Datalogic M3410-010200-00403 vs Datalogic M3410-010210-00403: Specification Comparison
Both SKUs belong to the Datalogic Magellan 3410VSi Vertical Presentation Scanner family — countertop, fixed-mount 1D/2D area imagers aimed at retail point-of-sale checkout. The M3410-010200-00403 and M3410-010210-00403 share the same platform name, form factor, and interface options, making them directly cross-shoppable units within the same product class. The comparison below examines where the provided specifications diverge — specifically symbology coverage, physical and environmental ratings, and connectivity — to help installers and IT buyers identify which SKU better fits a given deployment requirement.
In This Guide
- Which SKU reads the broader range of barcode symbologies?
- Do the two scanners share the same physical footprint, weight, and ingress protection rating?
- Are the interface options and POS integration paths the same for both SKUs?
- Which should you choose: the M3410-010200-00403 or the M3410-010210-00403?
- Side-by-Side Specs
- FAQ
Which SKU reads the broader range of barcode symbologies?
Symbology coverage is the primary functional differentiator between these two SKUs based on the provided specifications. The M3410-010200-00403 explicitly lists a wider 1D symbology set under its structured spec fields: Code 128, Code 39, UPC, and EAN are all individually called out alongside 2D types QR Code, Data Matrix, and PDF417. The M3410-010210-00403 spec data lists only the 2D symbologies — QR Code, Data Matrix, and PDF417 — in its structured fields; its 1D coverage (Code 128, Code 39, UPC, EAN) appears in narrative bullets but is not enumerated in the machine-readable spec fields.
For deployments where the POS environment mixes legacy 1D printed labels (UPC shelf tags, Code 128 shipping labels) with modern 2D mobile wallet codes, the M3410-010200-00403 provides explicit, spec-confirmed 1D coverage. Buyers configuring the M3410-010210-00403 should verify 1D capability directly with Datalogic documentation, as the structured spec data for that SKU does not formally enumerate those symbologies.
Do the two scanners share the same physical footprint, weight, and ingress protection rating?
On physical characteristics, the two SKUs are spec-identical across every available data point. Both measure 152 × 137 × 94 mm (6.0 × 5.4 × 3.7 in) and weigh 350 g (0.77 lb) per the tilde-prefixed enriched fields; the underscore-prefixed raw fields similarly record weight at 1.32 lb and dimensions at 5.39 × 5.98 × 3.7 in for both units. Note that the raw weight field (1.32 lb / ~0.60 kg) differs from the enriched field (350 g / 0.77 lb) on both SKUs equally — this internal inconsistency is present in both data sets and should be confirmed against the Datalogic datasheet before specifying for weight-sensitive counter mounts.
Both SKUs carry an IP52 ingress protection rating, providing resistance to dust particles greater than 12.5 mm and protection against vertically dripping water. This rating is appropriate for typical dry retail checkout environments but is not rated for wet or outdoor use. Neither SKU carries a stated operating temperature range in the provided specifications.
Are the interface options and POS integration paths the same for both SKUs?
Both scanners list USB and RS-232 as their stated interfaces, enabling connection to both modern USB-native POS terminals and legacy serial-port register systems. This dual-interface capability is confirmed in structured spec fields for both SKUs, making either unit viable in mixed-generation POS environments without an additional adapter.
Neither SKU specification includes Bluetooth, Ethernet, or wireless connectivity data, so both are wired-only units per the available specs. No SDK, driver package version, or host-system compatibility matrix is provided in the specs for either model. Buyers integrating with a specific POS software platform or retail middleware stack should request Datalogic's interface configuration guide, as the specs do not distinguish any firmware or communication-protocol differences between the two SKU suffixes.
Which should you choose: the M3410-010200-00403 or the M3410-010210-00403?
Our take: The M3410-010200-00403 is the stronger documented choice when explicit, spec-confirmed 1D barcode coverage is a deployment requirement. The key delta: its structured spec fields formally enumerate Code 128, Code 39, UPC, and EAN alongside the shared 2D set (QR Code, Data Matrix, PDF417), while the M3410-010210-00403 structured fields list only the 2D symbologies — 1D capability for that SKU appears only in narrative text and is not machine-readable confirmed. On every other measurable dimension — dimensions (152 × 137 × 94 mm), weight (350 g per enriched field), IP52 rating, dual USB/RS-232 interfaces, and 3-year warranty — both SKUs are spec-identical. For retail POS environments running a single symbology type (QR-only mobile payments, for example), either unit is equivalent on paper. For mixed 1D/2D environments or deployments where spec-sheet auditability is required for procurement compliance, the M3410-010200-00403 provides stronger documented evidence of full symbology support.
Side-by-Side Comparison
Spec-for-spec, from manufacturer data.
| Specification | Datalogic M3410-010200-00403 | Datalogic M3410-010210-00403 |
|---|---|---|
| Series / Family | Magellan 3410VSi | Magellan 3410VSi |
| Product Type | Vertical Presentation Scanner | Bar Code Scanner / Vertical Presentation Scanner |
| Scan Engine | 2D Area Imager | 2D Area Imager |
| Scan Type | 1D/2D Area Imager | 1D/2D Area Imager |
| Symbologies — 1D (structured fields) | Code 128; Code 39; UPC; EAN | — |
| Symbologies — 2D (structured fields) | QR Code; Data Matrix; PDF417 | QR Code; Data Matrix; PDF417 |
| Interface | USB; RS-232 | USB; RS-232 |
| Dimensions | 152 x 137 x 94 mm (6.0 x 5.4 x 3.7 in) | 152 x 137 x 94 mm (6.0 x 5.4 x 3.7 in) |
| Weight (enriched field) | 350 g (0.77 lb) | 350 g (0.77 lb) |
| Weight (raw field) | 1.32 lb | 1.32 lb |
| IP Rating | IP52 | IP52 |
| Form Factor | Presentation / On-Counter Mount | Vertical Presentation |
| Warranty | 3-Year Limited Warranty | 3-Year Limited Warranty |
| Presentation Style | Vertical On-Counter | — |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which should you choose: the M3410-010200-00403 or the M3410-010210-00403?
The M3410-010200-00403 is the stronger documented choice when explicit, spec-confirmed 1D barcode coverage is a deployment requirement. The key delta: its structured spec fields formally enumerate Code 128, Code 39, UPC, and EAN alongside the shared 2D set (QR Code, Data Matrix, PDF417), while the M3410-010210-00403 structured fields list only the 2D symbologies — 1D capability for that SKU appears only in narrative text and is not machine-readable confirmed. On every other measurable dimension — dimensions (152 × 137 × 94 mm), weight (350 g per enriched field), IP52 rating, dual USB/RS-232 interfaces, and 3-year warranty — both SKUs are spec-identical. For retail POS environments running a single symbology type (QR-only mobile payments, for example), either unit is equivalent on paper. For mixed 1D/2D environments or deployments where spec-sheet auditability is required for procurement compliance, the M3410-010200-00403 provides stronger documented evidence of full symbology support.
Is the M3410-010200-00403 or M3410-010210-00403 better for a retail checkout lane that scans both printed shelf labels and mobile wallet QR codes?
Based on the provided specifications, the M3410-010200-00403 is the better-documented choice for that mixed use case. Its structured spec fields explicitly list Code 128, Code 39, UPC, and EAN for 1D printed labels, as well as QR Code, Data Matrix, and PDF417 for 2D/mobile codes. The M3410-010210-00403 specs confirm the 2D set in structured fields but do not formally enumerate the 1D symbologies there — verify directly with Datalogic before deploying that SKU in a 1D-dependent lane.
Do these two scanners use the same cables and mount hardware since they share the same physical dimensions?
Per the provided specifications, both SKUs share identical dimensions (152 × 137 × 94 mm / 6.0 × 5.4 × 3.7 in) and the same USB and RS-232 interfaces, suggesting cable and counter-mount hardware should be interchangeable. However, neither SKU's spec data includes mounting hardware part numbers or cable accessory lists, so compatibility with a specific bracket or cable should be confirmed with Datalogic before ordering replacement parts.
Is there a difference in warranty coverage between the M3410-010200-00403 and M3410-010210-00403?
Both SKUs carry a 3-year limited factory warranty per the provided specifications. The wording appears as '3-Year Factory Warranty' in the raw spec fields and '3-year limited warranty' in the enriched fields for the M3410-010200-00403, and '3-Year Limited Warranty' for the M3410-010210-00403. No distinction in warranty terms, coverage scope, or support tier is indicated by the available spec data for either unit.
More Barcode Scanner Comparisons
- Zebra DS9308 vs Datalogic M3410-010200-00403
- Zebra DS9308 vs Datalogic M3410-010210-00403
- Zebra DS9308 vs Datalogic M3450-010310-21104
- Zebra DS9308 vs Datalogic M3410-010210-00604
- Zebra DS9308 vs Zebra DS9308
- Zebra DS9308 vs Zebra DS9908
Barcode Scanner Buying Guides
Get a Second Opinion on Your Camera Choice
Share your site layout, coverage goals, and budget. Our team will validate the camera selection, flag anything we would change, and recommend products that match the use case.