Middle Atlantic UPX-2000R-2 vs Middle Atlantic RLNK-2000R-2: Specification Comparison
Both the UPX-2000R-2 and UPX-RLNK-2000R-2 are Middle Atlantic NEXSYS 2000VA, 120V rack-mount UPS units occupying the same 2 RU form factor and sharing virtually identical physical and electrical specifications. The sole distinguishing factor between these two models is their bank control mechanism: the UPX-2000R-2 uses local bank control, while the UPX-RLNK-2000R-2 integrates RLNK (remote-link) bank control. This comparison helps installers and IT buyers determine which control architecture suits their infrastructure management requirements.
In This Guide
- How does each unit's bank control method differ, and which fits your management workflow?
- Are the physical footprint, electrical ratings, and environmental tolerances identical across both models?
- Which model better supports centralized or remote infrastructure management, and what are the integration trade-offs?
- Which should you choose: the UPX-2000R-2 or the RLNK-2000R-2?
- Side-by-Side Specs
- FAQ
How does each unit's bank control method differ, and which fits your management workflow?
The UPX-2000R-2 uses local bank control, meaning outlet-bank switching and load management are handled physically at the unit itself. This is appropriate for installations where technicians have direct rack access and remote power management is not required.
The UPX-RLNK-2000R-2 incorporates RLNK bank control, indicating integration with Middle Atlantic's RLNK remote power management platform. This allows outlet-level switching and monitoring to be performed remotely over a network connection, without physical access to the rack.
Neither model's spec sheet details the number of individually controllable outlet banks or specific RLNK protocol support beyond the 'Special Features: NEXSYS UPS' notation and the product-name-embedded 'RLNK' designation. Buyers requiring granular remote outlet control should verify RLNK compatibility with their existing management infrastructure before purchase.
Are the physical footprint, electrical ratings, and environmental tolerances identical across both models?
Both units share an identical physical profile: 19 in (48.3 cm) wide, 22 in (55.9 cm) deep, 3.46 in (8.8 cm) tall, occupying 2 RU in a standard rack with 4 mounting points. Unit weight is identical at 63 lbs (28.6 kg) for both.
Electrically, both models draw 120 VAC input via a NEMA 5-20P plug on a 6 ft (1.8 m) cord, and both specify an output voltage of 48 VDC with NEMA 5-20R receptacles. Both carry the NEXSYS UPS designation and neither is TAA compliant.
Operating environment tolerances are identical: 32°F–104°F (0°C–40°C). Country of origin is China for both. The only physical difference between the two is shipping weight: 70.1 lbs (31.8 kg) for the UPX-2000R-2 versus 71 lbs (32.2 kg) for the UPX-RLNK-2000R-2, a 0.9 lb delta likely attributable to the RLNK control module.
Which model better supports centralized or remote infrastructure management, and what are the integration trade-offs?
The UPX-RLNK-2000R-2's RLNK bank control positions it for environments already using or planning to deploy Middle Atlantic's RLNK ecosystem, enabling remote outlet switching, power cycling, and load monitoring from a centralized management interface. This is directly relevant for AV, security, and IT integrators managing distributed rack systems across multiple sites or data closets.
The UPX-2000R-2's local bank control offers a simpler, self-contained solution with no dependency on network infrastructure or a management platform. For single-site installations, small deployments, or environments where network-based power management introduces unacceptable complexity or security surface area, local control may be preferable.
Neither unit's provided specifications detail runtime curves, battery capacity (Ah), communication ports (USB, serial, SNMP card slots), or software compatibility beyond the RLNK/local control distinction. Buyers should consult the respective datasheets at the listed PDF paths for those parameters before finalizing a selection.
Which should you choose: the UPX-2000R-2 or the RLNK-2000R-2?
Our take: The UPX-RLNK-2000R-2 is the stronger choice when remote outlet-bank management is a project requirement and the site already operates within the Middle Atlantic RLNK ecosystem. The two units are electrically and physically interchangeable: same 2000VA class, same 120 VAC / 48 VDC electrical profile, same 2 RU / 19 in footprint, same 63 lb unit weight, and same NEMA 5-20P/R plug and receptacle type. The only spec-confirmed delta is shipping weight (71 lbs vs. 70.1 lbs) and the RLNK versus local control architecture embedded in the product name and SKU. For installations where a technician will always have physical rack access and remote power management adds unnecessary complexity or cost, the UPX-2000R-2's local bank control is the leaner, network-independent option. For managed AV or security rack deployments requiring remote outlet cycling without truck rolls, the UPX-RLNK-2000R-2 is the appropriate platform.
Side-by-Side Comparison
Spec-for-spec, from manufacturer data.
| Specification | Middle Atlantic UPX-2000R-2 | Middle Atlantic RLNK-2000R-2 |
|---|---|---|
| SKU | UPX-2000R-2 | UPX-RLNK-2000R-2 |
| Bank Control Type | Local | RLNK (Remote) |
| UPS Capacity | 2000VA | 2000VA |
| Input Voltage | 120 VAC | 120 VAC |
| Output Voltage | 48 VDC | 48 VDC |
| Plug Type | NEMA 5-20P | NEMA 5-20P |
| Receptacle Type | NEMA 5-20R | NEMA 5-20R |
| Cord Length | 6 ft (1.8 m) | 6 ft (1.8 m) |
| Rack Units | 2 RU | 2 RU |
| Width | 19 in (48.3 cm) | 19 in (48.3 cm) |
| Depth | 22 in (55.9 cm) | 22 in (55.9 cm) |
| Height | 3.46 in (8.8 cm) | 3.46 in (8.8 cm) |
| Mounting Points | 4 | 4 |
| Unit Weight | 63 lbs (28.6 kg) | 63 lbs (28.6 kg) |
| Shipping Weight | 70.1 lbs (31.8 kg) | 71 lbs (32.2 kg) |
| Operating Temp | 32°–104°F (0°–40°C) | 32°–104°F (0°–40°C) |
| Special Features | NEXSYS UPS | NEXSYS UPS |
| TAA Compliant | No | No |
| Country of Origin | China | China |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which should you choose: the UPX-2000R-2 or the RLNK-2000R-2?
The UPX-RLNK-2000R-2 is the stronger choice when remote outlet-bank management is a project requirement and the site already operates within the Middle Atlantic RLNK ecosystem. The two units are electrically and physically interchangeable: same 2000VA class, same 120 VAC / 48 VDC electrical profile, same 2 RU / 19 in footprint, same 63 lb unit weight, and same NEMA 5-20P/R plug and receptacle type. The only spec-confirmed delta is shipping weight (71 lbs vs. 70.1 lbs) and the RLNK versus local control architecture embedded in the product name and SKU. For installations where a technician will always have physical rack access and remote power management adds unnecessary complexity or cost, the UPX-2000R-2's local bank control is the leaner, network-independent option. For managed AV or security rack deployments requiring remote outlet cycling without truck rolls, the UPX-RLNK-2000R-2 is the appropriate platform.
Can I use the UPX-2000R-2 or UPX-RLNK-2000R-2 on a standard 20A circuit?
Both units use a NEMA 5-20P plug, which requires a NEMA 5-20R receptacle — a dedicated 20A, 120V circuit. A standard 15A outlet will not physically accept the 5-20P plug without an adapter, and running a 2000VA UPS on an unrated circuit is outside spec. Verify your circuit capacity before installation.
Is the UPX-RLNK-2000R-2 worth the upgrade over the UPX-2000R-2 for a single-rack installation?
Based on the provided specifications, the only functional difference is RLNK remote bank control versus local control. If your single-rack installation does not require remote outlet switching — or if you do not have a Middle Atlantic RLNK management platform in place — the UPX-2000R-2 delivers an identical electrical and physical package without the added control complexity. If remote power cycling across that rack is operationally important, the RLNK model is the appropriate choice.
Do both units fit in the same rack space and use the same cabling?
Yes. Both units are 2 RU, 19 in wide, 22 in deep, with 4 rack-mounting points, and both use a 6 ft NEMA 5-20P input cord. They are physically interchangeable in a standard EIA-310 rack. Output receptacles are NEMA 5-20R on both models.
More UPS Comparisons
- APC by Schneider Electric SMX2000LV vs CyberPower PR2000RTXL2UC
- APC by Schneider Electric SMX2000LV vs CyberPower CP2000PFCRM2U
- APC by Schneider Electric SMX2000LV vs CyberPower PR2000RT2UCN
- APC by Schneider Electric SMX2000LV vs Middle Atlantic UPX-EXPANRUN-OL20
- APC by Schneider Electric SMX2000LV vs APC by Schneider Electric SMX2000LVNCUS
- APC by Schneider Electric SMX2000LV vs APC by Schneider Electric SMX2000RMLV2U
UPS Buying Guides
Get a Second Opinion on Your Camera Choice
Share your site layout, coverage goals, and budget. Our team will validate the camera selection, flag anything we would change, and recommend products that match the use case.