Vivotek ND9442P vs Hanwha PRN-1600B2: Specification Comparison
Both the Vivotek ND9442P and Hanwha PRN-1600B2 are standalone 16-channel network video recorders running embedded Linux, designed for mid-scale IP camera deployments. This comparison covers the three dimensions most critical to NVR selection: recording capacity and throughput, storage architecture and redundancy, and integration ecosystem with management software. Neither unit ships with HDDs. Buyers choosing between these will typically be evaluating resolution ceiling, storage scalability, and platform lock-in against site-specific cabling and failover requirements.
In This Guide
- Which NVR delivers higher recording bandwidth and resolution ceiling for 16 cameras?
- How do the two NVRs differ in HDD capacity, RAID support, and redundancy options?
- Which NVR offers broader VMS integration, AI analytics, and remote management options?
- Which should you choose: the ND9442P or the PRN-1600B2?
- Side-by-Side Specs
- FAQ
Which NVR delivers higher recording bandwidth and resolution ceiling for 16 cameras?
The Hanwha PRN-1600B2 specifies a recording bandwidth of 250 Mbps and supports camera input resolutions up to 32MP. Its decoding spec lists 32M@15fps, 12M@30fps, 8.3M@120fps, and 1080p@480fps. The Vivotek ND9442P specifies a recording throughput of 192 Mbps and a maximum decoding resolution of 7680x2560, with stated decoding capability of 3840x2160 (4K) at 90fps and 1920x1080 at 360fps.
The PRN-1600B2 holds a 58 Mbps throughput advantage (250 vs. 192 Mbps) and a higher resolution ceiling (32MP vs. 4K/8MP input). For sites deploying 12MP or higher cameras, the PRN-1600B2 is the only option of the two that supports those streams at the recorder level. The ND9442P's 192 Mbps is sufficient for 16 channels of 4K H.265 in a typical deployment. Both units support H.265, H.264, and MJPEG compression. The ND9442P adds dual-stream recording; the PRN-1600B2 lists Normal, Dual Stream, Schedule, Event, and Bookmark recording modes.
Network throughput is specified as 224 Mbps (input/output total) for the ND9442P. The PRN-1600B2 lists a transmission bandwidth of 250 Mbps and three Gigabit Ethernet ports (RJ-45 x3) versus the ND9442P's two Gigabit ports. The additional NIC on the PRN-1600B2 provides network redundancy or segmentation options not available on the ND9442P.
How do the two NVRs differ in HDD capacity, RAID support, and redundancy options?
The Vivotek ND9442P provides four internal 3.5" HDD bays and supports RAID 0, 1, and 5. Maximum capacity is not stated numerically in the provided specs; buyers are directed to the Vivotek recommended HDD list. External storage is via USB 3.0; scheduled backup is via FTP. No iSCSI or network-attached storage integration is listed.
The Hanwha PRN-1600B2 provides eight SATA HDD bays supporting drives up to 10TB each, for a stated maximum of 80TB in non-RAID mode. RAID support covers RAID 5 and RAID 6 (single array). External storage extends to iSCSI, which the ND9442P does not support. Playback bandwidth in RAID mode is specified at 64 Mbps; non-RAID mode at 32 Mbps.
The PRN-1600B2 also includes N+1 failover redundancy and Automatic Recovery Backup (ARB), neither of which appears in the ND9442P spec set. These are critical differentiators for mission-critical or 24/7 control-room deployments where recorder downtime must be minimized. The PRN-1600B2 front panel includes a dedicated RAID indicator LED and HDD key lock, features absent from the ND9442P spec listing. The ND9442P includes USB storage export and supports HDD S.M.A.R.T. monitoring; similar disk management features are not enumerated in the PRN-1600B2 spec set provided.
Which NVR offers broader VMS integration, AI analytics, and remote management options?
The Vivotek ND9442P integrates with Vivotek's own VAST Security Station (VSS) and Shepherd software, the iViewer, VIVOCloud, and VORTEX mobile apps (Android and iOS), and supports ONVIF Profile S for third-party cameras. It includes built-in Smart VCA event search, object search (people and vehicle), scene search (line crossing, intrusion, loitering), and attribute search (gender, age, clothing color, vehicle type and color). Trend Micro IoT Security integration is listed. Web browser support is limited to Chrome per the provided spec.
The Hanwha PRN-1600B2 supports Hanwha's WAVE VMS, SSM, Smart Viewer, and Wisenet Mobile, and explicitly lists CGI/SUNAPI for third-party VMS integration alongside ONVIF Profile S. PTZ preset capacity is listed at 300 presets. AI search covers human, face, vehicle, and license plate attributes, with LPR support for English and numeric plates using Wisenet AI-capable cameras. Web viewer supports Windows 10, macOS 10.13, Google Chrome, Microsoft Edge, and Mac Safari — a broader browser/OS matrix than the ND9442P.
The PRN-1600B2 supports up to 20 simultaneous multicast live viewers and 10 unicast, with max remote users specified at 10 live unicast and 3 search concurrently. The ND9442P does not enumerate concurrent remote user limits in the provided specs. The PRN-1600B2 logs up to 100,000 entries per log type (system and event); the ND9442P logs system, recording, user, and error categories without a stated maximum. The ND9442P includes Trend Micro cybersecurity management; the PRN-1600B2 lists 802.1x, IP filtering, device certificates (Hanwha Techwin Root CA), and signed firmware as its security feature set.
Which should you choose: the ND9442P or the PRN-1600B2?
Our take: The PRN-1600B2 is the stronger choice when the deployment requires higher resolution cameras (above 4K/8MP), greater raw storage capacity, or recorder-level redundancy. Key spec deltas: the PRN-1600B2 records at up to 250 Mbps versus the ND9442P's 192 Mbps; it provides eight HDD bays (max 80TB) versus four bays on the ND9442P; and it adds N+1 failover and ARB redundancy that are not listed for the ND9442P. The ND9442P is the stronger choice where the camera count stays at 16 channels of 4K or below, budget or rack space limits HDD bay count, Vivotek's VSS/VCA analytics ecosystem is already deployed, or built-in Trend Micro IoT security integration is a site requirement. The PRN-1600B2 is best suited to control-room and enterprise sites; the ND9442P fits mid-size installations on a Vivotek camera infrastructure.
Side-by-Side Comparison
Spec-for-spec, from manufacturer data.
| Specification | Vivotek ND9442P | Hanwha PRN-1600B2 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Camera Inputs | 16 CH | 16 CH |
| Max Camera Resolution | 4K / 8MP | 32MP |
| Recording Bandwidth | 192 Mbps | 250 Mbps |
| Video Compression | H.265, H.264, MJPEG | H.265, H.264, MJPEG |
| HDD Bays | 4 x 3.5" internal | 8 x SATA |
| Max Raw Storage | Not stated in spec | 80TB (non-RAID) |
| RAID Support | RAID 0, 1, 5 | RAID 5, 6 |
| N+1 Failover / ARB | Not listed | N+1 Failover + ARB |
| External Storage | USB 3.0 | iSCSI |
| Video Outputs | HDMI x1, VGA x1 | HDMI x2 (4K@30Hz + 1080p@60Hz) |
| Ethernet Ports | 2 x Gigabit RJ-45 | 3 x Gigabit RJ-45 |
| Alarm Inputs / Outputs | 16 In / 8 Out | 8 In / 4 Out |
| ONVIF | Profile S | Profile S + SUNAPI |
| AI / Analytics | VCA: people, vehicle, scene, attribute search; Trend Micro IoT | AI: human, face, vehicle, LPR |
| Operating Temperature | -10°C to 55°C | 0°C to 40°C |
| Max Power Draw | 300W | 205W (with 8x 10TB HDDs) |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which should you choose: the ND9442P or the PRN-1600B2?
The PRN-1600B2 is the stronger choice when the deployment requires higher resolution cameras (above 4K/8MP), greater raw storage capacity, or recorder-level redundancy. Key spec deltas: the PRN-1600B2 records at up to 250 Mbps versus the ND9442P's 192 Mbps; it provides eight HDD bays (max 80TB) versus four bays on the ND9442P; and it adds N+1 failover and ARB redundancy that are not listed for the ND9442P. The ND9442P is the stronger choice where the camera count stays at 16 channels of 4K or below, budget or rack space limits HDD bay count, Vivotek's VSS/VCA analytics ecosystem is already deployed, or built-in Trend Micro IoT security integration is a site requirement. The PRN-1600B2 is best suited to control-room and enterprise sites; the ND9442P fits mid-size installations on a Vivotek camera infrastructure.
Is the ND9442P or PRN-1600B2 better for larger or future-proofed deployments?
The PRN-1600B2 scales further on both storage and resolution. It supports up to 80TB across eight HDD bays versus four bays on the ND9442P (maximum capacity not stated in the provided ND9442P spec), and its camera input ceiling is 32MP versus the ND9442P's 4K/8MP maximum. If the deployment anticipates higher-resolution cameras or significant storage growth, the PRN-1600B2 has the larger headroom based on the specs provided.
Do both NVRs support third-party cameras, or are they locked to their own brands?
Both support ONVIF Profile S, which provides a baseline of third-party camera interoperability. The PRN-1600B2 additionally lists SUNAPI for deeper Hanwha/Wisenet camera integration and explicit CGI/SUNAPI support for third-party VMS platforms. The ND9442P lists ONVIF Profile S and integrates with Vivotek's VSS and Shepherd platforms. Neither is exclusively locked to its own brand, but advanced analytics features on each unit are tied to compatible cameras from the respective manufacturer's ecosystem.
Which NVR is better suited for a site that cannot tolerate recorder downtime?
The PRN-1600B2 lists N+1 failover redundancy and Automatic Recovery Backup (ARB) in its specifications. Neither of these redundancy features appears in the ND9442P's provided spec set. For sites where continuous recording availability is a hard requirement — such as casinos, transportation hubs, or critical infrastructure — the PRN-1600B2's stated redundancy capabilities are a meaningful differentiator based on the available specs.
Get a Second Opinion on Your Camera Choice
Share your site layout, coverage goals, and budget. Our team will validate the camera selection, flag anything we would change, and recommend products that match the use case.