Hanwha QNO-8080R vs i-PRO X15500-V3L: Specification Comparison
Both the Hanwha QNO-8080R and i-PRO WV-X15500-V3L are 5MP outdoor bullet cameras with motorized varifocal lenses, PoE power, IR illumination, H.265/H.264 compression, ONVIF compliance, and IK10 impact ratings — placing them squarely in the same cross-shop category for perimeter and mid-range surveillance deployments. This comparison examines their imaging capabilities, installation requirements, and VMS/analytics integration based solely on published specifications.
In This Guide
How do the imaging specs compare?
Both cameras use an approximate 1/2.8" CMOS sensor at 5MP resolution, but they differ meaningfully in output and low-light performance. The QNO-8080R outputs 2592×1944 (4:3 aspect) at 30fps, while the X15500-V3L outputs 3072×1728 (16:9 aspect) at 30fps — the i-PRO unit provides wider horizontal pixel coverage suited to widescreen monitoring. Low-light performance diverges sharply: the QNO-8080R specifies 0.15 Lux color minimum illumination, while the X15500-V3L specifies 0.02 Lux (B&W, 50IRE, F1.3, 1/30s) — a roughly 7.5× sensitivity advantage for the i-PRO, supported by its wider F1.3 maximum aperture versus the Hanwha's F1.6. The X15500-V3L also extends IR illumination to 70m (230ft) versus the QNO-8080R's 30m (98ft), a more than 2× IR reach advantage.
Wide dynamic range also separates the two: the X15500-V3L specifies 132dB maximum Super Dynamic range (at level 31), while the QNO-8080R specifies 120dB WDR — a 12dB difference that can matter in high-contrast scenes with mixed sunlight and shadow. Lens coverage is similar: the QNO-8080R covers 3.2–10mm (3.1x) at up to 101° horizontal, and the X15500-V3L covers 2.9–9mm (3.1x) at up to 106° horizontal. DORI detection distances at 25ppm favor the i-PRO in both wide (46.3m vs 43.3m) and tele (201.0m vs 185.7m) positions per spec. The X15500-V3L adds an extra digital zoom to 12.4x (at 640×360 resolution), which the QNO-8080R does not specify.
What about installation and environment?
Both cameras carry IP66 and IK10 ratings, confirming dust-tight, jet-water-resistant, and impact-resistant housings suitable for outdoor deployment. The X15500-V3L adds IP67 (temporary immersion) and NEMA 4X / UL Type 4X certifications, providing an additional ingress protection tier and UL-listed environmental compliance not specified for the QNO-8080R. The X15500-V3L also specifies wind resistance up to 40 m/s (approx. 89 mph), a spec absent from the QNO-8080R's published data.
Temperature range differs: the X15500-V3L operates from -40°C to +55°C, while the QNO-8080R operates from -30°C to +55°C — a 10°C cold-side advantage for the i-PRO that matters in northern climates. Power requirements diverge: the QNO-8080R draws a maximum of 9.5W and is powered by IEEE 802.3af PoE (Class 3), compatible with standard PoE switches. The X15500-V3L requires PoE+ (802.3at, Class 4) at up to 14W, or DC12V 1.2A — installers must confirm PoE+ switch port availability. The QNO-8080R is lighter at 1,190g (2.62 lb) versus approximately 2.5kg (5.6 lb) for the X15500-V3L, and smaller in its primary dimension (322.9mm depth vs 383mm depth).
Which fits your VMS and analytics better?
Both cameras support ONVIF Profile S, G, and T. The X15500-V3L adds ONVIF Profile M, which covers metadata and analytics interoperability — relevant when the VMS consumes AI event metadata over ONVIF. The QNO-8080R supports Hanwha's SUNAPI (HTTP API) and Wisenet Open Platform for deeper integration with Wisenet VMS/NVR ecosystems. Simultaneous stream users differ: the X15500-V3L supports up to 14 concurrent users versus the QNO-8080R's 6 unicast users — meaningful in large multi-client monitoring centers.
Edge analytics diverge considerably. The QNO-8080R provides motion detection, tampering, defocus detection, virtual area (intrusion/enter/exit), and virtual line (crossing/direction) analytics. The X15500-V3L adds AI-class analytics — AI motion, face, vehicle, and occupancy detection — plus audio detection and AI sound classification (gunshot, yell, vehicle horn, glass break), scene change detection (SCD), and an image stabilizer. Audio I/O is specified for the X15500-V3L (3.5mm stereo input and output jacks, 4× alarm I/O terminals, G.726/G.711/AAC-LC compression); the QNO-8080R specifies 1 alarm input and 1 alarm output but does not list audio input/output ports. Edge storage on the X15500-V3L supports up to 512GB microSDXC versus 128GB on the QNO-8080R. Security credentials differ: the X15500-V3L specifies FIPS 140-2 Level 3 compliance; the QNO-8080R specifies firmware encryption, 802.1X, SRTP, and SD card partition encryption, but does not cite FIPS 140-2.
Which should you choose: the QNO-8080R or the X15500-V3L?
Our take: The QNO-8080R is the stronger choice when budget, standard PoE infrastructure, and Wisenet VMS integration are the primary drivers, while the X15500-V3L is the stronger choice for demanding environments requiring superior low-light performance, extended IR range, and on-camera AI analytics. Key spec deltas: the X15500-V3L achieves 0.02 Lux minimum illumination versus 0.15 Lux on the QNO-8080R (roughly 7.5× more sensitive), extends IR coverage to 70m versus 30m, and delivers 132dB versus 120dB WDR. The X15500-V3L also operates to -40°C versus -30°C and adds NEMA 4X / UL Type 4X certifications absent from the Hanwha. However, the X15500-V3L requires PoE+ (Class 4, 14W max) rather than standard PoE (Class 3, 9.5W max) — a meaningful infrastructure constraint. Buyers on Wisenet NVR platforms gain deeper API access with the QNO-8080R; buyers prioritizing AI sound/face/vehicle analytics or FIPS 140-2 Level 3 security compliance should evaluate the X15500-V3L.
Side-by-Side Comparison
Spec-for-spec, from manufacturer data.
| Specification | Hanwha QNO-8080R | i-PRO X15500-V3L |
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 2592×1944 (5MP, 4:3) | 3072×1728 (5MP, 16:9) |
| Image Sensor | 1/2.8" CMOS | Approx. 1/2.8" type CMOS |
| Focal Length / Zoom | 3.2–10mm, 3.1x motorized varifocal | 2.9–9mm, 3.1x motorized varifocal |
| Max Aperture | F1.6 (Wide) / F2.9 (Tele) | F1.3 (Wide) / F2.5 (Tele) |
| Horizontal FOV | 101° (Wide) to approx. 31° (Tele) | 106° (Wide) to 34° (Tele) |
| Min Illumination | 0.15 Lux color / 0 Lux IR | 0.02 Lux B&W (50IRE, F1.3, 1/30s) |
| IR Range | 30m (98ft) | 70m (230ft) |
| Wide Dynamic Range | 120 dB | 132 dB (Super Dynamic, level 31) |
| Max Frame Rate | 30fps @ 5MP | 30fps @ 5MP |
| Video Compression | H.265 / H.264 / MJPEG | H.265 / H.264 / MJPEG |
| IP Rating | IP66 | IP66 / IP67 / NEMA 4X / UL Type 4X |
| Impact Rating | IK10 | IK10 |
| Operating Temperature | -30°C to +55°C | -40°C to +55°C |
| Power Input / PoE Class | IEEE 802.3af PoE, Class 3 (max 9.5W) | IEEE 802.3at PoE+, Class 4 (max 14W) or DC12V |
| Edge Storage | Micro SD/SDHC/SDXC up to 128GB | microSDXC up to 512GB |
| Alarm I/O | 1 input / 1 output | 4 alarm I/O terminals (IN1, IN2, IN3, OUT, AUX) |
| Audio I/O | — | 3.5mm stereo input and output jacks |
| ONVIF Profiles | S / G / T | S / G / T / M |
| AI / Edge Analytics | Virtual line/area, defocus, tampering | AI motion, face, vehicle, occupancy; AI sound classification |
| Security Certification | Firmware encryption, 802.1X, SRTP, SD partition encrypt | FIPS 140-2 Level 3, Device Certificate, HTTPS |
| Weight | 1,190g (2.62 lb) | Approx. 2,500g (5.6 lb) |
| Warranty | 3 years | 5 years |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which should you choose: the QNO-8080R or the X15500-V3L?
The QNO-8080R is the stronger choice when budget, standard PoE infrastructure, and Wisenet VMS integration are the primary drivers, while the X15500-V3L is the stronger choice for demanding environments requiring superior low-light performance, extended IR range, and on-camera AI analytics. Key spec deltas: the X15500-V3L achieves 0.02 Lux minimum illumination versus 0.15 Lux on the QNO-8080R (roughly 7.5× more sensitive), extends IR coverage to 70m versus 30m, and delivers 132dB versus 120dB WDR. The X15500-V3L also operates to -40°C versus -30°C and adds NEMA 4X / UL Type 4X certifications absent from the Hanwha. However, the X15500-V3L requires PoE+ (Class 4, 14W max) rather than standard PoE (Class 3, 9.5W max) — a meaningful infrastructure constraint. Buyers on Wisenet NVR platforms gain deeper API access with the QNO-8080R; buyers prioritizing AI sound/face/vehicle analytics or FIPS 140-2 Level 3 security compliance should evaluate the X15500-V3L.
Is the QNO-8080R or X15500-V3L better for low-light performance?
Based on published specifications, the X15500-V3L has a significant low-light advantage: it specifies 0.02 Lux minimum illumination (B&W, F1.3) versus 0.15 Lux color for the QNO-8080R, and its IR illumination reaches 70m compared to 30m on the QNO-8080R. Its wider maximum aperture of F1.3 (vs F1.6 on the Hanwha) also admits more light in color mode.
Can I power both cameras from a standard PoE switch?
No — not both. The QNO-8080R runs on standard IEEE 802.3af PoE (Class 3, max 9.5W) and will work with any compliant PoE switch port. The X15500-V3L requires IEEE 802.3at PoE+ (Class 4, up to 14W) or a separate DC12V 1.2A supply. Using a standard 802.3af port for the X15500-V3L is not supported per spec.
Which camera offers better on-camera analytics for AI-driven detection?
The X15500-V3L provides AI-class analytics including face, vehicle, and occupancy detection, plus AI sound classification (gunshot, yell, vehicle horn, glass break) and scene change detection — capabilities not listed in the QNO-8080R's specification. The QNO-8080R offers rule-based video analytics including virtual line crossing, intrusion, enter/exit zone detection, and defocus detection, which are sufficient for many standard deployments but do not include AI-classified object or sound categories.
Get a Second Opinion on Your Camera Choice
Share your site layout, coverage goals, and budget. Our team will validate the camera selection, flag anything we would change, and recommend products that match the use case.