Zebra ET85C-3P5A2-00B vs Zebra ET60AW-0SQAGN00A0-NA: Specification Comparison
Both the Zebra ET85C-3P5A2-00B and the ET60AW-0SQAGN00A0-NA are enterprise rugged tablets from Zebra Technologies, but they target fundamentally different operating environments and workflows. The ET85 is a 12.1-inch Windows-based 5G tablet built for mobile professionals requiring a full desktop OS and cellular connectivity, while the ET60AW is a 10.1-inch Android tablet with an integrated 1D/2D barcode scan engine aimed at warehouse and logistics scan-intensive operations. A buyer choosing between them is weighing OS platform, form factor, and scan capability against connectivity tier and display size.
In This Guide
- Which OS platform and compute power fits your workflow?
- How do the ruggedness ratings and environmental specs compare for harsh deployments?
- Which unit better supports your connectivity and data-capture requirements?
- Which should you choose: the ET85C-3P5A2-00B or the ET60AW-0SQAGN00A0-NA?
- Side-by-Side Specs
- FAQ
Which OS platform and compute power fits your workflow?
The ET85C-3P5A2-00B runs Windows 10 IoT Enterprise 64-bit on an 11th-generation Intel Core i5-1130G7 processor. This makes it directly compatible with legacy Windows enterprise applications, ERP clients, and domain-joined IT environments without virtualization or repackaging. Both units carry 8GB of RAM.
The ET60AW-0SQAGN00A0-NA runs Android (upgradable to Android 16) on a Qualcomm Snapdragon 6490 octa-core processor clocked at 2.7 GHz, with 128GB UFS internal storage and a MicroSD slot supporting up to 2TB expansion. Storage capacity for the ET85 is not specified in the provided data. The Android platform integrates natively with Zebra's Mobility DNA suite and modern MDM solutions but requires Android-compatible applications rather than Win32 software.
How do the ruggedness ratings and environmental specs compare for harsh deployments?
The ET85C-3P5A2-00B carries an IP65 sealing rating, protecting against dust ingress and low-pressure water jets. Its drop rating is 4 ft. (1.2 m) to plywood over concrete, extendable to 5 ft. (1.5 m) with an optional rugged boot. With an attached keyboard, the drop rating drops to 3 ft. (0.9 m). Display brightness is 800 nits with Corning Gorilla Glass and a sunlight-viewable designation.
The ET60AW-0SQAGN00A0-NA achieves an IP66 rating, one step higher than the ET85's IP65, meaning it is fully dust-tight and protected against powerful water jets. Its drop rating is not explicitly stated in the provided specifications. Display brightness is 1,000 nits on a 10.1-inch WUXGA (1920x1200) panel, which is 200 nits brighter than the ET85's 800-nit display. Neither unit's operating temperature range is provided in the supplied specs.
Which unit better supports your connectivity and data-capture requirements?
The ET85C-3P5A2-00B leads on wide-area and wired connectivity: it includes 5G LTE WAN and GPS in addition to Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.2, plus USB-C (USB 3.2 Gen2 with USB-PD and DisplayPort) and two USB 3.2 Gen2 Type-A ports. There is no integrated barcode scanner; data capture relies on the 13MP autofocus rear camera or a separately attached scanner. The ET85 does not list NFC in the provided specs.
The ET60AW-0SQAGN00A0-NA integrates a 1D/2D area imager scan engine directly into the tablet body, supporting standard 1D/2D symbologies including QR Code, Data Matrix, PDF417, and optional OCR — eliminating the need for a separate scan device in pick, pack, and receiving workflows. Wireless connectivity includes Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax), Bluetooth 5.2 Class 1 BLE, and NFC (ISO 14443 Type A/B, FeliCa, ISO 15693). There is no 5G or GPS listed for the ET60AW in the provided specifications. The ET60AW's battery is specified at 920 mAh, compared to the ET85's 5180 mAh (39.8 Whr) Li-Polymer pack; no battery runtime figures are provided for either unit.
Which should you choose: the ET85C-3P5A2-00B or the ET60AW-0SQAGN00A0-NA?
Our take: The ET85C-3P5A2-00B is the stronger choice when the deployment requires Windows applications, cellular 5G/GPS field connectivity, or a larger 12.1-inch display for complex data entry and multi-window workflows. Its Intel Core i5-1130G7 runs Win32 enterprise software natively, its 5G LTE WAN enables connectivity outside Wi-Fi coverage, and its 5180 mAh battery pack dwarfs the ET60AW's 920 mAh cell. Conversely, the ET60AW-0SQAGN00A0-NA is the stronger choice for scan-intensive warehouse, distribution, or retail environments: its integrated 1D/2D area imager eliminates a separate scan device, its IP66 rating exceeds the ET85's IP65, and its 1,000-nit display outshines the ET85's 800-nit panel. Platform is the decisive qualifier — Windows-dependent enterprise IT favors the ET85; Android MDM environments with high-volume barcode scanning favor the ET60AW.
Side-by-Side Comparison
Spec-for-spec, from manufacturer data.
| Specification | Zebra ET85C-3P5A2-00B | Zebra ET60AW-0SQAGN00A0-NA |
|---|---|---|
| Operating System | Windows 10 IoT Enterprise 64-bit | Android (upgradable to Android 16) |
| Processor | Intel Core i5-1130G7 (11th Gen) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6490 octa-core 2.7 GHz |
| RAM | 8GB | 8GB |
| Storage | — | 128GB UFS; MicroSD up to 2TB |
| Display Size | 12.1 in. | 10.1 in. |
| Display Resolution | 2160x1440 | 1920x1200 (WUXGA) |
| Display Brightness | 800 nits | 1,000 nits |
| IP Rating | IP65 | IP66 |
| Drop Rating | 4 ft. (1.2 m); 5 ft. with rugged boot | — |
| Integrated Scanner | — | 1D/2D Area Imager |
| Wide-Area Wireless | 5G LTE WAN, GPS | — |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax) |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 Class 1 BLE |
| NFC | — | ISO 14443 A/B; FeliCa; ISO 15693 |
| Battery Capacity | 5,180 mAh (39.8 Whr) | 920 mAh |
| Weight | 2.8 lbs | — |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which should you choose: the ET85C-3P5A2-00B or the ET60AW-0SQAGN00A0-NA?
The ET85C-3P5A2-00B is the stronger choice when the deployment requires Windows applications, cellular 5G/GPS field connectivity, or a larger 12.1-inch display for complex data entry and multi-window workflows. Its Intel Core i5-1130G7 runs Win32 enterprise software natively, its 5G LTE WAN enables connectivity outside Wi-Fi coverage, and its 5180 mAh battery pack dwarfs the ET60AW's 920 mAh cell. Conversely, the ET60AW-0SQAGN00A0-NA is the stronger choice for scan-intensive warehouse, distribution, or retail environments: its integrated 1D/2D area imager eliminates a separate scan device, its IP66 rating exceeds the ET85's IP65, and its 1,000-nit display outshines the ET85's 800-nit panel. Platform is the decisive qualifier — Windows-dependent enterprise IT favors the ET85; Android MDM environments with high-volume barcode scanning favor the ET60AW.
Can the ET85C-3P5A2-00B scan barcodes like the ET60AW-0SQAGN00A0-NA?
Not natively. The ET85C-3P5A2-00B does not include an integrated barcode scan engine per the provided specifications; it has a 13MP autofocus rear camera that could be used with camera-decode software, but it lacks the dedicated 1D/2D area imager built into the ET60AW-0SQAGN00A0-NA. For high-volume scan workflows, the ET60AW's integrated scanner is purpose-built for that task.
Is the ET60AW-0SQAGN00A0-NA or the ET85C-3P5A2-00B better for workers in outdoor or cellular-dependent field roles?
The ET85C-3P5A2-00B is better suited for cellular-dependent outdoor roles. It includes 5G LTE WAN and GPS, which the ET60AW-0SQAGN00A0-NA does not list in the provided specifications. The ET85 also offers a sunlight-viewable display with Corning Gorilla Glass. However, the ET60AW has a higher 1,000-nit brightness versus the ET85's 800 nits, and a higher IP66 dust/water seal versus the ET85's IP65.
Which tablet has better battery life — the ET85C-3P5A2-00B or the ET60AW-0SQAGN00A0-NA?
Based on capacity alone, the ET85C-3P5A2-00B has a significantly larger battery at 5,180 mAh (39.8 Whr) compared to the ET60AW-0SQAGN00A0-NA's 920 mAh. Neither product's runtime in hours is stated in the provided specifications, so a direct runtime comparison cannot be made from the available data. The ET85's battery is a 7.7V Li-Polymer pack; the ET60AW's battery chemistry is not specified.
More Mobile Computer Comparisons
- Zebra ET60AW-0HQAGN00A0-NA vs Zebra ET60AW-0SQAGN00A0-NA
- Zebra ET60AW-0HQAGN00A0-NA vs Zebra ET60AW-0SQAGSK0A0-NA
- Zebra ET60AW-0SQAGN00A0-NA vs Zebra ET60AW-0SQAGSK0A0-NA
- Zebra ET85B-3P5A2-000 vs Zebra ET60AW-0HQAGN00A0-NA
- Zebra ET85B-3P5A2-000 vs Zebra ET60AW-0SQAGN00A0-NA
- Zebra ET80A-0P5A2-000 vs Zebra ET60AW-0HQAGN00A0-NA
Mobile Computer Buying Guides
Get a Second Opinion on Your Camera Choice
Share your site layout, coverage goals, and budget. Our team will validate the camera selection, flag anything we would change, and recommend products that match the use case.