant, and link aggregation capabilities are not stated in the provided specifications. The switch appears positioned for integration within Hanwha's Wisenet ecosystem; the spec data references a pre-installed WAVE Server with 1 Pro License and Heatmap analytics, though it is unclear whether these apply to the switch itself or represent data contamination from a bundled product record. Warranty is explicitly stated as 5 years; the Ubiquiti warranty term is listed only as 'Manufacturer Warranty' without a duration.
Which should you choose: the USW-PRO-MAX-48-POE or the GS980M/52PS-10?
Our take: The USW-PRO-MAX-48-POE is the stronger choice when the deployment is in a controlled indoor environment and requires verified, high-throughput multi-gigabit switching with deep VLAN segmentation. Its 224 Gbps switching capacity and 112 Gbps non-blocking throughput are explicitly documented, whereas the Hanwha HV-GS980M/52PS-10 provides no throughput figures in the supplied specifications. The Ubiquiti also offers 2 × 10G SFP+ uplinks versus the Hanwha's unrated SFP ports, and explicitly supports 1,000 VLANs against an unspecified count for the Hanwha. Conversely, the HV-GS980M/52PS-10 is the clear choice for thermally demanding or outdoor-adjacent installations: its -40°C to +55°C operating range versus the Ubiquiti's -5°C to 40°C, combined with NEMA 4X and NEMA-TS 2 ratings, makes it viable where the Ubiquiti is not. The Hanwha also carries a stated 5-year warranty against an unspecified term for the Ubiquiti. Platform alignment — UniFi vs. Wisenet — should be the final tiebreaker for mixed-vendor sites.
Side-by-Side Comparison
Spec-for-spec, from manufacturer data.
| Specification | Ubiquiti USW-PRO-MAX-48-POE | Hanwha GS980M/52PS-10 |
|---|---|---|
| Access Ports | 48 × 1G RJ-45 | 48 × 1000 Mbps RJ-45 |
| Additional Access Ports | 8 × 2.5G RJ-45 | — |
| Uplink Ports | 2 × 10G SFP+ | 4 × SFP (speed not specified) |
| PoE Standard | PoE++ (802.3bt) | PoE++ (802.3bt) |
| PoE Power Budget | 720W | 740W |
| Switching Capacity | 224 Gbps | — |
| Non-Blocking Throughput | 112 Gbps | — |
| Forwarding Rate | 167 Mpps | — |
| VLAN Support | 1,000 VLANs | Supported (count not specified) |
| Management Interface | Ethernet (UniFi GUI) | GUI, Telnet (RFC 1091) |
| Layer 2/3 Features | VLAN; spec does not enumerate L3 routing | VLAN, QoS, Port Mirroring (L2/L3 stated) |
| Operating Temperature | -5°C to 40°C | -40°C to +55°C |
| Environmental Rating | None listed | NEMA 4X, NEMA-TS 2 |
| Internal Power Supply | 870W AC (100–240V) | — |
| NDAA Compliant | Yes | — |
| Warranty | Manufacturer Warranty (duration not stated) | 5 Years |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which should you choose: the USW-PRO-MAX-48-POE or the GS980M/52PS-10?
The USW-PRO-MAX-48-POE is the stronger choice when the deployment is in a controlled indoor environment and requires verified, high-throughput multi-gigabit switching with deep VLAN segmentation. Its 224 Gbps switching capacity and 112 Gbps non-blocking throughput are explicitly documented, whereas the Hanwha HV-GS980M/52PS-10 provides no throughput figures in the supplied specifications. The Ubiquiti also offers 2 × 10G SFP+ uplinks versus the Hanwha's unrated SFP ports, and explicitly supports 1,000 VLANs against an unspecified count for the Hanwha. Conversely, the HV-GS980M/52PS-10 is the clear choice for thermally demanding or outdoor-adjacent installations: its -40°C to +55°C operating range versus the Ubiquiti's -5°C to 40°C, combined with NEMA 4X and NEMA-TS 2 ratings, makes it viable where the Ubiquiti is not. The Hanwha also carries a stated 5-year warranty against an unspecified term for the Ubiquiti. Platform alignment — UniFi vs. Wisenet — should be the final tiebreaker for mixed-vendor sites.
Is the USW-PRO-MAX-48-POE or the HV-GS980M/52PS-10 better for large indoor camera deployments where throughput matters?
The USW-PRO-MAX-48-POE is better supported by documented specs for that use case. It states 224 Gbps switching capacity, 112 Gbps non-blocking throughput, and 167 Mpps forwarding rate. The HV-GS980M/52PS-10 does not provide switching capacity or throughput figures in its available specifications, making direct verification impossible for throughput-sensitive designs.
Can either switch be installed in an outdoor cabinet or a roadside traffic enclosure?
Based on provided specifications, only the HV-GS980M/52PS-10 is rated for that environment. It carries an operating temperature range of -40°C to +55°C and NEMA 4X / NEMA-TS 2 ratings. The USW-PRO-MAX-48-POE is rated -5°C to 40°C with no outdoor enclosure rating listed, making it unsuitable for uncontrolled ambient temperature environments per its stated spec.
Which switch has the longer warranty, and does NDAA compliance affect my purchasing decision?
The HV-GS980M/52PS-10 carries an explicitly stated 5-year warranty. The USW-PRO-MAX-48-POE lists only 'Manufacturer Warranty' with no duration specified in the provided data — buyers should confirm the term directly with Ubiquiti. On NDAA compliance, the USW-PRO-MAX-48-POE is explicitly listed as NDAA-compliant. No NDAA compliance statement is present in the HV-GS980M/52PS-10 specifications as provided.
More Network Switch Comparisons
- NETGEAR GS748PP-100NAS vs Ubiquiti USW-48-POE
- NETGEAR GS748PP-100NAS vs Ubiquiti USW-PRO-MAX-48-POE
- NETGEAR GS748PP-100NAS vs Ubiquiti USW-ENTERPRISE-48-POE
- NETGEAR GS748PP-100NAS vs Ubiquiti ES-48-500W
- NETGEAR GS748PP-100NAS vs NETGEAR GS348PP-100NAS
- Ubiquiti USW-48-POE vs NETGEAR GS348PP-100NAS
Network Switch Buying Guides
Get a Second Opinion on Your Camera Choice
Share your site layout, coverage goals, and budget. Our team will validate the camera selection, flag anything we would change, and recommend products that match the use case.