Honeywell 8675I200FR-2-N vs Honeywell 8690IB201-2-N: Specification Comparison
Both the Honeywell 8675I200FR-2-N (8675i series) and the 8690IB201-2-N (8680i series) are wearable Bluetooth ring scanners designed for hands-free 1D/2D barcode capture in warehouse, logistics, and manufacturing environments. Both carry IP55 environmental ratings and a 3-year warranty, making them legitimate cross-shop candidates for operations teams evaluating wearable scanning solutions. The comparison focuses on the three dimensions that most directly drive a buying decision: scanning capability and form factor, power and environmental tolerance, and wireless connectivity.
In This Guide
- How do scanning capability and form factor differ between the 8675I200FR-2-N and 8690IB201-2-N?
- Which unit offers stronger battery endurance and environmental tolerance for demanding operating conditions?
- Are there meaningful differences in Bluetooth connectivity and integration between the two ring scanners?
- Which should you choose: the 8675I200FR-2-N or the 8690IB201-2-N?
- Side-by-Side Specs
- FAQ
How do scanning capability and form factor differ between the 8675I200FR-2-N and 8690IB201-2-N?
Both units capture 1D and 2D barcodes in a wearable ring form factor. The 8675I200FR-2-N specifies an area imager with an 844 × 640 pixel array and notes outdoor-ready status explicitly. The 8690IB201-2-N specifies an omni-directional scan pattern and explicitly states coverage of all 1D/2D symbologies including damaged and high-density codes — a claim not made in the 8675I200FR-2-N spec set.
Weight differs modestly: the 8675I200FR-2-N weighs 28 g versus 26 g for the 8690IB201-2-N, a 2 g advantage for the 8690IB201-2-N that may matter in sustained shift-long wear. Neither unit's maximum scan range is fully specified in the provided data; the 8690IB201-2-N references a range of 44 mm to 552 mm (1.7 in to 21.7 in), while an equivalent figure is absent for the 8675I200FR-2-N.
Which unit offers stronger battery endurance and environmental tolerance for demanding operating conditions?
Battery capacity favors the 8690IB201-2-N at 420 mAh versus 380 mAh for the 8675I200FR-2-N — a 10.5% larger cell. Both are described as rechargeable. Actual shift runtime is not specified for either model in the provided specs, so per-shift endurance comparisons cannot be made from the available data.
On environmental tolerance, the 8690IB201-2-N specifies an operating temperature range of −20°C to 50°C. No equivalent operating temperature range is provided in the 8675I200FR-2-N spec set. Both units share an IP55 rating for dust and moisture resistance. For cold-storage, outdoor, or wide-temperature-swing deployments, the 8690IB201-2-N's documented temperature range provides a concrete, verifiable specification the 8675I200FR-2-N cannot currently match from the data supplied.
Are there meaningful differences in Bluetooth connectivity and integration between the two ring scanners?
Both scanners connect via Bluetooth wireless in the 2.4 GHz ISM band. The 8690IB201-2-N's spec explicitly identifies the frequency band as 2.4 GHz to 2.5 GHz (ISM). The 8675I200FR-2-N lists Bluetooth connectivity without specifying the frequency band in the provided data.
Neither model's spec set details Bluetooth version (e.g., BT 4.x vs. 5.x), supported profiles (HID, SPP, etc.), or compatible host pairings beyond the general Bluetooth descriptor. Buyers evaluating specific WMS platform compatibility or multi-device pairing requirements should consult each product's full datasheet at the PDF paths provided, as those parameters are not resolvable from the specs supplied here. Both units carry the same 3-year warranty.
Which should you choose: the 8675I200FR-2-N or the 8690IB201-2-N?
Our take: The 8690IB201-2-N is the stronger choice when operating temperature range, battery capacity, and documented scan-range coverage are primary decision factors. It carries a 420 mAh battery versus 380 mAh in the 8675I200FR-2-N (+10.5%), a specified operating range of −20°C to 50°C absent from the 8675I200FR-2-N spec set, and an explicitly stated omni-directional pattern covering damaged and high-density codes alongside a documented scan range of 44–552 mm. It is also 2 g lighter at 26 g versus 28 g. The 8675I200FR-2-N counters with a specified 844 × 640 pixel area imager array and an explicit outdoor-ready designation, but lacks the temperature and battery depth of the 8690IB201-2-N. Buyers in cold-chain, wide-temperature, or full-shift battery-intensive deployments should favor the 8690IB201-2-N; buyers whose specs require a confirmed pixel-array imager spec should validate the 8675I200FR-2-N datasheet directly.
Side-by-Side Comparison
Spec-for-spec, from manufacturer data.
| Specification | Honeywell 8675I200FR-2-N | Honeywell 8690IB201-2-N |
|---|---|---|
| Series / Family | 8675i | 8680i |
| Part Number | 8675I200FR-2-N | 8690IB201-2-N |
| Device Type | Wearable Ring Scanner | Wearable Ring Scanner |
| Scan Type | 1D/2D barcode | 1D/2D barcode (all symbologies incl. damaged & high-density) |
| Scan Pattern | Area Imager (844 × 640 pixel array) | Omni-directional |
| Scan Range | — | 44 mm – 552 mm (1.7 in – 21.7 in) |
| IP Rating | IP55 | IP55 |
| Weight | 28 g (1.0 oz) | 26 g |
| Battery Capacity | 380 mAh | 420 mAh |
| Connectivity | Bluetooth wireless | Bluetooth wireless (2.4 GHz – 2.5 GHz ISM) |
| Operating Temperature | — | -20°C to 50°C |
| Outdoor Ready | Yes | — |
| Warranty | 3-year | 3-year |
| PoE Class | — | 1 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which should you choose: the 8675I200FR-2-N or the 8690IB201-2-N?
The 8690IB201-2-N is the stronger choice when operating temperature range, battery capacity, and documented scan-range coverage are primary decision factors. It carries a 420 mAh battery versus 380 mAh in the 8675I200FR-2-N (+10.5%), a specified operating range of −20°C to 50°C absent from the 8675I200FR-2-N spec set, and an explicitly stated omni-directional pattern covering damaged and high-density codes alongside a documented scan range of 44–552 mm. It is also 2 g lighter at 26 g versus 28 g. The 8675I200FR-2-N counters with a specified 844 × 640 pixel area imager array and an explicit outdoor-ready designation, but lacks the temperature and battery depth of the 8690IB201-2-N. Buyers in cold-chain, wide-temperature, or full-shift battery-intensive deployments should favor the 8690IB201-2-N; buyers whose specs require a confirmed pixel-array imager spec should validate the 8675I200FR-2-N datasheet directly.
Which ring scanner — the 8675I200FR-2-N or 8690IB201-2-N — is better suited for cold-storage or freezer environments?
Based on the provided specifications, only the 8690IB201-2-N carries a documented operating temperature range (−20°C to 50°C). The 8675I200FR-2-N does not specify an operating temperature range in the data supplied. For cold-storage or freezer deployments where low-temperature operation must be confirmed, the 8690IB201-2-N is the only model with a verifiable spec supporting sub-zero use.
Does the higher battery capacity on the 8690IB201-2-N translate to a meaningfully longer shift life compared to the 8675I200FR-2-N?
The 8690IB201-2-N's 420 mAh battery is 10.5% larger than the 8675I200FR-2-N's 380 mAh cell. However, neither product's specification set includes rated shift runtime or scan-cycles-per-charge figures, so a concrete hours-per-shift comparison cannot be made from the specs provided. Buyers should consult each unit's full datasheet for runtime data before making shift-endurance decisions.
Are the 8675I200FR-2-N and 8690IB201-2-N compatible with the same Bluetooth host systems and WMS platforms?
Both scanners use Bluetooth wireless in the 2.4 GHz ISM band, but neither unit's provided specifications detail Bluetooth version, supported profiles (such as HID or SPP), or specific WMS/host compatibility lists. The 8690IB201-2-N's spec explicitly states the 2.4–2.5 GHz band; the 8675I200FR-2-N does not specify the band in the available data. Platform compatibility should be confirmed against each product's full datasheet and the host system's certification list before deployment.
More Barcode Scanner Comparisons
- Unitech HT730-LJ6122BG vs Datalogic HS7500SR
- Unitech HT730-LJ6122BG vs Honeywell 8690IB601-2
- Unitech HT730-LJ6122BG vs Honeywell 8690IB201-2-N
- Unitech HT730-LJ6122BG vs Honeywell 8680I400-2
- Unitech HT730-LJ6122BG vs Unitech HT730-LJ6142BG
- Unitech HT730-LJ6142BG vs Datalogic HS7500SR
Barcode Scanner Buying Guides
Get a Second Opinion on Your Camera Choice
Share your site layout, coverage goals, and budget. Our team will validate the camera selection, flag anything we would change, and recommend products that match the use case.