Honeywell CK67-X0N-58S1B0G vs CipherLab B8200PISTOL02: Specification Comparison
Both the Honeywell CK67-X0N-58S1B0G and the CipherLab B8200PISTOL02 are handheld mobile computers with integrated barcode scanning, targeting warehouse and logistics environments. However, they represent dramatically different tiers of the same product class: the CK67 is a modern enterprise-grade Android device with a large display, high-end processor, and long-range imager, while the B8200 is a compact pistol-grip terminal running a proprietary OS with minimal memory and a small display. Buyers considering both are likely weighing capability and futureproofing against cost and simplicity.
In This Guide
- Which device offers more capable processing and display for complex warehouse applications?
- Which device is more durable and delivers greater barcode scanning capability in the field?
- Which device provides better wireless connectivity and battery endurance for shift-length deployments?
- Which should you choose: the CK67-X0N-58S1B0G or the B8200PISTOL02?
- Side-by-Side Specs
- FAQ
Which device offers more capable processing and display for complex warehouse applications?
The Honeywell CK67-X0N-58S1B0G is powered by a Qualcomm QCS4490 Octa-Core 2.0 GHz processor paired with 6 GB RAM and 128 GB internal Flash storage, running Android (non-GMS). Its 4.3-inch display resolves at 800×480 pixels and is protected by Corning Gorilla Glass 7. This platform supports modern Android warehouse management apps, web-based workflows, and concurrent multitasking.
The CipherLab B8200PISTOL02 uses a 32-bit processor (specific speed not specified) with 8 MB Flash and 4 MB or 8 MB SRAM, running CipherLab's proprietary cOS. Its display is 2.1 inches at 160×160 pixels. This architecture is suited for single-purpose, legacy or lightweight data-collection applications but is not capable of running Android apps or complex WMS clients. Both units offer microSD expansion, but storage baselines are incomparable: 128 GB versus 8 MB Flash.
Which device is more durable and delivers greater barcode scanning capability in the field?
The CK67-X0N-58S1B0G carries an IP65/IP68 dual rating, meaning it is fully sealed against dust and protected against sustained water immersion in addition to water jets. Its drop rating is 2.4 m. The scan engine is the FlexRange XLR Imager, specified to read barcodes at ranges exceeding 20 meters, supporting both 1D and 2D symbologies. Operating temperature is rated from -20°C to 50°C.
The B8200PISTOL02 is rated IP54, protecting against dust ingress (partial) and water splashing from any direction. Its drop specification is 1.2 m onto concrete (five drops per side). The scan engine is described as a 2D imager supporting QR Code, Data Matrix, PDF417, Code 128, Code 39, UPC, and EAN. Maximum scan range is not specified in the provided specs. Operating temperature is not specified for the B8200PISTOL02. On every measurable ruggedness axis — IP rating, drop height — the CK67 exceeds the B8200.
Which device provides better wireless connectivity and battery endurance for shift-length deployments?
The CK67-X0N-58S1B0G supports WiFi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax), Bluetooth 5.2, USB, integrated NFC, and a 13-megapixel rear camera. Its 7000 mAh Li-Ion battery is specified to deliver 8–12 hours of runtime. GNSS (dual-band concurrent L1/G1) is referenced in the spec data. The device also supports wireless headsets via Bluetooth.
The B8200PISTOL02 interfaces via Serial/USB. Wi-Fi and Bluetooth specifications are not listed in the provided specs. Its battery is a 3.7 V, 1200 mAh Li-ion rechargeable cell; runtime is not specified. NFC, GNSS, and camera are not mentioned in the provided specs. For deployments requiring wireless real-time connectivity, the CK67 is the only device of the two with confirmed Wi-Fi capability per the supplied specifications.
Which should you choose: the CK67-X0N-58S1B0G or the B8200PISTOL02?
Our take: The CK67-X0N-58S1B0G is the stronger choice when the deployment requires modern Android WMS compatibility, long-range scanning, or shift-length wireless operation. Three concrete spec deltas illustrate the gap: the CK67 carries a 7000 mAh battery versus the B8200's 1200 mAh; it is rated IP65/IP68 with a 2.4 m drop rating versus IP54 and 1.2 m; and it runs on a Qualcomm Octa-Core 2.0 GHz SoC with 6 GB RAM versus a 32-bit processor with 4–8 MB SRAM. The B8200PISTOL02 may serve deployments that require a compact, lightweight (150 g versus 516 g) pistol-grip form factor running simple cOS-based data collection scripts, particularly where Android app support is unnecessary and upfront device cost is the primary constraint. Organizations standardizing on Android enterprise ecosystems should select the CK67.
Side-by-Side Comparison
Spec-for-spec, from manufacturer data.
| Specification | Honeywell CK67-X0N-58S1B0G | CipherLab B8200PISTOL02 |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm QCS4490 Octa-Core 2.0 GHz | 32-bit (speed not specified) |
| RAM | 6 GB | 4 MB or 8 MB SRAM |
| Internal Storage | 128 GB Flash | 8 MB Flash |
| Expandable Storage | microSD | microSD (SDHC) |
| Operating System | Android (non-GMS) | CipherLab cOS |
| Display Size | 4.3 in (800×480) | 2.1 in (160×160) |
| Display Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7 | Not specified |
| Scan Engine | FlexRange XLR Imager (20+ m range) | 2D Imager (range not specified) |
| IP Rating | IP65/IP68 | IP54 |
| Drop Rating | 2.4 m | 1.2 m (5 drops per side) |
| Battery Capacity | 7000 mAh Li-Ion | 1200 mAh Li-ion |
| Battery Runtime | 8–12 hours (per spec) | Not specified |
| Wi-Fi | WiFi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Not specified |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | Not specified |
| Weight | 516 g (18.2 oz) | 150 g (5.3 oz) |
| Operating Temperature | -20°C to 50°C | Not specified |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which should you choose: the CK67-X0N-58S1B0G or the B8200PISTOL02?
The CK67-X0N-58S1B0G is the stronger choice when the deployment requires modern Android WMS compatibility, long-range scanning, or shift-length wireless operation. Three concrete spec deltas illustrate the gap: the CK67 carries a 7000 mAh battery versus the B8200's 1200 mAh; it is rated IP65/IP68 with a 2.4 m drop rating versus IP54 and 1.2 m; and it runs on a Qualcomm Octa-Core 2.0 GHz SoC with 6 GB RAM versus a 32-bit processor with 4–8 MB SRAM. The B8200PISTOL02 may serve deployments that require a compact, lightweight (150 g versus 516 g) pistol-grip form factor running simple cOS-based data collection scripts, particularly where Android app support is unnecessary and upfront device cost is the primary constraint. Organizations standardizing on Android enterprise ecosystems should select the CK67.
Is the Honeywell CK67-X0N-58S1B0G or the CipherLab B8200PISTOL02 better for scanning barcodes at a distance in a large warehouse?
Based on the provided specifications, the CK67-X0N-58S1B0G is the clear choice for long-range scanning: its FlexRange XLR Imager is rated for 20+ meter read distances. The B8200PISTOL02 has a 2D imager but no maximum scan range is stated in its specifications, so a range comparison cannot be made on that point.
Which device is lighter and easier to carry for staff doing extended manual scanning runs?
The CipherLab B8200PISTOL02 is significantly lighter at 150 g (5.3 oz) compared to the Honeywell CK67-X0N-58S1B0G at 516 g (18.2 oz). However, the B8200's pistol-grip form factor is designed for handheld trigger-based scanning rather than touchscreen operation, so the ergonomic trade-off depends on the specific workflow.
Can either of these devices run our existing Android warehouse management app?
Only the Honeywell CK67-X0N-58S1B0G runs Android (non-GMS), making it compatible with Android-based WMS applications subject to GMS dependency verification. The CipherLab B8200PISTOL02 runs CipherLab's proprietary cOS and does not support Android applications.
More Mobile Computer Comparisons
- Datalogic 944850001 vs Honeywell CK67-X0N-5EC1C2G
- Datalogic 944850001 vs Honeywell CK67-X1N-58A1B1G
- Datalogic 944850001 vs Honeywell CK67-X1N-58A1A1G
- Datalogic 944850001 vs Honeywell CK67-X1N-58A1C1G
- Datalogic 944850001 vs Datalogic 944950001
- Datalogic 944850001 vs Datalogic 944900004
Mobile Computer Buying Guides
Get a Second Opinion on Your Camera Choice
Share your site layout, coverage goals, and budget. Our team will validate the camera selection, flag anything we would change, and recommend products that match the use case.