Zebra ET60AW-0HQAGN00A0-NA vs Zebra ET60AW-0SQAGSK0A0-NA

MOBILE COMPUTER COMPARISON

Zebra ET60AW-0HQAGN00A0-NA vs Zebra ET60AW-0SQAGSK0A0-NA: Specification Comparison

Both the ET60AW-0HQAGN00A0-NA and ET60AW-0SQAGSK0A0-NA are Zebra ET60 series 10.1-inch rugged Android tablets built around the same Qualcomm 6490 octa-core platform, targeted at warehouse, logistics, and field-service environments. They share the same chassis dimensions, IP66 rating, display resolution, RAM, and storage tier. The comparison centers on differentiated environmental features (specifically the heated display option), Bluetooth class, audio configuration, and connectivity stack details that matter to buyers selecting for specific deployment conditions.



Which tablet is better equipped for extreme temperature and harsh-environment deployments?

Both tablets carry an IP66 rating, meaning full dust ingress protection and resistance to powerful water jets, and both share identical chassis dimensions of 10.8 in. W × 7.8 in. L × 0.7 in. H. The ET60AW-0HQAGN00A0-NA adds a heated touchscreen explicitly specified for cold-environment use, allowing gloved-hand interaction in freezing warehouse or cold-storage conditions. The ET60AW-0SQAGSK0A0-NA does not list a heated display feature in its specifications.

The ET60AW-0SQAGSK0A0-NA's storage spec cites an operating temperature range of -40 °F to 158 °F (-40 °C to 70 °C), which indicates broad thermal tolerance, but this figure appears in the storage field rather than a dedicated operating-temperature spec. No equivalent temperature range is explicitly stated for the ET60AW-0HQAGN00A0-NA in the provided specifications. Buyers deploying into controlled cold-chain or outdoor freezer environments should weigh the confirmed heated-display advantage of the -0HQAGN00A0-NA.


How do the two tablets differ in wireless capability and interface options?

The ET60AW-0HQAGN00A0-NA specifies WiFi 6E (802.11ax) with channel bandwidths of 20/40/80/160 MHz, Bluetooth 5.2 Class 1 with BLE, and NFC supporting ISO 14443 Type A and B, FeliCa, and ISO 15693. Class 1 Bluetooth provides extended range versus Class 2. Its wired interface is USB Type-C with USB PD 3.0 power delivery.

The ET60AW-0SQAGSK0A0-NA specifies WiFi 6 (802.11ax) — notably without the '6E' designation — with the same 20/40/80/160 MHz channel bandwidths. Its Bluetooth is listed as 5.2 LE without a Class designation. NFC is confirmed (ISO 14443 Type A/B, FeliCa, ISO 15693). The interface field references a docking connector for charge and data plus a keyboard repair port, but does not explicitly confirm USB PD 3.0 in the same detail. Buyers in 6-GHz-band RF environments gain additional spectrum access with the -0HQAGN00A0-NA's WiFi 6E radio.


Are there meaningful differences in scanning capability, camera, and audio between the two models?

Both tablets integrate a 1D/2D barcode scan engine. The ET60AW-0SQAGSK0A0-NA provides an explicit symbology list — Code 128, Code 39, UPC, EAN, QR Code, Data Matrix, PDF417 — while the ET60AW-0HQAGN00A0-NA describes 1D/2D coverage with optional OCR for documents but does not publish the same enumerated symbology list in the provided specifications.

On imaging, both units list a 16 MP autofocus rear camera with LED flash and an 8 MP front camera with a mechanical privacy shade. Audio differs: the ET60AW-0HQAGN00A0-NA specifies stereo speakers and two microphones alongside a 3-axis gyroscope and 3-axis accelerometer motion sensor. The ET60AW-0SQAGSK0A0-NA lists only microphone support in its audio field — no stereo speaker specification is provided. Deployments requiring voice-directed workflows or multimedia output will find the richer audio configuration of the -0HQAGN00A0-NA more clearly documented.


Which should you choose: the ET60AW-0HQAGN00A0-NA or the ET60AW-0SQAGSK0A0-NA?

Our take: The ET60AW-0HQAGN00A0-NA is the stronger choice when the deployment involves cold-storage, freezer aisles, or outdoor winter environments and demands the fullest wireless spectrum access. Three concrete spec deltas drive this: (1) the -0HQAGN00A0-NA includes a heated touchscreen for gloved cold-environment use — a feature absent from the -0SQAGSK0A0-NA's specifications; (2) the -0HQAGN00A0-NA carries a WiFi 6E radio extending into the 6 GHz band, versus WiFi 6 (no 6E) on the -0SQAGSK0A0-NA; and (3) the -0HQAGN00A0-NA specifies Bluetooth 5.2 Class 1 for extended range, while the -0SQAGSK0A0-NA lists Bluetooth 5.2 LE without a class rating. The ET60AW-0SQAGSK0A0-NA is suitable for standard ambient-temperature warehouse or logistics dock deployments where a detailed published symbology list and a docking-connector interface are priorities and the 6 GHz band is not required.


Side-by-Side Comparison

Spec-for-spec, from manufacturer data.

SpecificationZebra ET60AW-0HQAGN00A0-NAZebra ET60AW-0SQAGSK0A0-NA
Product TypeRugged Android TabletRugged Android Tablet
Form FactorTablet (display)Tablet
Display Size10.1 in. WUXGA (1920×1200)10.1 in. WUXGA (1920×1200)
Display Brightness1,000 nits1,000 nits
Heated TouchscreenYes
ProcessorQualcomm 6490 octa-core, 2.7 GHzQualcomm 6490 octa-core, 2.7 GHz
RAM8 GB8 GB
Storage128 GB UFS Flash + microSD up to 2 TB128 GB UFS Flash + microSD up to 2 TB
Operating SystemAndroid 16Android 16
IP RatingIP66IP66
WiFiWiFi 6E (802.11ax), 20/40/80/160 MHzWiFi 6 (802.11ax), 20/40/80/160 MHz
Bluetooth5.2 Class 1, BLE5.2 LE
NFCISO 14443 A/B, FeliCa, ISO 15693ISO 14443 A/B, FeliCa, ISO 15693
Scan Engine1D/2D barcode imager1D/2D barcode imager
Camera (Rear / Front)16 MP AF + LED flash / 8 MP + privacy shade16 MP AF + LED flash / 8 MP + privacy shade
AudioStereo speakers + 2 microphonesMicrophone (no stereo speaker spec listed)
Battery5,920 mAh920 mAh (full capacity not confirmed in specs)
Dimensions10.8 in. W × 7.8 in. L × 0.7 in. H10.8 in. W × 7.8 in. L × 0.7 in. H
Warranty1-year1-year

Frequently Asked Questions

Which should you choose: the ET60AW-0HQAGN00A0-NA or the ET60AW-0SQAGSK0A0-NA?

The ET60AW-0HQAGN00A0-NA is the stronger choice when the deployment involves cold-storage, freezer aisles, or outdoor winter environments and demands the fullest wireless spectrum access. Three concrete spec deltas drive this: (1) the -0HQAGN00A0-NA includes a heated touchscreen for gloved cold-environment use — a feature absent from the -0SQAGSK0A0-NA's specifications; (2) the -0HQAGN00A0-NA carries a WiFi 6E radio extending into the 6 GHz band, versus WiFi 6 (no 6E) on the -0SQAGSK0A0-NA; and (3) the -0HQAGN00A0-NA specifies Bluetooth 5.2 Class 1 for extended range, while the -0SQAGSK0A0-NA lists Bluetooth 5.2 LE without a class rating. The ET60AW-0SQAGSK0A0-NA is suitable for standard ambient-temperature warehouse or logistics dock deployments where a detailed published symbology list and a docking-connector interface are priorities and the 6 GHz band is not required.

Is the ET60AW-0HQAGN00A0-NA or ET60AW-0SQAGSK0A0-NA better for cold-storage warehouse deployments?

The ET60AW-0HQAGN00A0-NA is the specified choice for cold environments. Its spec sheet explicitly lists a heated touchscreen designed for freezing conditions and gloved-hand operation. The ET60AW-0SQAGSK0A0-NA does not list a heated display in the provided specifications, making it less suitable for sustained cold-chain or freezer-aisle use.

Do both tablets support the same barcode symbologies?

Both integrate a 1D/2D scan engine. The ET60AW-0SQAGSK0A0-NA publishes an explicit symbology list (Code 128, Code 39, UPC, EAN, QR Code, Data Matrix, PDF417). The ET60AW-0HQAGN00A0-NA describes 1D/2D coverage and optional OCR but does not enumerate the same list in the provided specifications. Buyers requiring confirmed support for a specific symbology set should verify against Zebra's full datasheet for the -0HQAGN00A0-NA.

Is there a meaningful difference in wireless performance between the two models?

Yes. The ET60AW-0HQAGN00A0-NA specifies WiFi 6E (802.11ax), which includes access to the 6 GHz band for reduced congestion in dense RF environments. The ET60AW-0SQAGSK0A0-NA specifies WiFi 6 (802.11ax) without the 6E designation, limiting it to 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz bands. Both support 160 MHz channel bandwidth. In high-density facilities where 6 GHz channel availability matters, the -0HQAGN00A0-NA holds an advantage.



Get a Second Opinion on Your Camera Choice

Share your site layout, coverage goals, and budget. Our team will validate the camera selection, flag anything we would change, and recommend products that match the use case.