Zebra ET60AW-0SQAGN00A0-NA vs Zebra ET60AW-0SQAGSK0A0-NA: Specification Comparison
Both SKUs are Zebra ET60AW-series 10.1-inch rugged Android tablets with integrated 1D/2D barcode scan engines, targeting mobile workers in warehouse, logistics, and field-service environments. The ET60AW-0SQAGN00A0-NA and ET60AW-0SQAGSK0A0-NA share the same platform, display, processor, and IP rating, making them direct cross-shop candidates. The meaningful differentiation lies in wireless capability, NFC specification detail, audio hardware, and symbology documentation — the dimensions that matter most to IT buyers selecting between SKU variants for a specific deployment.
In This Guide
- Which tablet delivers broader wireless and short-range connectivity for your deployment environment?
- How do the integrated scan engines and supported barcode symbologies compare for warehouse and receiving workflows?
- How do display, camera, audio, and physical build specs compare for field and dockside operators?
- Which should you choose: the ET60AW-0SQAGN00A0-NA or the ET60AW-0SQAGSK0A0-NA?
- Side-by-Side Specs
- FAQ
Which tablet delivers broader wireless and short-range connectivity for your deployment environment?
Product A (ET60AW-0SQAGN00A0-NA) specifies Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax) with channel bandwidths of 20/40/80/160 MHz, Bluetooth 5.2 Class 1 BLE, and NFC per ISO 14443 Type A and B, FeliCa, and ISO 15693. Wi-Fi 6E adds access to the 6 GHz band, which reduces co-channel interference in high-density RF environments such as large distribution centers with many concurrent devices.
Product B (ET60AW-0SQAGSK0A0-NA) lists Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) and Bluetooth 5.2 LE with the same 20/40/80/160 MHz channel bandwidths. NFC is confirmed as present and the spec lists ISO 14443 Type A and B, FeliCa, and ISO 15693 — matching Product A's NFC protocol coverage. However, the wireless spec does not explicitly reference the 6 GHz band or the Wi-Fi 6E designation, leaving 6 GHz support unconfirmed for Product B.
For facilities already deploying or planning 6 GHz Wi-Fi infrastructure, Product A's explicit Wi-Fi 6E specification is a relevant differentiator. In environments running only 2.4 GHz or 5 GHz access points, both tablets operate equivalently on paper.
How do the integrated scan engines and supported barcode symbologies compare for warehouse and receiving workflows?
Both tablets integrate a 1D/2D area imager scan engine directly into the tablet chassis, eliminating the need for an external sled or companion scanner. Neither spec sheet identifies the scan engine module by model number.
Product A lists supported symbologies as 1D and 2D codes with optional OCR, and calls out QR Code, Data Matrix, and PDF417 in the 2D category. The 1D symbology list is not itemized beyond the general '1D and 2D codes' descriptor.
Product B provides a more complete symbology list: Code 128, Code 39, UPC, EAN (1D) and QR Code, Data Matrix, PDF417 (2D). This explicit enumeration is useful when validating against a facility's label formats, particularly for retail receiving (UPC/EAN) or GS1-compliant carton labels (Code 128). Product A's optional OCR capability is not mentioned in Product B's spec, and Product B does not reference OCR. Buyers requiring OCR should confirm availability on the specific SKU before purchase.
How do display, camera, audio, and physical build specs compare for field and dockside operators?
Both tablets share the same display: 10.1-inch WUXGA (1920 x 1200) panel at 1,000 nits, making outdoor or bright-warehouse readability equivalent between the two. Physical dimensions are identical at 10.8 in. W x 7.8 in. L x 0.7 in. H, and both carry an IP66 rating for dust and high-pressure water resistance. Battery capacity is 920 mAh on both units.
Camera hardware is specified similarly: 16 MP autofocus rear with LED flash and 8 MP front with mechanical privacy shade on Product A; Product B lists the same camera configuration but uses slightly different source phrasing. Both list USB Type-C as the primary charge and data port with USB PD 3.0 compatibility noted on Product B.
Audio is a point of divergence. Product A specifies stereo speakers and two microphones. Product B lists only 'microphone supported,' with no speaker count or stereo confirmation. For operators who rely on audio alerts, voice-directed work, or push-to-talk applications, Product A's stereo speaker specification provides a clearer hardware baseline. Product B's audio capability beyond the microphone is not confirmed in the provided specs.
Which should you choose: the ET60AW-0SQAGN00A0-NA or the ET60AW-0SQAGSK0A0-NA?
Our take: The ET60AW-0SQAGN00A0-NA is the stronger choice when deploying into high-density 6 GHz Wi-Fi infrastructure or when audio output quality and OCR capability are operational requirements. Concretely: Product A explicitly supports Wi-Fi 6E (6 GHz band) while Product B's wireless spec stops at Wi-Fi 6 without 6E confirmation; Product A specifies stereo speakers plus dual microphones versus Product B's unconfirmed speaker output; and Product A documents optional OCR scanning while Product B's spec omits OCR entirely. Product B has an advantage in symbology documentation, listing Code 128, Code 39, UPC, and EAN explicitly — useful for procurement teams validating label compatibility without a presales call. Both units are otherwise equivalent on processor, RAM, storage, display, IP rating, battery, NFC protocols, and dimensions. Buyers on 2.4/5 GHz-only networks with no OCR or audio-output requirements will find Product B functionally equivalent for basic 1D/2D scan workflows.
Side-by-Side Comparison
Spec-for-spec, from manufacturer data.
| Specification | Zebra ET60AW-0SQAGN00A0-NA | Zebra ET60AW-0SQAGSK0A0-NA |
|---|---|---|
| MPN | ET60AW-0SQAGN00A0-NA | ET60AW-0SQAGSK0A0-NA |
| Screen Size & Resolution | 10.1 in. WUXGA 1920x1200 | 10.1 in. WUXGA 1920x1200 |
| Brightness | 1,000 nits | 1,000 nits |
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6490 octa-core 2.7 GHz | Qualcomm 6490 octa-core 2.7 GHz |
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Storage | 128 GB UFS; MicroSD up to 2 TB | 128 GB UFS; MicroSD up to 2 TB |
| Operating System | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| Wi-Fi Standard | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) |
| Channel Bandwidth | 20/40/80/160 MHz | 20/40/80/160 MHz |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.2 Class 1 BLE | Bluetooth 5.2 LE |
| NFC Protocols | ISO 14443 A/B; FeliCa; ISO 15693 | ISO 14443 A/B; FeliCa; ISO 15693 |
| IP Rating | IP66 | IP66 |
| Battery Capacity | 920 mAh | 920 mAh |
| Scan Engine | 1D/2D Area Imager; optional OCR | 1D/2D integrated; no OCR listed |
| Symbologies (1D) | 1D codes (specific list not provided) | Code 128, Code 39, UPC, EAN |
| Symbologies (2D) | QR Code, Data Matrix, PDF417 | QR Code, Data Matrix, PDF417 |
| Camera (Rear / Front) | 16 MP AF + LED flash / 8 MP + privacy shade | 16 MP AF + LED flash / 8 MP + privacy shade |
| Audio | Stereo speakers + 2 microphones | Microphone supported (speakers not specified) |
| Dimensions | 10.8 in. W x 7.8 in. L x 0.7 in. H | 10.8 in. W x 7.8 in. L x 0.7 in. H |
| Warranty | 1 year | 1 year |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which should you choose: the ET60AW-0SQAGN00A0-NA or the ET60AW-0SQAGSK0A0-NA?
The ET60AW-0SQAGN00A0-NA is the stronger choice when deploying into high-density 6 GHz Wi-Fi infrastructure or when audio output quality and OCR capability are operational requirements. Concretely: Product A explicitly supports Wi-Fi 6E (6 GHz band) while Product B's wireless spec stops at Wi-Fi 6 without 6E confirmation; Product A specifies stereo speakers plus dual microphones versus Product B's unconfirmed speaker output; and Product A documents optional OCR scanning while Product B's spec omits OCR entirely. Product B has an advantage in symbology documentation, listing Code 128, Code 39, UPC, and EAN explicitly — useful for procurement teams validating label compatibility without a presales call. Both units are otherwise equivalent on processor, RAM, storage, display, IP rating, battery, NFC protocols, and dimensions. Buyers on 2.4/5 GHz-only networks with no OCR or audio-output requirements will find Product B functionally equivalent for basic 1D/2D scan workflows.
Is the ET60AW-0SQAGN00A0-NA or ET60AW-0SQAGSK0A0-NA better for a large warehouse with hundreds of concurrent Wi-Fi devices?
Based on the provided specs, the ET60AW-0SQAGN00A0-NA is the better-documented choice for dense RF environments because it explicitly supports Wi-Fi 6E, which includes access to the less-congested 6 GHz band. The ET60AW-0SQAGSK0A0-NA specifies Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) but does not confirm 6 GHz / Wi-Fi 6E support in its spec sheet. If your access point infrastructure already supports 6 GHz, Product A's Wi-Fi 6E spec is the relevant differentiator.
Do both tablets support the same barcode types, or is one better documented for retail-format labels like UPC and EAN?
Both integrate a 1D/2D scan engine, but their symbology documentation differs. The ET60AW-0SQAGSK0A0-NA explicitly lists Code 128, Code 39, UPC, EAN, QR Code, Data Matrix, and PDF417. The ET60AW-0SQAGN00A0-NA lists 1D and 2D codes broadly, calls out QR Code, Data Matrix, and PDF417 in the 2D category, and adds optional OCR — but does not enumerate specific 1D symbologies like UPC or EAN by name. Buyers validating retail label compatibility should confirm 1D symbology coverage on Product A directly with Zebra.
Are there any differences between these two tablets for voice-directed work or audio alert applications?
Yes, based on the provided specs. The ET60AW-0SQAGN00A0-NA specifies stereo speakers and two microphones, giving it a defined audio hardware baseline for voice-directed picking or audible alerts. The ET60AW-0SQAGSK0A0-NA lists only 'microphone supported' — speaker presence and count are not confirmed in the available spec data. If audio output is required for your workflow, Product A has the stronger documented audio specification.
More Mobile Computer Comparisons
- Zebra ET60AW-0HQAGN00A0-NA vs Zebra ET60AW-0SQAGN00A0-NA
- Zebra ET60AW-0HQAGN00A0-NA vs Zebra ET60AW-0SQAGSK0A0-NA
- Zebra ET85B-3P5A2-000 vs Zebra ET60AW-0HQAGN00A0-NA
- Zebra ET85B-3P5A2-000 vs Zebra ET60AW-0SQAGN00A0-NA
- Zebra ET80A-0P5A2-000 vs Zebra ET60AW-0HQAGN00A0-NA
- Zebra ET80A-0P5A2-000 vs Zebra ET60AW-0SQAGN00A0-NA
Mobile Computer Buying Guides
Get a Second Opinion on Your Camera Choice
Share your site layout, coverage goals, and budget. Our team will validate the camera selection, flag anything we would change, and recommend products that match the use case.