Pelco SRXE4-2X33-EBT-IR1 vs Pelco SRXE4P-4V9-EBT-IR1: Specification Comparison
Both the Pelco SRXE4-2X33-EBT-IR1 and the SRXE4P-4V9-EBT-IR1 belong to the Sarix Enhanced 4 Series and are fixed outdoor bullet cameras sharing the same 4MP resolution class. This comparison is written for installers and IT procurement teams evaluating which model better suits a specific deployment. Both units share a substantial number of identical core specifications, so this analysis focuses on the differences that surface in the provided spec data and notes where specifications are absent or inconsistent across the two data sets.
In This Guide
How do the imaging specs compare?
Both cameras use a 1/1.8-inch progressive-scan CMOS sensor delivering 2560×1440 at up to 60 fps, with 130 dB SureVision WDR and a minimum illumination of 0.003 lux color / 0 lux IR. The lens on both is a motorized varifocal 4.4–9.3 mm unit covering a 32–109° horizontal field of view, and both carry an F1.4 maximum aperture. On these primary imaging parameters the two models are specification-identical; neither offers a measurable advantage in resolution, frame rate, dynamic range, or low-light sensitivity based on the provided data.
Both models include an integrated IR1 illuminator module operating at 850 nm with a stated range of approximately 70 meters. The SRXE4-2X33-EBT-IR1 spec set references a '~0.001 lux mono / 0 lux with IR' figure in its card bullets, while the main spec field for both lists '0.003 lux color / 0 lux IR.' The SRXE4P-4V9-EBT-IR1 data does not separately restate a mono lux value. Both support H.265, H.264, and Motion JPEG compression. A note of caution: the SRXE4-2X33-EBT-IR1 data contains internally inconsistent sensor size entries (1/1.8-inch in the primary spec versus 1/2.8-inch CMOS in a secondary field, and two different focal-length ranges: 4.4–9.3 mm primary versus 2.8–12 mm in a tertiary field). The SRXE4P-4V9-EBT-IR1 data does not carry these contradictions. Buyers should verify the SRXE4-2X33-EBT-IR1 sensor and lens specs against the official Pelco datasheet before finalizing procurement.
What about installation and environment?
Ingress and impact ratings are identical across both models: IP66, IP67, IP68 (2 m for 2 hr), IPX9K, NEMA 4X, and IK11. Operating temperature range is likewise the same at -50°C to +65°C when powered via PoE+ or external supply. Both are white outdoor bullet housings. The SRXE4P-4V9-EBT-IR1 spec explicitly states '12/24 Vdc external' as an alternative power input alongside PoE+ (802.3at); the SRXE4-2X33-EBT-IR1 primary spec lists only PoE, though its PoE class field reads '3' and a secondary field states 'PoE+ (802.3at).' Neither spec set provides mounting hardware details beyond general references to wall, pole, corner, and rack in a secondary field on the SRXE4-2X33-EBT-IR1 only; the SRXE4P-4V9-EBT-IR1 does not list mount types in the provided data. Dimensions and weight are absent from both data sets.
Which fits your VMS and analytics better?
Both cameras carry identical ONVIF compliance: Profile S, Profile T, Profile G, and Profile M. Edge analytics are also identical as stated: Smart Analytics covering Person/Vehicle Detection, Direction Violation, Loitering, Beam Crossing, Crowd Detection, Audio Analytics, and Tamper Alert. Both support microSD on-board storage and HTTPS encryption. Cybersecurity credentials are the same on both: FIPS 140-3 Level 3, TPM, Secure Boot, HTTPS, and 802.1X. Compliance approvals are identical: NDAA Section 889 and TAA Compliant. The SRXE4-2X33-EBT-IR1 secondary spec references a microphone as 'supported' and mentions Pelco Smart Compression technology and idle-scene bandwidth management; these items do not appear in the SRXE4P-4V9-EBT-IR1 provided data, though absence from the data set does not confirm absence from the product. Both models carry a 5-year warranty.
Which should you choose: the SRXE4-2X33-EBT-IR1 or the SRXE4P-4V9-EBT-IR1?
Our take: The two models are specification-equivalent on every primary decision-relevant parameter provided: 4MP at 60 fps, 130 dB SureVision WDR, motorized 4.4–9.3 mm varifocal lens, 70 m 850 nm IR, IP66/67/68/IPX9K/NEMA 4X, IK11, -50°C to +65°C, PoE+ (802.3at), FIPS 140-3 Level 3, NDAA/TAA, and a 5-year warranty. The only meaningful spec-level differentiator in the provided data is that the SRXE4P-4V9-EBT-IR1 explicitly documents 12/24 Vdc external power as an alternative input, making it the clearer choice for installations where PoE infrastructure is unavailable or where power-budget constraints favor local DC supply. The SRXE4-2X33-EBT-IR1 data contains internal inconsistencies (sensor size, focal-length range) that should be resolved against the official Pelco datasheet before specifying it. For any deployment relying solely on PoE+, both models appear functionally interchangeable based on the specs supplied; select on availability, price, and verified datasheet accuracy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
Spec-for-spec, from manufacturer data.
| Specification | Pelco SRXE4-2X33-EBT-IR1 | Pelco SRXE4P-4V9-EBT-IR1 |
|---|---|---|
| Series | Sarix Enhanced 4 | Sarix Enhanced 4 |
| Resolution | 4MP (2560 x 1440) | 4MP (2560 x 1440) |
| Image Sensor | 1/1.8" progressive scan CMOS (note: secondary field lists 1/2.8") | 1/1.8" progressive scan CMOS |
| Lens / Focal Length | 4.4–9.3 mm motorized varifocal (note: tertiary field lists 2.8–12 mm) | 4.4–9.3 mm motorized varifocal |
| HFOV | 32–109° | 32–109° |
| Aperture | F1.4 | F1.4 |
| Min Illumination | 0.003 lux color / 0 lux IR | 0.003 lux color / 0 lux IR |
| IR Range / Wavelength | ~70 m / 850 nm | ~70 m / 850 nm |
| WDR | 130 dB SureVision | 130 dB SureVision |
| Max Frame Rate | 60 fps | 60 fps |
| Video Compression | H.265; H.264; Motion JPEG | H.265; H.264; Motion JPEG |
| IP Rating | IP66 / IP67 / IP68 (2m/2hr) / IPX9K / NEMA 4X | IP66 / IP67 / IP68 (2m/2hr) / IPX9K / NEMA 4X |
| Impact Rating | IK11 | IK11 |
| Operating Temperature | -50°C to +65°C | -50°C to +65°C |
| Power Input | PoE+ (802.3at) | PoE+ (802.3at) or 12/24 Vdc external |
| Edge Storage | microSD | microSD |
| ONVIF Profiles | S, T, G, M | S, T, G, M |
| Cybersecurity | FIPS 140-3 Level 3; TPM; Secure Boot; HTTPS; 802.1X | FIPS 140-3 Level 3; TPM; Secure Boot; HTTPS; 802.1X |
| Compliance | NDAA Section 889; TAA Compliant | NDAA Section 889; TAA Compliant |
| Warranty | 5 years | 5 years |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which should you choose: the SRXE4-2X33-EBT-IR1 or the SRXE4P-4V9-EBT-IR1?
The two models are specification-equivalent on every primary decision-relevant parameter provided: 4MP at 60 fps, 130 dB SureVision WDR, motorized 4.4–9.3 mm varifocal lens, 70 m 850 nm IR, IP66/67/68/IPX9K/NEMA 4X, IK11, -50°C to +65°C, PoE+ (802.3at), FIPS 140-3 Level 3, NDAA/TAA, and a 5-year warranty. The only meaningful spec-level differentiator in the provided data is that the SRXE4P-4V9-EBT-IR1 explicitly documents 12/24 Vdc external power as an alternative input, making it the clearer choice for installations where PoE infrastructure is unavailable or where power-budget constraints favor local DC supply. The SRXE4-2X33-EBT-IR1 data contains internal inconsistencies (sensor size, focal-length range) that should be resolved against the official Pelco datasheet before specifying it. For any deployment relying solely on PoE+, both models appear functionally interchangeable based on the specs supplied; select on availability, price, and verified datasheet accuracy.
Is the SRXE4-2X33-EBT-IR1 or SRXE4P-4V9-EBT-IR1 better for low light?
Based on the provided specifications, both cameras share the same low-light rating: 0.003 lux color and 0 lux with IR active, using 850 nm IR illuminators rated to approximately 70 meters. Neither model has a specified advantage in low-light performance over the other from the data supplied.
Can either camera be powered without a PoE switch?
The SRXE4P-4V9-EBT-IR1 explicitly lists 12/24 Vdc external power as an alternative input alongside PoE+ (802.3at). The SRXE4-2X33-EBT-IR1 provided data does not include an explicit external DC power option in its primary spec fields; buyers should confirm this with the Pelco datasheet before assuming DC power compatibility on that model.
Do both cameras support the same edge analytics and VMS integration standards?
Yes, per the provided specifications. Both models support identical edge analytics (Person/Vehicle Detection, Direction Violation, Loitering, Beam Crossing, Crowd Detection, Audio Analytics, Tamper Alert) and the same ONVIF profiles (S, T, G, M), making them equivalent from a VMS integration standpoint.
Get a Second Opinion on Your Camera Choice
Share your site layout, coverage goals, and budget. Our team will validate the camera selection, flag anything we would change, and recommend products that match the use case.