2N 01274-001 vs 2N 03369-001: Specification Comparison
Both the 2N IP Verso Black (01274-001) and the 2N IP Force 5MP (03369-001) are wired IP video intercom door stations from 2N, designed for building-entry access control applications. Buyers evaluating either unit are selecting a primary visitor-facing intercom station — wall-mounted, PoE-powered, with two-way audio and video. The comparison turns on image resolution and analytics capability, environmental ruggedization, power budget, and modular expandability: the Verso targets indoor or sheltered lobbies with a modular frame, while the Force targets demanding outdoor deployments with higher-resolution imaging and on-device analytics.
In This Guide
- Which unit delivers stronger video capability and on-device analytics?
- How do the two units compare on environmental protection and power requirements?
- Which product supports greater on-site expandability and system integration?
- Which should you choose: the 01274-001 or the 03369-001?
- Side-by-Side Specs
- FAQ
Which unit delivers stronger video capability and on-device analytics?
The 03369-001 (IP Force) specifies a 5MP sensor (2592×1944) and includes on-device analytics — adaptive face zooming and QR code reading (1D/2D credential scanning) — running on an ARTPEC-8 processor. These capabilities are stated directly in the product specs.
The 01274-001 (IP Verso) lists H.265 and H.264/MJPEG compression codecs. Its specs note that a camera is optional rather than integrated, and no analytics functions such as facial detection or QR scanning are listed in the provided specification data.
For deployments requiring face-capture quality for visitor logging, or contactless QR-credential entry without a separate reader, the 03369-001's 5MP sensor and on-device analytics represent a meaningful functional difference. The 01274-001's H.265 support can reduce bandwidth consumption by approximately 40–60% versus H.264 per the product data, but resolution and analytics figures are absent from its spec sheet.
How do the two units compare on environmental protection and power requirements?
The 03369-001 (IP Force) carries an IP66 ingress-protection rating and an IK10 impact rating, qualifying it for fully exposed outdoor installation — IP66 means dust-tight and protected against powerful water jets; IK10 is the highest standard IEC impact class (50-joule vandal resistance).
The 01274-001 (IP Verso) lists an IK08 impact rating. An IP ingress-protection rating is not stated in the provided specifications for this unit. IK08 offers meaningful tamper resistance but is two classes below IK10.
On power, the 03369-001 requires PoE+ (802.3at) at approximately 15–18W, meaning the supplying switch port or injector must support 802.3at. The 01274-001 operates on standard PoE (802.3af), which is more widely available in existing infrastructure and draws less power. Installers should verify switch-port compatibility before deploying the 03369-001 on legacy PoE switches.
Which product supports greater on-site expandability and system integration?
The 01274-001 (IP Verso) is built around a modular 2-position frame — one position occupied by the main unit, one reserved for additional modules such as a keypad, card reader, or additional buttons. This architecture allows expansion without replacing the core unit. The spec also notes Bluetooth Smart technology and ONVIF compliance, supporting integration with third-party VMS and access-control platforms.
The 03369-001 (IP Force) specs note that it can be equipped with a numeric keypad module and a wide-angle camera module, indicating modular capability as well, though the total frame-position count is not stated in the provided data. It is listed as Ethernet-connected with ONVIF implied by the platform but not explicitly confirmed in the provided spec fields.
Both units support wired Ethernet connectivity. The Verso's explicit ONVIF listing and defined 2-position frame count are concrete expandability data points; the Force's modular options are described qualitatively in the provided specs without a stated position count.
Which should you choose: the 01274-001 or the 03369-001?
Our take: The 03369-001 (IP Force) is the stronger choice when the installation demands outdoor-rated, high-resolution video capture with on-device analytics and vandal resistance. It provides a 5MP sensor versus no stated resolution for the 01274-001, an IK10 impact rating versus IK08, an IP66 environmental seal versus no IP rating stated for the Verso, and adds on-device QR scanning and adaptive face zooming absent from the Verso's spec sheet. The trade-off is a higher power demand — PoE+ (802.3at, ~15–18W) versus the Verso's standard PoE (802.3af) — requiring compatible switch infrastructure. The 01274-001 (IP Verso) is the stronger choice for indoor or sheltered lobbies where modular frame expandability, H.265 bandwidth efficiency, standard PoE compatibility, and a defined ONVIF integration path matter more than outdoor ruggedization or high-resolution analytics.
Side-by-Side Comparison
Spec-for-spec, from manufacturer data.
| Specification | 2N 01274-001 | 2N 03369-001 |
|---|---|---|
| Product Type | Main Unit with Camera (camera optional per spec) | Video Intercom – Outdoor |
| Sensor / Resolution | Not stated in provided specs | 5MP (2592×1944) |
| Video Compression | H.265; H.264; MJPEG | H.265; H.264 (per spec) |
| On-Device Analytics | Not listed in provided specs | Adaptive face zooming; QR code reading (1D/2D) |
| Processor | Not stated in provided specs | ARTPEC-8 |
| IP Ingress Rating | Not stated in provided specs | IP66 |
| Impact Rating | IK08 | IK10 |
| Environment | Not stated (no IP rating listed) | Outdoor |
| Power Type | PoE (802.3af) | PoE+ (802.3at) |
| Power Draw | Not stated in provided specs | ~15–18W |
| Audio | Two-way (built-in mic) | Two-way (microphone + speaker) |
| Mount Type | Wall | Wall |
| Connectivity | Wired Ethernet | Wired Ethernet |
| ONVIF | Yes (listed in specs) | Not explicitly stated in provided specs |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth Smart (listed in specs) | Not listed in provided specs |
| Modular Frame | 2-position frame (1 reserved for expansion) | Modular (keypad, wide-angle camera options; position count not stated) |
| Color | Black | Not stated in provided specs |
| Warranty | 3-Year | Not stated in provided specs |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which should you choose: the 01274-001 or the 03369-001?
The 03369-001 (IP Force) is the stronger choice when the installation demands outdoor-rated, high-resolution video capture with on-device analytics and vandal resistance. It provides a 5MP sensor versus no stated resolution for the 01274-001, an IK10 impact rating versus IK08, an IP66 environmental seal versus no IP rating stated for the Verso, and adds on-device QR scanning and adaptive face zooming absent from the Verso's spec sheet. The trade-off is a higher power demand — PoE+ (802.3at, ~15–18W) versus the Verso's standard PoE (802.3af) — requiring compatible switch infrastructure. The 01274-001 (IP Verso) is the stronger choice for indoor or sheltered lobbies where modular frame expandability, H.265 bandwidth efficiency, standard PoE compatibility, and a defined ONVIF integration path matter more than outdoor ruggedization or high-resolution analytics.
Can I use the 01274-001 or 03369-001 on a standard PoE switch?
The 01274-001 (IP Verso) runs on standard PoE (802.3af), which is compatible with the vast majority of existing PoE switches. The 03369-001 (IP Force) requires PoE+ (802.3at) at approximately 15–18W — standard 802.3af ports typically budget only 15.4W and may not reliably power the Force. Verify that your switch supports 802.3at on the intended port before deploying the 03369-001.
Does either unit support QR code or mobile credential access without an additional reader?
Yes — the 03369-001 (IP Force) includes on-device QR code reading (1D/2D) as a stated specification, using its ARTPEC-8 processor. The 01274-001 (IP Verso) does not list QR or mobile credential reading in its provided specifications. If contactless QR-based visitor access is a requirement, the 03369-001 meets it natively; the 01274-001 would require an additional module or external reader.
Which unit is better suited for exterior gate or façade installations exposed to weather and vandalism?
The 03369-001 (IP Force) is purpose-built for this environment: its IP66 rating means it is sealed against dust and powerful water jets, and its IK10 impact rating is the highest standardized vandal-resistance class. The 01274-001 (IP Verso) carries an IK08 impact rating but has no IP ingress-protection rating stated in its provided specifications, making it a lower-confidence choice for fully exposed outdoor deployments.
More Intercom Comparisons
- Hanwha TID-600R vs Aiphone IX-EA
- Hanwha TID-600R vs Axis A8207-VE
- Hanwha TID-600R vs Aiphone IX-DVF-6
- Hanwha TID-600R vs Aiphone JOS-1FW
- Aiphone IX-EA vs Axis A8207-VE
- Aiphone IX-EA vs 2N 01273-001
Intercom Buying Guides
Get a Second Opinion on Your Camera Choice
Share your site layout, coverage goals, and budget. Our team will validate the camera selection, flag anything we would change, and recommend products that match the use case.