Vivotek GEL-065A-060 vs Comelit 1440A: Specification Comparison
Both the Vivotek AW-GEL-065A-060 and the Comelit 1440A are 6-port Gigabit PoE switches aimed at IP surveillance deployments. The Vivotek unit is a lite-managed switch with VLAN, QoS, RSTP, and LACP capabilities, while the Comelit 1440A is an unmanaged (or minimally specified) 802.3af PoE switch targeting Comelit IP camera ecosystems. A buyer sizing a small-to-medium camera network would reasonably cross-shop these two on port count, PoE budget, management depth, and physical fit.
In This Guide
Which switch delivers more PoE power and to how many ports?
The Vivotek AW-GEL-065A-060 provides PoE on 4 of its 6 ports, each rated to 30 W under IEEE 802.3af/at, with a total PoE power budget of 60 W. The remaining 2 ports are standard Gigabit RJ-45 uplinks without PoE. This split design assumes the uplink ports connect to an upstream switch or router rather than powering endpoints.
The Comelit 1440A specifies 6 ports with 802.3af PoE at 15.4 W per port maximum. A total PoE budget is not stated in the provided specifications. With 802.3af only, the Comelit cannot power 802.3at (PoE+) devices such as PTZ cameras, multi-sensor cameras, or access control panels that draw between 15.4 W and 30 W.
For deployments mixing standard IP cameras with higher-draw endpoints, the Vivotek's 802.3af/at support and 30 W per-port ceiling is a meaningful advantage. If all 6 ports must supply PoE simultaneously, the Comelit's architecture (6 PoE ports vs. 4) offers more PoE-capable connections per chassis, provided load stays within 802.3af limits and the undisclosed total budget is sufficient.
How do these switches differ in management capability and switching performance?
The Vivotek AW-GEL-065A-060 is a fully managed switch. Specified features include 802.1Q tag-based VLAN (4,096 IDs), port-based VLAN, IEEE 802.1d STP and 802.1w RSTP, Link Aggregation Control Protocol (LACP), CoS port-based / 802.1p / DSCP-based QoS, storm control, loop protection, port mirroring, port isolation, bandwidth control, static MAC, PoE on/off control, PoE auto-checking, Non-Stop PoE, and Extend PoE Mode (250 m range). Switching bandwidth is specified at 12 Gbps with a 1 MB buffer and a 4K MAC address table.
The Comelit 1440A's management capabilities are not described in the provided specifications. No VLAN, QoS, STP/RSTP, or CLI/web-GUI management features are listed. Throughput is stated as 1 Gbps per port in the marketing descriptor, but aggregate switching bandwidth and buffer size are absent from the spec sheet.
For network segmentation, traffic prioritization, or redundant ring topologies common in multi-camera surveillance LANs, the Vivotek offers documented, standards-based mechanisms. The Comelit 1440A cannot be verified against those requirements based on available data, making it unsuitable for installations that mandate managed switching.
Which unit is better suited to the physical installation environment?
The Vivotek AW-GEL-065A-060 is rated for 0 °C to 50 °C operating temperature and 10–90% RH (non-condensing). It measures 200 × 118 × 44 mm (W × D × H) and weighs 0.66 kg. The unit ships with a rack mount kit and accepts universal AC input (100–240 V, 50–60 Hz). Per-port PoE surge protection is specified at 4 kV. Maximum system power draw is 65 W. Regulatory compliance marks listed are CE, FCC, LVD, and VCCI.
The Comelit 1440A lists dimensions of 66 × 85 × 35 mm (interpreted from the spec as width × height × depth in inches per the decimal values 2.8 × 3.5 × 2.44 in), making it a notably compact unit. Form factor is described as desktop or DIN-rail mountable. Operating temperature, humidity range, input voltage, surge protection ratings, and regulatory certifications are not provided in the specification data supplied.
The Vivotek unit's documented environmental ratings, rack-mount hardware, and 4 kV surge protection per PoE port provide verifiable guidance for compliance-sensitive or outdoor-adjacent installations. The Comelit's DIN-rail option suits panel or enclosure mounting in compact runs, but the absence of temperature, humidity, and surge specs means integrators cannot confirm suitability for anything beyond a conditioned indoor closet.
Which should you choose: the GEL-065A-060 or the 1440A?
Our take: The AW-GEL-065A-060 is the stronger choice when the installation requires managed switching, higher per-port PoE wattage, or documented environmental and surge specifications. Specifically: the Vivotek supports 802.3at at 30 W per PoE port versus the Comelit's 802.3af ceiling of 15.4 W—a 2× power headroom advantage for PTZ or multi-sensor cameras; it delivers a confirmed 12 Gbps switching fabric with VLAN, RSTP, QoS, and LACP, while the Comelit's management capabilities are entirely unspecified; and it carries a 4 kV per-port surge rating with CE/FCC/LVD/VCCI marks versus no stated surge or compliance data for the 1440A. The Comelit 1440A may suit a pure Comelit IP camera deployment in a conditioned indoor space where all endpoints are 802.3af-compliant and management is unnecessary, but integrators cannot confirm that fit without additional specifications from Comelit.
Side-by-Side Comparison
Spec-for-spec, from manufacturer data.
| Specification | Vivotek GEL-065A-060 | Comelit 1440A |
|---|---|---|
| Total Ports | 6 | 6 |
| PoE Ports | 4 | 6 |
| Non-PoE Uplink Ports | 2 | — |
| PoE Standard | 802.3af / 802.3at | 802.3af |
| Max PoE per Port | 30 W | 15.4 W |
| Total PoE Budget | 60 W | — |
| Switching Bandwidth | 12 Gbps | — |
| Management | Managed (VLAN, QoS, RSTP, LACP) | — |
| 802.1Q VLAN | Yes (4,096 IDs) | — |
| Surge Protection per Port | 4 kV | — |
| Extend PoE (250 m) | Yes | — |
| Operating Temperature | 0 °C to 50 °C | — |
| Dimensions (W × D × H) | 200 × 118 × 44 mm | ~71 × 89 × 62 mm (DIN-rail) |
| Weight | 0.66 kg | — |
| Input Voltage | 100–240 V AC, 50–60 Hz | — |
| Warranty | 24 months | 2 years |
| Regulatory | CE, FCC, LVD, VCCI | — |
| Form Factor / Mounting | Rack-mount (kit included) | Desktop / DIN-rail |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which should you choose: the GEL-065A-060 or the 1440A?
The AW-GEL-065A-060 is the stronger choice when the installation requires managed switching, higher per-port PoE wattage, or documented environmental and surge specifications. Specifically: the Vivotek supports 802.3at at 30 W per PoE port versus the Comelit's 802.3af ceiling of 15.4 W—a 2× power headroom advantage for PTZ or multi-sensor cameras; it delivers a confirmed 12 Gbps switching fabric with VLAN, RSTP, QoS, and LACP, while the Comelit's management capabilities are entirely unspecified; and it carries a 4 kV per-port surge rating with CE/FCC/LVD/VCCI marks versus no stated surge or compliance data for the 1440A. The Comelit 1440A may suit a pure Comelit IP camera deployment in a conditioned indoor space where all endpoints are 802.3af-compliant and management is unnecessary, but integrators cannot confirm that fit without additional specifications from Comelit.
Can either switch power PTZ cameras or multi-sensor cameras that require more than 15 W?
Only the Vivotek AW-GEL-065A-060 is specified to support IEEE 802.3at (PoE+) at up to 30 W per port. The Comelit 1440A is listed as 802.3af only, with a maximum of 15.4 W per port. PTZ cameras, multi-sensor units, and some access control panels that exceed 15.4 W cannot be reliably powered by the 1440A based on the provided specifications.
Is the AW-GEL-065A-060 or the 1440A better for a deployment that needs network segmentation or camera VLANs?
The Vivotek AW-GEL-065A-060 explicitly supports 802.1Q tag-based VLAN with 4,096 VLAN IDs, port-based VLAN, and RSTP. These are standard requirements for isolating camera traffic from corporate LAN traffic. The Comelit 1440A has no VLAN or STP features listed in its specifications; integrators requiring segmentation should not assume the 1440A supports them.
Which switch fits better in a tight panel or wall enclosure without rack space?
The Comelit 1440A is described as DIN-rail mountable in a compact form (approximately 2.8 × 3.5 × 2.44 inches per the provided dimensional data), making it well suited to distribution panels and compact enclosures. The Vivotek AW-GEL-065A-060 ships with a rack mount kit and measures 200 × 118 × 44 mm; it is rack-oriented and larger. For DIN-rail panel installations, the 1440A is the more appropriate physical format, provided its unspecified power and environmental ratings are acceptable for the site.
More Network Switch Comparisons
- Vivotek GEL-065A-060 vs Comelit 10081
- Vivotek GEL-065A-060 vs Comelit 1440
- Comelit 10081 vs Code Blue SLNP0018
- Comelit 10081 vs Comelit 1440
- Comelit 10081 vs Comelit 1440A
- Code Blue SLNP0018 vs Comelit 1440
Network Switch Buying Guides
Get a Second Opinion on Your Camera Choice
Share your site layout, coverage goals, and budget. Our team will validate the camera selection, flag anything we would change, and recommend products that match the use case.