Cradlepoint SW2400P-GN vs Cradlepoint SW2400P-GN: Specification Comparison
Both products are 24-port Gigabit PoE managed switches from Cradlepoint, positioned for branch and fixed-site deployments. The LS01-SW2400P-GN and TAA-LS03-SW2400P-GN share the same core port count, PoE standard, and power budget, but differ in SKU lineage, the depth of published specs, and procurement compliance posture. This comparison helps buyers decide which variant suits their specific purchasing channel, management requirements, and integration needs.
In This Guide
- Do the port counts, PoE budget, and switching throughput differ between the two models?
- How do the two switches compare on operating environment and physical build specifications?
- Which model offers stronger management integration and procurement compliance credentials?
- Which should you choose: the SW2400P-GN or the SW2400P-GN?
- Side-by-Side Specs
- FAQ
Do the port counts, PoE budget, and switching throughput differ between the two models?
Both the LS01-SW2400P-GN and TAA-LS03-SW2400P-GN offer 24 Gigabit PoE+ (802.3at) access ports and an identical 370W PoE power budget, meaning neither model has an advantage in terms of powered-device capacity or per-port PoE headroom.
Throughput is where the data diverges. Product A (LS01-SW2400P-GN) lists a switching capacity of 128 Gbps. Product B (TAA-LS03-SW2400P-GN) carries no throughput figure in the provided specifications. Buyers who need to validate non-blocking performance for dense VoIP, IP camera, or access-point deployments can confirm 128 Gbps from the LS01 datasheet; the TAA variant's throughput must be verified against its own datasheet (/content/product-datasheets/TAA-LS03-SW2400P-GN.pdf) before assuming parity.
Product A also specifies 4 SFP+ uplink slots and USB connectivity, neither of which is listed for Product B. If uplink fiber density or out-of-band management via USB matters to the deployment, the LS01 spec sheet is the only source confirming those interfaces.
How do the two switches compare on operating environment and physical build specifications?
Both models share an industrial operating temperature rating. Product A narrows this to a specific range of -5°C to 45°C (23°F to 113°F), making it suitable for unconditioned IDF rooms, wiring closets without dedicated HVAC, and light-industrial edge locations. Product B's industrial rating is stated but no numeric temperature range is provided in the supplied specifications.
Both are rack-mount form factors, consistent with standard 1U or 2U data-closet installation. Neither product lists ingress-protection (IP) rating, humidity range, or dimensions in the provided data, so buyers requiring full environmental compliance documentation should consult the respective datasheets.
Both carry a Manufacturer Warranty; no term length (e.g., 1-year, lifetime) is specified for either model in the supplied data.
Which model offers stronger management integration and procurement compliance credentials?
Product A (LS01-SW2400P-GN) specifies NetCloud as its management platform, enabling centralized policy control, visibility, and configuration across branch sites from a single cloud dashboard. This is directly relevant for enterprises running Cradlepoint SD-WAN or cellular WAN edge infrastructure, where switch management converges with router management under one pane of glass. Product B lists managed as 'Yes' but does not name the management platform in the provided specifications.
On procurement compliance, both models list TAA (Trade Agreements Act) compliance as a feature, making both eligible for U.S. federal and SLED purchasing vehicles. Product B's SKU prefix 'TAA-LS03' explicitly encodes compliance in the part number, which can simplify procurement validation workflows for contracting officers.
For organizations standardized on the NetCloud ecosystem, Product A's explicit NetCloud integration is the stronger documented management credential. For federal buyers where TAA traceability in the SKU itself aids contract administration, Product B's naming convention offers a minor procedural advantage.
Which should you choose: the SW2400P-GN or the SW2400P-GN?
Our take: The LS01-SW2400P-GN (Product A) is the stronger documented choice for commercial branch deployments requiring validated throughput and explicit management platform integration. Product A specifies 128 Gbps switching capacity—a figure absent from Product B's provided specs—confirms 4 SFP+ uplink slots versus none listed for Product B, and explicitly names NetCloud as the management plane. Both models share the same 24-port Gigabit PoE+ layout, 370W budget, industrial-grade build, rack-mount form factor, and TAA compliance. The TAA-LS03-SW2400P-GN (Product B) is the preferable choice when federal or SLED procurement workflows require TAA compliance to be embedded in the part number itself for contract traceability. Buyers on Cradlepoint's NetCloud SD-WAN platform should confirm whether the TAA variant is fully NetCloud-managed before substituting it for the LS01 SKU.
Side-by-Side Comparison
Spec-for-spec, from manufacturer data.
| Specification | Cradlepoint SW2400P-GN | Cradlepoint SW2400P-GN |
|---|---|---|
| SKU / MPN | LS01-SW2400P-GN | TAA-LS03-SW2400P-GN |
| Access Ports | 24 x Gigabit | 24 x Gigabit |
| PoE Standard | PoE+ (802.3at) | PoE+ (802.3at) |
| PoE Budget | 370W | 370W |
| SFP+ Uplink Slots | 4 | — |
| Switching Capacity | 128 Gbps | — |
| Management Platform | NetCloud | Yes (platform not specified) |
| TAA Compliant | Yes | Yes |
| Operating Temp (numeric) | -5°C to 45°C (23°F to 113°F) | — |
| Operating Temp (rating) | Industrial | Industrial |
| Form Factor | Rack-mount | Rack-mount |
| USB Connectivity | Yes | — |
| Deployment Target | Branch, fixed sites | Branch, fixed sites |
| Warranty | Manufacturer Warranty | Manufacturer Warranty |
| Product Type (spec) | 24-Port Gigabit PoE Switch | Switch |
| Datasheet | /content/product-datasheets/LS01-SW2400P-GN.pdf | /content/product-datasheets/TAA-LS03-SW2400P-GN.pdf |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which should you choose: the SW2400P-GN or the SW2400P-GN?
The LS01-SW2400P-GN (Product A) is the stronger documented choice for commercial branch deployments requiring validated throughput and explicit management platform integration. Product A specifies 128 Gbps switching capacity—a figure absent from Product B's provided specs—confirms 4 SFP+ uplink slots versus none listed for Product B, and explicitly names NetCloud as the management plane. Both models share the same 24-port Gigabit PoE+ layout, 370W budget, industrial-grade build, rack-mount form factor, and TAA compliance. The TAA-LS03-SW2400P-GN (Product B) is the preferable choice when federal or SLED procurement workflows require TAA compliance to be embedded in the part number itself for contract traceability. Buyers on Cradlepoint's NetCloud SD-WAN platform should confirm whether the TAA variant is fully NetCloud-managed before substituting it for the LS01 SKU.
Can I use either switch with Cradlepoint routers on a NetCloud subscription?
Product A (LS01-SW2400P-GN) explicitly lists NetCloud as its management platform, confirming integration with the Cradlepoint NetCloud ecosystem. Product B (TAA-LS03-SW2400P-GN) is listed as managed but the specific management platform is not named in the provided specifications. Buyers should verify NetCloud compatibility for the TAA variant directly with Cradlepoint before deploying it in a NetCloud-managed branch.
Are both switches eligible for U.S. federal government purchase?
Yes. Both models list TAA (Trade Agreements Act) compliance as a stated feature, making both eligible for federal, SLED, and other government procurement vehicles that require TAA-compliant products. Product B's SKU prefix (TAA-LS03) encodes compliance directly in the part number, which some contracting workflows find administratively convenient.
Is the 370W PoE budget enough to power 24 devices simultaneously on either switch?
Both switches provide a 370W total PoE budget using the PoE+ (802.3at) standard, which supports up to 30W per port. At full 24-port utilization, 370W averages approximately 15.4W per port—sufficient for standard IP cameras, VoIP phones, and Wi-Fi 6 access points, but not enough to simultaneously drive all 24 ports at the PoE+ maximum. Neither model lists per-port power allocation controls in the provided specs; consult the respective datasheets for power management features.
More Network Switch Comparisons
- Vivotek GEV-288A-370 vs Axis T8524
- Vivotek GEV-288A-370 vs Cradlepoint SW2400P-GN
- Vivotek GEV-288A-370 vs Allied Telesis AT-x530L-28GPX-901
- Vivotek GEV-288A-370 vs Ubiquiti USW-ENTERPRISE-24-POE
- Axis T8524 vs Cradlepoint SW2400P-GN
- Axis T8524 vs Allied Telesis AT-x530L-28GPX-901
Network Switch Buying Guides
Get a Second Opinion on Your Camera Choice
Share your site layout, coverage goals, and budget. Our team will validate the camera selection, flag anything we would change, and recommend products that match the use case.