SDC 101-KDENA vs Axis A1711: Specification Comparison
Both the SDC 101-KDENA and the Axis A1711 are 4-door access controllers targeting commercial and institutional installations where a single controller must manage up to four independent entry points. The SDC unit is a standalone wired controller emphasizing deep credential storage and dual-protocol reader support, while the Axis kit bundles a network door controller inside a tamper-protected steel enclosure with an integrated 150 W power supply. Installers and IT buyers evaluating either product are comparing on credential capacity, power architecture, physical integration, and ecosystem compatibility.
In This Guide
- How do credential capacity and reader/protocol support compare between the 101-KDENA and the A1711?
- How does each unit handle power delivery and physical installation requirements?
- What compliance certifications, ecosystem integrations, and warranty terms does each product offer?
- Which should you choose: the 101-KDENA or the A1711?
- Side-by-Side Specs
- FAQ
How do credential capacity and reader/protocol support compare between the 101-KDENA and the A1711?
The SDC 101-KDENA specifies on-device storage of 250,000 credentials and explicitly lists HID-compatible readers with keypad support. It communicates via OSDP and TCP/IP, giving installers a choice between an encrypted, RS-485 wired reader bus (OSDP) and standard IP networking—reducing lock-in to any single reader manufacturer.
The Axis A1711 kit does not state a credential capacity in the provided specifications. Its network integration is described as ONVIF-compatible, positioning it within IP-centric VMS ecosystems. Reader protocol details (e.g., OSDP, Wiegand) are not specified for the A1711 in the available data and cannot be inferred.
How does each unit handle power delivery and physical installation requirements?
The SDC 101-KDENA operates at 24 VDC input and lists PoE (802.3af) as a power option alongside wall and rack mounting. Its physical footprint is 4½" × 6 7⁄16" × 2" and it weighs 2 lbs. Power for door peripherals (locks, readers) is not addressed in the provided specs beyond the controller's own 24 VDC supply.
The Axis A1711 is supplied as a kit that includes a 150 W regulated DC power supply with battery charging capability, all housed inside the AXIS TA1202 tamper-protected steel enclosure. The integrated power supply is sized to drive door hardware directly from the enclosure, simplifying field wiring. Enclosure dimensions and weight are not specified in the provided data.
What compliance certifications, ecosystem integrations, and warranty terms does each product offer?
The SDC 101-KDENA carries a lifetime warranty—a meaningful long-term cost consideration for end-users and service contracts. Compliance certifications beyond HID compatibility are not listed in the provided specifications.
The Axis A1711 kit is UL Listed, which is a prerequisite for acceptance by North American Authorities Having Jurisdiction (AHJ) on many commercial and government projects. It integrates with ONVIF-capable VMS platforms, aligning with IT-managed video/access convergence deployments. Warranty terms for the A1711 are not stated in the provided specifications.
Which should you choose: the 101-KDENA or the A1711?
Our take: The 101-KDENA is the stronger choice when on-device credential scale, reader-protocol flexibility, and long-term ownership cost are the primary criteria: it stores 250,000 credentials locally, supports both OSDP and TCP/IP, and carries a lifetime warranty—none of which are matched or addressed in the A1711's available specifications. Conversely, the A1711 kit is the stronger choice when AHJ approval, integrated power infrastructure, and ONVIF-based VMS convergence drive the decision: its UL Listing satisfies compliance requirements the SDC unit does not document, and its 150 W regulated supply with battery charging eliminates a separate power panel. Buyers on Axis ACAP or ONVIF-centric platforms should favor the A1711; installers needing maximum credential depth, OSDP reader compatibility, or a lifetime-warranted controller on an independent or multi-brand platform should favor the 101-KDENA.
Side-by-Side Comparison
Spec-for-spec, from manufacturer data.
| Specification | SDC 101-KDENA | Axis A1711 |
|---|---|---|
| Product Type | Controller | Controller (Kit) |
| Door Capacity | 4 independent zones | 4 doors simultaneous |
| Credential Capacity | 250,000 | — |
| Communication Protocols | OSDP; TCP/IP | ONVIF (IP) |
| Reader/Credential Type | HID-compatible; Keypad | — |
| Input Power | 24 VDC | — |
| Integrated Power Supply | — | 150 W regulated DC with battery charging |
| PoE Support | 802.3af | PoE compatible |
| Enclosure Included | — | Yes — AXIS TA1202 tamper-protected steel |
| Mount Type | Wall; Rack | — |
| Dimensions | 4.5" × 6.44" × 2" | — |
| Weight | 2 lbs | — |
| Override Feature | Integrated key switch | — |
| UL Listed | — | Yes |
| VMS Compatibility | — | ONVIF-capable platforms |
| Warranty | Lifetime | — |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which should you choose: the 101-KDENA or the A1711?
The 101-KDENA is the stronger choice when on-device credential scale, reader-protocol flexibility, and long-term ownership cost are the primary criteria: it stores 250,000 credentials locally, supports both OSDP and TCP/IP, and carries a lifetime warranty—none of which are matched or addressed in the A1711's available specifications. Conversely, the A1711 kit is the stronger choice when AHJ approval, integrated power infrastructure, and ONVIF-based VMS convergence drive the decision: its UL Listing satisfies compliance requirements the SDC unit does not document, and its 150 W regulated supply with battery charging eliminates a separate power panel. Buyers on Axis ACAP or ONVIF-centric platforms should favor the A1711; installers needing maximum credential depth, OSDP reader compatibility, or a lifetime-warranted controller on an independent or multi-brand platform should favor the 101-KDENA.
Is the 101-KDENA or the A1711 better for a large-tenant building with thousands of cardholders?
Based on available specs, the 101-KDENA specifies storage for 250,000 credentials on-device. The A1711's credential capacity is not stated in its provided specifications, so a direct comparison cannot be made on this point. Buyers with large cardholder databases should confirm the A1711's credential limit with Axis before specifying it.
Which controller is easier to get approved by a local building inspector or AHJ?
The Axis A1711 kit is UL Listed per its provided specifications, which is the certification most North American AHJs require for access control equipment. The SDC 101-KDENA's provided specifications do not list UL or equivalent certification, so installers in jurisdictions with strict compliance requirements should verify SDC's certification status independently.
Do I need a separate power supply and enclosure for either controller?
The Axis A1711 is supplied as a complete kit including a 150 W regulated DC power supply with battery charging inside a tamper-protected steel enclosure (AXIS TA1202), so no separate power panel or cabinet is specified as required. The SDC 101-KDENA's provided specifications address only its own 24 VDC input power; a separate power supply and enclosure for door hardware would typically need to be specified and ordered separately.
More Access Controller Comparisons
- SDC 101-KDENA vs SDC MC-4PAK
- SDC 101-KDENA vs SDC PTH-4Q
- SDC MC-4PAK vs Axis A1711
- SDC PTH-4Q vs Axis A1711
- SDC 400U-RMB vs Axis A1711
- SDC 400U-RMB vs SDC 101-KDENA
Access Controller Buying Guides
Get a Second Opinion on Your Camera Choice
Share your site layout, coverage goals, and budget. Our team will validate the camera selection, flag anything we would change, and recommend products that match the use case.