Which device delivers more processing power and a better display for field workflows?

The Datalogic Memor 35 uses a Qualcomm QCM4490 octa-core clocked at 2.4 GHz paired with 6 GB or 8 GB of RAM and 128 GB UFS storage. Its 6.0-inch Full HD+ display (2160 × 1080) is protected by Corning Gorilla Glass 5 and delivers significantly higher pixel density, making it suited for tasks requiring map rendering, PDF review, or richly formatted applications in the field.

The Honeywell CK67 runs a Qualcomm QCS4490 octa-core at 2.0 GHz with a fixed 6 GB RAM and 128 GB Flash storage. Its 4.3-inch display resolves to 800 × 480 — a much lower pixel count — but is protected by the newer Corning Gorilla Glass 7. The smaller screen and dedicated keypad form factor (implied by the CK67 series design) favor eyes-free scan-intensive workflows over content consumption. Storage expansion via microSD is available on both units.

For compute headroom the Memor 35 has a 0.4 GHz clock advantage and the option of 8 GB RAM; for display clarity it is substantially ahead at 2160 × 1080 vs 800 × 480. The CK67 counters with a newer glass generation on its screen, though the resolution gap limits its utility for complex visual content.

How do barcode scanning capability and wireless connectivity compare between the two units?

The Honeywell CK67 specifies the S0703 FlexRange Imager by name — a 1D/2D engine designed for variable-distance scanning without manual refocus, a concrete and verifiable spec relevant to pick-and-pack, receiving dock, and retail scan scenarios where distances to barcodes vary. The Datalogic Memor 35 lists a 1D/2D imager but does not identify the engine model in the provided specifications; symbology support notes QR Code configured per deployment.

On wireless, both devices support 5G (Sub-6 GHz), Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax), and Bluetooth 5.2. The CK67 explicitly specifies 5G Sub-6 GHz plus mmWave support and includes a Nano SIM and eSIM slot. The Memor 35 spec data references Bluetooth 5.2 in one field and 5.3 in another — the exact version is not definitively confirmed by the provided specs. Both units include NFC and USB connectivity. Neither spec sheet lists a specific Ethernet port; the Memor 35 references Ethernet in one interface field but no rate or port type is confirmed.

For scanning-intensive deployments the CK67's named FlexRange engine is a differentiating advantage since buyers can verify its range and decode performance against published Honeywell data. The Memor 35's scanning engine remains unspecified in the provided documentation.

Which unit is built to withstand harsher operating conditions and longer shifts?

Both devices carry IP65/IP68 ingress protection ratings, meaning each is rated against dust ingress and submersion. The Honeywell CK67 is tested to a 2.4 m (approximately 7.9 ft) drop specification and operates across a confirmed temperature range of -20°C to 50°C (-4°F to 122°F), with a storage temperature range of -30°C to 70°C. The Datalogic Memor 35 is certified to MIL-STD-810H and lists a drop rating of 6 ft (approximately 1.8 m) to concrete; no operating temperature range is present in the provided specifications.

Battery is a decisive separator: the CK67 ships with a 7000 mAh Li-Ion pack, with Honeywell citing 8–12 hour shift coverage in its published tagline data. The Memor 35 lists a 4000 mAh main battery with a separate reference to a 4680 mAh safe-swap pack with wireless charging — the hot-swap capability avoids downtime during battery changes, but total capacity per installed cell is lower than the CK67's single large pack.

The CK67 is also significantly heavier at 516 g (18.2 oz) versus the Memor 35 at 327 g, a difference of 189 g that matters in hand-held-all-day scenarios. The CK67's larger battery and confirmed cold-temperature floor of -20°C make it better suited to freezer warehouse or outdoor winter use where temperature floor and shift-length endurance dominate. The Memor 35's lighter weight and hot-swap capability favor multi-shift environments where changeover speed matters and ambient temperatures are moderate.

Which should you choose: the 944950001 or the CK67-X1N-58A1C1G?

Our take: The 944950001 is the stronger choice when the deployment demands a large, high-resolution display, lighter carry weight, and rapid battery swap across multiple shifts at moderate temperatures. The Memor 35 leads on display resolution (2160 × 1080 vs 800 × 480), processor clock (2.4 GHz vs 2.0 GHz), weight (327 g vs 516 g), and offers an optional 8 GB RAM configuration absent on the CK67. However, the CK67-X1N-58A1C1G is the stronger choice for scan-intensive warehouse or cold-chain deployments: its 7000 mAh battery (vs 4000–4680 mAh), confirmed -20°C operating floor, 2.4 m drop rating (vs 1.8 m / 6 ft), and named S0703 FlexRange imager with documented variable-distance scanning provide verifiable durability and endurance advantages. Buyers running Honeywell ScanPal-standardized fleets should also factor platform continuity. No price data was provided for either unit.

Side-by-Side Comparison

Spec-for-spec, from manufacturer data.

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Resources

• Datalogic 944950001 product page — full specs and to add to a quote
• Honeywell CK67-X1N-58A1C1G product page — full specs and to add to a quote