Which device offers more capable processing and a better display for the intended workflow?

The Datalogic 944950001 uses a Qualcomm QCM4490 octa-core processor clocked at 2.4 GHz, paired with 6 GB or 8 GB RAM and 128 GB UFS storage. Its display measures 6.0 inches at Full HD+ resolution (2160 × 1080) protected by Corning Gorilla Glass 5. The higher RAM ceiling (8 GB option) and UFS storage type suggest faster read/write throughput than conventional flash. The 13 MP rear and 8 MP front cameras are specified.

The Honeywell CK67-X0N-5EC1C2G uses a Qualcomm QCS4490 octa-core processor at 2.0 GHz with 6 GB RAM and 128 GB Flash storage. Its display is 4.3 inches at 800 × 480 resolution, protected by Corning Gorilla Glass 7. A 13 MP rear camera is specified; front camera specs are not provided in the supplied data. The QCS4490 versus QCM4490 distinction is a Qualcomm platform difference; the CK67 runs at a lower clock speed (2.0 GHz vs. 2.4 GHz) and tops out at 6 GB RAM with no higher-RAM SKU listed in the provided specs.

For display-intensive tasks such as route navigation, document review, or customer-facing interactions, the 944950001's 6.0-inch Full HD+ panel is a material advantage. For scan-centric warehouse workflows where display size is secondary to ergonomics and scan throughput, the CK67's smaller 4.3-inch form factor may be preferable despite the lower pixel count.

How do the two devices compare on wireless connectivity, cellular capability, and data interface options?

The Datalogic 944950001 supports 5G WWAN (per the series designation and spec fields), Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax), Bluetooth 5.3 (noted in multiple spec fields, though one field states 5.2—5.3 appears in the more detailed interface fields), NFC, and USB 3.2 Type-C. The inclusion of 5G makes this device viable for deployments without reliable fixed wireless infrastructure, such as utility field work, remote logistics, or outdoor last-mile operations.

The Honeywell CK67-X0N-5EC1C2G supports Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax), Bluetooth 5.2, and integrated NFC. No cellular (4G or 5G) WWAN capability is listed in the provided specifications. USB connectivity is listed but the connector type and generation are not specified in the supplied data. The device is Wi-Fi 6E certified per the spec sheet.

For deployments requiring cellular fallback or primary WAN connectivity away from fixed infrastructure, the 944950001 is the only option of the two. Both devices are equivalent on Wi-Fi 6E. The Datalogic unit holds a marginal edge on Bluetooth version (5.3 vs. 5.2) based on the detailed spec fields, though the practical difference between 5.2 and 5.3 in most enterprise use cases is minimal.

Which device is more rugged and provides longer sustained battery life for shift-length deployments?

The Datalogic 944950001 carries IP65/IP68 ingress protection and MIL-STD-810H certification. Its specified drop rating is 6 ft (approximately 1.8 m) to concrete. The device weighs 327 g. Battery capacity is stated as 4000 mAh in one spec field and 4680 mAh in another (labeled 'safe-swap'); the hot-swap/safe-swap feature allows battery replacement without powering down. Wireless charging is noted. No operating temperature range is provided in the supplied specifications.

The Honeywell CK67-X0N-5EC1C2G carries IP65/IP68 ingress protection and is drop-rated to 2.4 m (approximately 7.9 ft). It weighs 516 g. Battery capacity is 7000 mAh Li-Ion with a stated typical runtime of 12–14 hours. Operating temperature range is specified as -20 °C to 50 °C, and storage temperature as -30 °C to 70 °C. No operating temperature range is provided for the Datalogic unit in the supplied specs, so a direct thermal comparison cannot be made.

On raw drop rating the CK67 (2.4 m) exceeds the Memor 35 (1.8 m / 6 ft). On battery capacity the CK67's 7000 mAh is substantially larger than the Memor 35's 4000–4680 mAh, and the CK67 provides a stated runtime estimate (12–14 hours) while the Datalogic spec does not. The Memor 35 counters with a hot-swap battery feature, which can extend effective uptime across shifts without a larger fixed cell. The CK67 is notably heavier (516 g vs. 327 g), which is a factor in shift-long handheld use.

Which should you choose: the 944950001 or the CK67-X0N-5EC1C2G?

Our take: The 944950001 is the stronger choice when 5G cellular connectivity, a large Full HD+ display, and lighter carry weight are the primary requirements—for example, field service technicians, utility workers, or delivery personnel operating away from fixed Wi-Fi infrastructure. The Memor 35 provides a 6.0-inch 2160 × 1080 display versus the CK67's 4.3-inch 800 × 480 panel, a 5G WWAN radio absent from the CK67, and a 189 g weight advantage (327 g vs. 516 g). Conversely, the CK67-X0N-5EC1C2G is the stronger choice for high-volume scan-centric warehouse environments: its 7000 mAh battery (vs. 4000–4680 mAh) delivers a stated 12–14 hours of runtime, its S0703 FlexRange imager is a named enterprise scan engine suited to repetitive barcode reads, and its 2.4 m drop rating exceeds the Memor 35's 6 ft (1.8 m) rating. Platform buyers already invested in Honeywell ScanPal MDM should also weight the CK67's native platform integration.

Side-by-Side Comparison

Spec-for-spec, from manufacturer data.

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Resources

• Datalogic 944950001 product page — full specs and to add to a quote
• Honeywell CK67-X0N-5EC1C2G product page — full specs and to add to a quote