Socket Mobile CX4067-3130 vs CipherLab A2564SMBKU0S1

BARCODE SCANNER COMPARISON

Socket Mobile CX4067-3130 vs CipherLab A2564SMBKU0S1: Specification Comparison

Both the Socket Mobile CX4067-3130 SocketScan S720 and the CipherLab A2564SMBKU0S1 are cordless 1D handheld barcode scanners connecting via Bluetooth, positioned for retail, logistics, and mobile workflow deployments. The CX4067-3130 ships with a charging dock and lists a 2000 mAh battery, while the A2564SMBKU0S1 is an IP65-rated USB kit with a linear imager rated at 578 scans per second. Buyers choosing between the two will weigh symbology breadth, environmental durability, and throughput performance against platform integration needs.



Which scanner covers more barcode symbologies for your inventory or POS workflow?

The CX4067-3130 lists five symbologies across both 1D and 2D: Code 128, Code 39, QR Code, Data Matrix, and PDF417. Notably, it supports three 2D symbologies (QR Code, Data Matrix, PDF417), making it viable for applications that mix 1D shelf labels with 2D codes on mobile devices or documents.

The A2564SMBKU0S1 is a dedicated 1D linear imager with a substantially wider 1D symbology set: Codabar, Code 11, Code 39, Code 93, Code 128, GS1 DataBar (RSS), Industrial 2 of 5, Interleave 2 of 5, ISBT-128, Italian and French Pharmacodes, Matrix 2 of 5, MSI, Plessey, Telepen, and UPC/EAN/GS1-128 — fifteen 1D symbologies in total. No 2D symbologies are listed for the A2564SMBKU0S1. Buyers in healthcare (ISBT-128), pharmacy (Italian/French Pharmacodes), or GS1 DataBar retail environments gain meaningful coverage with the CipherLab unit that the Socket Mobile does not explicitly provide.


Which scanner is better suited to harsh or demanding physical environments?

The A2564SMBKU0S1 carries an IP65 rating, meaning it is fully dust-sealed and protected against low-pressure water jets from any direction. No drop-rating spec is provided, but IP65 indicates meaningful ingress protection suitable for warehouse floors, light outdoor use, or environments with moisture, cleaning agents, or debris.

The CX4067-3130 does not list any IP or drop-resistance rating in the provided specifications. Its operating temperature range is documented at 0° to 45°C (32° to 113°F); no equivalent operating temperature is listed for the A2564SMBKU0S1. For deployments in controlled retail or office environments, the absence of an IP rating on the Socket Mobile unit may be acceptable. In manufacturing, food service, or distribution center environments where liquid or particulate exposure is likely, the CipherLab's IP65 rating is a concrete, spec-confirmed differentiator.


Which scanner delivers higher throughput and more flexible connection options?

The A2564SMBKU0S1 specifies a scan rate of 578 scans per second with auto-sense and continuous scan modes, and a scan range of 3–60 cm for Code 39 (0.5–38 cm for UPC-A) with a minimum print contrast of 15%. These figures give integrators concrete performance parameters for high-volume scanning stations. Connectivity is Bluetooth plus a USB dock, providing a wired fallback path when the dock is in use.

The CX4067-3130 does not list a scan rate, scan range, or minimum print contrast ratio in the provided specifications. Its connectivity is listed as Bluetooth only, with a 2000 mAh charging dock included in the box. No USB wired fallback is specified. Battery capacity is explicitly stated at 2000 mAh — no battery spec is provided for the A2564SMBKU0S1. The Socket Mobile unit's warranty is 1 year; the CipherLab's is 2 years.


Which should you choose: the CX4067-3130 or the A2564SMBKU0S1?

Our take: The A2564SMBKU0S1 is the stronger choice when the deployment demands verified environmental durability, high-volume throughput, and a broad 1D symbology set. The CipherLab unit holds three concrete spec advantages: an IP65 ingress-protection rating versus no IP rating on the CX4067-3130; a documented scan rate of 578 scans per second versus no scan rate listed for the Socket Mobile; and fifteen 1D symbologies including ISBT-128, GS1 DataBar, and pharmacodes versus five on the CX4067-3130. It also carries a 2-year warranty against the Socket Mobile's 1-year term, and adds a USB dock connection as a wired fallback. The CX4067-3130 holds one clear advantage: it supports 2D symbologies (QR Code, Data Matrix, PDF417), which the A2564SMBKU0S1 does not list. Choose the Socket Mobile unit only where 2D code reading is required and environmental ruggedness is not a factor.


Side-by-Side Comparison

Spec-for-spec, from manufacturer data.

SpecificationSocket Mobile CX4067-3130CipherLab A2564SMBKU0S1
Product Type1D/2D Handheld Scanner1D Handheld Barcode Scanner
Scan Engine1D (with 2D symbologies listed)1D Linear Imager
Form FactorHandheldHandheld
ConnectivityBluetoothBluetooth; USB dock
IP RatingIP65
Scan Rate578 scans/second
Scan RangeCode 39: 3–60 cm; UPC-A: 0.5–38 cm
Min Print Contrast15%
Scan ModesAuto-sense and continuous
2D SymbologiesQR Code; Data Matrix; PDF417
1D Symbologies (count)2 (Code 128; Code 39)15 (Codabar; Code 11; Code 39; Code 93; Code 128; GS1 DataBar; I 2of5; ITF; ISBT-128; Pharmacodes; Matrix 2of5; MSI; Plessey; Telepen; UPC/EAN)
Battery Capacity2000 mAh
Charging / Connection DockCharging Dock (included)USB Dock (included)
Operating Temperature0° to 45°C (32° to 113°F)
Color OptionsGreenBlack; Register White
Warranty1 year2 years

Frequently Asked Questions

Which should you choose: the CX4067-3130 or the A2564SMBKU0S1?

The A2564SMBKU0S1 is the stronger choice when the deployment demands verified environmental durability, high-volume throughput, and a broad 1D symbology set. The CipherLab unit holds three concrete spec advantages: an IP65 ingress-protection rating versus no IP rating on the CX4067-3130; a documented scan rate of 578 scans per second versus no scan rate listed for the Socket Mobile; and fifteen 1D symbologies including ISBT-128, GS1 DataBar, and pharmacodes versus five on the CX4067-3130. It also carries a 2-year warranty against the Socket Mobile's 1-year term, and adds a USB dock connection as a wired fallback. The CX4067-3130 holds one clear advantage: it supports 2D symbologies (QR Code, Data Matrix, PDF417), which the A2564SMBKU0S1 does not list. Choose the Socket Mobile unit only where 2D code reading is required and environmental ruggedness is not a factor.

Is the CX4067-3130 or A2564SMBKU0S1 better for a warehouse or food-service environment?

The A2564SMBKU0S1 is the spec-supported choice for those environments. It carries an IP65 rating — full dust-seal and water-jet resistance — which the CX4067-3130 does not list. The CX4067-3130 has no documented IP or drop rating, making it unsuitable for wet or particulate-heavy conditions based on available specifications.

Can either scanner read QR codes or 2D barcodes?

Only the CX4067-3130 lists 2D symbology support: QR Code, Data Matrix, and PDF417 are explicitly specified. The A2564SMBKU0S1 is a 1D linear imager; no 2D symbologies are listed in its specifications. If your workflow includes scanning 2D codes on mobile device screens, shipping labels, or documents, the Socket Mobile unit is the only one of the two with documented 2D capability.

Which scanner has a longer warranty, and does either include a charging solution in the box?

The A2564SMBKU0S1 carries a 2-year warranty; the CX4067-3130 carries a 1-year warranty. Regarding in-box charging, the CX4067-3130 explicitly lists a Charging Dock as a package-contents item alongside the scanner. The A2564SMBKU0S1 is described as a USB Kit with a USB dock, but specific package contents beyond the scanner and dock are not enumerated in the provided specifications.



Get a Second Opinion on Your Camera Choice

Share your site layout, coverage goals, and budget. Our team will validate the camera selection, flag anything we would change, and recommend products that match the use case.