Honeywell 8675I505-LHGXL-PS vs Zebra RS21C0-TS00ZWR: Specification Comparison
Both the Honeywell 8675I505-LHGXL-PS and the Zebra RS21C0-TS00ZWR are wearable, hands-free barcode scanners targeting warehouse, logistics, and field-operations buyers who need to keep hands free during picking, packing, or receiving workflows. Each supports 1D and 2D symbologies in a body-worn form factor with wireless connectivity and an IP-rated enclosure for light industrial environments. The comparison covers scan capability and symbology support, physical durability and wearability, and wireless connectivity and deployment architecture—the three axes most likely to drive a purchase decision in this category.
In This Guide
- How do scan capability, symbology support, and scan speed compare between the 8675I505-LHGXL-PS and RS21C0-TS00ZWR?
- Which unit offers better durability and wearability for all-day use in industrial environments?
- How do the wireless connectivity and deployment architectures of the two scanners differ?
- Which should you choose: the 8675I505-LHGXL-PS or the RS21C0-TS00ZWR?
- Side-by-Side Specs
- FAQ
How do scan capability, symbology support, and scan speed compare between the 8675I505-LHGXL-PS and RS21C0-TS00ZWR?
The Honeywell 8675I505-LHGXL-PS is specified as a 1D/2D barcode scanner supporting both linear and area-imaging symbologies; no scan rate figure is provided in the available specifications.
The Zebra RS21C0-TS00ZWR lists a scan rate of 92 scans/sec minimum, 104 typical, and 116 maximum (bi-directional) and explicitly enumerates symbologies including UPC, Code 39, Code 128, QR Code, and Data Matrix. The structured specs also list '1D linear codes' and '2D codes' under Symbologies, while the tilde-sourced detail adds the 2D imager callout.
Both units handle the 1D/2D symbology range expected in warehouse and logistics use cases. The Zebra RS21C0-TS00ZWR provides a concrete scan rate specification (up to 116 scans/sec) and an itemized symbology list, giving buyers more measurable performance data. The Honeywell 8675I505-LHGXL-PS does not publish a scan rate in the provided specifications, so a direct speed comparison cannot be made from available data.
Which unit offers better durability and wearability for all-day use in industrial environments?
The Honeywell 8675I505-LHGXL-PS carries an IP55 rating, meaning it is protected against low-pressure water jets from any direction in addition to dust ingress. It weighs 28 g and is described in its specifications as optimized for all-day wear in a ring form factor. The 380 mAh battery is the published power source.
The Zebra RS21C0-TS00ZWR carries an IP54 rating, providing protection against dust ingress (not fully dust-tight) and water splash from any direction, but not against directed water jets. It weighs 56.7 g (2.0 oz) in a wrist-mount form. Storage temperature is rated to -40 °C / -25 °F on the lower end and 70 °C / 160 °F on the upper end; operating temperature is not separately listed in the provided specs. Battery capacity is not specified beyond a reference to a 'Backup Rechargeable UPS battery for operation during' (the specification appears truncated).
The Honeywell unit has a higher IP rating (IP55 vs IP54) and is substantially lighter (28 g vs 56.7 g). For environments with directed water spray—hose-down areas, outdoor docks—the IP55 advantage is material. For all-day ring-worn use where arm fatigue matters, the 28 g vs 56.7 g difference is significant. The Zebra unit's battery specification is incomplete in the provided data, preventing a runtime comparison.
How do the wireless connectivity and deployment architectures of the two scanners differ?
The Honeywell 8675I505-LHGXL-PS connects via Bluetooth wireless. No 802.11 Wi-Fi specification is listed in the available data. Its platform is identified as the 8675i wearable ring scanner series, with optional accessories including a trigger (8675I505-TRGR) and battery (BAT-SCN10), indicating it is designed to pair with a host mobile computer or terminal rather than operate as a standalone device.
The Zebra RS21C0-TS00ZWR connects via 802.11 Enterprise Wi-Fi (wireless LAN). No Bluetooth specification is listed in the available data. It is classified as a 'Mobile Computer' in its product type field, implying onboard processing and direct network connectivity to WMS/backend systems in real time, without requiring a paired host device.
The connectivity architectures serve different deployment models. The Honeywell 8675I505-LHGXL-PS is a Bluetooth peripheral intended to work alongside a host device (mobile computer, wearable terminal), whereas the Zebra RS21C0-TS00ZWR is a standalone enterprise Wi-Fi-connected mobile computer that communicates directly with WMS infrastructure. Buyers must account for existing infrastructure: Bluetooth-host deployments suit environments already running paired mobile computers, while the Zebra model suits environments with enterprise Wi-Fi and direct WMS integration.
Which should you choose: the 8675I505-LHGXL-PS or the RS21C0-TS00ZWR?
Our take: The 8675I505-LHGXL-PS is the stronger choice when minimum device weight, higher ingress protection, and Bluetooth-peripheral pairing with an existing host mobile computer are the primary requirements. It is rated IP55 versus the RS21C0-TS00ZWR's IP54—a meaningful difference in environments with directed water exposure—and weighs 28 g versus 56.7 g, a roughly 50% weight reduction that matters across multi-hour shifts. The RS21C0-TS00ZWR, however, is a self-contained 802.11 Enterprise mobile computer with a documented scan rate of up to 116 scans/sec and an itemized 2D symbology list, making it the stronger fit for deployments requiring standalone Wi-Fi connectivity and direct WMS integration without a paired host. Buyers running a Bluetooth-host wearable platform will favor the Honeywell; buyers needing an autonomous enterprise Wi-Fi node with published scan throughput should evaluate the Zebra.
Side-by-Side Comparison
Spec-for-spec, from manufacturer data.
| Specification | Honeywell 8675I505-LHGXL-PS | Zebra RS21C0-TS00ZWR |
|---|---|---|
| Product Type | Wearable Ring Scanner | Wearable Mobile Computer |
| Series / Family | 8675i | RS21 (Zebra) |
| Scan Type | 1D/2D (ring form factor) | 1D/2D imager |
| Symbologies | 1D/2D (no itemized list in specs) | UPC, Code 39, Code 128, QR, Data Matrix |
| Scan Rate | — | 92 min / 104 typical / 116 max scans/sec (bi-directional) |
| Connectivity | Bluetooth wireless | 802.11 Enterprise Wi-Fi |
| IP Rating | IP55 | IP54 |
| Weight | 28 g | 56.7 g (2.0 oz) |
| Battery Capacity | 380 mAh | Not specified (backup UPS battery referenced) |
| Form Factor | Wearable ring | Wrist-mount wearable |
| Standalone Operation | No (Bluetooth peripheral) | Yes (Mobile Computer, Wi-Fi connected) |
| Storage Temperature | — | -40 °C to 70 °C (-25 °F to 160 °F) |
| Dimensions | — | 1.9 in. H × 1.4 in. W × 1.9 in. D |
| Warranty | 3-year | 1-year |
| Outdoor Ready (per spec) | Yes | — |
| Part Number | 8675I505-LHGXL-PS | RS21C0-TS00ZWR |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which should you choose: the 8675I505-LHGXL-PS or the RS21C0-TS00ZWR?
The 8675I505-LHGXL-PS is the stronger choice when minimum device weight, higher ingress protection, and Bluetooth-peripheral pairing with an existing host mobile computer are the primary requirements. It is rated IP55 versus the RS21C0-TS00ZWR's IP54—a meaningful difference in environments with directed water exposure—and weighs 28 g versus 56.7 g, a roughly 50% weight reduction that matters across multi-hour shifts. The RS21C0-TS00ZWR, however, is a self-contained 802.11 Enterprise mobile computer with a documented scan rate of up to 116 scans/sec and an itemized 2D symbology list, making it the stronger fit for deployments requiring standalone Wi-Fi connectivity and direct WMS integration without a paired host. Buyers running a Bluetooth-host wearable platform will favor the Honeywell; buyers needing an autonomous enterprise Wi-Fi node with published scan throughput should evaluate the Zebra.
Is the 8675I505-LHGXL-PS or the RS21C0-TS00ZWR better for high-volume picking where scan speed matters?
The Zebra RS21C0-TS00ZWR publishes a scan rate specification of 92 scans/sec minimum, 104 typical, and 116 maximum (bi-directional). The Honeywell 8675I505-LHGXL-PS does not include a scan rate figure in the available specifications, so a direct speed comparison cannot be made. Buyers for whom scan throughput is a primary criterion should request scan rate data from Honeywell before purchasing the 8675I505-LHGXL-PS.
Can either scanner work independently without a paired mobile computer or host terminal?
The Zebra RS21C0-TS00ZWR is classified as a Mobile Computer with 802.11 Enterprise Wi-Fi and is specified for real-time data sync to WMS/backend systems, indicating standalone operation. The Honeywell 8675I505-LHGXL-PS connects via Bluetooth and its optional accessories include a host-pairing trigger and battery module, indicating it is designed as a Bluetooth peripheral requiring a paired host device rather than an autonomous unit.
Which scanner is more suitable for environments with water spray or outdoor dock exposure?
The Honeywell 8675I505-LHGXL-PS carries an IP55 rating, which includes protection against low-pressure water jets from any direction. The Zebra RS21C0-TS00ZWR is rated IP54, which covers water splash but not directed jets. For loading docks, outdoor receiving areas, or environments with hose-down cleaning procedures, the IP55-rated Honeywell unit provides a higher level of ingress protection per the IEC 60529 standard.
More Barcode Scanner Comparisons
- Unitech HT730-LJ6122BG vs Datalogic HS7500SR
- Unitech HT730-LJ6122BG vs Honeywell 8690IB601-2
- Unitech HT730-LJ6122BG vs Honeywell 8690IB201-2-N
- Unitech HT730-LJ6122BG vs Honeywell 8680I400-2
- Unitech HT730-LJ6122BG vs Unitech HT730-LJ6142BG
- Unitech HT730-LJ6142BG vs Datalogic HS7500SR
Barcode Scanner Buying Guides
Get a Second Opinion on Your Camera Choice
Share your site layout, coverage goals, and budget. Our team will validate the camera selection, flag anything we would change, and recommend products that match the use case.