CipherLab A2504S2BS0001 vs CipherLab A2564SMBKU0S1: Specification Comparison
Both the CipherLab A2504S2BS0001 and A2564SMBKU0S1 are IP65-rated, Bluetooth handheld 1D linear imager scanners sharing the same scan engine, scan rate, scan range, symbology set, minimum print contrast, color options, and warranty period. They occupy the same product class — cordless 1D barcode scanners — and are devices a retail, warehouse, or logistics buyer would directly cross-shop. The sole differentiator surfaced by the provided specifications is connectivity and kit contents: Product B includes a USB dock in addition to Bluetooth, whereas Product A ships as a standalone Bluetooth-only scanner.
In This Guide
- How do the A2504S2BS0001 and A2564SMBKU0S1 differ in connectivity and deployment options?
- Do the A2504S2BS0001 and A2564SMBKU0S1 deliver equivalent scanning performance?
- Are the A2504S2BS0001 and A2564SMBKU0S1 equivalent in ruggedness and barcode symbology coverage?
- Which should you choose: the A2504S2BS0001 or the A2564SMBKU0S1?
- Side-by-Side Specs
- FAQ
How do the A2504S2BS0001 and A2564SMBKU0S1 differ in connectivity and deployment options?
The A2504S2BS0001 is specified as Bluetooth-only. No wired fallback or charging/communication dock is listed in its spec sheet. It is intended for deployments where the host system communicates exclusively over Bluetooth and where charging is handled separately or via an unspecified cradle.
The A2564SMBKU0S1 is specified as 'Bluetooth; USB dock,' and its SKU suffix 'KU' and product name explicitly call it a 'USB Kit.' This means the unit ships bundled with a USB dock that serves as both a Bluetooth base station or direct USB communication interface and, typically, a charging cradle. For sites that need a wired tethered fallback or a ready-to-use charging stand out of the box, the A2564SMBKU0S1 provides that without a separate accessory purchase. Neither spec sheet defines the dock's USB standard (2.0 vs. 3.x) or its HID/SPP profile details, so buyers should confirm those with CipherLab documentation.
Do the A2504S2BS0001 and A2564SMBKU0S1 deliver equivalent scanning performance?
On every quantifiable scan-performance metric present in the provided specifications, the two units are identical. Both employ a 1D linear imager engine. Both deliver 578 scans per second. Both support auto-sense and continuous scan patterns. Both share the same minimum print contrast of 15%.
Scan range is likewise identical: Code 39 reads from 3 cm to 60 cm; UPC-A reads from 0.5 cm to 38 cm. Product B's enriched metadata notes '3–10 cm (3 mil), up to 60 cm (20 mil codes),' which is a resolution-vs-range clarification consistent with standard linear imager behavior, not a capability advantage over Product A. No spec indicates a difference in decode speed, optical resolution beyond 3 mil minimum, or first-pass read rate between the two models.
Are the A2504S2BS0001 and A2564SMBKU0S1 equivalent in ruggedness and barcode symbology coverage?
Both units carry an IP65 rating, meaning both are certified dust-tight and protected against low-pressure water jets from any direction. Neither spec sheet states a drop-rating (IK or MIL-STD), operating temperature range, humidity range, or weight, so ruggedness beyond IP65 cannot be compared from the data provided.
Symbology coverage is identical across both products. Each decodes the same 15 1D symbology families: Code 39, Code 128, UPC/EAN/GS1-128, Codabar, Interleave 2 of 5, Code 93, Code 11, MSI, Plessey, Telepen, ISBT-128, Italian and French Pharmacodes, Matrix 2 of 5, Industrial 2 of 5, and GS1 DataBar (RSS). No 2D, PDF417, or QR capability is listed for either model, consistent with their 1D linear imager classification. Warranty is 2 years for both.
Which should you choose: the A2504S2BS0001 or the A2564SMBKU0S1?
Our take: The A2564SMBKU0S1 is the stronger choice when a site needs an out-of-the-box USB dock for wired communication or integrated charging, while the A2504S2BS0001 suits buyers who need a lean Bluetooth-only unit and already have charging infrastructure in place. Beyond that single differentiator, every measurable spec is shared: both deliver 578 scans per second on a 1D linear imager, both carry IP65 protection, both cover the same 15 1D symbology families at 15% minimum print contrast, and both carry a 2-year warranty. Buyers on pure Bluetooth deployments — retail counters with existing cradles, inventory carts with paired handhelds — gain nothing from the kit bundle and may prefer the simpler A2504S2BS0001 SKU. Buyers standing up new stations or requiring a USB fallback path should favor the A2564SMBKU0S1 kit to avoid a separate dock procurement.
Side-by-Side Comparison
Spec-for-spec, from manufacturer data.
| Specification | CipherLab A2504S2BS0001 | CipherLab A2564SMBKU0S1 |
|---|---|---|
| Product Type | 1D Barcode Scanner | 1D Barcode Scanner |
| Form Factor | Handheld Scanner | Handheld |
| Scan Engine | 1D Linear Imager | 1D Linear Imager |
| Connectivity | Bluetooth | Bluetooth; USB dock |
| Kit Contents | Scanner only (no dock specified) | Scanner + USB dock (kit) |
| IP Rating | IP65 | IP65 |
| Scan Rate | 578 scans/second | 578 scans/second |
| Scan Range — Code 39 | 3–60 cm | 3–60 cm |
| Scan Range — UPC-A | 0.5–38 cm | 0.5–38 cm |
| Scan Patterns | Auto-sense and continuous | Auto-sense and continuous |
| Min Print Contrast | 15% | 15% |
| Symbology Count (1D) | 15 families | 15 families |
| Color Options | Black, Register White | Black, Register White |
| Warranty | 2-Year | 2-Year |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which should you choose: the A2504S2BS0001 or the A2564SMBKU0S1?
The A2564SMBKU0S1 is the stronger choice when a site needs an out-of-the-box USB dock for wired communication or integrated charging, while the A2504S2BS0001 suits buyers who need a lean Bluetooth-only unit and already have charging infrastructure in place. Beyond that single differentiator, every measurable spec is shared: both deliver 578 scans per second on a 1D linear imager, both carry IP65 protection, both cover the same 15 1D symbology families at 15% minimum print contrast, and both carry a 2-year warranty. Buyers on pure Bluetooth deployments — retail counters with existing cradles, inventory carts with paired handhelds — gain nothing from the kit bundle and may prefer the simpler A2504S2BS0001 SKU. Buyers standing up new stations or requiring a USB fallback path should favor the A2564SMBKU0S1 kit to avoid a separate dock procurement.
Is the A2504S2BS0001 or A2564SMBKU0S1 better for a new checkout lane installation with no existing cradles?
The A2564SMBKU0S1 is the more practical choice for a new installation because its spec lists a USB dock included in the kit, providing both a communication interface and a charging/docking station out of the box. The A2504S2BS0001 is Bluetooth-only with no dock specified, so you would need to source a compatible cradle separately.
Do these two scanners read the same barcodes?
Yes. Both the A2504S2BS0001 and A2564SMBKU0S1 decode the identical set of 15 1D symbologies: Code 39, Code 128, UPC/EAN/GS1-128, Codabar, Interleave 2 of 5, Code 93, Code 11, MSI, Plessey, Telepen, ISBT-128, Italian and French Pharmacodes, Matrix 2 of 5, Industrial 2 of 5, and GS1 DataBar (RSS). Neither model decodes 2D symbologies such as QR or Data Matrix per the provided specifications.
Is one model more rugged or water-resistant than the other?
No. Both units are rated IP65, which is the same level of dust-tight and water-jet resistance. The provided specifications do not include drop ratings, operating temperature ranges, or other ruggedness metrics for either model, so no further ruggedness comparison can be made from the available data.
More Barcode Scanner Comparisons
- Datalogic QBT2500-BK-BTK1 vs CipherLab A2504S2BS0001
- Datalogic QBT2500-BK-BTK1 vs CipherLab A2560SCBS0001
- Datalogic QBT2500-BK-BTK1 vs CipherLab A2564SMBKU0S1
- Datalogic QBT2500-BK-BTK1 vs Socket Mobile CX3532-2134
- Datalogic QBT2500-BK-BTK1 vs Datalogic QBT2131-BK-BTK1
- CipherLab A2504S2BS0001 vs Socket Mobile CX3532-2134
Barcode Scanner Buying Guides
Get a Second Opinion on Your Camera Choice
Share your site layout, coverage goals, and budget. Our team will validate the camera selection, flag anything we would change, and recommend products that match the use case.