Which model supports the wireless connectivity your deployment requires?

The CK67-X0N-5EC1C2G is a Wi-Fi-only device, supporting WiFi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) and Bluetooth 5.2. It has no WWAN radio and no SIM slot, meaning it depends entirely on infrastructure Wi-Fi coverage for network access. The Product A spec set identifies the scan engine explicitly as the S0703 FlexRange Imager (1D/2D).

The CK67-X1N-58A1A1G adds 5G Sub-6 GHz and mmWave WWAN radios on top of the same WiFi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) and Bluetooth 5.2 stack. It also includes a Nano SIM slot and eSIM support, enabling carrier connectivity independent of Wi-Fi infrastructure. Both models list USB as an additional connectivity option. The Product B spec set identifies the scan engine as FlexRange Imager without the S0703 model designation, though both are described as 1D/2D capable.

How do the two models compare on ruggedization and environmental tolerance?

Both the CK67-X0N-5EC1C2G and CK67-X1N-58A1A1G carry identical published durability ratings across every available spec dimension. Both are rated IP65 and IP68 for dust and water ingress protection, and both are drop-rated to 2.4 m (approximately 8 ft). Operating temperature range is -20°C to 50°C (-4°F to 122°F) for both, and storage temperature range is -30°C to 70°C (-22°F to 158°F) for both.

Physical form factor is also identical: 220 x 83 x 37 mm (8.7 x 3.3 x 1.5 in) and 516 g (18.2 oz / 1.14 lb) for each. The display on both units is 4.3 inches at 800 x 480 resolution with Corning Gorilla Glass 7. Neither model has a published MIL-STD rating in the provided specs. No differentiation exists between the two on any durability or environmental axis based on the available data.

Are there any differences in processing power, scanning capability, or platform between the two units?

Both models are built on the same compute foundation: a Qualcomm QCS4490 Octa-Core processor running at 2.0 GHz, paired with 6 GB RAM and 128 GB Flash internal storage, expandable via microSD. Both run Android with GMS on the Honeywell ScanPal platform. Battery capacity is 7000 mAh Li-Ion on both units; Product A's marketing copy cites a 12–14 hour typical runtime, though no equivalent runtime figure appears in Product B's spec set.

Both units include a 13-megapixel rear camera, integrated NFC reader, and microphone. Both carry FCC approval. The scan engine for Product A is explicitly named as the S0703 FlexRange Imager (1D/2D barcode); Product B lists only 'FlexRange Imager' without the S0703 model designation — the provided specs do not confirm whether the hardware is identical. No difference in NFC standard, camera spec, or audio spec is indicated between the two models in the provided data.

Which should you choose: the CK67-X0N-5EC1C2G or the CK67-X1N-58A1A1G?

Our take: The CK67-X1N-58A1A1G is the stronger choice when workers operate outside reliable Wi-Fi infrastructure coverage or in environments requiring carrier-grade network resilience. The defining spec delta is WWAN: the X1N variant adds 5G Sub-6 GHz and mmWave radios plus Nano SIM and eSIM support, which the X0N variant entirely lacks. Every other published specification — processor (Qualcomm QCS4490 Octa-Core 2.0 GHz), memory (6 GB RAM / 128 GB Flash), display (4.3-in 800x480 Gorilla Glass 7), battery (7000 mAh Li-Ion), drop rating (2.4 m), and IP rating (IP65/IP68) — is identical between the two. The CK67-X0N-5EC1C2G is the appropriate selection for fixed-site deployments with dense, managed Wi-Fi 6E infrastructure, where the added cost and complexity of a cellular radio is unnecessary. Buyers should also note that Product A's specs explicitly identify the S0703 FlexRange Imager, while Product B's specs omit that model designation.

Side-by-Side Comparison

Spec-for-spec, from manufacturer data.

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Resources

• Honeywell CK67-X0N-5EC1C2G product page — full specs and to add to a quote
• Honeywell CK67-X1N-58A1A1G product page — full specs and to add to a quote