Zebra ET85B-3P5A2-000 vs Zebra ET60AW-0SQAGN00A0-NA: Specification Comparison
Both the Zebra ET85B-3P5A2-000 and the Zebra ET60AW-0SQAGN00A0-NA are enterprise rugged tablets from the same manufacturer, making them a legitimate cross-shop for mobile-workforce deployments. The ET85 is a 12.1-inch Windows-based tablet built around an Intel Core i5, targeting field service and professional-grade compute tasks. The ET60 is a 10.1-inch Android tablet with an integrated 1D/2D scan engine, oriented toward warehouse, logistics, and scan-intensive workflows. Buyers must weigh OS ecosystem, display size, scanning capability, and ruggedness profile against their specific operational environment.
In This Guide
- Which OS and compute platform better fits your workflow?
- Which device delivers better display performance and input capability for your use case?
- Which unit is better suited to harsh environments and mobile connectivity demands?
- Which should you choose: the ET85B-3P5A2-000 or the ET60AW-0SQAGN00A0-NA?
- Side-by-Side Specs
- FAQ
Which OS and compute platform better fits your workflow?
The ET85B-3P5A2-000 runs Windows 10 IoT Enterprise 64-bit on an 11th-generation Intel Core i5-1130G7. This positions it squarely in enterprise Windows environments where legacy applications, VPN clients, or full desktop software suites are required. The ET60AW-0SQAGN00A0-NA runs Android 16 on a Qualcomm Snapdragon 6490 octa-core processor clocked at 2.7 GHz. Android suits organizations already deployed on Zebra's Android MDM ecosystem (Zebra DNA, StageNow) or apps built for the Google Play/enterprise Android stack.
Storage is specified only for the ET60 at 128GB UFS with MicroSD expansion up to 2TB. No internal storage figure is provided in the ET85 spec sheet. RAM is 8GB on both units. The Snapdragon 6490 is a mobile-class SoC optimized for power efficiency; the i5-1130G7 is a full x86 processor capable of running compiled Windows applications without emulation — a critical distinction for industries relying on Windows-only software.
Which device delivers better display performance and input capability for your use case?
The ET85B-3P5A2-000 offers a 12.1-inch display at 2160×1440 resolution and 800 nits brightness, with Corning Gorilla Glass and a sunlight-viewable rating. The ET60AW-0SQAGN00A0-NA has a 10.1-inch WUXGA (1920×1200) display rated at 1,000 nits — 25% higher brightness than the ET85, which can be a decisive advantage in outdoor or high-ambient-light environments, despite the smaller screen.
A fundamental differentiator is the ET60's integrated 1D/2D area imager scan engine supporting QR Code, Data Matrix, PDF417, and optional OCR. The ET85 has no scan engine listed in its specifications. For any workflow requiring barcode or label scanning — receiving, picking, asset tracking — the ET60 eliminates the need for a paired external scanner. The ET85 compensates with a larger canvas for data-entry-heavy tasks and a 13MP autofocus rear camera versus the ET60's 16MP main camera with LED flash.
Which unit is better suited to harsh environments and mobile connectivity demands?
The ET85B-3P5A2-000 specifies a 4 ft./1.2 m drop rating to plywood over concrete (5 ft./1.5 m with rugged boot). No IP rating is provided for the ET85 in the supplied specifications. The ET60AW-0SQAGN00A0-NA carries an IP66 rating, confirming total dust ingress protection and protection against powerful water jets — a meaningful advantage in wash-down environments, dusty warehouses, or outdoor wet conditions. The ET85 drop rating is documented; the ET60's drop rating is not specified in the provided data.
On wireless, both support Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax) and Bluetooth 5.2. The ET85 adds 4G LTE WAN and GPS, enabling untethered connectivity outside Wi-Fi coverage — the ET60 has no cellular WAN listed. The ET60 adds NFC (ISO 14443 Type A/B, FeliCa, ISO 15693) for contactless card reads or asset tags; the ET85 lists no NFC. Battery capacity differs significantly: the ET85 carries a 5,180 mAh / 39.8 Whr Li-Polymer pack versus the ET60's 920 mAh — though tablet battery life is not solely mAh-comparable across different SoC power envelopes, the ET85's larger physical cell suggests longer untethered endurance.
Which should you choose: the ET85B-3P5A2-000 or the ET60AW-0SQAGN00A0-NA?
Our take: The ET85B-3P5A2-000 is the stronger choice when workers need a full Windows desktop OS, cellular WAN connectivity, and a large high-resolution display for data-intensive or application-dependent tasks. The ET60AW-0SQAGN00A0-NA is the stronger choice for scan-centric operations where an integrated 1D/2D imager, IP66 sealing, a 1,000-nit display, and NFC are operationally required. Three concrete spec deltas: the ET85 provides 4G LTE WAN and GPS while the ET60 has neither; the ET60 delivers 1,000 nits versus the ET85's 800 nits; and the ET60 includes an integrated scan engine versus none on the ET85. Platform qualifier: Windows-dependent enterprise software dictates the ET85; Android-MDM or scan-workflow environments point to the ET60.
Side-by-Side Comparison
Spec-for-spec, from manufacturer data.
| Specification | Zebra ET85B-3P5A2-000 | Zebra ET60AW-0SQAGN00A0-NA |
|---|---|---|
| Operating System | Windows 10 IoT Enterprise 64-bit | Android 16 |
| Processor | Intel Core i5-1130G7 (11th Gen) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6490 octa-core 2.7 GHz |
| RAM | 8GB | 8GB |
| Storage | — | 128GB UFS; MicroSD up to 2TB |
| Display Size | 12.1 in. | 10.1 in. |
| Display Resolution | 2160×1440 | 1920×1200 (WUXGA) |
| Display Brightness | 800 nits | 1,000 nits |
| Display Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass, sunlight viewable | — |
| Integrated Scan Engine | — | 1D/2D Area Imager |
| IP Rating | — | IP66 |
| Drop Rating | 4 ft. (1.2 m) to plywood/concrete | — |
| Wi-Fi Standard | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax) | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax) |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Cellular WAN | 4G LTE | — |
| NFC | — | ISO 14443 A/B; FeliCa; ISO 15693 |
| Battery Capacity | 5,180 mAh / 39.8 Whr | 920 mAh |
| Rear Camera | 13MP autofocus | 16MP autofocus with LED flash |
| Front Camera | 5MP autofocus | 8MP with privacy shade |
| Dimensions | 12.1" W × 8.9" L × 0.6" H | 10.8" W × 7.8" L × 0.7" H |
| Weight | 2.8 lbs | — |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which should you choose: the ET85B-3P5A2-000 or the ET60AW-0SQAGN00A0-NA?
The ET85B-3P5A2-000 is the stronger choice when workers need a full Windows desktop OS, cellular WAN connectivity, and a large high-resolution display for data-intensive or application-dependent tasks. The ET60AW-0SQAGN00A0-NA is the stronger choice for scan-centric operations where an integrated 1D/2D imager, IP66 sealing, a 1,000-nit display, and NFC are operationally required. Three concrete spec deltas: the ET85 provides 4G LTE WAN and GPS while the ET60 has neither; the ET60 delivers 1,000 nits versus the ET85's 800 nits; and the ET60 includes an integrated scan engine versus none on the ET85. Platform qualifier: Windows-dependent enterprise software dictates the ET85; Android-MDM or scan-workflow environments point to the ET60.
Can the ET85B-3P5A2-000 scan barcodes like the ET60AW-0SQAGN00A0-NA?
No integrated scan engine is specified for the ET85B-3P5A2-000. The ET60AW-0SQAGN00A0-NA has a built-in 1D/2D area imager supporting QR Code, Data Matrix, PDF417, and optional OCR. For scan-intensive workflows, the ET60 eliminates the need for a paired peripheral scanner; the ET85 would require one.
Which tablet is better protected against water and dust?
The ET60AW-0SQAGN00A0-NA carries an IP66 rating, meaning it is fully dust-tight and protected against powerful water jets. No IP rating is listed in the provided specifications for the ET85B-3P5A2-000. If wash-down or wet/dusty environments are a requirement, the ET60's IP66 certification is a documented advantage.
Does either tablet support cellular connectivity for use outside Wi-Fi coverage?
Yes — the ET85B-3P5A2-000 specifies 4G LTE WAN and GPS, enabling mobile broadband connectivity independent of local Wi-Fi infrastructure. The ET60AW-0SQAGN00A0-NA lists only Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.2; no cellular WAN is specified. For field deployments requiring always-on connectivity away from a facility network, the ET85 is the only option of the two with documented cellular capability.
More Mobile Computer Comparisons
- Zebra ET60AW-0HQAGN00A0-NA vs Zebra ET60AW-0SQAGN00A0-NA
- Zebra ET60AW-0HQAGN00A0-NA vs Zebra ET60AW-0SQAGSK0A0-NA
- Zebra ET60AW-0SQAGN00A0-NA vs Zebra ET60AW-0SQAGSK0A0-NA
- Zebra ET85B-3P5A2-000 vs Zebra ET60AW-0HQAGN00A0-NA
- Zebra ET80A-0P5A2-000 vs Zebra ET60AW-0HQAGN00A0-NA
- Zebra ET80A-0P5A2-000 vs Zebra ET60AW-0SQAGN00A0-NA
Mobile Computer Buying Guides
Get a Second Opinion on Your Camera Choice
Share your site layout, coverage goals, and budget. Our team will validate the camera selection, flag anything we would change, and recommend products that match the use case.