Pelco SRXP4-5V29-EBT-IR vs Pelco SRXV2-2V13-EBT-IR: Specification Comparison
Both the Pelco SRXP4-5V29-EBT-IR (Sarix Pro 4) and the SRXV2-2V13-EBT-IR (Sarix Value 2) are 2MP outdoor bullet cameras with IR illumination, PoE power, IK09 vandal resistance, and IP66 ingress protection. They target the same resolution class and physical form factor, making them a direct cross-shop for integrators deciding between Pelco's professional-tier and value-tier bullet lines. The comparison centers on imaging capability, analytics depth, frame rate, lens flexibility, and platform integration breadth.
In This Guide
How do the imaging specs compare?
Both cameras share a 1/2.8-inch progressive-scan CMOS sensor at 1920×1080 resolution. The SRXP4-5V29-EBT-IR differentiates itself with a 4.4–9.3 mm motorized varifocal lens (32–109° HFOV), a maximum frame rate of 60 fps, a wider dynamic range of 130 dB SureVision, and a lower minimum color illumination of 0.01 Lux. The SRXV2-2V13-EBT-IR uses a fixed 13 mm lens (focal-length range noted in specs as 2.7–13.5 mm varifocal with remote zoom and focus control), caps at 30 fps, offers 120 dB WDR, and has a minimum color illumination of 0.02 Lux. Both cameras reach 0 Lux in IR mode using 850 nm illuminators.
The 10 dB WDR advantage and 2× frame-rate advantage of the Pro 4 are measurable differences that matter in high-contrast scenes and in applications requiring smooth motion capture (license plates, fast-moving subjects). The Value 2's 13 mm focal length concentrates pixels on a narrower field, which can support longer-range identification at the cost of scene width. The Pro 4's motorized varifocal lens allows field adjustment after installation without physical access to the lens barrel, a practical advantage in difficult mounting positions.
What about installation and environment?
Both cameras carry IP66 ingress protection and IK09 impact resistance, and both are powered via PoE Class 3. The SRXV2-2V13-EBT-IR specifies an operating temperature range of -40°C to +60°C, making it suitable for extreme cold environments. The SRXP4-5V29-EBT-IR does not include an operating temperature figure in the provided specifications, so cold-climate suitability cannot be confirmed from available data. The Value 2 lists wall, ceiling, pole, pendant, and corner mount types; the Pro 4 lists wall, ceiling, and pendant. Both cameras are rated for outdoor deployment.
Installers should note that the Pro 4's motorized lens eliminates the need to physically reposition the camera to adjust zoom and focus, reducing truck rolls for fine-tuning. The Value 2's remote zoom and autofocus capability (noted in lens control specs) similarly supports remote adjustment. Weight differs: the Pro 4 is listed at 0.81 kg (camera body) versus the Value 2 at 636 g, though both figures appear to reflect individual configuration variants per the multi-value weight fields in the source specs.
Which fits your VMS and analytics better?
The SRXP4-5V29-EBT-IR supports ONVIF Profile S, Profile T, Profile G, and Profile M. The SRXV2-2V13-EBT-IR supports ONVIF Profile S and Profile T only. Profile G adds on-camera recording and playback interoperability; Profile M adds metadata and analytics event interoperability. For VMS platforms that leverage Profile G for edge recording or Profile M for analytics metadata, the Pro 4 provides broader native compatibility. Both cameras support HTTPS encryption and on-board microSD storage.
Edge analytics is a clear differentiator: the Pro 4 explicitly lists Smart Analytics including Person/Vehicle Detection, Directional Violation, Loitering, Beam Crossing, Crowd Detection, and Tamper Alert. The Value 2's spec sheet does not list comparable on-camera analytics; its analytics field references only 'Specifications,' which is not an enumerated capability. The Pro 4 also notes microphone support for audio; the Value 2 does not list audio capability in the provided specifications. Both cameras support H.264, H.265, and Smart/Smart Codec compression with dynamic GOP management, and both support microSD local storage.
Which should you choose: the SRXP4-5V29-EBT-IR or the SRXV2-2V13-EBT-IR?
Our take: The SRXP4-5V29-EBT-IR is the stronger choice when the deployment requires on-camera analytics, higher frame rates, or broader VMS protocol coverage. Concretely: it delivers 60 fps versus the Value 2's 30 fps, 130 dB WDR versus 120 dB, and ONVIF Profile G and M support that the Value 2 lacks. Its built-in Smart Analytics (Person/Vehicle Detection, Loitering, Directional Violation, Beam Crossing) offload processing from the VMS server, which is material in multi-camera deployments. The SRXV2-2V13-EBT-IR is the appropriate selection when the application demands long fixed-focal coverage in extreme cold—its -40°C floor is specified; the Pro 4's cold-limit is not stated in available data—and when analytics and frame rate are secondary to installation cost. NDAA Section 889 compliance is confirmed only for the Value 2, which is a hard requirement on certain U.S. federal and government projects regardless of other specs.
Side-by-Side Comparison
Spec-for-spec, from manufacturer data.
| Specification | Pelco SRXP4-5V29-EBT-IR | Pelco SRXV2-2V13-EBT-IR |
|---|---|---|
| Series | Sarix Professional 4 | Sarix Value 2 |
| Resolution | 2MP (1920×1080) | 2MP (1920×1080) |
| Image Sensor | 1/2.8" Progressive Scan CMOS | 1/2.8" Progressive Scan CMOS |
| Lens / Focal Length | 4.4–9.3 mm motorized varifocal (32–109° HFOV) | 13 mm fixed (2.7–13.5 mm range w/ remote zoom) |
| Aperture | F1.4 | F1.4 |
| Max Frame Rate | 60 fps | 30 fps |
| WDR | 130 dB SureVision | 120 dB |
| Min Illumination (Color / IR) | 0.01 Lux / 0 Lux | 0.02 Lux / 0 Lux |
| IR Illumination | 850 nm | 850 nm |
| Video Compression | H.265; H.264; Smart Compression | H.265; H.264; Motion JPEG |
| ONVIF Profiles | Profile S; T; G; M | Profile S; T |
| Edge Analytics | Person/Vehicle Detection, Loitering, Directional Violation, Beam Crossing, Crowd Detection, Tamper Alert | — |
| IP Rating | IP66 | IP66 |
| IK / Impact Rating | IK09 | IK09 |
| Operating Temperature | Not specified in available data | -40°C to +60°C |
| Power / PoE Class | PoE Class 3 (802.3af) | PoE Class 3 (802.3af) |
| On-Board Storage | microSD | microSD |
| Audio | Microphone supported | Not specified in available data |
| NDAA Section 889 | Not specified in available data | Compliant |
| Warranty | 5-year | 5-year |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which should you choose: the SRXP4-5V29-EBT-IR or the SRXV2-2V13-EBT-IR?
The SRXP4-5V29-EBT-IR is the stronger choice when the deployment requires on-camera analytics, higher frame rates, or broader VMS protocol coverage. Concretely: it delivers 60 fps versus the Value 2's 30 fps, 130 dB WDR versus 120 dB, and ONVIF Profile G and M support that the Value 2 lacks. Its built-in Smart Analytics (Person/Vehicle Detection, Loitering, Directional Violation, Beam Crossing) offload processing from the VMS server, which is material in multi-camera deployments. The SRXV2-2V13-EBT-IR is the appropriate selection when the application demands long fixed-focal coverage in extreme cold—its -40°C floor is specified; the Pro 4's cold-limit is not stated in available data—and when analytics and frame rate are secondary to installation cost. NDAA Section 889 compliance is confirmed only for the Value 2, which is a hard requirement on certain U.S. federal and government projects regardless of other specs.
Is the SRXP4-5V29-EBT-IR or SRXV2-2V13-EBT-IR better for low-light performance?
Both cameras reach 0 Lux in IR mode using 850 nm illuminators. In color/day mode, the SRXP4-5V29-EBT-IR has a specified minimum illumination of 0.01 Lux versus 0.02 Lux for the SRXV2-2V13-EBT-IR—a one-stop difference. The Pro 4 also offers 130 dB WDR compared to 120 dB on the Value 2, which reduces blown highlights and crushed shadows in mixed-lighting scenes. On published specs, the Pro 4 has the measurable low-light edge in color mode.
Can either camera be used on a U.S. federal government project requiring NDAA compliance?
Only the SRXV2-2V13-EBT-IR explicitly lists NDAA Section 889 compliance in its provided specifications. The SRXP4-5V29-EBT-IR does not include an NDAA compliance statement in the available spec data. For any project where Section 889 compliance is a contractual or regulatory requirement, the Value 2 is the only one of these two cameras with a confirmed declaration; buyers should verify the Pro 4's status directly with Pelco before specifying it on qualifying projects.
Does either camera support on-camera analytics without a separate analytics server?
Yes—the SRXP4-5V29-EBT-IR (Sarix Pro 4) includes on-board Smart Analytics covering Person Detection, Vehicle Detection, Directional Violation, Loitering, Beam Crossing, Crowd Detection, and Tamper Alert, all running at the edge without an external server. The SRXV2-2V13-EBT-IR (Sarix Value 2) does not list equivalent on-camera analytics in its provided specifications. If edge analytics is a project requirement, the Pro 4 is the only one of these two cameras with confirmed built-in capability.
Get a Second Opinion on Your Camera Choice
Share your site layout, coverage goals, and budget. Our team will validate the camera selection, flag anything we would change, and recommend products that match the use case.