Datalogic 946200002 vs Honeywell CK67-X1N-58A1C1G

MOBILE COMPUTER COMPARISON

Datalogic 946200002 vs Honeywell CK67-X1N-58A1C1G: Specification Comparison

Both the Datalogic Joya Touch 22 (946200002) and the Honeywell CK67-X1N-58A1C1G are Android-based handheld mobile computers in the same 4.3-inch display class, each featuring integrated barcode scanning, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and microSD expansion. Buyers in retail, warehousing, or field operations evaluating a touch-screen handheld scanner will legitimately cross-shop these two units. The comparison covers compute and storage, durability and environmental ratings, and wireless connectivity and scanning capability.



Which device offers more compute power and storage for demanding mobile applications?

The Honeywell CK67-X1N-58A1C1G is equipped with a Qualcomm QCS4490 Octa-Core processor running at 2.0 GHz, paired with 6 GB RAM and 128 GB of onboard flash storage. The Datalogic Joya Touch 22 uses a Qualcomm SD660 clocked at 2.2 GHz with 4 GB RAM and 32 GB of flash storage. Both support microSD expansion for additional local storage.

On raw memory and storage capacity, the CK67 holds a clear advantage: it offers 50% more RAM (6 GB vs. 4 GB) and four times the built-in flash (128 GB vs. 32 GB). The Joya Touch 22's SD660 has a marginally higher clock speed (2.2 GHz vs. 2.0 GHz), though the CK67's octa-core architecture provides more parallel processing threads. The Android version for the CK67 is listed as Android with GMS without a specific version number in the provided specs; the Joya Touch 22 specifies Android 11 with GMS.

For applications requiring large local data caches, multiple simultaneous apps, or heavier middleware, the CK67's memory and storage configuration is notably more capable. The Joya Touch 22's 4 GB / 32 GB profile is adequate for standard retail point-of-sale or light inventory tasks.


Which unit is built for harsher operating environments and physical abuse?

The Honeywell CK67-X1N-58A1C1G carries a published IP65/IP68 ingress protection rating and a 2.4 m drop rating. Its operating temperature range is specified as -20°C to 50°C (-4°F to 122°F), and its storage temperature range extends from -30°C to 70°C (-22°F to 158°F). The display uses Corning Gorilla Glass 7. The device is also listed as 'Outdoor Ready' in the provided specs.

The Datalogic Joya Touch 22 does not have an IP rating, drop rating, or operating/storage temperature range listed in the provided specifications. No ruggedization claims can be confirmed from the available data.

This is a decisive differentiator for deployment environment selection. The CK67 is demonstrably spec'd for outdoor, cold-storage, dock, and field use cases where exposure to dust, moisture, drops, and temperature extremes is expected. The Joya Touch 22's environmental capabilities cannot be evaluated from the provided specs, making it unsuitable to recommend for any deployment where ruggedization is a requirement.


Which device provides more capable wireless connectivity and barcode scanning for high-throughput operations?

The Honeywell CK67-X1N-58A1C1G supports WiFi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax), Bluetooth 5.2, NFC, and 5G Sub-6 GHz / mmWave WWAN with Nano SIM and eSIM support. Its scan engine is the S0703 FlexRange Imager, specified as capable of reading 1D and 2D codes at variable distances. FCC approval is listed.

The Datalogic Joya Touch 22 supports Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac with 2x2 MU-MIMO, Bluetooth 5.1 with BLE, and NFC. It does not support Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax) or any WWAN/cellular connectivity. Specific scan engine model and scan range are not provided in the available specs, though the product description references a 2D imager.

The CK67 is the stronger choice for connectivity-intensive deployments: it adds Wi-Fi 6E for higher throughput and lower latency on 6 GHz-capable infrastructure, integrated 5G for sites without reliable Wi-Fi coverage, and the named S0703 FlexRange imager with confirmed variable-distance scanning. The Joya Touch 22's Wi-Fi 5 (ac) with MU-MIMO is adequate for dense retail environments but lacks the cellular fallback and next-generation Wi-Fi standard of the CK67.


Which should you choose: the 946200002 or the CK67-X1N-58A1C1G?

Our take: The CK67-X1N-58A1C1G is the stronger choice when deployment environments involve physical hazards, outdoor or cold-storage conditions, cellular connectivity requirements, or high-throughput scanning at variable distances. Three concrete spec deltas support this: the CK67 provides 6 GB RAM and 128 GB storage versus 4 GB / 32 GB on the Joya Touch 22; it carries IP65/IP68 and a 2.4 m drop rating where the Joya Touch 22 has no published ruggedization specs; and it supports WiFi 6E plus 5G WWAN while the Joya Touch 22 tops out at Wi-Fi 5 with no cellular option. The CK67's 7,000 mAh battery also substantially exceeds the Joya Touch 22's 3,300 mAh. The Joya Touch 22 is a lighter, more compact unit (286 g vs. 516 g) with wireless charging, positioning it for supervised retail floor or checkout-adjacent use where weight and charge convenience matter more than ruggedization or cellular range.


Side-by-Side Comparison

Spec-for-spec, from manufacturer data.

SpecificationDatalogic 946200002Honeywell CK67-X1N-58A1C1G
Series / FamilyJoya Touch 22CK67
ProcessorQualcomm SD660, 2.2 GHzQualcomm QCS4490 Octa-Core, 2.0 GHz
RAM4 GB6 GB
Onboard Storage32 GB Flash128 GB Flash
Expandable StoragemicroSDmicroSD
Operating SystemAndroid 11 with GMSAndroid with GMS (version not specified)
Display4.3 in FWVGA (854 x 480)4.3 in (800 x 480) Gorilla Glass 7
Wi-Fi Standard802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, 2x2 MU-MIMOWiFi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Bluetooth5.1 with BLE5.2
WWAN / Cellular5G Sub-6 GHz / mmWave; Nano SIM + eSIM
NFCYesYes
IP RatingIP65 / IP68
Drop Rating2.4 m
Operating Temperature-20°C to 50°C (-4°F to 122°F)
Battery Capacity3,300 mAh (wireless charging)7,000 mAh Li-Ion
Weight286 g (0.63 lb)516 g (18.2 oz / 1.14 lb)
Dimensions (mm)77 x 145 x 34220 x 83 x 37
Scan Engine2D Imager (model not specified)S0703 FlexRange Imager
Warranty1-Year Limited

Frequently Asked Questions

Which should you choose: the 946200002 or the CK67-X1N-58A1C1G?

The CK67-X1N-58A1C1G is the stronger choice when deployment environments involve physical hazards, outdoor or cold-storage conditions, cellular connectivity requirements, or high-throughput scanning at variable distances. Three concrete spec deltas support this: the CK67 provides 6 GB RAM and 128 GB storage versus 4 GB / 32 GB on the Joya Touch 22; it carries IP65/IP68 and a 2.4 m drop rating where the Joya Touch 22 has no published ruggedization specs; and it supports WiFi 6E plus 5G WWAN while the Joya Touch 22 tops out at Wi-Fi 5 with no cellular option. The CK67's 7,000 mAh battery also substantially exceeds the Joya Touch 22's 3,300 mAh. The Joya Touch 22 is a lighter, more compact unit (286 g vs. 516 g) with wireless charging, positioning it for supervised retail floor or checkout-adjacent use where weight and charge convenience matter more than ruggedization or cellular range.

Is the Joya Touch 22 or the CK67-X1N-58A1C1G better suited for warehouse or cold-storage environments?

Based on available specs, the CK67-X1N-58A1C1G is the only one of the two with published environmental ratings. It carries IP65/IP68 dust and water ingress protection, a 2.4 m drop rating, and an operating temperature range of -20°C to 50°C. The Datalogic Joya Touch 22 does not have an IP rating, drop rating, or temperature range listed in its provided specifications, so it cannot be confirmed suitable for those conditions.

Does either device support cellular connectivity for use outside Wi-Fi coverage areas?

Only the Honeywell CK67-X1N-58A1C1G includes cellular connectivity. Its specs list 5G Sub-6 GHz and mmWave WWAN with Nano SIM and eSIM support. The Datalogic Joya Touch 22 does not list any WWAN or cellular capability in its provided specifications; its wireless connectivity is limited to Wi-Fi and Bluetooth.

Which device has the longer battery life for all-day shift use?

The Honeywell CK67-X1N-58A1C1G is rated at 7,000 mAh. The Datalogic Joya Touch 22 is rated at 3,300 mAh with wireless charging support. The CK67's battery capacity is approximately 2.1 times larger by mAh rating. Neither device's spec sheet in the provided data states a runtime in hours, so a direct hour-for-hour comparison cannot be made from specs alone; however, the CK67's significantly larger cell is designed for full-shift operations per the product description.



Get a Second Opinion on Your Camera Choice

Share your site layout, coverage goals, and budget. Our team will validate the camera selection, flag anything we would change, and recommend products that match the use case.