Pelco SRXP4-3V40-EBT-IR vs Pelco SRXV2-2V13-EBT-IRWL: Specification Comparison
Both the Pelco SRXP4-3V40-EBT-IR and the SRXV2-2V13-EBT-IRWL are 2MP outdoor bullet cameras sharing the same 1/2.8-inch progressive-scan CMOS sensor and PoE Class 3 power. One is drawn from the Sarix Professional 4 series and the other from the Sarix Value 2 series. This comparison examines how the two models differ across imaging performance, installation and environmental ruggedness, and VMS integration and analytics capabilities to help installers and IT buyers select the right unit for their deployment.
In This Guide
How do the imaging specs compare?
Both cameras deliver 1920×1080 resolution from a 1/2.8-inch CMOS sensor, but the Professional 4 (SRXP4-3V40-EBT-IR) posts a higher maximum frame rate of 60 fps versus 30 fps on the Value 2 (SRXV2-2V13-EBT-IRWL), a meaningful difference in applications that require smooth motion capture. WDR performance also favors the Pro 4 at 130 dB SureVision compared to 120 dB on the Value 2. Minimum color illumination is 0.01 lux on the Pro 4 versus 0.02 lux on the Value 2; both reach 0 lux in IR mode.
Lens coverage diverges significantly. The Pro 4 carries a 4.4–9.3 mm motorized varifocal (HFOV 32–109°), while the Value 2 uses a 2.7–13.5 mm varifocal with remote zoom, autofocus, and IR cut filter. The Value 2's wider zoom range provides greater scene flexibility, but the Pro 4's stated HFOV spec is explicit in the provided data whereas the Value 2's HFOV is not listed. The Value 2 also adds a white-light illuminator alongside its 850 nm IR, enabling full-color nighttime imaging; the Pro 4 provides IR-only low-light operation.
What about installation and environment?
Both cameras are rated IP66 for weather resistance and IK09 for vandal resistance per the provided specifications; neither is specified at IP67 or IK10 despite some internal cross-reference fields suggesting those ratings—the primary spec fields for both confirm IP66/IK09. Operating temperature is not stated in the Pro 4's primary specs, while the Value 2 is explicitly rated from -40°C to +60°C, a notable advantage for harsh cold-climate deployments.
Both units are powered via PoE Class 3 (802.3af) and support wall, ceiling, and pendant mounting. The Value 2 additionally lists pole and corner mount options per its specs, offering more flexibility on exterior structures. Connector type is specified as RJ-45 on the Value 2; the Pro 4 does not explicitly list connector type in the provided data.
Which fits your VMS and analytics better?
ONVIF compliance is broader on the Pro 4, which supports Profile S, Profile T, Profile G, and Profile M. The Value 2 supports Profile S and Profile T only; Profile G (on-camera recording management) and Profile M (metadata and analytics) are absent from its listed specs. Both cameras support onboard microSD storage and HTTPS encryption.
Edge analytics is an area of clear differentiation. The Pro 4 specifies Smart Analytics including Person and Vehicle Detection, Directional Violation, Loitering, Beam Crossing, Crowd Detection, and Tamper Alert. The Value 2 does not list equivalent edge analytics capabilities in its provided specifications. Audio is listed as microphone-supported on the Pro 4; the Value 2 does not include an audio specification in the provided data. The Pro 4 also carries 1 GB RAM and 512 MB Flash versus 512 MB RAM and 256 MB Flash on the Value 2, supporting its heavier analytics workload. The Value 2 is explicitly NDAA Section 889 compliant; this approval is not stated in the Pro 4's provided specifications.
Which should you choose: the SRXP4-3V40-EBT-IR or the SRXV2-2V13-EBT-IRWL?
Our take: The SRXP4-3V40-EBT-IR is the stronger choice when edge analytics, higher frame rates, and deeper ONVIF integration are priorities. It delivers 60 fps versus the Value 2's 30 fps, a 130 dB WDR rating versus 120 dB, and onboard Smart Analytics (Person/Vehicle Detection, Loitering, Beam Crossing, Crowd Detection, Directional Violation) that are not listed for the Value 2. It also adds ONVIF Profile G and Profile M support absent from the Value 2. Conversely, the SRXV2-2V13-EBT-IRWL is the more practical choice when budget, white-light color nighttime identification, a wider varifocal range (2.7–13.5 mm), an explicit -40°C cold-weather rating, or NDAA Section 889 compliance are the deciding factors—none of which are confirmed in the Pro 4's provided specifications.
Side-by-Side Comparison
Spec-for-spec, from manufacturer data.
| Specification | Pelco SRXP4-3V40-EBT-IR | Pelco SRXV2-2V13-EBT-IRWL |
|---|---|---|
| Series | Sarix Professional 4 | Sarix Value 2 |
| Resolution | 2MP (1920×1080) | 2MP (1920×1080) |
| Image Sensor | 1/2.8" Progressive Scan CMOS | 1/2.8" Progressive Scan CMOS |
| Lens / Focal Length | 4.4–9.3 mm motorized varifocal | 2.7–13.5 mm varifocal, remote zoom/autofocus |
| HFOV | 32–109° | — |
| Min Illumination (Color / IR) | 0.01 lux / 0 lux | 0.02 lux / 0 lux |
| IR Illumination | 850 nm IR | 850 nm IR + White Light |
| WDR | 130 dB SureVision | 120 dB |
| Max Frame Rate | 60 fps | 30 fps |
| Video Compression | H.265; H.264; Smart Compression | H.265; H.264; Motion JPEG |
| ONVIF Profiles | S, T, G, M | S, T |
| Edge Analytics | Person/Vehicle Detection, Directional Violation, Loitering, Beam Crossing, Crowd Detection, Tamper Alert | — |
| IP Rating | IP66 | IP66 |
| IK / Impact Rating | IK09 | IK09 |
| Operating Temperature | — | -40°C to +60°C |
| Power / PoE Class | PoE Class 3 (802.3af) | PoE Class 3 (802.3af) |
| Onboard Storage | microSD | microSD |
| Audio | Microphone supported | — |
| NDAA Section 889 | — | Compliant |
| Warranty | 5-year | 5-year |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which should you choose: the SRXP4-3V40-EBT-IR or the SRXV2-2V13-EBT-IRWL?
The SRXP4-3V40-EBT-IR is the stronger choice when edge analytics, higher frame rates, and deeper ONVIF integration are priorities. It delivers 60 fps versus the Value 2's 30 fps, a 130 dB WDR rating versus 120 dB, and onboard Smart Analytics (Person/Vehicle Detection, Loitering, Beam Crossing, Crowd Detection, Directional Violation) that are not listed for the Value 2. It also adds ONVIF Profile G and Profile M support absent from the Value 2. Conversely, the SRXV2-2V13-EBT-IRWL is the more practical choice when budget, white-light color nighttime identification, a wider varifocal range (2.7–13.5 mm), an explicit -40°C cold-weather rating, or NDAA Section 889 compliance are the deciding factors—none of which are confirmed in the Pro 4's provided specifications.
Is the SRXP4-3V40-EBT-IR or SRXV2-2V13-EBT-IRWL better for low light?
The Pro 4 reaches 0.01 lux in color mode versus 0.02 lux for the Value 2, and both achieve 0 lux in IR mode. However, the Value 2 adds a white-light illuminator alongside its 850 nm IR, enabling full-color imaging at night—a capability not listed for the Pro 4, which relies on IR-only low-light operation. If color identification in darkness is required, the Value 2 has the advantage; if raw IR sensitivity and frame rate matter more, the Pro 4 leads.
Does the SRXV2-2V13-EBT-IRWL meet NDAA compliance requirements?
Yes—the Value 2 is explicitly listed as NDAA Section 889 compliant in its provided specifications. NDAA compliance is not stated in the provided specifications for the Pro 4 (SRXP4-3V40-EBT-IR). Buyers with federal or government-adjacent requirements should verify Pro 4 compliance status directly with Pelco before specifying it.
Which camera supports more VMS analytics integrations—the Pro 4 or the Value 2?
The Pro 4 (SRXP4-3V40-EBT-IR) supports ONVIF Profile S, T, G, and M, while the Value 2 supports only Profile S and T per the provided specifications. Profile G enables on-camera recording management and Profile M carries metadata and analytics events. The Pro 4 also lists onboard Smart Analytics (six event types); no equivalent edge analytics are listed for the Value 2. For analytics-driven VMS deployments, the Pro 4 offers materially broader integration options.
Get a Second Opinion on Your Camera Choice
Share your site layout, coverage goals, and budget. Our team will validate the camera selection, flag anything we would change, and recommend products that match the use case.

