Socket Mobile CX4479-3674 vs Socket Mobile CX4490-3692: Specification Comparison
Both the Socket Mobile CX4479-3674 (Mag XS662 Pro) and the CX4490-3692 (XScan XS962 Pro) are handheld Bluetooth barcode scanners in the 1D/2D mid-range class, targeting mobile and point-of-sale environments. They share the same IP67 ingress protection rating, Bluetooth LE wireless interface, USB connectivity, EN 50581 RoHS compliance, and a one-year warranty. This comparison examines the key specification differences and commonalities to help installers and IT buyers determine which unit best fits their deployment requirements.
In This Guide
- Does one scanner support a broader range of barcode symbologies or a more capable scan engine?
- Do the two scanners differ in how they connect to host systems or mobile platforms?
- Are there differences in physical build, weight, or what is included in the box?
- Which should you choose: the CX4479-3674 or the CX4490-3692?
- Side-by-Side Specs
- FAQ
Does one scanner support a broader range of barcode symbologies or a more capable scan engine?
Both the CX4479-3674 and the CX4490-3692 are equipped with 1D/2D scan engines capable of reading UPC and multiple additional symbologies. The CX4479-3674 spec sheet references 1D/2D symbologies including UPC, Code 128, QR, and Data Matrix. The CX4490-3692 similarly lists Code 128, Code 39, QR, and Data Matrix in addition to UPC. Notably, the CX4490-3692 explicitly calls out Code 39 support, which is not mentioned in the CX4479-3674 spec data; conversely, the CX4479-3674 references Code 128 while the CX4490-3692 also lists Code 128. Neither product's provided specifications include a full symbology count or decode speed (scans per second), so a definitive engine performance comparison cannot be made from the data at hand. Buyers requiring exhaustive symbology lists should consult the manufacturer's full datasheet for each model.
Do the two scanners differ in how they connect to host systems or mobile platforms?
Both units offer dual-interface connectivity: Bluetooth LE for wireless pairing with mobile devices, POS terminals, and WMS hosts, and USB for wired or dock-based connections. The CX4490-3692 spec data explicitly describes Bluetooth LE and USB as enabling 'cordless mobility or direct dock connection,' clarifying that USB functions actively through the included charging dock rather than solely for charging. The CX4479-3674 specs list the same interface pair (USB; Bluetooth LE) but do not elaborate on the USB operational mode in the provided data. Neither model lists proprietary RF, Wi-Fi, or NFC connectivity in the supplied specifications. For deployments requiring simultaneous wireless and wired host communication, the CX4490-3692 documentation more explicitly confirms dual active-interface operation, though the CX4479-3674 may support the same — its spec sheet simply does not confirm this.
Are there differences in physical build, weight, or what is included in the box?
Both scanners carry an IP67 rating, meaning full protection against dust ingress and resistance to immersion in up to 1 meter of water for 30 minutes — an identical environmental protection standard. The CX4490-3692 has a documented weight of 0.05 (units not specified in the provided data, but consistent with kilograms for a compact handheld scanner at approximately 50 g). No weight figure is provided for the CX4479-3674, preventing a direct mass comparison. Both units ship with a charging dock. The CX4490-3692 package contents are explicitly listed as the scanner plus charging dock. The CX4479-3674 spec notes a charging dock under included accessories but does not provide a formal package-contents field. Form factor descriptions differ: the CX4479-3674 is described as a 'compact mid-range design,' while the CX4490-3692 model designation (XS962 Pro MR) suggests a mid-range positioning. No drop-rating or housing material data is provided for either unit.
Which should you choose: the CX4479-3674 or the CX4490-3692?
Our take: The CX4490-3692 is the marginally better-documented choice for buyers who need confirmed dual active-interface operation and an explicit package-contents declaration, while the CX4479-3674 presents no specification-backed advantage over it in the data provided. Three concrete spec observations: (1) the CX4490-3692 explicitly lists Code 39 symbology support not mentioned in the CX4479-3674 data; (2) the CX4490-3692 carries a documented weight of 0.05 kg whereas no weight figure exists for the CX4479-3674; (3) both models share identical IP67 protection, Bluetooth LE, USB, 1D/2D engine, 1-year warranty, and EN 50581 RoHS compliance. For POS and WMS platforms where Code 39 is a required symbology, the CX4490-3692 is the lower-risk pick based on available specs. Buyers should request full manufacturer datasheets to compare scan rate, battery capacity, and complete symbology tables before final procurement.
Side-by-Side Comparison
Spec-for-spec, from manufacturer data.
| Specification | Socket Mobile CX4479-3674 | Socket Mobile CX4490-3692 |
|---|---|---|
| Product Type | Scanner | Scanner |
| Model Name | Mag XS662 Pro | XScan XS962 Pro MR |
| SKU | CX4479-3674 | CX4490-3692 |
| Scanner Type | Handheld | Handheld |
| Scan Engine | 1D/2D | 1D/2D |
| Symbologies (noted) | UPC, Code 128, QR, Data Matrix | UPC, Code 128, Code 39, QR, Data Matrix |
| IP Rating | IP67 | IP67 |
| Wireless Interface | Bluetooth LE | Bluetooth LE |
| Wired Interface | USB | USB |
| Included Accessories | Charging dock | Scanner + charging dock |
| Weight | — | 0.05 (units not specified in spec) |
| Warranty | 1 year | 1 year |
| RoHS Compliance | EN 50581 | EN 50581 |
| Battery Life (spec) | Not specified | Not specified |
| Primary Use Cases | Warehouse, logistics, retail, POS | POS, WMS, mobile platforms |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which should you choose: the CX4479-3674 or the CX4490-3692?
The CX4490-3692 is the marginally better-documented choice for buyers who need confirmed dual active-interface operation and an explicit package-contents declaration, while the CX4479-3674 presents no specification-backed advantage over it in the data provided. Three concrete spec observations: (1) the CX4490-3692 explicitly lists Code 39 symbology support not mentioned in the CX4479-3674 data; (2) the CX4490-3692 carries a documented weight of 0.05 kg whereas no weight figure exists for the CX4479-3674; (3) both models share identical IP67 protection, Bluetooth LE, USB, 1D/2D engine, 1-year warranty, and EN 50581 RoHS compliance. For POS and WMS platforms where Code 39 is a required symbology, the CX4490-3692 is the lower-risk pick based on available specs. Buyers should request full manufacturer datasheets to compare scan rate, battery capacity, and complete symbology tables before final procurement.
Is the CX4479-3674 or CX4490-3692 better for warehouse and logistics environments with exposure to water or dust?
Both scanners carry an IP67 rating, which means both are fully protected against dust ingress and can withstand immersion in up to 1 meter of water for 30 minutes. The provided specifications show no difference in environmental protection between the two models, so neither holds an advantage on ruggedness based on available data.
Can both the CX4479-3674 and CX4490-3692 connect wirelessly to a POS or WMS host without a cable?
Yes. Both units feature Bluetooth LE, enabling wireless pairing with mobile devices, POS terminals, and WMS platforms. The CX4490-3692 documentation explicitly confirms that USB operates through the included dock for direct connection as an alternative to wireless use. The CX4479-3674 lists the same USB and Bluetooth LE interfaces, but the provided spec data does not elaborate on active USB data mode — buyers should verify this with Socket Mobile's full datasheet.
Do the CX4479-3674 and CX4490-3692 both include a charging dock, and is there any difference in what comes in the box?
Both models include a charging dock. The CX4490-3692 has a formal package-contents field confirming the scanner and charging dock. The CX4479-3674 lists a charging dock under included accessories but lacks a formal package-contents declaration in the provided specifications. No additional accessories beyond the dock are listed for either model.
More Barcode Scanner Comparisons
- Zebra DS8108-SR vs Zebra DS8108-SR
- Zebra DS8108-SR vs Zebra DS8108-HC
- Datalogic 931061345 vs Datalogic 931024111-00053
- Datalogic 931061335 vs Datalogic 931061345
- Datalogic 931061335 vs Datalogic 931024111-00053
- Datalogic 957022201-00053 vs Datalogic 931061345
Barcode Scanner Buying Guides
Get a Second Opinion on Your Camera Choice
Share your site layout, coverage goals, and budget. Our team will validate the camera selection, flag anything we would change, and recommend products that match the use case.