Pelco SRXP4-3V10-EBT-IR vs Pelco SRXV2-2V13-EBT-IRWL: Specification Comparison
Both the Pelco SRXP4-3V10-EBT-IR (Sarix Professional 4) and the SRXV2-2V13-EBT-IRWL (Sarix Value 2) are 2MP outdoor bullet cameras sharing the same 1/2.8-inch progressive scan CMOS sensor and PoE Class 3 power input. This comparison examines how the higher-tier Pro 4 platform's imaging, analytics, and ONVIF depth stack up against the Value 2's dual IR/white-light illumination, wider temperature tolerance, and NDAA Section 889 compliance for installers weighing performance against compliance and cost.
In This Guide
How do the imaging specs compare?
On sensor and resolution both cameras are identical: 1/2.8-inch progressive scan CMOS delivering 1920×1080 at F1.4 aperture. The key imaging divergence is frame rate and dynamic range. The SRXP4-3V10-EBT-IR delivers up to 60 fps versus the SRXV2-2V13-EBT-IRWL's 30 fps cap — a meaningful difference for capturing fast-moving subjects or feeding forensic review. WDR is specified at 130 dB SureVision on the Pro 4 versus 120 dB on the Value 2, giving the Pro 4 a 10 dB advantage in high-contrast scenes such as entry vestibules or parking structures with mixed sunlight and shadow.
Low-light performance edges slightly to the Pro 4 as well: minimum illumination is rated at 0.01 lux color / 0 lux IR versus 0.02 lux color / 0 lux IR on the Value 2 — both reach zero lux in IR mode. The Pro 4 lens is specified as 4.4–9.3 mm motorized varifocal (with a secondary spec listing 3.4–10.5 mm); the Value 2 lens is 2.7–13.5 mm varifocal with remote zoom, focus, and autofocus. The Value 2's wider zoom range offers more installation flexibility, while the Pro 4's HFOV is given as 32–109 degrees. Notably, the Value 2 adds white-light illumination alongside 850 nm IR, enabling true-color nighttime identification — a capability absent from the Pro 4's spec sheet.
What about installation and environment?
Both cameras carry an IP66 weatherproof rating and IK09 vandal resistance (the Value 2 spec sheet also references IK10 in one field — the provided data is inconsistent on this point; the dominant rating stated is IK09). Both are PoE Class 3 (802.3af) and white-housing bullet form factors supporting wall, ceiling, and pendant mounting. The Value 2 additionally lists pole and corner mount options, broadening deployment scenarios. Operating temperature is a significant differentiator: the Value 2 is rated from -40°C to +60°C, while the Pro 4's operating temperature range is not explicitly stated in the provided specifications — installers in extreme-climate environments should verify this with Pelco documentation before specifying the Pro 4.
The Value 2 carries NDAA Section 889 compliance per its spec sheet, which is a procurement requirement for U.S. federal and many state/local government projects. The SRXP4-3V10-EBT-IR spec sheet does not state NDAA compliance. Both cameras support microSD on-board storage. The Pro 4 is specified with 1 GB RAM / 512 MB Flash; the Value 2 with 512 MB RAM / 256 MB Flash.
Which fits your VMS and analytics better?
ONVIF profile depth differs notably. The SRXP4-3V10-EBT-IR supports ONVIF Profile S, Profile T, Profile G, and Profile M, covering streaming, metadata/analytics events, recording management, and media. The SRXV2-2V13-EBT-IRWL is specified for Profile S and Profile T only, lacking Profile G (recording) and Profile M (metadata/analytics). For VMS platforms that leverage Profile G for edge-recording interoperability or Profile M for standardized metadata ingestion, the Pro 4 offers broader compatibility.
Edge analytics are exclusive to the Pro 4 in the provided specifications: Smart Analytics covering Person and Vehicle Detection, Directional Violation, Loitering, Beam Crossing, Crowd Detection, and Tamper Alert. The Value 2's analytics field lists only 'Specifications' — no named edge analytics are described. Both cameras are specified with H.265 and H.264 compression; the Value 2 adds Motion JPEG. The Pro 4 lists Pelco Smart Compression and idle-scene mode for bandwidth management; the Value 2 uses Smart Codec technology and Dynamic GOP. Audio support is noted on the Pro 4 (microphone supported); the Value 2's spec sheet does not specify an audio capability. Both carry a 5-year warranty.
Which should you choose: the SRXP4-3V10-EBT-IR or the SRXV2-2V13-EBT-IRWL?
Our take: The SRXP4-3V10-EBT-IR is the stronger choice when edge analytics, higher frame rate, and deeper ONVIF integration are the primary drivers. It delivers 60 fps versus the Value 2's 30 fps, a 10 dB WDR advantage (130 dB vs 120 dB), and adds ONVIF Profile G and Profile M alongside a full Smart Analytics suite — capabilities absent from the Value 2's spec sheet. Conversely, the SRXV2-2V13-EBT-IRWL is the correct specification when NDAA Section 889 compliance is mandatory, when the installation environment demands sub-zero operation (rated to -40°C versus an unstated range on the Pro 4), or when dual white-light/IR illumination for true-color nighttime identification is a project requirement. The Value 2's wider varifocal range (2.7–13.5 mm vs 4.4–9.3 mm) also provides more mounting-distance flexibility. Buyers on government or federally-funded projects should default to the Value 2 on compliance grounds alone.
Side-by-Side Comparison
Spec-for-spec, from manufacturer data.
| Specification | Pelco SRXP4-3V10-EBT-IR | Pelco SRXV2-2V13-EBT-IRWL |
|---|---|---|
| Series | Sarix Professional 4 | Sarix Value 2 |
| Resolution | 2MP (1920×1080) | 2MP (1920×1080) |
| Image Sensor | 1/2.8" progressive scan CMOS | 1/2.8" progressive scan CMOS |
| Aperture | F1.4 | F1.4 |
| Lens / Focal Length | 4.4–9.3 mm motorized varifocal | 2.7–13.5 mm varifocal |
| Max Frame Rate | 60 fps | 30 fps |
| Min Illumination (color / IR) | 0.01 lux / 0 lux | 0.02 lux / 0 lux |
| IR Illumination | 850 nm IR | 850 nm IR + White Light |
| WDR | 130 dB SureVision | 120 dB |
| Video Compression | H.265; H.264; Smart Compression | H.265; H.264; Motion JPEG |
| ONVIF Profiles | Profile S, T, G, M | Profile S, T |
| Edge Analytics | Person/Vehicle, Loitering, Directional Violation, Beam Crossing, Crowd Detection, Tamper Alert | — |
| IP Rating | IP66 | IP66 |
| IK / Impact Rating | IK09 | IK09 (IK10 also referenced in one spec field) |
| Operating Temperature | Not specified in provided specs | -40°C to +60°C |
| Power Input / PoE Class | PoE Class 3 (802.3af) | PoE Class 3 (802.3af) |
| Audio | Microphone supported | — |
| Edge Storage | microSD | microSD |
| Memory (RAM / Flash) | 1 GB RAM / 512 MB Flash | 512 MB RAM / 256 MB Flash |
| NDAA Section 889 | — | Compliant |
| Mount Types | Wall; Ceiling; Pendant | Wall; Ceiling; Pole; Pendant; Corner |
| Warranty | 5-year | 5-year |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which should you choose: the SRXP4-3V10-EBT-IR or the SRXV2-2V13-EBT-IRWL?
The SRXP4-3V10-EBT-IR is the stronger choice when edge analytics, higher frame rate, and deeper ONVIF integration are the primary drivers. It delivers 60 fps versus the Value 2's 30 fps, a 10 dB WDR advantage (130 dB vs 120 dB), and adds ONVIF Profile G and Profile M alongside a full Smart Analytics suite — capabilities absent from the Value 2's spec sheet. Conversely, the SRXV2-2V13-EBT-IRWL is the correct specification when NDAA Section 889 compliance is mandatory, when the installation environment demands sub-zero operation (rated to -40°C versus an unstated range on the Pro 4), or when dual white-light/IR illumination for true-color nighttime identification is a project requirement. The Value 2's wider varifocal range (2.7–13.5 mm vs 4.4–9.3 mm) also provides more mounting-distance flexibility. Buyers on government or federally-funded projects should default to the Value 2 on compliance grounds alone.
Is the SRXP4-3V10-EBT-IR or SRXV2-2V13-EBT-IRWL better for low-light performance?
Both reach 0 lux in IR mode. In color (ambient light) mode, the Pro 4 is rated at 0.01 lux versus 0.02 lux for the Value 2 — a marginal difference in practice. The Value 2 has a distinct advantage for applications requiring color identification at night because it adds white-light illumination alongside 850 nm IR; the Pro 4 provides IR only per its spec sheet.
Does either camera meet NDAA Section 889 requirements for government installations?
The SRXV2-2V13-EBT-IRWL is explicitly listed as NDAA Section 889 Compliant in its provided specifications. The SRXP4-3V10-EBT-IR spec sheet does not state NDAA compliance. Installers on federal, state, or local government projects with NDAA requirements should specify the Value 2 or confirm compliance status directly with Pelco for the Pro 4 before procurement.
Which camera works better with analytics-capable VMS platforms?
The SRXP4-3V10-EBT-IR is the stronger fit. It supports ONVIF Profile S, T, G, and M — including the metadata profile (M) used by analytics-capable VMS platforms — and runs onboard Smart Analytics (person/vehicle detection, loitering, directional violation, crowd detection, tamper alert). The Value 2 supports only Profile S and Profile T and lists no named edge analytics in its specifications, making it dependent on server-side analytics in the VMS.
Get a Second Opinion on Your Camera Choice
Share your site layout, coverage goals, and budget. Our team will validate the camera selection, flag anything we would change, and recommend products that match the use case.