How does scan range and resolution differ between the A2504S2BS0001 and A2560SCBS0001 for varying barcode densities?

The A2504S2BS0001 specifies its scan range as Code 39: 3–60 cm and UPC-A: 0.5–38 cm. These two data points indicate the engine handles a range of barcode densities but the spec sheet does not break out performance by mil size.

The A2560SCBS0001 provides more granular range data tied directly to print density: Code 39 at 3 mil reads 3–10 cm, at 5 mil reads 2–14 cm, and at 20 mil reads 1.5–60 cm. This density-indexed breakdown gives integrators clearer guidance for matching the scanner to the label stock in use.

Both models share the same 578 scans-per-second rate and 15% minimum print contrast. The A2504S2BS0001's maximum stated reach of 60 cm (Code 39) matches the A2560SCBS0001's 20 mil maximum, but the A2560SCBS0001's specs make the density-to-distance relationship explicit where the A2504S2BS0001's do not.

Are the A2504S2BS0001 and A2560SCBS0001 equivalent in physical durability and environmental protection?

Both scanners carry an IP65 rating, meaning both are certified dust-tight and protected against low-pressure water jets from any direction. Neither specification sheet lists a drop-rating, operating temperature range, humidity tolerance, or chassis material, so no comparison can be made on those parameters from the provided data.

Both units are available in Black and Register White colorways, both are described as handheld form factors, and both list the same scanner type classification. No dimensional or weight data is present in either spec set, so physical size cannot be compared.

From the provided specifications, the two models are functionally identical on every documented environmental and physical build attribute.

Do the A2504S2BS0001 and A2560SCBS0001 differ in wireless connectivity or supported symbologies?

Both scanners connect via Bluetooth wireless and neither specification identifies a Bluetooth version, profile (HID, SPP, etc.), or operating range. Buyers requiring a specific Bluetooth class or profile should consult CipherLab datasheets directly, as this data is absent from both specs.

The symbology sets are identical across both models: Code 39, Code 128, UPC/EAN/GS1-128, Codabar, Interleave 2 of 5, Code 93, Code 11, MSI, Plessey, Telepen, ISBT-128, Italian and French Pharmacodes, Matrix 2 of 5, Industrial 2 of 5, and GS1 DataBar (RSS). Neither model supports 2D symbologies such as QR Code or PDF417.

Both carry a 2-year warranty. Scan pattern modes (auto-sense and continuous) are identical. No host interface, cradle compatibility, or pairing protocol data is provided for either unit.

Which should you choose: the A2504S2BS0001 or the A2560SCBS0001?

Our take: The A2560SCBS0001 is the stronger choice when label density varies across a deployment and integrators need to validate scanner-to-label compatibility before procurement. Its spec sheet explicitly maps Code 39 read distances to three mil sizes (3 mil: 3–10 cm; 5 mil: 2–14 cm; 20 mil: 1.5–60 cm), giving installers concrete data to match the engine to label stock. The A2504S2BS0001 provides only two range data points (Code 39: 3–60 cm; UPC-A: 0.5–38 cm), which is sufficient for straightforward retail or warehouse label formats but leaves density-specific performance undocumented. On every other measured parameter — scan rate (578 scans/sec), IP rating (IP65), symbology set (15 identical 1D codes), Bluetooth connectivity, scan patterns, minimum print contrast (15%), and warranty (2 years) — the two units are specification-equivalent. Neither model is differentiated on Bluetooth version or drop rating, so buyers with those requirements must consult CipherLab directly.

Side-by-Side Comparison

Spec-for-spec, from manufacturer data.

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Resources

• CipherLab A2504S2BS0001 product page — full specs and to add to a quote
• CipherLab A2560SCBS0001 product page — full specs and to add to a quote