Hanwha XRN-6420DB4-32TB vs i-PRO NX400/3000T3: Specification Comparison
Both the Hanwha XRN-6420DB4-32TB and the i-PRO WJ-NX400/3000T3 are rack-mount 64-channel NVRs targeting enterprise and mid-large physical-security deployments. The comparison centers on recording performance and resolution ceiling, storage architecture and scalability, and integration ecosystem. Buyers evaluating either unit are sizing a centralized recorder for a multi-camera IP network and need to weigh raw throughput and image quality against storage redundancy options and camera-compatibility breadth.
In This Guide
- Which NVR delivers higher recording throughput and resolution ceiling?
- How do the two units compare on installed storage, maximum capacity, and data-protection options?
- Which unit offers broader camera and VMS compatibility, and what open-platform options are available?
- Which should you choose: the XRN-6420DB4-32TB or the NX400/3000T3?
- Side-by-Side Specs
- FAQ
Which NVR delivers higher recording throughput and resolution ceiling?
The Hanwha XRN-6420DB4-32TB is specified at 520 Mbps distributed recording bandwidth and 200 Mbps playback bandwidth, supporting a maximum per-channel resolution of 32MP (8K), with dual HDMI outputs at 4K/30Hz and 1080p/60Hz. Its processor is described as 12th-generation Intel architecture. The unit supports H.265, H.264, and MJPEG dual-stream compression.
The i-PRO WJ-NX400/3000T3 specifies H.265 and H.264 compression and lists a maximum resolution of 2MP in its provided specs. Recording bandwidth and output resolution specifications are not provided in the available i-PRO spec data. Without those figures it is not possible to make a numeric throughput comparison for the NX400/3000T3.
On the data available, the XRN-6420DB4-32TB carries a substantially higher resolution ceiling (32MP vs. 2MP as specified) and a documented recording bandwidth figure (520 Mbps). Buyers requiring 4K-and-above camera inputs should verify the i-PRO unit's actual resolution support against its full datasheet before drawing conclusions.
How do the two units compare on installed storage, maximum capacity, and data-protection options?
The Hanwha XRN-6420DB4-32TB ships with 32TB installed across what the spec notes as 16 SATA bays, expandable to 160TB. RAID configuration options are not specified in the provided Hanwha spec data.
The i-PRO WJ-NX400/3000T3 ships with 3TB installed (3TB × 1 drive) and scales to a stated maximum of 324TB. Critically, the i-PRO unit explicitly lists RAID 0, 1, 5, 6, and 10 support, providing meaningful data-redundancy options at the recorder level. Local microSD storage is also noted as an available medium.
The Hanwha unit arrives with significantly more pre-installed capacity (32TB vs. 3TB), but the i-PRO unit's 324TB ceiling exceeds the Hanwha's 160TB ceiling and its documented RAID modes (0/1/5/6/10) provide data-protection options not confirmed in the Hanwha spec sheet. Buyers with strict retention or redundancy mandates should verify Hanwha RAID support via its full datasheet.
Which unit offers broader camera and VMS compatibility, and what open-platform options are available?
The Hanwha XRN-6420DB4-32TB declares ONVIF Profile S/G/T/M compliance and supports SUNAPI (HTTP API) and the Hanwha Vision Open Platform. Analytics include DetectionShot support. The unit is rated for PoE+ (802.3at). Operating temperature is specified at -10°C to +55°C with an IK10 impact rating noted in the attribute data.
The i-PRO WJ-NX400/3000T3 is listed as compatible with i-PRO IP cameras and ONVIF-compliant cameras, and VMS compatibility is noted as ONVIF Profile S plus major VMS platforms. Power is specified at 12V DC external supply. Operating temperature and impact ratings are not provided in the available spec data. Multi-site compatibility is noted as a feature.
Both units carry ONVIF compliance, enabling heterogeneous camera integration. The Hanwha unit specifies four ONVIF profiles (S/G/T/M) versus the i-PRO's Profile S, suggesting broader protocol coverage on paper. The i-PRO's explicit multi-site compatibility note may be relevant for distributed enterprise deployments. Buyers running proprietary VMS platforms should verify native driver availability for each unit independently.
Which should you choose: the XRN-6420DB4-32TB or the NX400/3000T3?
Our take: The XRN-6420DB4-32TB is the stronger choice when recording resolution and pre-installed storage capacity are the primary drivers. It specifies a 32MP resolution ceiling versus the i-PRO's stated 2MP, ships with 32TB installed versus 3TB, and documents a 520 Mbps recording bandwidth figure the i-PRO spec does not provide. Conversely, the WJ-NX400/3000T3 offers a higher maximum storage ceiling (324TB vs. 160TB) and explicitly documented RAID 0/1/5/6/10 redundancy modes not confirmed in the Hanwha spec sheet—meaningful for deployments with strict uptime or forensic-retention mandates. ONVIF Profile S/G/T/M on the Hanwha versus Profile S on the i-PRO favors Hanwha for multi-profile camera ecosystems. Choose the Hanwha for high-resolution camera networks prioritizing throughput and day-one capacity; evaluate the i-PRO for storage-redundancy-focused or i-PRO-native camera deployments where the 324TB ceiling matters.
Side-by-Side Comparison
Spec-for-spec, from manufacturer data.
| Specification | Hanwha XRN-6420DB4-32TB | i-PRO NX400/3000T3 |
|---|---|---|
| Product Type | NVR | NVR |
| Max Channels | 64 | 64 |
| Max Resolution | 32MP (8K) | 2MP (per provided specs) |
| Recording Bandwidth | 520 Mbps distributed | — |
| Playback Bandwidth | 200 Mbps | — |
| Video Compression | H.265, H.264, MJPEG | H.265, H.264 |
| Installed Storage | 32TB | 3TB (3TB × 1) |
| Max Storage Capacity | 160TB (16 SATA bays) | 324TB |
| RAID Support | — (not specified) | RAID 0, 1, 5, 6, 10 |
| HDMI Outputs | Dual: 4K/30Hz + 1080p/60Hz | — |
| ONVIF Profiles | S, G, T, M | S |
| PoE Standard | PoE+ (802.3at) | PoE (standard not specified) |
| Power Supply | — (not specified) | 12V DC |
| Operating Temp | -10°C to +55°C | — |
| Impact Rating | IK10 | — |
| Warranty | 5-Year | — |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which should you choose: the XRN-6420DB4-32TB or the NX400/3000T3?
The XRN-6420DB4-32TB is the stronger choice when recording resolution and pre-installed storage capacity are the primary drivers. It specifies a 32MP resolution ceiling versus the i-PRO's stated 2MP, ships with 32TB installed versus 3TB, and documents a 520 Mbps recording bandwidth figure the i-PRO spec does not provide. Conversely, the WJ-NX400/3000T3 offers a higher maximum storage ceiling (324TB vs. 160TB) and explicitly documented RAID 0/1/5/6/10 redundancy modes not confirmed in the Hanwha spec sheet—meaningful for deployments with strict uptime or forensic-retention mandates. ONVIF Profile S/G/T/M on the Hanwha versus Profile S on the i-PRO favors Hanwha for multi-profile camera ecosystems. Choose the Hanwha for high-resolution camera networks prioritizing throughput and day-one capacity; evaluate the i-PRO for storage-redundancy-focused or i-PRO-native camera deployments where the 324TB ceiling matters.
Is the XRN-6420DB4-32TB or WJ-NX400/3000T3 better for larger deployments needing long retention?
The WJ-NX400/3000T3 supports a higher maximum storage capacity (324TB vs. 160TB per the provided specs) and explicitly lists RAID 0, 1, 5, 6, and 10 options for drive redundancy. The XRN-6420DB4-32TB ships with more pre-installed storage (32TB vs. 3TB) but its RAID support is not specified in the available data. For very long retention with redundancy, the i-PRO unit's documented maximum capacity and RAID modes are notable; buyers should confirm Hanwha RAID options via its full datasheet.
Can either NVR work with cameras from other manufacturers, not just its own brand?
Both units declare ONVIF compliance. The Hanwha XRN-6420DB4-32TB lists ONVIF Profile S, G, T, and M plus SUNAPI (HTTP API). The i-PRO WJ-NX400/3000T3 lists ONVIF Profile S and is noted as compatible with major VMS platforms. Either unit can integrate non-proprietary ONVIF cameras, but buyers should validate specific camera models against each manufacturer's compatibility matrix, as ONVIF profile support levels differ.
What is the difference in out-of-box recording capacity between the two units?
The Hanwha XRN-6420DB4-32TB ships with 32TB of installed storage across its drive bays. The i-PRO WJ-NX400/3000T3 ships with 3TB installed (one 3TB drive). If day-one storage depth is a priority without additional drive purchases, the Hanwha arrives with over ten times the installed capacity. However, the i-PRO's maximum expandable capacity (324TB) exceeds the Hanwha's stated 160TB ceiling.
Get a Second Opinion on Your Camera Choice
Share your site layout, coverage goals, and budget. Our team will validate the camera selection, flag anything we would change, and recommend products that match the use case.