Pelco SRXP4-2V10-EBT-IR vs Pelco SRXV2-2V13-EBT-IR: Specification Comparison
Both the Pelco SRXP4-2V10-EBT-IR (Sarix Pro 4) and the SRXV2-2V13-EBT-IR (Sarix Value 2) are 2MP outdoor bullet cameras sharing the same 1/2.8-inch progressive-scan CMOS sensor, IP66/IK09 ratings, PoE Class 3 power, microSD edge storage, and 850 nm IR capability. Despite that common baseline, they diverge on frame rate, WDR depth, lens type, analytics depth, ONVIF profile coverage, and platform memory—differences that matter for high-traffic scenes, long-range identification corridors, and VMS integration requirements.
In This Guide
How do the imaging specs compare?
The SRXP4-2V10-EBT-IR delivers 1920×1080 at up to 60 fps versus the SRXV2-2V13-EBT-IR's 30 fps ceiling—a two-to-one advantage that reduces motion blur on fast-moving subjects and enables smoother forensic review. Its WDR is rated at 130 dB (SureVision) compared with 120 dB on the Value 2, a 10 dB improvement that translates to a meaningfully wider dynamic range in high-contrast scenes such as entrance lobbies or parking lot exits. Minimum color illumination is 0.01 lux on the Pro 4 versus 0.02 lux on the Value 2, giving the Pro 4 a one-stop sensitivity edge before IR assist is needed.
Lens architecture also differs. The Pro 4 carries a motorized varifocal lens specified at 4.4–9.3 mm (with a second focal-length figure of 3.4–10.5 mm appearing in supplemental spec fields), providing remote zoom and focus adjustment without physical access to the camera. The Value 2 uses a varifocal lens specified at 2.7–13.5 mm with remote zoom, autofocus, and IR-cut filter control; its longer top end (13.5 mm versus 9.3 mm) concentrates pixels for identification at greater standoff distances, while its wider bottom end (2.7 mm) covers more field of view at the close end. Both share an F1.4 aperture. HFOV is stated only for the Pro 4 at 32–109 degrees; the Value 2 HFOV is not specified in the provided data. IR range figures are not quantified in numeric meters for either model in the supplied specifications.
What about installation and environment?
Both cameras share IP66 ingress protection and IK09 vandal resistance, making them equally rated for outdoor exposed mounting under the provided specs. Both are white-housing outdoor bullet form factors powered by PoE Class 3 (802.3af). The SRXV2-2V13-EBT-IR carries a stated operating temperature range of -40°C to +60°C, a notably wide cold-weather envelope suitable for northern climates. An equivalent operating temperature range is not provided in the SRXP4-2V10-EBT-IR specifications; installers in extreme-cold environments should verify that figure independently.
Mounting flexibility differs slightly: the Value 2 spec lists wall, ceiling, pole, pendant, and corner mounting options, while the Pro 4 lists wall, ceiling, and pendant. The Value 2 also carries an explicit NDAA Section 889 compliance approval in its specification data; this approval is not listed for the Pro 4. Physical dimension data for both cameras appears corrupted in the provided specifications and cannot be used for enclosure or conduit planning. Stated weight is 0.81 kg for the Pro 4 and 0.636 kg (camera module) for the Value 2, though the Pro 4 data includes multiple weight entries.
Which fits your VMS and analytics better?
ONVIF coverage is broader on the Pro 4: it is listed as compliant with Profile S, Profile T, Profile G, and Profile M. The Value 2 covers Profile S and Profile T only. Profile G adds on-camera recording and playback interoperability; Profile M adds metadata and analytics event handling. If your VMS or PSIM relies on Profile G for edge-recording failover or Profile M for structured analytics events, the Value 2 will not satisfy those requirements without a proprietary driver.
Edge analytics are specified only for the Pro 4, which lists Smart Analytics including Person/Vehicle Detection, Directional Violation, Loitering, Beam Crossing, Crowd Detection, and Tamper Alert. No analytics capabilities are listed in the Value 2 specification data. Audio is explicitly noted for the Pro 4 (microphone supported); no audio specification is provided for the Value 2. Both cameras support microSD edge storage and HTTPS encryption. On-board memory is 1 GB RAM / 512 MB Flash for the Pro 4 versus 512 MB RAM / 256 MB Flash for the Value 2—differences that may affect buffering depth and analytics processing headroom. Video compression on the Pro 4 is H.264, H.265, and Smart Compression; the Value 2 adds Motion JPEG as a third codec option.
Which should you choose: the SRXP4-2V10-EBT-IR or the SRXV2-2V13-EBT-IR?
Our take: The SRXP4-2V10-EBT-IR is the stronger choice when frame rate, analytics depth, and full ONVIF profile coverage are priorities. It delivers 60 fps versus the Value 2's 30 fps, reducing motion blur in high-traffic corridors; its WDR is 130 dB versus 120 dB, a 10 dB advantage in high-contrast entrances; and it adds ONVIF Profile G and Profile M, which are absent on the Value 2 and required for VMS-integrated edge recording failover and structured metadata pipelines. It also carries specified Smart Analytics—Person/Vehicle Detection, Loitering, Beam Crossing, and others—where the Value 2 lists none. Conversely, the SRXV2-2V13-EBT-IR is the stronger choice for long-range fixed-angle corridors (2.7–13.5 mm lens versus 4.4–9.3 mm), cold climates where its -40°C lower operating limit is confirmed, installations requiring NDAA Section 889 compliance, or budget-sensitive deployments where those higher-end Pro 4 capabilities are not needed.
Side-by-Side Comparison
Spec-for-spec, from manufacturer data.
| Specification | Pelco SRXP4-2V10-EBT-IR | Pelco SRXV2-2V13-EBT-IR |
|---|---|---|
| Series | Sarix Professional 4 | Sarix Value 2 |
| Resolution | 2MP (1920×1080) | 2MP (1920×1080) |
| Image Sensor | 1/2.8" Progressive Scan CMOS | 1/2.8" Progressive Scan CMOS |
| Lens / Focal Length | 4.4–9.3 mm motorized varifocal | 2.7–13.5 mm varifocal (remote zoom/focus) |
| Aperture | F1.4 | F1.4 |
| Max Frame Rate | 60 fps | 30 fps |
| WDR | 130 dB (SureVision) | 120 dB |
| Min Illumination (Color / IR) | 0.01 lux / 0 lux | 0.02 lux / 0 lux |
| IR | 850 nm, Day/Night | 850 nm, Day/Night |
| Video Compression | H.265; H.264; Smart Compression | H.265; H.264; Motion JPEG |
| ONVIF Profiles | Profile S, T, G, M | Profile S, T |
| Edge Analytics | Person/Vehicle, Directional Violation, Loitering, Beam Crossing, Crowd Detection, Tamper Alert | — |
| Audio | Microphone supported | — |
| IP Rating | IP66 | IP66 |
| IK / Impact Rating | IK09 | IK09 |
| Operating Temperature | — | -40°C to +60°C |
| Power / PoE Class | PoE 802.3af / Class 3 | PoE 802.3af / Class 3 |
| Edge Storage | microSD | microSD |
| On-board Memory | 1 GB RAM / 512 MB Flash | 512 MB RAM / 256 MB Flash |
| NDAA Section 889 | — | Compliant |
| Mounting Options | Wall; Ceiling; Pendant | Wall; Ceiling; Pole; Pendant; Corner |
| Warranty | 5-year | 5-year |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which should you choose: the SRXP4-2V10-EBT-IR or the SRXV2-2V13-EBT-IR?
The SRXP4-2V10-EBT-IR is the stronger choice when frame rate, analytics depth, and full ONVIF profile coverage are priorities. It delivers 60 fps versus the Value 2's 30 fps, reducing motion blur in high-traffic corridors; its WDR is 130 dB versus 120 dB, a 10 dB advantage in high-contrast entrances; and it adds ONVIF Profile G and Profile M, which are absent on the Value 2 and required for VMS-integrated edge recording failover and structured metadata pipelines. It also carries specified Smart Analytics—Person/Vehicle Detection, Loitering, Beam Crossing, and others—where the Value 2 lists none. Conversely, the SRXV2-2V13-EBT-IR is the stronger choice for long-range fixed-angle corridors (2.7–13.5 mm lens versus 4.4–9.3 mm), cold climates where its -40°C lower operating limit is confirmed, installations requiring NDAA Section 889 compliance, or budget-sensitive deployments where those higher-end Pro 4 capabilities are not needed.
Is the SRXP4-2V10-EBT-IR or SRXV2-2V13-EBT-IR better for low-light performance?
Based on the provided specifications, the SRXP4-2V10-EBT-IR has a minimum color illumination of 0.01 lux versus 0.02 lux for the SRXV2-2V13-EBT-IR. Both cameras reach 0 lux with IR active. The Pro 4 also offers 130 dB WDR compared to 120 dB on the Value 2, which helps in mixed-lighting scenes before IR is needed. Neither spec sheet provides a numeric IR range in meters, so direct IR throw distance cannot be compared from the data provided.
Does the SRXV2-2V13-EBT-IR support edge video analytics like the SRXP4-2V10-EBT-IR?
No. The SRXP4-2V10-EBT-IR specifies Smart Analytics including Person/Vehicle Detection, Directional Violation, Loitering, Beam Crossing, Crowd Detection, and Tamper Alert. The SRXV2-2V13-EBT-IR has no analytics capabilities listed in its provided specification data. If on-camera analytics are required to reduce VMS server load or enable edge-triggered alerting, the Pro 4 is the only option of the two based on the available specs.
Which camera is better suited for installations requiring NDAA compliance or extreme cold?
The SRXV2-2V13-EBT-IR has an explicit NDAA Section 889 compliance listing in its specification data; this approval does not appear in the SRXP4-2V10-EBT-IR specs. For cold-weather installations, the Value 2 specifies an operating range down to -40°C; an equivalent lower-limit temperature is not provided for the Pro 4 in the supplied data. Installers in regulated federal environments or severe-cold climates should factor both of these points in favor of the Value 2.
Get a Second Opinion on Your Camera Choice
Share your site layout, coverage goals, and budget. Our team will validate the camera selection, flag anything we would change, and recommend products that match the use case.