Datalogic QBT2500-BK-BTK vs CipherLab A2500SCBSU0T1: Specification Comparison
Both the Datalogic QBT2500-BK-BTK and the CipherLab A2500SCBSU0T1 are cordless handheld 1D barcode scanners with Bluetooth connectivity, sold as USB kits targeting retail and light-industrial environments. The comparison covers scan engine capability and symbology breadth, environmental durability and physical characteristics, and connectivity alongside interface flexibility — the three axes that most directly determine fit for a given deployment.
In This Guide
- Which scanner offers broader symbology support and faster throughput?
- Which unit is better sealed against dust and moisture for industrial use?
- How do the two scanners differ in interface options and physical integration?
- Which should you choose: the QBT2500-BK-BTK or the A2500SCBSU0T1?
- Side-by-Side Specs
- FAQ
Which scanner offers broader symbology support and faster throughput?
The Datalogic QBT2500-BK-BTK is specified as a 1D linear imager in its marketing tier but the product spec sheet also lists a 2D scan engine and includes 2D symbologies — QR Code, Data Matrix, and PDF417 — alongside 1D codes such as Code 39, UPC, and EAN. No scan rate figure is provided in the available specifications for the Datalogic unit.
The CipherLab A2500SCBSU0T1 is a confirmed 1D linear imager at 3 mil minimum resolution and is rated at 578 scans per second. Its symbology list is strictly 1D and is notably broad: Codabar, Code 11, Code 39, Code 93, Code 128, GS1 DataBar (RSS), Industrial 2 of 5, Interleaved 2 of 5, ISBT-128, Italian and French Pharmacodes, Matrix 2 of 5, MSI, Plessey, Telepen, and UPC/EAN/GS1-128.
Buyers needing QR Code or Data Matrix read capability should weigh the Datalogic's listed 2D symbologies, acknowledging the internal inconsistency in its spec sheet (1D imager listed in one field, 2D engine in another). Buyers whose entire workflow is 1D — including niche codes such as ISBT-128 or Pharmacodes — will find the CipherLab's symbology coverage more explicitly verified and its 578-scan-per-second throughput a quantified advantage.
Which unit is better sealed against dust and moisture for industrial use?
The CipherLab A2500SCBSU0T1 carries an IP65 rating, meaning it is fully dust-tight and protected against low-pressure water jets from any direction. This rating is suitable for environments where the scanner may be exposed to washdowns, heavy particulate, or sustained moisture — including light food-service adjacency and warehouse dock applications.
The Datalogic QBT2500-BK-BTK is rated IP52, which means it is protected against dust ingress sufficient to prevent harmful deposits (not fully dust-tight) and against vertically dripping water with the device tilted up to 15 degrees. IP52 is appropriate for typical retail or office environments but is not rated for jet water exposure or dusty industrial settings.
The gap between IP52 and IP65 is meaningful: the CipherLab has full dust exclusion and directional water-jet resistance while the Datalogic does not. For warehouse pick-pack, manufacturing floors, or outdoor receiving areas, the IP65 rating of the CipherLab provides a documented level of environmental protection that the Datalogic's IP52 does not match.
How do the two scanners differ in interface options and physical integration?
The Datalogic QBT2500-BK-BTK supports Bluetooth, USB, and RS-232 via its base station. Its spec sheet also references Wi-Fi as an interface option, though this is not confirmed across all spec fields. The base provides multi-interface flexibility, which is relevant for legacy POS systems that require RS-232 serial connections. The scanner weighs 159 g and measures 69 × 127 × 124 mm. Battery is a 3,250 mAh lithium-ion cell charged at 5 VDC. Warranty is 3 years.
The CipherLab A2500SCBSU0T1 connects via Bluetooth and USB. RS-232 is not listed in the available specifications. The kit includes a USB cradle. Scan modes include auto-sense and continuous. Weight and battery capacity are not provided in the available specifications. Warranty is 2 years.
For sites with legacy RS-232 POS terminals, the Datalogic's base station providing that interface is a concrete advantage not matched by the CipherLab's listed specs. The Datalogic's 3-year warranty also exceeds the CipherLab's 2-year coverage. The CipherLab's scan pattern options (auto-sense and continuous) are explicitly documented; equivalent modes for the Datalogic are not listed in the provided specifications.
Which should you choose: the QBT2500-BK-BTK or the A2500SCBSU0T1?
Our take: The A2500SCBSU0T1 is the stronger choice when the deployment environment demands certified dust and water resistance, high-throughput 1D scanning, or a broad legacy 1D symbology set. Its IP65 rating versus the QBT2500-BK-BTK's IP52 is a two-grade sealing advantage — the CipherLab is fully dust-tight and jet-water resistant while the Datalogic is not. Its 578 scans per second throughput is a documented figure; no equivalent rate is provided for the Datalogic. Its 1D symbology list includes 15 distinct codes including ISBT-128 and Pharmacodes not mentioned for the Datalogic. Conversely, the QBT2500-BK-BTK is the stronger choice when RS-232 legacy POS integration is required (the CipherLab does not list RS-232 support), when 2D code reading — QR or Data Matrix — may be needed in future workflows, or when a 3-year warranty versus 2-year is a procurement requirement. Neither scanner should be selected solely on scan type labeling without resolving the Datalogic's internal 1D/2D spec inconsistency with the manufacturer.
Side-by-Side Comparison
Spec-for-spec, from manufacturer data.
| Specification | Datalogic QBT2500-BK-BTK | CipherLab A2500SCBSU0T1 |
|---|---|---|
| Product Type | Wireless Handheld Barcode Scanner | Barcode Scanner (Handheld) |
| Scan Engine | 1D Linear Imager (2D also listed in specs — verify with mfg) | 1D Linear Imager, 3 mil resolution |
| Scan Rate | — | 578 scans/second |
| Scan Range | — | Code 39: 3–60 cm; UPC-A: 0.5–38 cm |
| IP Rating | IP52 | IP65 |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| USB | Yes (via base) | Yes (kit included) |
| RS-232 | Yes (via base) | — |
| Wi-Fi | Listed in some spec fields — verify with mfg | — |
| 2D Symbologies | QR Code, Data Matrix, PDF417 (listed — verify with mfg) | — |
| 1D Symbologies | Code 39, UPC, EAN, Code 128 (partial list) | Codabar, Code 11, Code 39, Code 93, Code 128, GS1 DataBar, I 2of5, ISBT-128, Pharmacodes, MSI, Plessey, Telepen, UPC/EAN/GS1-128 |
| Scan Modes | — | Auto-sense and continuous |
| Battery | 3,250 mAh lithium-ion | — |
| Input Voltage | 5 VDC | — |
| Weight | 159 g | — |
| Warranty | 3-Year Limited | 2-Year |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which should you choose: the QBT2500-BK-BTK or the A2500SCBSU0T1?
The A2500SCBSU0T1 is the stronger choice when the deployment environment demands certified dust and water resistance, high-throughput 1D scanning, or a broad legacy 1D symbology set. Its IP65 rating versus the QBT2500-BK-BTK's IP52 is a two-grade sealing advantage — the CipherLab is fully dust-tight and jet-water resistant while the Datalogic is not. Its 578 scans per second throughput is a documented figure; no equivalent rate is provided for the Datalogic. Its 1D symbology list includes 15 distinct codes including ISBT-128 and Pharmacodes not mentioned for the Datalogic. Conversely, the QBT2500-BK-BTK is the stronger choice when RS-232 legacy POS integration is required (the CipherLab does not list RS-232 support), when 2D code reading — QR or Data Matrix — may be needed in future workflows, or when a 3-year warranty versus 2-year is a procurement requirement. Neither scanner should be selected solely on scan type labeling without resolving the Datalogic's internal 1D/2D spec inconsistency with the manufacturer.
Is the QBT2500-BK-BTK or the A2500SCBSU0T1 better for a warehouse with dusty or wet conditions?
The CipherLab A2500SCBSU0T1 is the documented choice for those conditions. It carries an IP65 rating — fully dust-tight and resistant to water jets from any direction. The Datalogic QBT2500-BK-BTK is rated IP52, which provides only partial dust protection and resistance to dripping water at limited angles. IP52 is not rated for dusty industrial floors or washdown-adjacent areas.
Can either scanner connect to an older RS-232 serial POS terminal?
Only the Datalogic QBT2500-BK-BTK lists RS-232 as a supported interface — delivered through its base station cradle. The CipherLab A2500SCBSU0T1's available specifications list Bluetooth and USB only; RS-232 is not mentioned. Buyers with legacy serial POS infrastructure should verify RS-232 support directly with CipherLab before specifying the A2500SCBSU0T1.
Which scanner is better suited for reading 2D barcodes like QR codes or Data Matrix?
The Datalogic QBT2500-BK-BTK's spec sheet lists QR Code, Data Matrix, and PDF417 among its symbologies, alongside a 2D scan engine field — though the same spec sheet also categorizes it as a 1D linear imager in another field, an internal inconsistency that should be resolved with Datalogic before purchase. The CipherLab A2500SCBSU0T1 is a confirmed 1D-only scanner with no 2D symbologies listed. If 2D code reading is a firm requirement, the Datalogic is the candidate, but buyers should confirm the 2D capability directly from the manufacturer datasheet.
More Barcode Scanner Comparisons
- Datalogic QBT2131 vs Honeywell 1962HSR-5USB-WC-N
- Datalogic QBT2131 vs CipherLab A2500SCBSU0T1
- Datalogic QBT2131 vs Socket Mobile CX4523-3764
- Datalogic QBT2131 vs Socket Mobile CX4619-3886
- Datalogic QBT2131 vs Datalogic QBT2500-BK-BTK
- Datalogic QBT2500-BK-BTK vs Honeywell 1962HSR-5USB-WC-N
Barcode Scanner Buying Guides
Get a Second Opinion on Your Camera Choice
Share your site layout, coverage goals, and budget. Our team will validate the camera selection, flag anything we would change, and recommend products that match the use case.