Socket Mobile CX3445-1908 vs Socket Mobile CX3487-1982: Specification Comparison
Both the Socket Mobile CX3445-1908 and CX3487-1982 are Bluetooth handheld 1D barcode scanners in the SocketScan S740 line, targeting mobile retail, warehouse, and field deployments across iOS, Android, and Windows platforms. This comparison examines the two SKUs across scan engine and symbology support, battery and environmental ratings, and connectivity and platform compatibility — the three axes most relevant to buyers choosing between same-family scanner variants for their specific deployment environment.
In This Guide
- Do the CX3445-1908 and CX3487-1982 support the same scan engine and symbologies?
- How do the CX3445-1908 and CX3487-1982 compare on battery capacity and environmental ratings?
- Are there differences in connectivity or platform compatibility between the CX3445-1908 and CX3487-1982?
- Which should you choose: the CX3445-1908 or the CX3487-1982?
- Side-by-Side Specs
- FAQ
Do the CX3445-1908 and CX3487-1982 support the same scan engine and symbologies?
Both scanners share an identical 1D imager scan engine. Neither unit is a 2D-only or laser-based scanner — both use imager technology capable of reading 1D barcodes as their primary engine class.
Symbology support is identical across both models. Each decodes Code 128, Code 39, UPC, and EAN in the 1D tier, and QR Code and Data Matrix in the 2D tier. No spec difference exists between the two units on either 1D or 2D symbology coverage. Buyers standardizing on a specific barcode format will find no differentiation here.
How do the CX3445-1908 and CX3487-1982 compare on battery capacity and environmental ratings?
Battery capacity is identical: both units carry a 2000mAh rechargeable pack. No cycle count, charge time, or scan-per-charge figure is provided in the specifications for either model, so runtime comparisons beyond capacity are not possible from available data.
Operating temperature is the same for both: 0° to 45°C (32° to 113°F). However, the CX3487-1982 carries an 'Outdoor' environment rating that is absent from the CX3445-1908 spec set. The CX3445-1908 has no stated environment rating in its specifications. This is the single environmental differentiator between the two models — buyers deploying in outdoor settings should note that only the CX3487-1982 carries an explicit outdoor-rated designation.
Are there differences in connectivity or platform compatibility between the CX3445-1908 and CX3487-1982?
Both scanners use Bluetooth wireless connectivity. No Bluetooth version, profile (HID, SPP, etc.), or range specification is provided in the specs for either model, limiting a precise protocol-level comparison.
Platform compatibility is explicitly stated for the CX3445-1908 as iOS, Android, and Windows. The CX3487-1982 spec set references Bluetooth pairing with iOS, Android, and Windows in its bullet content but does not list compatible platforms as a discrete structured spec field. Form factor for both is compact handheld. No weight, dimensions, or IP/IK rating is provided for either unit beyond the CX3487-1982's 'Outdoor' environment designation.
Which should you choose: the CX3445-1908 or the CX3487-1982?
Our take: The CX3487-1982 is the stronger choice when deployments include outdoor environments, as it carries an explicit 'Outdoor' environment rating absent from the CX3445-1908 spec set. Beyond that single differentiator, the two units are specification-identical across every other measurable dimension: both use a 1D imager engine, both support the same six symbologies (Code 128, Code 39, UPC, EAN, QR Code, Data Matrix), both carry a 2000mAh battery, both operate from 0° to 45°C, and both connect via Bluetooth. The CX3445-1908 explicitly lists iOS, Android, and Windows as compatible platforms in its structured spec; the CX3487-1982 references the same platforms in bullet copy but not in a discrete spec field. For indoor retail or warehouse deployments where environment rating is irrelevant, either unit is functionally equivalent per available specifications. Buyers requiring outdoor-rated hardware should select the CX3487-1982.
Side-by-Side Comparison
Spec-for-spec, from manufacturer data.
| Specification | Socket Mobile CX3445-1908 | Socket Mobile CX3487-1982 |
|---|---|---|
| Product Type | Scanner | Scanner |
| Model Line | SocketScan S740 | SocketScan S740 |
| Form Factor | Handheld | Handheld |
| Scan Engine | 1D Imager | 1D Imager |
| Connectivity | Bluetooth | Bluetooth |
| Symbologies 1D | Code 128, Code 39, UPC, EAN | Code 128, Code 39, UPC, EAN |
| Symbologies 2D | QR Code, Data Matrix | QR Code, Data Matrix |
| Battery Capacity | 2000mAh | 2000mAh |
| Operating Temperature | 0° to 45°C (32° to 113°F) | 0° to 45°C (32° to 113°F) |
| Environment Rating | — | Outdoor |
| Compatible Platforms | iOS, Android, Windows | — |
| Warranty | 1-year | 1-year |
| Datasheet | /content/product-datasheets/CX3445-1908.pdf | /content/product-datasheets/CX3487-1982.pdf |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which should you choose: the CX3445-1908 or the CX3487-1982?
The CX3487-1982 is the stronger choice when deployments include outdoor environments, as it carries an explicit 'Outdoor' environment rating absent from the CX3445-1908 spec set. Beyond that single differentiator, the two units are specification-identical across every other measurable dimension: both use a 1D imager engine, both support the same six symbologies (Code 128, Code 39, UPC, EAN, QR Code, Data Matrix), both carry a 2000mAh battery, both operate from 0° to 45°C, and both connect via Bluetooth. The CX3445-1908 explicitly lists iOS, Android, and Windows as compatible platforms in its structured spec; the CX3487-1982 references the same platforms in bullet copy but not in a discrete spec field. For indoor retail or warehouse deployments where environment rating is irrelevant, either unit is functionally equivalent per available specifications. Buyers requiring outdoor-rated hardware should select the CX3487-1982.
Is the CX3445-1908 or CX3487-1982 better for outdoor field scanning?
The CX3487-1982 is the appropriate choice for outdoor deployments — its specifications include an explicit 'Outdoor' environment rating. The CX3445-1908 has no environment rating listed in its specifications, making it unsuitable to recommend for outdoor use based on available data.
Do the CX3445-1908 and CX3487-1982 read the same barcodes?
Yes. Both scanners support an identical symbology set: Code 128, Code 39, UPC, and EAN in 1D, plus QR Code and Data Matrix in 2D. There is no difference in barcode format coverage between the two models per the provided specifications.
Will either scanner work all day without recharging?
Both units carry a 2000mAh battery. Neither model's specifications include a stated scan count per charge or runtime figure, so a direct runtime comparison is not possible from available data. Battery capacity is identical between the two.
More Barcode Scanner Comparisons
- Datalogic PM9100-910RB vs CipherLab A1000ACBU0001
- Datalogic PM9100-910RB vs CipherLab A1000ACWU0001
- Datalogic PM9100-910RB vs Zebra LI2208-SR7U2100AZW
- Datalogic PM9100-910RB vs CipherLab A8001RSC00025
- Datalogic PM9100-910RB vs Datalogic PM9100-D910RB
- Datalogic PM9100-910RB vs Datalogic QBT2500-BK
Barcode Scanner Buying Guides
Get a Second Opinion on Your Camera Choice
Share your site layout, coverage goals, and budget. Our team will validate the camera selection, flag anything we would change, and recommend products that match the use case.