Datalogic QBT2500-BK-BTK vs Honeywell 1962HSR-5USB-WC-N: Specification Comparison
Both the Datalogic QBT2500-BK-BTK and the Honeywell 1962HSR-5USB-WC-N are cordless handheld barcode scanners intended for professional workflows, making them a legitimate cross-shop for buyers evaluating wireless 2D capture solutions. The Datalogic targets retail POS and light warehouse use with multi-interface flexibility, while the Honeywell is purpose-built for healthcare point-of-care environments. This comparison examines their scanning capability, connectivity and interface breadth, and physical/environmental specifications to help buyers match the right scanner to their deployment context.
In This Guide
- What barcode types and scan performance can each scanner handle?
- Which scanner offers broader connectivity and interface flexibility for diverse IT environments?
- How do the two scanners compare on physical durability, power, and deployment-specific design?
- Which should you choose: the QBT2500-BK-BTK or the 1962HSR-5USB-WC-N?
- Side-by-Side Specs
- FAQ
What barcode types and scan performance can each scanner handle?
The Datalogic QBT2500-BK-BTK is specified with a 2D scan engine and explicitly lists supported symbologies including QR Code, Data Matrix, PDF417, Code 39, UPC, and EAN. Despite a marketing description referencing a '1D linear imager,' the product specs list a 2D scan engine, meaning it is capable of reading both 1D and 2D codes in a single pass.
The Honeywell 1962HSR-5USB-WC-N is also specified with a 2D imager and a single-pass scan pattern, making it equally capable of reading both 1D and 2D barcodes. However, no explicit symbology list is provided in the available specifications for the Honeywell unit.
On raw scan capability, both units share a 2D imager foundation. The Datalogic provides a verifiable symbology list; the Honeywell's supported symbologies are not enumerated in the provided specs. Buyers requiring confirmed PDF417 or Data Matrix support should note that only the Datalogic has this documented.
Which scanner offers broader connectivity and interface flexibility for diverse IT environments?
The Datalogic QBT2500-BK-BTK supports Bluetooth, USB, RS-232, and Wi-Fi interfaces, with RS-232 and USB available via its cradle base. This multi-interface design allows deployment across legacy POS terminals (RS-232), modern USB hosts, and wireless Bluetooth or Wi-Fi environments without swapping hardware.
The Honeywell 1962HSR-5USB-WC-N is specified with USB connectivity and an HID/keyboard-wedge interface only. No Bluetooth, RS-232, or Wi-Fi interface is listed in the provided specifications. The unit is described as cordless, implying an internal wireless link to a base or dongle, but the wireless protocol is not specified in the available data.
For deployments requiring interface versatility—particularly legacy serial connectivity or Wi-Fi infrastructure integration—the Datalogic holds a documented advantage. The Honeywell's interface breadth cannot be confirmed beyond USB HID based on the provided specifications.
How do the two scanners compare on physical durability, power, and deployment-specific design?
The Datalogic QBT2500-BK-BTK carries an IP52 ingress protection rating, meaning it is protected against solid particle ingress of 5mm or larger and light water dripping. It weighs 159g and measures 69 × 127 × 124 mm. It is powered by a 3,250 mAh lithium-ion battery with a 5 VDC input, supporting extended cordless shifts.
The Honeywell 1962HSR-5USB-WC-N has no IP rating listed in the provided specifications. No weight, dimensions, or battery capacity data are available for this model in the provided specs. Its design intent is explicitly healthcare point-of-care, implying compatibility with disinfectant-cleaning workflows, but no formal rating or tested resistance level is documented in the available data.
The Datalogic provides quantifiable durability and power figures. The Honeywell's physical and environmental specifications are largely absent from the provided data, making a direct numeric comparison impossible. Buyers requiring confirmed IP ratings or battery run-time data should seek the Honeywell's full datasheet before committing.
Which should you choose: the QBT2500-BK-BTK or the 1962HSR-5USB-WC-N?
Our take: The QBT2500-BK-BTK is the stronger documented choice when interface flexibility, battery endurance, and confirmed environmental ratings are decision factors. It supports four interfaces (Bluetooth, USB, RS-232, Wi-Fi) versus the Honeywell's documented one (USB HID), carries a verified IP52 rating versus no published rating for the Honeywell, and ships with a specified 3,250 mAh lithium-ion battery versus no battery spec available for the 1962HSR-5USB-WC-N. Both units share a 2D imager and single-pass scan capability, but only the Datalogic enumerates its symbology list. The Honeywell 1962HSR-5USB-WC-N is explicitly positioned for healthcare point-of-care workflows—a context that may carry additional requirements (disinfectant tolerance, healthcare EMR integration) not captured in the available specs. Buyers in clinical or hospital environments should obtain Honeywell's full datasheet to verify those attributes before ruling it out.
Side-by-Side Comparison
Spec-for-spec, from manufacturer data.
| Specification | Datalogic QBT2500-BK-BTK | Honeywell 1962HSR-5USB-WC-N |
|---|---|---|
| Product Type | Cordless Handheld Barcode Scanner | Cordless Healthcare Barcode Scanner |
| Scan Engine | 2D Imager | 2D Imager |
| Scan Pattern | — | Single-pass |
| Supported Symbologies | QR Code, Data Matrix, PDF417, Code 39, UPC, EAN | — |
| Connectivity | Bluetooth, USB, RS-232 (via base), Wi-Fi | USB |
| Interface Type | USB, RS-232, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi | HID / Keyboard-wedge |
| IP Rating | IP52 | — |
| Weight | 159 g | — |
| Dimensions | 69 × 127 × 124 mm | — |
| Battery Capacity | 3,250 mAh Lithium-Ion | — |
| Input Voltage | 5 VDC | — |
| Form Factor | Compact Cordless Handheld | Cordless Handheld |
| Primary Use Case | Retail POS / Light Warehouse | Healthcare Point-of-Care |
| Warranty | 3-Year Limited | Manufacturer Warranty (duration not specified) |
| Read Confirmation | Datalogic Green Spot Visual Confirmation | — |
| Wireless Protocol | Bluetooth (version not specified) | Not specified in provided specs |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which should you choose: the QBT2500-BK-BTK or the 1962HSR-5USB-WC-N?
The QBT2500-BK-BTK is the stronger documented choice when interface flexibility, battery endurance, and confirmed environmental ratings are decision factors. It supports four interfaces (Bluetooth, USB, RS-232, Wi-Fi) versus the Honeywell's documented one (USB HID), carries a verified IP52 rating versus no published rating for the Honeywell, and ships with a specified 3,250 mAh lithium-ion battery versus no battery spec available for the 1962HSR-5USB-WC-N. Both units share a 2D imager and single-pass scan capability, but only the Datalogic enumerates its symbology list. The Honeywell 1962HSR-5USB-WC-N is explicitly positioned for healthcare point-of-care workflows—a context that may carry additional requirements (disinfectant tolerance, healthcare EMR integration) not captured in the available specs. Buyers in clinical or hospital environments should obtain Honeywell's full datasheet to verify those attributes before ruling it out.
Is the QBT2500-BK-BTK or the 1962HSR-5USB-WC-N better for a mixed retail and warehouse environment?
Based on the available specifications, the Datalogic QBT2500-BK-BTK is better documented for mixed retail and warehouse use. It supports Bluetooth, USB, RS-232, and Wi-Fi interfaces, reads a confirmed list of 1D and 2D symbologies including UPC, EAN, and QR Code, and carries an IP52 rating for light environmental protection. The Honeywell 1962HSR-5USB-WC-N is specified for healthcare point-of-care use and lists only a USB HID interface in the provided specs, making its suitability for multi-interface retail or warehouse deployment unconfirmed.
Which scanner has a longer battery life for all-day cordless use?
Only the Datalogic QBT2500-BK-BTK provides a battery specification in the available data: a 3,250 mAh lithium-ion cell with a 5 VDC input. No battery capacity or run-time data is listed for the Honeywell 1962HSR-5USB-WC-N in the provided specifications. Buyers prioritizing documented battery endurance should consult Honeywell's full datasheet before making a decision.
Is the Honeywell 1962HSR-5USB-WC-N suitable for hospital disinfection protocols, and how does it compare to the Datalogic on durability?
The Honeywell 1962HSR-5USB-WC-N is described as a healthcare scanner intended for point-of-care workflows, suggesting design consideration for clinical environments, but no IP rating, chemical resistance rating, or disinfection-tolerance specification is present in the provided data. The Datalogic QBT2500-BK-BTK has a documented IP52 rating for dust and drip resistance. Neither unit's spec set confirms compatibility with hospital-grade disinfectants; buyers should verify this directly with Honeywell before deploying in a regulated clinical setting.
More Barcode Scanner Comparisons
- Datalogic QBT2131 vs Honeywell 1962HSR-5USB-WC-N
- Datalogic QBT2131 vs CipherLab A2500SCBSU0T1
- Datalogic QBT2131 vs Socket Mobile CX4523-3764
- Datalogic QBT2131 vs Socket Mobile CX4619-3886
- Datalogic QBT2131 vs Datalogic QBT2500-BK-BTK
- Datalogic QBT2500-BK-BTK vs CipherLab A2500SCBSU0T1
Barcode Scanner Buying Guides
Get a Second Opinion on Your Camera Choice
Share your site layout, coverage goals, and budget. Our team will validate the camera selection, flag anything we would change, and recommend products that match the use case.