Datalogic M3410-010200-01104 vs Datalogic M3410-010210-00403: Specification Comparison
Both SKUs belong to the Datalogic Magellan 3410VSi Vertical Presentation Scanner family — compact, counter-mount 1D/2D area-imager barcode scanners targeting retail point-of-sale environments. The M3410-010200-01104 and M3410-010210-00403 share the same series name, form factor, and published physical specifications. This comparison examines their interface support, physical and environmental ratings, and symbology coverage to identify whether any meaningful differentiation exists for installers and POS integrators selecting between the two SKUs.
In This Guide
- Do the M3410-010200-01104 and M3410-010210-00403 differ in interface or POS system compatibility?
- Are there physical dimension, weight, or ingress-protection differences between the two SKUs?
- Do the two SKUs support different barcode symbologies that would affect deployment scope?
- Which should you choose: the M3410-010200-01104 or the M3410-010210-00403?
- Side-by-Side Specs
- FAQ
Do the M3410-010200-01104 and M3410-010210-00403 differ in interface or POS system compatibility?
Both units list identical interface options: USB and RS-232. Neither SKU documents additional interfaces such as Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or keyboard-wedge in the provided specifications. RS-232 support on both models means compatibility with legacy serial-port POS terminals without an adapter, while USB covers modern systems natively.
No cable or power-supply part numbers are differentiated between the two SKUs in the provided specs, so interface-level selection between them yields no practical distinction based on available data.
Are there physical dimension, weight, or ingress-protection differences between the two SKUs?
Dimensions are identical across both SKUs: 152 × 137 × 94 mm (6.0 × 5.4 × 3.7 in). Weight is listed as 1.3 lb / 1.32 (dimensionless field) / 350 g on Product A and 1.3 lb / 1.32 / 350 g on Product B — no measurable difference in the provided data.
Both carry an IP52 ingress-protection rating, indicating resistance to dust particles greater than 12.5 mm and protection against vertically dripping water. No temperature or humidity operating-range data is provided in the supplied specifications for either SKU.
Do the two SKUs support different barcode symbologies that would affect deployment scope?
Both units are specified as 1D/2D area imagers. Shared 2D symbologies listed for both: QR Code, Data Matrix, PDF417. Shared 1D symbologies listed for Product A: Code 128, Code 39, UPC, EAN. Product B's specification data does not include an explicit 1D symbology list in the provided fields — the _Symbologies_1D field is absent.
The absence of a 1D symbology list for Product B is a data gap, not necessarily a capability gap; the SKU is described as a '1D/2D area imager' in its own spec headers. Buyers requiring documented 1D coverage (Code 128, UPC, EAN, Code 39) have explicit confirmation only from Product A's spec sheet as provided here.
Which should you choose: the M3410-010200-01104 or the M3410-010210-00403?
Our take: The M3410-010200-01104 is the stronger documented choice when explicit 1D symbology confirmation is required at the spec level. Both SKUs are otherwise identical across every provided measurable dimension: 152 × 137 × 94 mm footprint, 350 g / 1.3 lb weight, IP52 ingress rating, USB and RS-232 interfaces, 2D scan engine, QR Code / Data Matrix / PDF417 support, and a 3-year factory warranty. The sole documented difference is that M3410-010200-01104 explicitly lists Code 128, Code 39, UPC, and EAN in its 1D symbology fields, while M3410-010210-00403 does not include those fields in the provided data. For integrators deploying into retail environments where legacy UPC/EAN grocery scanning must be spec-sheet verifiable, M3410-010200-01104 carries that documentation. The SKU suffix difference likely reflects a configuration variant (cable type, color, or regional packaging) not captured in the supplied spec data.
Side-by-Side Comparison
Spec-for-spec, from manufacturer data.
| Specification | Datalogic M3410-010200-01104 | Datalogic M3410-010210-00403 |
|---|---|---|
| Series / Family | Magellan 3410VSi | Magellan 3410VSi |
| Product Type | Vertical Presentation Scanner | Vertical Presentation Scanner |
| Scan Engine | 2D Area Imager | 2D Area Imager |
| Scan Type | 1D/2D | 1D/2D |
| Interfaces | USB; RS-232 | USB; RS-232 |
| 2D Symbologies | QR Code; Data Matrix; PDF417 | QR Code; Data Matrix; PDF417 |
| 1D Symbologies (documented) | Code 128; Code 39; UPC; EAN | — |
| Scan Pattern | Omnidirectional | — |
| Dimensions (mm) | 152 × 137 × 94 | 152 × 137 × 94 |
| Dimensions (in) | 6.0 × 5.4 × 3.7 | 6.0 × 5.4 × 3.7 |
| Weight | 350 g / 1.3 lb | 350 g / 1.3 lb |
| IP Rating | IP52 | IP52 |
| Form Factor | Vertical Presentation | Vertical Presentation |
| Mount Type | Wall | Wall |
| Warranty | 3-Year Factory Warranty | 3-Year Factory Warranty |
| Compatible Application | Retail | Retail |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which should you choose: the M3410-010200-01104 or the M3410-010210-00403?
The M3410-010200-01104 is the stronger documented choice when explicit 1D symbology confirmation is required at the spec level. Both SKUs are otherwise identical across every provided measurable dimension: 152 × 137 × 94 mm footprint, 350 g / 1.3 lb weight, IP52 ingress rating, USB and RS-232 interfaces, 2D scan engine, QR Code / Data Matrix / PDF417 support, and a 3-year factory warranty. The sole documented difference is that M3410-010200-01104 explicitly lists Code 128, Code 39, UPC, and EAN in its 1D symbology fields, while M3410-010210-00403 does not include those fields in the provided data. For integrators deploying into retail environments where legacy UPC/EAN grocery scanning must be spec-sheet verifiable, M3410-010200-01104 carries that documentation. The SKU suffix difference likely reflects a configuration variant (cable type, color, or regional packaging) not captured in the supplied spec data.
Is the M3410-010200-01104 or M3410-010210-00403 better for a grocery checkout lane that scans UPC barcodes?
Based on the provided specifications, only the M3410-010200-01104 explicitly documents UPC and EAN in its 1D symbology list. The M3410-010210-00403 is described as a 1D/2D imager but its supplied spec data omits a 1D symbology field. For spec-sheet-verifiable UPC coverage, M3410-010200-01104 has the documented confirmation; M3410-010210-00403 may support the same symbologies but that is not confirmed in the data provided.
Can either scanner be used in a wet or dusty environment such as a deli or produce counter?
Both the M3410-010200-01104 and M3410-010210-00403 carry an IP52 rating, which covers protection against solid objects larger than 12.5 mm and dripping water in a vertical direction. Neither unit documents a higher ingress rating such as IP54 or IP65 in the provided specs, so neither is specified for direct wash-down or heavy condensation environments. No operating temperature or humidity range is provided for either model.
What is the physical size and weight difference between the two models?
There is no physical size or weight difference in the provided specifications. Both the M3410-010200-01104 and M3410-010210-00403 measure 152 × 137 × 94 mm (6.0 × 5.4 × 3.7 in) and weigh 350 g (approximately 1.3 lb). Counter-space and mounting footprint planning can use identical dimensions for both SKUs.
More Barcode Scanner Comparisons
- Zebra DS9308 vs Datalogic M3410-010200-00403
- Zebra DS9308 vs Datalogic M3410-010210-00403
- Zebra DS9308 vs Datalogic M3450-010310-21104
- Zebra DS9308 vs Datalogic M3410-010210-00604
- Zebra DS9308 vs Zebra DS9308
- Zebra DS9308 vs Zebra DS9908
Barcode Scanner Buying Guides
Get a Second Opinion on Your Camera Choice
Share your site layout, coverage goals, and budget. Our team will validate the camera selection, flag anything we would change, and recommend products that match the use case.