Pelco SRXE4-4V9-EBT-IR1 vs Pelco SRXE4-6V9-EBT-IR1: Specification Comparison
Both the Pelco SRXE4-4V9-EBT-IR1 and SRXE4-6V9-EBT-IR1 belong to the Sarix Enhanced 4 Series and are 4MP outdoor bullet cameras sharing an identical sensor, lens assembly, frame rate, WDR rating, and cybersecurity posture. The primary documented difference between the two SKUs is the IR range specified in product B (~70 m at 850 nm) versus no stated IR distance in product A. This comparison examines each spec category so installers and IT buyers can determine which model fits a given deployment.
In This Guide
How do the imaging specs compare?
Both cameras share a 1/1.8-inch progressive-scan CMOS sensor, 2560 × 1440 (4MP) maximum resolution, and a maximum frame rate of 60 fps. The motorized varifocal lens is identical on both: 4.4–9.3 mm focal range producing a 32–109° HFOV at F1.4 aperture. Minimum illumination is also identical: 0.003 lux in color mode and 0 lux with IR active. WDR is 130 dB SureVision on each unit. Video compression options are the same: H.265, H.264, and Motion JPEG.
The one imaging-related distinction present in the supplied specifications is the IR illumination range: Product B (SRXE4-6V9-EBT-IR1) lists an IR range of approximately 70 m at 850 nm, while Product A (SRXE4-4V9-EBT-IR1) does not state an IR distance figure in its provided spec data. Both cameras confirm 850 nm IR illumination and 0-lux capability; the absence of a published range value for Product A means a direct numerical IR-distance comparison cannot be completed from these specs alone. All other imaging parameters documented in the provided specifications are identical between the two models.
What about installation and environment?
Ingress protection and impact ratings are identical across both SKUs: IP66, IP67, IP68 (2 m for 2 hours), IPX9K, and NEMA 4X for water and dust ingress, and IK11 for impact resistance. Operating temperature range is likewise the same for both: -50 °C to +65 °C when powered via PoE+ or external supply. Both units are rated for outdoor deployment with a white housing and bullet form factor.
Power input is specified as PoE+ (802.3at) or 12/24 Vdc on both cameras. Product B's spec data includes a power consumption note of approximately 13 W; Product A does not state a wattage figure in the provided specifications. Both list PoE Class 3 in their attributes, which is technically a PoE (802.3af) class designator — installers should verify actual power draw against the PoE+ reference before switch port planning. Mounting options noted for Product A include wall, pole, and corner; Product B does not explicitly list mounting styles in the provided data.
Which fits your VMS and analytics better?
ONVIF compliance is identical on both: Profile S, Profile T, Profile G, and Profile M — covering live streaming, advanced media, recording, and metadata/analytics interoperability. Edge analytics are the same on both units: Smart Analytics covering Person/Vehicle Detection, Direction Violation, Loitering, Beam Crossing, Crowd Detection, Audio Analytics, and Tamper Alert. Cybersecurity features are also matched: FIPS 140-3 Level 3, TPM, Secure Boot, HTTPS, and 802.1X on both models. Both carry NDAA Section 889 and TAA compliance.
On-board storage via microSD is supported by both cameras. Audio input (microphone supported) is documented for Product A; Product A's spec data also references audio analytics as part of the Smart Analytics suite, which is shared with Product B. Neither product lists a specific microSD card capacity limit in the provided specifications. Both SKUs share the same ONVIF profile set and analytics engine, meaning VMS integration paths and analytics licensing requirements should be equivalent when evaluated against the documented specs.
Which should you choose: the SRXE4-4V9-EBT-IR1 or the SRXE4-6V9-EBT-IR1?
Our take: The SRXE4-6V9-EBT-IR1 is the stronger documented choice when verified IR throw distance is a deployment requirement, as it explicitly states an ~70 m IR range at 850 nm — a figure absent from the SRXE4-4V9-EBT-IR1's provided specifications. Beyond that single differentiator, every other spec in the supplied data is identical: both deliver 4MP at 60 fps from a 1/1.8-inch CMOS sensor, both achieve 0-lux minimum illumination with 130 dB SureVision WDR, and both carry the same IP66/67/68, IK11, -50 °C to +65 °C environmental ratings. ONVIF (S/T/G/M), FIPS 140-3 Level 3 cybersecurity, NDAA/TAA compliance, and the Smart Analytics suite are shared. For perimeter runs longer than moderate distances where IR throw matters, Product B's documented 70 m range gives procurement a concrete number to validate against lighting plans. If IR range is irrelevant to the site design, no other spec in the provided data favors one unit over the other.
Side-by-Side Comparison
Spec-for-spec, from manufacturer data.
| Specification | Pelco SRXE4-4V9-EBT-IR1 | Pelco SRXE4-6V9-EBT-IR1 |
|---|---|---|
| Series | Sarix Enhanced 4 | Sarix Enhanced 4 |
| Resolution | 4MP (2560 × 1440) | 4MP (2560 × 1440) |
| Image Sensor | 1/1.8" Progressive Scan CMOS | 1/1.8" Progressive Scan CMOS |
| Max Frame Rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Lens / Focal Length | 4.4–9.3 mm Motorized Varifocal | 4.4–9.3 mm Motorized Varifocal |
| HFOV | 32–109° | 32–109° |
| Aperture | F1.4 | F1.4 |
| Min Illumination | 0.003 lux color / 0 lux IR | 0.003 lux color / 0 lux IR |
| IR Illumination | 850 nm (range not stated in provided specs) | 850 nm / ~70 m |
| WDR | 130 dB SureVision | 130 dB SureVision |
| Video Compression | H.265; H.264; Motion JPEG | H.265; H.264; Motion JPEG |
| IP Rating | IP66 / IP67 / IP68 (2m/2hr) / IPX9K / NEMA 4X | IP66 / IP67 / IP68 (2m/2hr) / IPX9K / NEMA 4X |
| Impact Rating | IK11 | IK11 |
| Operating Temperature | -50°C to +65°C | -50°C to +65°C |
| Power Input | PoE+ (802.3at) or 12/24 Vdc | PoE+ (802.3at) or 12/24 Vdc (~13 W) |
| Edge Storage | microSD | microSD |
| ONVIF Profiles | S, T, G, M | S, T, G, M |
| Cybersecurity | FIPS 140-3 L3; TPM; Secure Boot; HTTPS; 802.1X | FIPS 140-3 L3; TPM; Secure Boot; HTTPS; 802.1X |
| Compliance | NDAA Sec. 889; TAA | NDAA Sec. 889; TAA |
| Warranty | 5 years | 5 years |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which should you choose: the SRXE4-4V9-EBT-IR1 or the SRXE4-6V9-EBT-IR1?
The SRXE4-6V9-EBT-IR1 is the stronger documented choice when verified IR throw distance is a deployment requirement, as it explicitly states an ~70 m IR range at 850 nm — a figure absent from the SRXE4-4V9-EBT-IR1's provided specifications. Beyond that single differentiator, every other spec in the supplied data is identical: both deliver 4MP at 60 fps from a 1/1.8-inch CMOS sensor, both achieve 0-lux minimum illumination with 130 dB SureVision WDR, and both carry the same IP66/67/68, IK11, -50 °C to +65 °C environmental ratings. ONVIF (S/T/G/M), FIPS 140-3 Level 3 cybersecurity, NDAA/TAA compliance, and the Smart Analytics suite are shared. For perimeter runs longer than moderate distances where IR throw matters, Product B's documented 70 m range gives procurement a concrete number to validate against lighting plans. If IR range is irrelevant to the site design, no other spec in the provided data favors one unit over the other.
Is the SRXE4-4V9-EBT-IR1 or SRXE4-6V9-EBT-IR1 better for low-light performance?
Both cameras specify 0 lux minimum illumination with IR active and use 850 nm IR illuminators, so their low-light thresholds are identical per the provided specs. The SRXE4-6V9-EBT-IR1 additionally documents an IR range of approximately 70 m; the SRXE4-4V9-EBT-IR1 does not state an IR distance in its supplied specification data, so a range comparison cannot be made from specs alone.
Do both cameras support the same VMS and ONVIF integration?
Yes. Both models list identical ONVIF compliance — Profile S, Profile T, Profile G, and Profile M — and share the same Smart Analytics feature set (Person/Vehicle Detection, Loitering, Beam Crossing, Direction Violation, Crowd Detection, Audio Analytics, Tamper Alert). VMS integration paths should be equivalent based on the documented specifications.
Are both cameras suitable for the same harsh outdoor environments?
Yes, based on the provided specs. Both units carry IP66, IP67, IP68 (2 m / 2 hr), IPX9K, NEMA 4X, and IK11 ratings, and both are rated for -50 °C to +65 °C operating temperature. There is no difference in environmental or impact ratings between the two SKUs in the supplied specification data.
Get a Second Opinion on Your Camera Choice
Share your site layout, coverage goals, and budget. Our team will validate the camera selection, flag anything we would change, and recommend products that match the use case.