Hanwha X530L-18GHXM-90 vs Hanwha GS970M/18PS-R-10: Specification Comparison
Both the Hanwha HV-X530L-18GHXM-90 and HV-GS970M/18PS-R-10 are 16-port PoE managed switches designed for IP surveillance deployments, making them directly cross-shoppable by installers sizing network infrastructure for camera systems. The core comparison turns on PoE standard and per-port wattage, switching throughput and uplink speed, and the power budget available to feed high-demand devices such as PTZ cameras, multi-sensor units, and video encoders. Both carry a 5-year warranty and share wall/rack mount options under the Hanwha Wisenet brand.
In This Guide
- How much PoE power does each switch deliver per port and in total?
- What switching throughput and uplink capacity does each model provide?
- How do the two switches compare on management capabilities and compliance?
- Which should you choose: the X530L-18GHXM-90 or the GS970M/18PS-R-10?
- Side-by-Side Specs
- FAQ
How much PoE power does each switch deliver per port and in total?
The HV-X530L-18GHXM-90 implements PoE++ (802.3bt) Class 8, delivering up to 90W per port across all 16 multi-speed PoE++ ports, with a 720W aggregate power budget. This allows the switch to simultaneously power high-draw devices—such as PTZ cameras with onboard heaters, multi-sensor panoramic units, or AI edge-compute cameras—without requiring external injectors or midspans.
The HV-GS970M/18PS-R-10 implements PoE+ (802.3at), which is rated to a maximum of 30W per port under that standard. Its aggregate PoE budget is specified at 247W across all 16 ports. This is sufficient for standard IP cameras and access-control readers but leaves significantly less headroom for high-wattage endpoints. Neither a per-port wattage cap nor a per-port maximum figure is stated in the provided specifications for the GS970M/18PS-R-10 beyond the 247W total and the 802.3at classification.
What switching throughput and uplink capacity does each model provide?
The HV-X530L-18GHXM-90 delivers a 200Gbps non-blocking switching fabric at 148.8Mpps forwarding rate. Its 16 access ports are multi-speed (100M/1G/2.5G/5G), and the switch adds dual 10 Gigabit SFP+ fiber uplinks, enabling aggregated upstream bandwidth that scales with the high-throughput access ports. Latency is specified at sub-microsecond levels across speed tiers (5.23µs–8.35µs), which is relevant for time-sensitive surveillance video streams.
The HV-GS970M/18PS-R-10 provides 16 x 1GbE PoE+ access ports and 2 x SFP uplinks. The SFP uplink speed and the switching fabric capacity (Gbps) are not stated in the provided specifications. Port rates listed reference 10Mbps, 100Mbps, and 1Gbps tiers. No latency figure is provided for the GS970M/18PS-R-10 in the supplied data. Buyers requiring verified throughput numbers for the GS970M/18PS-R-10 should consult the manufacturer datasheet directly.
How do the two switches compare on management capabilities and compliance?
The HV-X530L-18GHXM-90 is explicitly specified as NDAA and TAA compliant, which is a procurement requirement for U.S. federal, state, and many enterprise customers. Its management feature set references EPSRing™ protection-switched ring topology, RFC 3956 multicast support, and sub-microsecond latency management. Physical dimensions and weight are fully specified (1.73 x 12.72 x 17.36 in, 13.89 lb), aiding rack or wall-mount planning. Country of origin is stated as Singapore.
The HV-GS970M/18PS-R-10 is described as a Layer 3 managed switch using 'FrameworkTM Plus' management. RFC 2819 RMON MIB groups 1, 2, 3, and 9 are referenced. However, NDAA/TAA compliance status, physical dimensions, weight, and country of origin are not stated in the provided specifications. Buyers with federal procurement requirements or physical-space constraints should verify these attributes with Hanwha directly before specifying the GS970M/18PS-R-10.
Which should you choose: the X530L-18GHXM-90 or the GS970M/18PS-R-10?
Our take: The HV-X530L-18GHXM-90 is the stronger choice when the deployment includes high-wattage endpoints, multi-gigabit camera streams, or federal/enterprise procurement requirements. Key spec deltas: (1) PoE budget is 720W versus 247W—nearly 3× more aggregate power, enabling full 90W per port versus the 30W ceiling of 802.3at on the GS970M/18PS-R-10; (2) the X530L-18GHXM-90 provides dual 10GbE SFP+ uplinks and a 200Gbps non-blocking fabric versus 1GbE-class SFP uplinks of unspecified capacity on the GS970M/18PS-R-10; (3) NDAA and TAA compliance is confirmed on the X530L-18GHXM-90 and not stated for the GS970M/18PS-R-10. The GS970M/18PS-R-10 suits cost-sensitive installations running standard 802.3at cameras at moderate densities where the 247W budget is not a constraint and federal compliance is not required.
Side-by-Side Comparison
Spec-for-spec, from manufacturer data.
| Specification | Hanwha X530L-18GHXM-90 | Hanwha GS970M/18PS-R-10 |
|---|---|---|
| PoE Standard | PoE++ (802.3bt) Class 8 | PoE+ (802.3at) |
| PoE Power Budget (Total) | 720W | 247W |
| Max Power Per Port | 90W | Not specified (802.3at max: 30W) |
| Number of PoE Ports | 16 | 16 |
| Access Port Speeds | 100M / 1G / 2.5G / 5G (multi-speed) | 10M / 100M / 1G |
| Uplink Ports | 2 x 10GbE SFP+ | 2 x SFP (speed not specified) |
| Switching Fabric | 200Gbps non-blocking | Not specified |
| Forwarding Rate | 148.8 Mpps | Not specified |
| Latency | 5.23µs–8.35µs (sub-microsecond) | Not specified |
| Management | EPSRing™, RFC 3956 multicast | Layer 3 / FrameworkTM Plus / RFC 2819 RMON |
| NDAA / TAA Compliant | Yes | Not specified |
| Mount Type | Wall; Rack | Wall; Rack |
| Warranty | 5-Year | 5-Year |
| Dimensions (in) | 1.73 x 12.72 x 17.36 | Not specified |
| Weight | 13.89 lb | Not specified |
| Country of Origin | Singapore | Not specified |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which should you choose: the X530L-18GHXM-90 or the GS970M/18PS-R-10?
The HV-X530L-18GHXM-90 is the stronger choice when the deployment includes high-wattage endpoints, multi-gigabit camera streams, or federal/enterprise procurement requirements. Key spec deltas: (1) PoE budget is 720W versus 247W—nearly 3× more aggregate power, enabling full 90W per port versus the 30W ceiling of 802.3at on the GS970M/18PS-R-10; (2) the X530L-18GHXM-90 provides dual 10GbE SFP+ uplinks and a 200Gbps non-blocking fabric versus 1GbE-class SFP uplinks of unspecified capacity on the GS970M/18PS-R-10; (3) NDAA and TAA compliance is confirmed on the X530L-18GHXM-90 and not stated for the GS970M/18PS-R-10. The GS970M/18PS-R-10 suits cost-sensitive installations running standard 802.3at cameras at moderate densities where the 247W budget is not a constraint and federal compliance is not required.
Is the HV-X530L-18GHXM-90 or HV-GS970M/18PS-R-10 better for powering PTZ cameras with heaters?
The HV-X530L-18GHXM-90 is the appropriate choice. It supports PoE++ (802.3bt) Class 8 at up to 90W per port, which covers high-draw PTZ cameras with integrated heaters and blowers that can exceed the 30W ceiling of PoE+ (802.3at) supported by the HV-GS970M/18PS-R-10. If your PTZ or multi-sensor cameras require more than 30W, the GS970M/18PS-R-10 cannot power them natively.
Which switch is NDAA and TAA compliant for government or federal projects?
Only the HV-X530L-18GHXM-90 is explicitly specified as NDAA and TAA compliant in the provided specifications. NDAA and TAA compliance status for the HV-GS970M/18PS-R-10 is not stated in the available spec data; verify with Hanwha before specifying it on a federally funded or government project.
Can either switch handle multi-gigabit cameras or high-bandwidth NVR uplinks?
The HV-X530L-18GHXM-90 is purpose-built for this: its 16 access ports support 100M/1G/2.5G/5G multi-speed operation and its dual 10GbE SFP+ uplinks feed a 200Gbps non-blocking fabric. The HV-GS970M/18PS-R-10 provides 1GbE access ports and SFP uplinks whose speed is not stated in the available specifications, making it more suitable for standard gigabit camera deployments.
More Network Switch Comparisons
- Vivotek GEL-205A-260 vs TP-Link SL1218MP
- Vivotek GEL-205A-260 vs Allied Telesis AT-x530L-18GHXm-10
- Vivotek GEL-205A-260 vs Ubiquiti USW-LITE-16-POE
- Vivotek GEL-205A-260 vs Ubiquiti USW-16-POE
- TP-Link SL1218MP vs Allied Telesis AT-x530L-18GHXm-10
- TP-Link SL1218MP vs Ubiquiti USW-LITE-16-POE
Network Switch Buying Guides
Get a Second Opinion on Your Camera Choice
Share your site layout, coverage goals, and budget. Our team will validate the camera selection, flag anything we would change, and recommend products that match the use case.