Socket Mobile CX4479-3674 vs Socket Mobile CX4489-3691: Specification Comparison
Both the Socket Mobile CX4479-3674 (Mag XS662 Pro) and the CX4489-3691 (XScan XS962 Pro MR) are handheld Bluetooth 1D/2D barcode scanners targeting warehouse, logistics, and point-of-sale environments. Each carries IP67 ingress protection, Bluetooth LE wireless connectivity, and a 1-year warranty. This comparison evaluates the two on scan capability and symbology support, build and environmental protection, and integration and interface characteristics — the three axes most relevant to buyers selecting a cordless handheld scanner for mobile or fixed-station deployment.
In This Guide
- How do the scan engines and supported symbology sets compare between the CX4479-3674 and CX4489-3691?
- Which model offers stronger environmental and physical protection for demanding deployment conditions?
- How do the two scanners differ in terms of host integration, connectivity, and driver requirements?
- Which should you choose: the CX4479-3674 or the CX4489-3691?
- Side-by-Side Specs
- FAQ
How do the scan engines and supported symbology sets compare between the CX4479-3674 and CX4489-3691?
Both units share a 1D/2D scan engine and list UPC as a confirmed symbology. Product A (CX4479-3674) is marketed as the Mag XS662 Pro and its enriched spec notes indicate coverage of 1D/2D symbologies including UPC, Code 128, QR, and Data Matrix. Product B (CX4489-3691), the XScan XS962 Pro MR, confirms 1D and UPC under its structured fields and repeats 1D/2D symbologies including UPC in its enriched data, but does not independently enumerate Code 128, QR, or Data Matrix in the provided specs.
The CX4489-3691 spec sheet does note a 'Standard barcode input protocol' and references HID keyboard emulation as an integration method — neither of which appears in the CX4479-3674 spec set. Where the CX4479-3674 lists a scanner type of Handheld explicitly, the CX4489-3691 does not carry that structured field in the provided data. Neither product specifies a scan range, scan rate, or minimum print contrast in the supplied specifications.
Which model offers stronger environmental and physical protection for demanding deployment conditions?
Both scanners carry an IP67 ingress-protection rating, meaning each is rated for complete dust ingress prevention and submersion in up to 1 meter of water for 30 minutes per the IEC 60529 standard. The CX4479-3674 enriched bullet explicitly states the 1-meter/30-minute submersion parameter; the CX4489-3691 states IP67 sealed against warehouse dust and moisture but does not specify the submersion depth or duration in its provided specs.
The CX4489-3691 is the only model with a weight figure in the provided data, listed at 0.05 (unit not specified in the spec). Neither product provides drop-specification, operating temperature range, or storage temperature as distinct numerical values in the supplied data — both list 'Temperature' under Storage and 'Information' under Battery Life, which appear to be placeholder entries rather than populated specifications. RoHS compliance (EN 50581) is confirmed for both units.
How do the two scanners differ in terms of host integration, connectivity, and driver requirements?
Both models share a dual-interface spec of USB and Bluetooth, with Bluetooth LE as the wireless protocol. The CX4479-3674 enriched data notes wireless pairing with mobile devices and terminals; the CX4489-3691 similarly references pairing with mobile computers and stationary POS systems.
A meaningful differentiator present only in the CX4489-3691 specs is HID (Human Interface Device) keyboard emulation, which allows the scanner to present as a standard keyboard input device to the host — eliminating custom driver installation on most warehouse management systems and POS platforms. This feature is not mentioned anywhere in the CX4479-3674 provided specifications. The CX4479-3674 includes a charging dock in its listed accessories; no included accessories are specified for the CX4489-3691. Neither product lists a specific Bluetooth version number beyond 'LE', nor a wireless range figure, in the supplied data.
Which should you choose: the CX4479-3674 or the CX4489-3691?
Our take: The CX4489-3691 is the stronger choice when driver-free deployment and broad POS or WMS integration are the priority, while the CX4479-3674 is preferable when a bundled charging dock and explicitly documented scan-engine breadth (Code 128, QR, Data Matrix confirmed in specs) matter to the buyer. The single most actionable spec delta is HID keyboard emulation: it is confirmed on the CX4489-3691 and absent from the CX4479-3674's provided specifications, which reduces IT overhead significantly in mixed-OS environments. Both units share IP67 protection and Bluetooth LE. The CX4479-3674 ships with a charging dock per its spec; the CX4489-3691 does not list one. Battery life and operating temperature are unpopulated for both models, so buyers should request full datasheets before finalizing decisions for high-duty-cycle or extreme-temperature sites.
Side-by-Side Comparison
Spec-for-spec, from manufacturer data.
| Specification | Socket Mobile CX4479-3674 | Socket Mobile CX4489-3691 |
|---|---|---|
| Model Name | Mag XS662 Pro | XScan XS962 Pro MR |
| SKU | CX4479-3674 | CX4489-3691 |
| Product Type | Scanner | Scanner |
| Scanner Form Factor | Handheld | — |
| Scan Engine | 1D/2D | 1D/2D |
| Confirmed Symbologies (spec) | UPC, Code 128, QR, Data Matrix (enriched) | UPC (structured); 1D/2D (enriched) |
| Interface | USB; Bluetooth | USB; Bluetooth |
| Bluetooth | LE | LE |
| IP Rating | IP67 | IP67 |
| HID Keyboard Emulation | — | Yes |
| Included Accessories | Charging dock | — |
| Weight | — | 0.05 (unit not specified) |
| Battery Life | Not specified | Not specified |
| Operating Temperature | Not specified | Not specified |
| Warranty | 1-year | 1-year |
| RoHS Compliance | EN 50581 | EN 50581 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which should you choose: the CX4479-3674 or the CX4489-3691?
The CX4489-3691 is the stronger choice when driver-free deployment and broad POS or WMS integration are the priority, while the CX4479-3674 is preferable when a bundled charging dock and explicitly documented scan-engine breadth (Code 128, QR, Data Matrix confirmed in specs) matter to the buyer. The single most actionable spec delta is HID keyboard emulation: it is confirmed on the CX4489-3691 and absent from the CX4479-3674's provided specifications, which reduces IT overhead significantly in mixed-OS environments. Both units share IP67 protection and Bluetooth LE. The CX4479-3674 ships with a charging dock per its spec; the CX4489-3691 does not list one. Battery life and operating temperature are unpopulated for both models, so buyers should request full datasheets before finalizing decisions for high-duty-cycle or extreme-temperature sites.
Does either the CX4479-3674 or CX4489-3691 work without installing custom drivers on a Windows POS terminal?
Based on the provided specifications, only the CX4489-3691 (XScan XS962 Pro MR) explicitly lists HID keyboard emulation, which allows it to operate as a plug-and-play keyboard-class device on most platforms without custom drivers. The CX4479-3674 specifications do not mention HID emulation, so driver requirements for that model cannot be confirmed or ruled out from the supplied data alone.
Which model comes with a charging dock included in the box?
The CX4479-3674 (Mag XS662 Pro) lists a charging dock as an included accessory in its provided specifications. The CX4489-3691 (XScan XS962 Pro MR) does not list any included accessories in its provided spec data, so buyers requiring a dock with that unit should confirm availability and whether it is sold separately.
Are both scanners rated for wet or wash-down environments?
Both the CX4479-3674 and CX4489-3691 carry an IP67 ingress-protection rating per their provided specifications, meaning each is sealed against dust ingress and capable of withstanding water immersion. The CX4479-3674 spec notes specifically cite 1-meter submersion for 30 minutes. Neither model's provided data specifies chemical resistance or suitability for sanitizer or wash-down agents, so for food-service or pharmaceutical environments buyers should verify those requirements against the full manufacturer datasheets.
More Barcode Scanner Comparisons
- Zebra DS8108-SR vs Zebra DS8108-SR
- Zebra DS8108-SR vs Zebra DS8108-HC
- Datalogic 931061345 vs Datalogic 931024111-00053
- Datalogic 931061335 vs Datalogic 931061345
- Datalogic 931061335 vs Datalogic 931024111-00053
- Datalogic 957022201-00053 vs Datalogic 931061345
Barcode Scanner Buying Guides
Get a Second Opinion on Your Camera Choice
Share your site layout, coverage goals, and budget. Our team will validate the camera selection, flag anything we would change, and recommend products that match the use case.