Honeywell CK67-X1N-58A1A1G vs CipherLab B8200PISTOL02: Specification Comparison
Both the Honeywell CK67-X1N-58A1A1G and the CipherLab B8200PISTOL02 are handheld barcode-scanning mobile computers aimed at warehouse and logistics workflows. The comparison spans a modern Android-based enterprise handheld against a legacy-OS pistol-grip barcode terminal. Buyers evaluating these units are typically weighing connected-enterprise capability and durability depth against a simpler, lighter dedicated scanning device. The specs reveal fundamentally different performance tiers, connectivity generations, and operating environments worth examining across compute power, durability, and scanning capability.
In This Guide
- Which device delivers the compute power and wireless connectivity needed for modern enterprise workflows?
- How do these devices compare in ruggedness, drop protection, and operating environment tolerance?
- Which unit offers better scanning capability, display usability, and battery endurance for full-shift operation?
- Which should you choose: the CK67-X1N-58A1A1G or the B8200PISTOL02?
- Side-by-Side Specs
- FAQ
Which device delivers the compute power and wireless connectivity needed for modern enterprise workflows?
The CK67-X1N-58A1A1G is built on a Qualcomm QCS4490 octa-core processor running at 2.0 GHz, paired with 6 GB RAM and 128 GB internal flash storage. It runs Android with GMS on the Honeywell ScanPal platform and supports Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax), Bluetooth 5.2, 5G Sub-6 GHz and mmWave WWAN, plus Nano SIM and eSIM. This makes it suitable for real-time WMS integration, video, and cloud-connected applications.
The B8200PISTOL02 is powered by a 32-bit processor with 8 MB Flash and 4 MB or 8 MB SRAM. It runs CipherLab's proprietary cOS and communicates via Serial/USB interfaces. No Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, or cellular specifications are provided in the supplied specs. For buyers requiring wireless connectivity, cloud access, or modern application support, the CipherLab's spec sheet does not document those capabilities.
How do these devices compare in ruggedness, drop protection, and operating environment tolerance?
The CK67-X1N-58A1A1G carries an IP65/IP68 dual rating, meaning it is fully dust-tight and protected against both water jets and sustained immersion. It is drop-rated to 2.4 m, operates from -20°C to 50°C, and stores across -30°C to 70°C. The display uses Corning Gorilla Glass 7. This positions it for demanding outdoor, cold-storage, and wet-area deployments.
The B8200PISTOL02 is rated IP54, protecting against dust ingress and water splashes but not immersion. Its drop spec is 1.2 m onto concrete, five drops per side. No operating temperature range is stated in the provided specs. The IP54 and 1.2 m drop rating are appropriate for typical dry indoor warehouse or retail environments but represent a lower durability threshold than the CK67.
Which unit offers better scanning capability, display usability, and battery endurance for full-shift operation?
The CK67-X1N-58A1A1G is equipped with a FlexRange Imager capable of reading 1D and 2D barcodes across variable ranges. Its display is 4.3 inches at 800×480 resolution, protected by Gorilla Glass 7, with a 13-megapixel rear camera and integrated NFC. The 7,000 mAh Li-Ion battery is designed for extended shift use. The device also includes audio support and day/night usability per spec.
The B8200PISTOL02 uses a 2D imager reading QR Code, Data Matrix, PDF417, Code 128, Code 39, UPC, and EAN symbologies. Its display is 2.1 inches at 160×160 pixels. The battery is a 1,200 mAh 3.7 V Li-Ion cell — nearly one-sixth the capacity of the CK67. No camera or NFC is listed in the B8200PISTOL02 specs. The pistol-grip form factor may reduce hand fatigue in high-volume trigger-scan workflows.
Which should you choose: the CK67-X1N-58A1A1G or the B8200PISTOL02?
Our take: The CK67-X1N-58A1A1G is the stronger choice when the deployment requires enterprise-grade wireless connectivity, multi-shift battery life, and deep environmental protection. The CK67 delivers a Qualcomm octa-core 2.0 GHz processor with 6 GB RAM versus the B8200PISTOL02's unspecified 32-bit CPU with 8 MB Flash — a generational gap in compute. Battery capacity is 7,000 mAh versus 1,200 mAh, a nearly 5.8× difference that is material for uninterrupted shift coverage. Durability stands at IP65/IP68 with a 2.4 m drop rating versus IP54 and 1.2 m, making the CK67 the clear fit for cold storage, outdoor yards, or wet processing areas. The B8200PISTOL02 may suit buyers with tightly scoped, serial/USB-tethered scan station needs on a constrained budget in dry indoor settings, where its pistol-grip form and documented 2D symbology support are sufficient and a simpler OS reduces IT overhead.
Side-by-Side Comparison
Spec-for-spec, from manufacturer data.
| Specification | Honeywell CK67-X1N-58A1A1G | CipherLab B8200PISTOL02 |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm QCS4490 Octa-Core 2.0 GHz | 32-bit (speed not specified) |
| RAM | 6 GB | 4 MB or 8 MB SRAM |
| Internal Storage | 128 GB Flash | 8 MB Flash |
| Expandable Storage | microSD | microSD (SDHC) |
| Operating System | Android with GMS (Honeywell ScanPal) | CipherLab cOS |
| Display Size | 4.3 in (800×480) | 2.1 in (160×160) |
| Display Protection | Gorilla Glass 7 | — |
| Scan Engine | FlexRange Imager (1D/2D) | 2D Imager |
| IP Rating | IP65/IP68 | IP54 |
| Drop Rating | 2.4 m | 1.2 m (5 drops per side) |
| Operating Temperature | -20°C to 50°C | Not specified |
| Battery Capacity | 7,000 mAh Li-Ion | 1,200 mAh Li-Ion |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Not specified |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | Not specified |
| WWAN / Cellular | 5G Sub-6 GHz / mmWave | Not specified |
| Weight | 516 g (18.2 oz) | 150 g (5.3 oz) |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which should you choose: the CK67-X1N-58A1A1G or the B8200PISTOL02?
The CK67-X1N-58A1A1G is the stronger choice when the deployment requires enterprise-grade wireless connectivity, multi-shift battery life, and deep environmental protection. The CK67 delivers a Qualcomm octa-core 2.0 GHz processor with 6 GB RAM versus the B8200PISTOL02's unspecified 32-bit CPU with 8 MB Flash — a generational gap in compute. Battery capacity is 7,000 mAh versus 1,200 mAh, a nearly 5.8× difference that is material for uninterrupted shift coverage. Durability stands at IP65/IP68 with a 2.4 m drop rating versus IP54 and 1.2 m, making the CK67 the clear fit for cold storage, outdoor yards, or wet processing areas. The B8200PISTOL02 may suit buyers with tightly scoped, serial/USB-tethered scan station needs on a constrained budget in dry indoor settings, where its pistol-grip form and documented 2D symbology support are sufficient and a simpler OS reduces IT overhead.
Is the CK67-X1N-58A1A1G or B8200PISTOL02 better for larger deployments with wireless WMS integration?
Based on the provided specs, only the CK67-X1N-58A1A1G documents wireless connectivity — Wi-Fi 6E, Bluetooth 5.2, and 5G WWAN — alongside an Android with GMS platform capable of running modern WMS applications. The B8200PISTOL02 specs list Serial/USB as its interface and CipherLab's proprietary cOS; no Wi-Fi or cellular capability is documented for that unit, making it unsuitable for wireless networked deployments as specified.
Which device is better suited for cold-storage or outdoor environments?
The CK67-X1N-58A1A1G specifies an operating temperature range of -20°C to 50°C, a storage range of -30°C to 70°C, and dual IP65/IP68 ratings. The B8200PISTOL02 does not include an operating temperature range in the supplied specs, and its IP54 rating does not cover immersion or fine-dust ingress. For confirmed cold-storage or outdoor use, the CK67's published specifications directly address those conditions; the B8200PISTOL02's specs do not.
Will either device last a full 8–12 hour warehouse shift on a single charge?
The CK67-X1N-58A1A1G carries a 7,000 mAh Li-Ion battery; no specific runtime hours are stated in the provided specs, but the capacity is consistent with multi-shift enterprise handheld designs. The B8200PISTOL02 has a 1,200 mAh battery; again, no rated runtime is provided in the specs. Based on capacity alone, the CK67 has approximately 5.8× more stored energy, which is a significant indicator of relative endurance — though actual shift life depends on usage patterns not specified for either unit.
More Mobile Computer Comparisons
- Datalogic 944850001 vs Honeywell CK67-X0N-5EC1C2G
- Datalogic 944850001 vs Honeywell CK67-X1N-58A1B1G
- Datalogic 944850001 vs Honeywell CK67-X1N-58A1A1G
- Datalogic 944850001 vs Honeywell CK67-X1N-58A1C1G
- Datalogic 944850001 vs Datalogic 944950001
- Datalogic 944850001 vs Datalogic 944900004
Mobile Computer Buying Guides
Get a Second Opinion on Your Camera Choice
Share your site layout, coverage goals, and budget. Our team will validate the camera selection, flag anything we would change, and recommend products that match the use case.