CipherLab A2500SCBSU001 vs CipherLab A2564S2BKU0S1: Specification Comparison
Both the CipherLab A2500SCBSU001 and A2564S2BKU0S1 are handheld 1D linear imager barcode scanners with IP65 ratings and Bluetooth wireless connectivity, targeting retail, logistics, and warehouse environments. The comparison centers on connectivity options, scan range resolution detail, and resolution baseline — factors that determine deployment flexibility and read performance on aging or variable-quality barcodes. Buyers choosing between these two models are evaluating wired fallback capability against enhanced resolution specification depth.
In This Guide
- Which scanner gives you more connectivity flexibility for your deployment?
- How does scan range and resolution performance differ between the two models?
- Are there differences in symbology coverage or scan throughput that affect label type compatibility?
- Which should you choose: the A2500SCBSU001 or the A2564S2BKU0S1?
- Side-by-Side Specs
- FAQ
Which scanner gives you more connectivity flexibility for your deployment?
The A2500SCBSU001 ships with both Bluetooth wireless and a USB cable, providing dual-mode connectivity. This means a single unit can operate wirelessly via Bluetooth or be used in a wired USB configuration — useful in environments where wireless interference is a concern or where a tethered point-of-sale setup is needed. The A2564S2BKU0S1, by contrast, specifies Bluetooth only in its connectivity field. No USB wired mode is listed in the provided specs for the A2564S2BKU0S1. Buyers requiring a hard-wired fallback or a corded USB deployment option should note this distinction. Both units share the same IP65 environmental rating, form factor, and Black/Register White color options, so the connectivity difference is the primary deployment-mode differentiator between the two.
How does scan range and resolution performance differ between the two models?
The A2500SCBSU001 lists scan range as Code 39: 3–60 cm and UPC-A: 0.5–38 cm, but does not specify a baseline print resolution (mil size) in the provided specs. The A2564S2BKU0S1 provides granular range data tied to barcode density: Code 39 at 3 mil reads 3–10 cm, at 5 mil reads 2–14 cm, and at 20 mil reads 1.5–60 cm. This structured range-by-resolution data on the A2564S2BKU0S1 — including a stated 3 mil baseline — allows integrators to predict read performance on fine-print or degraded labels with more precision. The A2500SCBSU001's 60 cm maximum range on Code 39 is consistent with the A2564S2BKU0S1's 20 mil figure, but without mil-resolution breakpoints, fine-print performance cannot be directly compared from the provided specs.
Are there differences in symbology coverage or scan throughput that affect label type compatibility?
Both models share an identical scan rate of 578 scans per second, identical scan pattern modes (auto-sense and continuous), and a minimum print contrast of 15%. Symbology coverage is nearly identical across both units: Codabar, Code 39, Code 93, Code 128, GS1 DataBar (RSS), Industrial 2 of 5, Interleave 2 of 5, ISBT-128, Italian and French Pharmacodes, Matrix 2 of 5, MSI, Plessey, Telepen, UPC/EAN/GS1-128, and Code 11 are all listed for the A2500SCBSU001. The A2564S2BKU0S1's primary symbology field lists the same set; its secondary 'Symbologies 1D' field is a condensed subset. No 2D symbologies are listed for either model. Both carry 2-year warranties. Throughput and label-type compatibility are effectively equivalent based on provided specifications.
Which should you choose: the A2500SCBSU001 or the A2564S2BKU0S1?
Our take: The A2500SCBSU001 is the stronger choice when deployment requires both Bluetooth wireless and a USB wired fallback in a single unit. Its key advantage over the A2564S2BKU0S1 is dual-mode connectivity: the A2500SCBSU001 includes a USB cable and supports wired operation, while the A2564S2BKU0S1 specifies Bluetooth only. Scan throughput is identical at 578 scans per second, and both carry IP65 ratings and 2-year warranties. However, the A2564S2BKU0S1 provides a documented 3 mil baseline resolution with density-specific range breakpoints (3 mil: 3–10 cm; 20 mil: 1.5–60 cm), enabling more precise integration planning for environments with aging or fine-pitch labels — a spec the A2500SCBSU001's provided data does not match. Choose the A2500SCBSU001 for mixed wired/wireless retail or POS environments; choose the A2564S2BKU0S1 for purely wireless deployments where fine-print or degraded-label read confidence is a documented requirement.
Side-by-Side Comparison
Spec-for-spec, from manufacturer data.
| Specification | CipherLab A2500SCBSU001 | CipherLab A2564S2BKU0S1 |
|---|---|---|
| Product Type | 1D Linear Imager Barcode Scanner | 1D Linear Imager Barcode Scanner |
| Form Factor | Handheld | Handheld |
| Connectivity | Bluetooth + USB wired | Bluetooth only |
| USB Cable Included | Yes | — |
| IP Rating | IP65 | IP65 |
| Scan Engine | 1D Linear Imager | 1D Linear Imager |
| Baseline Resolution | — | 3 mil |
| Scan Range (Code 39) | 3–60 cm | 3 mil: 3–10 cm; 5 mil: 2–14 cm; 20 mil: 1.5–60 cm |
| Scan Range (UPC-A) | 0.5–38 cm | — |
| Scan Rate | 578 scans/second | 578 scans/second |
| Scan Modes | Auto-sense and continuous | Auto-sense and continuous |
| Min Print Contrast | 15% | 15% |
| Symbologies (1D) | Codabar, Code 39/93/128, GS1 DataBar, I2of5, ISBT-128, Pharmacodes, Matrix 2of5, MSI, Plessey, Telepen, UPC/EAN/GS1-128, Code 11 | Codabar, Code 39/93/128, GS1 DataBar, I2of5, ISBT-128, Pharmacodes, Matrix 2of5, MSI, Plessey, Telepen, UPC/EAN/GS1-128, Code 11 |
| Colors Available | Black, Register White | Black, Register White |
| Warranty | 2-Year | 2-Year |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which should you choose: the A2500SCBSU001 or the A2564S2BKU0S1?
The A2500SCBSU001 is the stronger choice when deployment requires both Bluetooth wireless and a USB wired fallback in a single unit. Its key advantage over the A2564S2BKU0S1 is dual-mode connectivity: the A2500SCBSU001 includes a USB cable and supports wired operation, while the A2564S2BKU0S1 specifies Bluetooth only. Scan throughput is identical at 578 scans per second, and both carry IP65 ratings and 2-year warranties. However, the A2564S2BKU0S1 provides a documented 3 mil baseline resolution with density-specific range breakpoints (3 mil: 3–10 cm; 20 mil: 1.5–60 cm), enabling more precise integration planning for environments with aging or fine-pitch labels — a spec the A2500SCBSU001's provided data does not match. Choose the A2500SCBSU001 for mixed wired/wireless retail or POS environments; choose the A2564S2BKU0S1 for purely wireless deployments where fine-print or degraded-label read confidence is a documented requirement.
Can the A2500SCBSU001 or A2564S2BKU0S1 be used as a wired USB scanner?
Only the A2500SCBSU001 lists USB cable connectivity in its provided specifications. The A2564S2BKU0S1 specifies Bluetooth only — no USB wired mode is documented in the specs provided. If wired USB operation is required, the A2500SCBSU001 is the only confirmed option between these two.
Which scanner is better for reading damaged or fine-print barcodes?
The A2564S2BKU0S1 documents a 3 mil baseline resolution with range data broken down by barcode density (3 mil, 5 mil, 20 mil), giving integrators concrete performance benchmarks for fine-pitch and degraded labels. The A2500SCBSU001 does not specify a minimum resolution (mil) in the provided specs, so a direct comparison on fine-print performance cannot be made from available data. Based on documented specs, the A2564S2BKU0S1 offers more transparency for fine-print read planning.
Is the A2500SCBSU001 or A2564S2BKU0S1 better for larger deployments where both wired and wireless operation are needed?
For mixed wired/wireless fleet deployments, the A2500SCBSU001 is the documented choice — it supports both Bluetooth and USB wired connectivity from a single unit, reducing the need to stock two different scanner models. The A2564S2BKU0S1's provided specs list Bluetooth only, making it suited for purely wireless deployments. Both models share the same IP65 rating, 578 scans/second throughput, identical symbology sets, and 2-year warranty, so total cost of ownership outside of connectivity is equivalent.
More Barcode Scanner Comparisons
- Zebra DS8108 vs Datalogic GBT4600-HC-BTK1-HP
- Zebra DS8108 vs Datalogic GD4590-HCK10-HDR-B
- Zebra DS8108 vs Honeywell 1202G-2USB-5BF-N
- Zebra DS8108 vs Datalogic GBT4500-BK-BTK1DRA
- Zebra DS8108 vs Zebra DS3608
- Zebra DS8108 vs Zebra LI3608
Barcode Scanner Buying Guides
Get a Second Opinion on Your Camera Choice
Share your site layout, coverage goals, and budget. Our team will validate the camera selection, flag anything we would change, and recommend products that match the use case.