Cradlepoint SW2400P-GN vs Ubiquiti USW-ENTERPRISE-24-POE: Specification Comparison
Both the Cradlepoint SW2400P-GN (LS01-SW2400P-GN) and the Ubiquiti USW-ENTERPRISE-24-POE are 24-port managed Gigabit PoE rack-mount switches targeting networked physical-security and wireless deployments. Both deliver PoE+ (802.3at) across 24 downstream ports, provide SFP+ uplink slots, and are positioned for professional-grade infrastructure. The comparison turns on PoE budget and port speed, switching throughput and forwarding performance, and management platform plus compliance posture — the three axes most relevant to installers choosing between branch-site and enterprise-campus deployments.
In This Guide
- Which switch delivers more PoE power and higher per-port bandwidth?
- How do switching capacity, non-blocking throughput, and forwarding rate compare?
- Which switch better fits the target site's management platform, compliance requirements, and operating environment?
- Which should you choose: the SW2400P-GN or the USW-ENTERPRISE-24-POE?
- Side-by-Side Specs
- FAQ
Which switch delivers more PoE power and higher per-port bandwidth?
The Ubiquiti USW-ENTERPRISE-24-POE provides a 400 W PoE budget across its 24 downstream ports, compared with 370 W on the Cradlepoint SW2400P-GN — a 30 W (roughly 8%) advantage that translates to approximately one additional powered device at typical camera or AP draw. Both devices support PoE+ (802.3at) on all 24 ports.
Port speed is a sharper differentiator. The Ubiquiti's 24 downstream ports run at 2.5 Gbps (with 1 G fallback) and its two uplinks are 10 GbE SFP+. The Cradlepoint spec lists Gigabit speed on downstream ports and four SFP+ slots, but does not specify whether those SFP+ slots are 1 G or 10 G, nor does it document individual uplink speeds. Buyers requiring multi-gigabit edge bandwidth for Wi-Fi 6/6E APs or high-bitrate camera backbones should verify Cradlepoint's uplink throughput against their link-speed requirements before specifying.
How do switching capacity, non-blocking throughput, and forwarding rate compare?
The Cradlepoint SW2400P-GN is rated at 128 Gbps switching capacity. The Ubiquiti USW-ENTERPRISE-24-POE is rated at 124 Gbps aggregate switching capacity with a stated 62 Gbps non-blocking forwarding plane, plus a forwarding rate of 92 Mpps. The Cradlepoint spec does not publish a non-blocking throughput figure or a packets-per-second forwarding rate.
On raw switching capacity the Cradlepoint's 128 Gbps nominally exceeds the Ubiquiti's 124 Gbps aggregate. However, because the Ubiquiti explicitly documents its 62 Gbps non-blocking throughput and 92 Mpps forwarding rate, architects can calculate head-room under full load with confidence. The absence of equivalent non-blocking and Mpps figures for the Cradlepoint makes an apples-to-apples performance comparison impossible from published specs alone; buyers with deterministic latency or wire-speed requirements should request third-party test data from Cradlepoint.
Which switch better fits the target site's management platform, compliance requirements, and operating environment?
Management architectures diverge significantly. The Cradlepoint SW2400P-GN is managed through Cradlepoint NetCloud — a cloud-managed platform oriented toward branch WAN/SD-WAN deployments, positioning the switch as part of a broader Cradlepoint network stack. The Ubiquiti USW-ENTERPRISE-24-POE is managed via Ubiquiti's UniFi controller (Ethernet-managed per spec), a widely deployed platform for enterprise AV and physical-security estates. Sites already invested in either ecosystem will favor the corresponding device; cross-platform adoption carries additional management overhead.
On compliance, the Ubiquiti carries NDAA compliance per its spec sheet, along with CE, FCC, IC, and Anatel certifications. The Cradlepoint spec lists TAA compliance — relevant for U.S. federal procurement — but does not state NDAA compliance in the provided data. Physical-security integrators working on government or sensitive-facility projects must confirm NDAA status directly with Cradlepoint before specifying.
Operating temperature ranges are close but not identical: the Cradlepoint is rated -5 °C to 45 °C (23 °F to 113 °F) and is described as 'industrial temperature build,' providing a 5 °C upper margin over the Ubiquiti's -5 °C to 40 °C (23 °F to 104 °F) ceiling. The Cradlepoint's higher thermal ceiling is meaningful for unconditioned IDF closets or edge-site enclosures without active cooling.
Which should you choose: the SW2400P-GN or the USW-ENTERPRISE-24-POE?
Our take: The USW-ENTERPRISE-24-POE is the stronger choice when the deployment runs on a UniFi infrastructure, requires NDAA compliance, or needs 2.5 GbE per-port bandwidth for next-generation APs or high-density camera backbones. Key spec deltas: the Ubiquiti edges out on PoE budget (400 W vs. 370 W), publishes a verified 62 Gbps non-blocking throughput and 92 Mpps forwarding rate the Cradlepoint does not match in available documentation, and its 24 ports run at 2.5 Gbps versus Cradlepoint's Gigabit. Conversely, the SW2400P-GN carries TAA compliance and a 45 °C operating ceiling (5 °C above the Ubiquiti), making it the defensible pick for U.S. federal procurement or thermally marginal branch-site IDF rooms managed within the Cradlepoint NetCloud ecosystem. Integrators should confirm Cradlepoint NDAA status and SFP+ uplink speeds independently before final specification.
Side-by-Side Comparison
Spec-for-spec, from manufacturer data.
| Specification | Cradlepoint SW2400P-GN | Ubiquiti USW-ENTERPRISE-24-POE |
|---|---|---|
| Downstream Ports | 24 × 1G PoE+ | 24 × 2.5G/1G PoE+ |
| Uplink Slots | 4 × SFP+ (speed not specified in provided data) | 2 × 10G SFP+ |
| PoE Standard | PoE+ (802.3at) | PoE+ (802.3af/802.3at) |
| PoE Budget | 370 W | 400 W |
| Switching Capacity | 128 Gbps | 124 Gbps aggregate |
| Non-Blocking Throughput | — | 62 Gbps |
| Forwarding Rate | — | 92 Mpps |
| VLAN Support | — | Up to 1,000 |
| Management Platform | Cradlepoint NetCloud | UniFi Controller (Ethernet) |
| Operating Temperature | -5 °C to 45 °C (23 °F to 113 °F) | -5 °C to 40 °C (23 °F to 104 °F) |
| Form Factor | Rack mount | Rack mount (1U) |
| Enclosure Material | — | SGCC steel |
| Weight | — | 5.1 kg (11.3 lb) |
| TAA Compliant | Yes | — |
| NDAA Compliant | — | Yes |
| Certifications | TAA | CE, FCC, IC, Anatel, NDAA |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which should you choose: the SW2400P-GN or the USW-ENTERPRISE-24-POE?
The USW-ENTERPRISE-24-POE is the stronger choice when the deployment runs on a UniFi infrastructure, requires NDAA compliance, or needs 2.5 GbE per-port bandwidth for next-generation APs or high-density camera backbones. Key spec deltas: the Ubiquiti edges out on PoE budget (400 W vs. 370 W), publishes a verified 62 Gbps non-blocking throughput and 92 Mpps forwarding rate the Cradlepoint does not match in available documentation, and its 24 ports run at 2.5 Gbps versus Cradlepoint's Gigabit. Conversely, the SW2400P-GN carries TAA compliance and a 45 °C operating ceiling (5 °C above the Ubiquiti), making it the defensible pick for U.S. federal procurement or thermally marginal branch-site IDF rooms managed within the Cradlepoint NetCloud ecosystem. Integrators should confirm Cradlepoint NDAA status and SFP+ uplink speeds independently before final specification.
Is the SW2400P-GN or the USW-ENTERPRISE-24-POE better for powering a large number of PoE cameras and APs simultaneously?
The USW-ENTERPRISE-24-POE offers a 400 W PoE budget versus 370 W on the SW2400P-GN, giving it approximately 30 W more headroom — enough for roughly one additional PoE+ device at typical draw. Both support PoE+ (802.3at) on all 24 ports. For very dense deployments the 30 W difference is modest; the more significant factor may be per-port speed: the Ubiquiti's 2.5 GbE ports better support high-bitrate or multi-stream cameras and Wi-Fi 6 APs than the Cradlepoint's Gigabit downstream ports.
Which switch is required for NDAA-compliant government or federal facility projects?
The USW-ENTERPRISE-24-POE explicitly lists NDAA compliance in its published specifications. The Cradlepoint SW2400P-GN spec sheet as provided lists TAA compliance but does not state NDAA compliance. Integrators pursuing NDAA-mandated projects should verify Cradlepoint's NDAA status directly with the manufacturer; if that confirmation is unavailable, the Ubiquiti is the documentable choice for NDAA requirements.
Which switch is better suited for an unconditioned equipment room or edge site without reliable air conditioning?
The Cradlepoint SW2400P-GN is rated to 45 °C (113 °F) and is described in its spec as an 'industrial temperature build,' giving it a 5 °C upper margin over the Ubiquiti USW-ENTERPRISE-24-POE's 40 °C (104 °F) ceiling. For branch closets, outdoor enclosures, or any site where ambient temperature may exceed 40 °C, the SW2400P-GN's higher thermal rating is a meaningful specification advantage.
More Network Switch Comparisons
- Vivotek GEV-288A-370 vs Axis T8524
- Vivotek GEV-288A-370 vs Cradlepoint SW2400P-GN
- Vivotek GEV-288A-370 vs Allied Telesis AT-x530L-28GPX-901
- Vivotek GEV-288A-370 vs Ubiquiti USW-ENTERPRISE-24-POE
- Axis T8524 vs Cradlepoint SW2400P-GN
- Axis T8524 vs Allied Telesis AT-x530L-28GPX-901
Network Switch Buying Guides
Get a Second Opinion on Your Camera Choice
Share your site layout, coverage goals, and budget. Our team will validate the camera selection, flag anything we would change, and recommend products that match the use case.