Lantronix SISPM1242-582-LRT vs Vivotek FGT-100P-110: Specification Comparison
Both the Lantronix SISPM1242-582-LRT and the Vivotek AW-FGT-100P-110 are 10-port PoE network switches aimed at IP security deployments, making them plausible cross-shop candidates for installers specifying edge switching infrastructure. The comparison spans management sophistication, power delivery standard, and environmental suitability—three axes that typically determine which unit fits a given installation. The SISPM1242-582-LRT targets hardened industrial environments with full management capability, while the FGT-100P-110 positions as a compact, zero-configuration plug-and-play unit for standard surveillance racks.
In This Guide
- Which switch delivers more PoE power per port, and does that matter for your cameras and devices?
- Does this switch need to be managed, monitored, or configured remotely, or is plug-and-play sufficient?
- Where can this switch physically be installed, and how does it hold up in harsh or outdoor-adjacent environments?
- Which should you choose: the SISPM1242-582-LRT or the FGT-100P-110?
- Side-by-Side Specs
- FAQ
Which switch delivers more PoE power per port, and does that matter for your cameras and devices?
The Lantronix SISPM1242-582-LRT is rated PoE++ (IEEE 802.3bt), which supports up to 95 W per port as noted in its spec sheet. This accommodates high-draw endpoints such as PTZ cameras with heaters, multi-sensor units, or access control readers with electric strikes on a single cable run.
The Vivotek AW-FGT-100P-110 delivers PoE per the 802.3af standard, which caps at 15.4 W per port. That is sufficient for the majority of fixed IP cameras, but it will not power 802.3at (PoE+) or 802.3bt (PoE++) devices without a mid-span injector or device-side power supply.
For deployments mixing standard fixed cameras with higher-draw devices, the SISPM1242-582-LRT's PoE++ headroom is a concrete advantage. For pure 802.3af camera arrays, the FGT-100P-110's simultaneous all-port delivery is functionally adequate, though its total PoE budget figure is not specified in the provided data.
Does this switch need to be managed, monitored, or configured remotely, or is plug-and-play sufficient?
The SISPM1242-582-LRT is a fully managed switch with a 16K MAC address table. Managed switching enables VLAN segmentation, QoS prioritization, port mirroring, SNMP monitoring, and network traffic control—capabilities required by IT-integrated or enterprise-grade security deployments where the switch must be administered alongside other network infrastructure.
The AW-FGT-100P-110 is explicitly unmanaged and plug-and-play with automatic MDI/MDIX crossover detection. There is no CLI, web interface, or SNMP agent specified. Configuration overhead is zero, which suits smaller stand-alone surveillance closets or branch locations where a dedicated network administrator is not available.
The management gap is significant: the SISPM1242-582-LRT supports network segmentation and monitoring that the FGT-100P-110 cannot provide. Conversely, the FGT-100P-110's zero-configuration profile reduces commissioning time and eliminates the need for network-certified staff on site.
Where can this switch physically be installed, and how does it hold up in harsh or outdoor-adjacent environments?
The SISPM1242-582-LRT is rated for industrial operating temperatures of −25°C to +60°C (−13°F to +140°F) with storage to −40°C to +85°C. It mounts on DIN rail, is certified to UL508 and TUV EN60950-1, carries Class B EMC certification (EN55022/CISPR22), and is TAA compliant. Dimensions are 2.48 × 5.26 × 4.93 in (63 × 113.5 × 125.2 mm). This profile suits traffic cabinets, factory floors, outdoor enclosures, and any location with wide temperature swings.
The AW-FGT-100P-110 is rack/cabinet mountable with a compact form factor described as fitting standard surveillance equipment racks. It weighs 1.0 lb. Operating temperature range, ingress protection rating, and certifications are not provided in the supplied specifications.
For installations subject to temperature extremes, vibration, or condensation—common in parking structures, building exteriors, or industrial facilities—the SISPM1242-582-LRT's documented hardening and DIN rail format are directly relevant. The FGT-100P-110's environmental envelope cannot be confirmed from available data, limiting its specification in those contexts.
Which should you choose: the SISPM1242-582-LRT or the FGT-100P-110?
Our take: The SISPM1242-582-LRT is the stronger choice when the deployment demands industrial-grade environmental tolerance, high per-port power, and full network management. Concretely: it delivers PoE++ (up to 95 W per port) versus the FGT-100P-110's 802.3af ceiling of 15.4 W per port; it operates across a documented −25°C to +60°C range backed by UL508 and TUV certification, while the FGT-100P-110's operating temperature is unspecified; and its managed feature set—16K MAC table, VLAN, QoS, SNMP—gives IT teams the visibility and segmentation controls the unmanaged FGT-100P-110 cannot provide. The FGT-100P-110 is the pragmatic pick for small, IT-light surveillance closets running standard 802.3af cameras where zero-configuration commissioning and low unit cost outweigh advanced management. Specify the SISPM1242-582-LRT for hardened, managed, high-power deployments; specify the FGT-100P-110 only where 802.3af power, no management, and rack mounting are genuinely sufficient.
Side-by-Side Comparison
Spec-for-spec, from manufacturer data.
| Specification | Lantronix SISPM1242-582-LRT | Vivotek FGT-100P-110 |
|---|---|---|
| Product Type | 10-Port Managed Hardened PoE++ Switch | 10-Port PoE Switch |
| Port Count | 10 | 10 |
| Port Speed | 10/100/1000 Mbps (Gigabit) | Not specified |
| PoE Standard | PoE++ (802.3bt) | PoE (802.3af) |
| Max PoE per Port | 95 W | 15.4 W (802.3af max) |
| Total PoE Budget | Not specified | Not specified |
| Management | Managed (full) | Unmanaged, plug-and-play |
| MAC Address Table | 16K | — |
| MDI/MDIX | Not specified | Automatic |
| Mount Type | DIN Rail | Rack / Cabinet |
| Operating Temperature | −25°C to +60°C (−13°F to +140°F) | Not specified |
| Storage Temperature | −40°C to +85°C | Not specified |
| Dimensions | 2.48 × 5.26 × 4.93 in (63 × 113.5 × 125.2 mm) | Not specified |
| Weight | Not specified | 1.0 lb |
| Certifications | UL508, TUV EN60950-1, Class B EMC (EN55022/CISPR22), TAA | Not specified |
| Warranty | 2-Year | Not specified |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which should you choose: the SISPM1242-582-LRT or the FGT-100P-110?
The SISPM1242-582-LRT is the stronger choice when the deployment demands industrial-grade environmental tolerance, high per-port power, and full network management. Concretely: it delivers PoE++ (up to 95 W per port) versus the FGT-100P-110's 802.3af ceiling of 15.4 W per port; it operates across a documented −25°C to +60°C range backed by UL508 and TUV certification, while the FGT-100P-110's operating temperature is unspecified; and its managed feature set—16K MAC table, VLAN, QoS, SNMP—gives IT teams the visibility and segmentation controls the unmanaged FGT-100P-110 cannot provide. The FGT-100P-110 is the pragmatic pick for small, IT-light surveillance closets running standard 802.3af cameras where zero-configuration commissioning and low unit cost outweigh advanced management. Specify the SISPM1242-582-LRT for hardened, managed, high-power deployments; specify the FGT-100P-110 only where 802.3af power, no management, and rack mounting are genuinely sufficient.
Is the SISPM1242-582-LRT or the AW-FGT-100P-110 better for powering PTZ cameras or other high-wattage devices?
The SISPM1242-582-LRT supports PoE++ (802.3bt) at up to 95 W per port, making it compatible with high-draw PTZ cameras, heated housings, and multi-sensor units. The AW-FGT-100P-110 is rated 802.3af only, capping at 15.4 W per port, which is insufficient for PoE+ or PoE++ devices without supplemental power.
Can either switch be used in an outdoor cabinet or unheated enclosure?
The SISPM1242-582-LRT is documented to operate from −25°C to +60°C with UL508 industrial certification and DIN rail mounting, making it a fit for temperature-variable enclosures. The AW-FGT-100P-110's operating temperature range and environmental certifications are not stated in the available specifications, so its suitability for outdoor or unheated installations cannot be confirmed from spec data alone.
Do I need IT staff on site to configure and maintain either of these switches?
The AW-FGT-100P-110 is unmanaged and plug-and-play with automatic MDI/MDIX crossover—no configuration is required and no management interface is available. The SISPM1242-582-LRT is fully managed with a 16K MAC address table, supporting VLANs, QoS, and SNMP, which requires network-trained personnel for initial setup and ongoing administration.
More Network Switch Comparisons
- TP-Link SG2210MP vs Lantronix SISPM1242-582-LRT
- TP-Link SG2210MP vs Vivotek FGT-100P-110
- TP-Link SG2210MP vs Speco Technologies P8S10G
- TP-Link SG2210MP vs TP-Link SG1210MPE
- Lantronix SISPM1242-582-LRT vs TP-Link SG1210MPE
- Lantronix SISPM1242-582-LRT vs Speco Technologies P8S10G
Network Switch Buying Guides
Get a Second Opinion on Your Camera Choice
Share your site layout, coverage goals, and budget. Our team will validate the camera selection, flag anything we would change, and recommend products that match the use case.

