Datalogic 931061335 vs Datalogic 931061345: Specification Comparison
Both the Datalogic 931061335 and 931061345 are fixed-mount stationary industrial barcode scanners from the Matrix 220 series. They share the same 1.2 MP 2D CMOS imager, IP65/IP67 sealing, PoE connectivity, and compact 48×46×64 mm enclosure. Buyers evaluating either unit for factory automation, logistics, or direct part marking (DPM) applications will find the two models nearly identical on paper, making interface configuration and symbology support the primary differentiating axes in this comparison.
In This Guide
- Which model supports a broader range of barcode symbologies and direct part marking?
- Do the two models differ in their industrial interface and communication options?
- Are there any differences in environmental ratings, physical build, or operating conditions?
- Which should you choose: the 931061335 or the 931061345?
- Side-by-Side Specs
- FAQ
Which model supports a broader range of barcode symbologies and direct part marking?
The 931061345 provides an explicitly enumerated symbology list in its specifications: Code 128, Code 39, UPC, EAN, QR Code, Data Matrix, PDF417, and Direct Part Mark (DPM). Its spec also calls out 'integrated flexible illumination' as the enabling feature for DPM reads, and the Symbologies_1D and Symbologies_2D fields confirm 1D and 2D coverage in detail.
The 931061335 lists symbologies more broadly as '1D/2D barcodes, Data Matrix, and direct part marking' without enumerating individual codes. QR Code and Data Matrix are confirmed under Symbologies_2D, but named 1D codes such as Code 128, Code 39, UPC, and EAN are not listed per spec. PDF417 is absent from the 931061335 spec entirely. Buyers requiring verified PDF417 support or a spec-confirmed 1D code list should note this gap.
Do the two models differ in their industrial interface and communication options?
Both scanners share PoE, PROFINET/IO, and EtherNet/IP as their primary industrial Ethernet interfaces. However, the 931061345 additionally lists RS-232 as a serial interface in its Interface field, which the 931061335 does not. RS-232 is relevant for legacy PLC integrations, serial host controllers, or setups where Ethernet infrastructure is unavailable.
The 931061335 spec notes 'Power over Ethernet' redundantly across multiple fields and confirms PROFINET/IO and EtherNet/IP, but RS-232 is absent from its specifications. Both models list a 16×2 character embedded display. The 931061345 also carries a noted power draw of 30W, whereas no explicit power consumption figure appears in the 931061335 spec.
Are there any differences in environmental ratings, physical build, or operating conditions?
Both models are rated IP65/IP67 per their ingress protection fields, operate from -10°C to 50°C (14°F to 122°F), and share identical physical dimensions of 48×46×64 mm and a 300 g weight. The 931061345 provides the imperial equivalents (1.89×1.81×2.52 in; 0.66 lbs) in its spec, whereas the 931061335 lists dimensions in mm only.
Scan rate is 800 scans/sec on both units. Both carry a 2-Year Limited warranty. The 931061335 describes its processor as a 'multicore image processing platform' while the 931061345 simply states 'multicore processor'; neither spec provides clock speed or specific processor model. No meaningful environmental or build differentiation exists between the two models based on the provided specifications.
Which should you choose: the 931061335 or the 931061345?
Our take: The 931061345 is the stronger choice when verified symbology breadth and RS-232 serial connectivity are requirements. Concretely: (1) the 931061345 explicitly confirms PDF417 support, which is absent from the 931061335 spec; (2) the 931061345 names RS-232 as an additional interface, extending compatibility to legacy serial host controllers not supported by the 931061335 per spec; (3) the 931061345 specifies 30W power draw, giving integrators a concrete figure for PoE budget planning, while the 931061335 provides no power consumption spec. Both units are otherwise spec-identical in imager resolution, IP rating, scan rate, dimensions, weight, operating temperature, and warranty. Buyers deploying purely on PROFINET/IO or EtherNet/IP Ethernet backbones, where RS-232 is irrelevant and PDF417 is not a required symbology, will find no differentiating advantage between the two models based on available specifications.
Side-by-Side Comparison
Spec-for-spec, from manufacturer data.
| Specification | Datalogic 931061335 | Datalogic 931061345 |
|---|---|---|
| Series / Family | Matrix 220 | Matrix 220 |
| Product Type | Stationary Industrial Scanner | Fixed-Mount Industrial Barcode Scanner |
| Imager | 1.2 MP 2D CMOS | 1.2 MP 2D CMOS |
| Scan Rate | 800 scan/s | 800 scans/sec |
| Symbologies — 1D | 1D barcodes (specific codes not enumerated) | Code 128; Code 39; UPC; EAN |
| Symbologies — 2D | Data Matrix; QR Code | QR Code; Data Matrix; PDF417; Direct Part Mark |
| DPM Support | Yes (per spec) | Yes, with integrated flexible illumination |
| Interface | PROFINET/IO; EtherNet/IP; PoE | PROFINET/IO; EtherNet/IP; RS-232; PoE |
| RS-232 | — | Yes |
| IP Rating | IP65/IP67 | IP65/IP67 |
| Operating Temperature | -10°C to 50°C (14°F to 122°F) | -10°C to 50°C (14°F to 122°F) |
| Dimensions | 48 × 46 × 64 mm | 48 × 46 × 64 mm (1.89 × 1.81 × 2.52 in) |
| Weight | 300 g | 300 g (0.66 lbs) |
| Power Consumption | — | 30W |
| Display | 16 × 2 characters | 16 × 2 characters |
| Warranty | 2-Year Limited | 2-Year Limited |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which should you choose: the 931061335 or the 931061345?
The 931061345 is the stronger choice when verified symbology breadth and RS-232 serial connectivity are requirements. Concretely: (1) the 931061345 explicitly confirms PDF417 support, which is absent from the 931061335 spec; (2) the 931061345 names RS-232 as an additional interface, extending compatibility to legacy serial host controllers not supported by the 931061335 per spec; (3) the 931061345 specifies 30W power draw, giving integrators a concrete figure for PoE budget planning, while the 931061335 provides no power consumption spec. Both units are otherwise spec-identical in imager resolution, IP rating, scan rate, dimensions, weight, operating temperature, and warranty. Buyers deploying purely on PROFINET/IO or EtherNet/IP Ethernet backbones, where RS-232 is irrelevant and PDF417 is not a required symbology, will find no differentiating advantage between the two models based on available specifications.
Is the 931061335 or 931061345 better for reading PDF417 barcodes?
Based on the provided specifications, only the 931061345 explicitly lists PDF417 as a supported symbology. The 931061335 spec references '1D/2D barcodes' generically but does not name PDF417. Buyers with a confirmed PDF417 requirement should select the 931061345 or verify PDF417 support with Datalogic for the 931061335 before purchasing.
Can either scanner connect to a legacy serial PLC or host controller via RS-232?
The 931061345 lists RS-232 as a supported interface alongside PROFINET/IO and EtherNet/IP. The 931061335 spec does not include RS-232. If your integration requires a serial RS-232 connection, the 931061345 is the only model confirmed to support it based on the specifications provided.
Are the two Matrix 220 models physically interchangeable in an existing bracket or enclosure mount?
Yes, based on the provided specifications. Both the 931061335 and 931061345 share identical dimensions (48×46×64 mm) and weight (300 g), the same IP65/IP67 sealed enclosure form factor, and the same PoE power input. Either unit should fit the same mechanical mounting hardware. Confirm bracket compatibility with Datalogic documentation before swapping units in a production line.
More Barcode Scanner Comparisons
- Zebra DS8108-SR vs Zebra DS8108-SR
- Zebra DS8108-SR vs Zebra DS8108-HC
- Datalogic 931061345 vs Datalogic 931024111-00053
- Datalogic 931061335 vs Datalogic 931024111-00053
- Datalogic 957022201-00053 vs Datalogic 931061345
- Zebra DS9308-SR vs Datalogic 931061335
Barcode Scanner Buying Guides
Get a Second Opinion on Your Camera Choice
Share your site layout, coverage goals, and budget. Our team will validate the camera selection, flag anything we would change, and recommend products that match the use case.