Datalogic 944900004 vs Honeywell CK67-X1N-58A1C1G: Specification Comparison
Both the Datalogic Memor 35 5G (944900004) and the Honeywell CK67-X1N-58A1C1G are Android-based 5G handheld mobile computers with IP65/IP68 ingress protection, MIL-grade ruggedness, integrated 1D/2D imagers, and enterprise wireless stacks targeting field and warehouse deployments. This comparison evaluates them across computing performance and display, scanning and connectivity, and physical durability and power — the three axes that most directly drive purchase decisions in enterprise mobile computing.
In This Guide
- Which device offers more capable computing performance and a better display for the task at hand?
- How do the scanning engines and wireless connectivity stacks compare for real-world deployment?
- Which device is built to survive harsher environments and last longer between charges?
- Which should you choose: the 944900004 or the CK67-X1N-58A1C1G?
- Side-by-Side Specs
- FAQ
Which device offers more capable computing performance and a better display for the task at hand?
The Datalogic 944900004 uses a Qualcomm QCM4490 octa-core processor clocked at 2.4 GHz, paired with 6 or 8 GB of RAM depending on configuration, and runs Android 13 with GMS — with documented upgradability to Android 18. The Honeywell CK67-X1N-58A1C1G also uses a Qualcomm octa-core SoC, the QCS4490, but at 2.0 GHz, and is limited to 6 GB RAM with no alternate memory tier listed in the provided specs. Both ship with 128 GB of internal storage, and both support microSD expansion.
Display priorities diverge sharply. The Memor 35 provides a 6.0-inch Full HD+ panel at 2160×1080 resolution, protected by Corning Gorilla Glass 5, with an 8 MP front camera and 13 MP rear camera. The CK67 uses a significantly smaller 4.3-inch display at 800×480 resolution — less than one-quarter the pixel count — protected by Corning Gorilla Glass 7. Buyers running apps with detailed maps, PDF documents, or rich UI workflows will find the Memor 35's display meaningfully more capable; the CK67's smaller, higher-generation glass panel suits single-hand warehouse grip and scan-centric workflows where screen real estate is secondary.
OS versioning: the 944900004 specifies Android 13 with GMS and a documented upgrade path to Android 18. The CK67-X1N-58A1C1G spec lists Android with GMS but does not specify an Android version number or upgrade roadmap in the provided data.
How do the scanning engines and wireless connectivity stacks compare for real-world deployment?
The Honeywell CK67-X1N-58A1C1G integrates the S0703 FlexRange Imager, a named scan engine specified for variable-distance 1D and 2D scanning without refocus. This is a distinct product feature: a dedicated, purpose-built scan engine designed for warehouse aisle and logistics environments where scan distances vary. The Datalogic 944900004 specs list a 1D/2D area imager supporting Code 128, Code 39, UPC, EAN, QR Code, Data Matrix, and PDF417 — the same major symbologies — but the scan engine model, working range, and range performance are not specified in the provided data.
Both devices support 5G WWAN. The CK67-X1N-58A1C1G explicitly specifies both Sub-6 GHz and mmWave bands, along with nano SIM and eSIM support. The 944900004 spec lists 5G connectivity but does not detail which 5G bands (Sub-6 only or mmWave) or SIM configuration in the provided data. Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) is supported by both. Bluetooth 5.2 is present on both. NFC is confirmed on the 944900004; the CK67 lists an integrated NFC reader in the spec fragment. USB is listed for both; the 944900004 specifies USB 3.2 Type-C; USB spec detail is not provided for the CK67.
Camera: both list a 13 MP rear camera. The 944900004 adds an 8 MP front camera; front camera specs are absent from the CK67 provided data. Audio support is confirmed for the CK67 including wireless headset support; audio specs are not detailed in the 944900004 provided data.
Which device is built to survive harsher environments and last longer between charges?
Both devices carry IP65/IP68 ingress protection ratings, making them sealed against dust and submersion at the same certified level. Both reference MIL-STD-810H compliance: the 944900004 lists it directly; the CK67-X1N-58A1C1G expresses drop performance as a 2.4-meter drop rating without explicitly citing MIL-STD-810H in the provided spec data.
Operating temperature is specified for the CK67 at -20°C to 50°C (-4°F to 122°F), with storage rated to -30°C to 70°C. The 944900004 specs do not include operating or storage temperature ranges in the provided data, which is a gap buyers in cold-storage or outdoor-cold environments should resolve before specifying.
Battery capacity differs substantially. The CK67-X1N-58A1C1G carries a 7,000 mAh Li-Ion battery, with marketing referencing 8–12 hour shift coverage. The Memor 35 carries a 4,680 mAh battery with safe-swap functionality and wireless charging support. Safe-swap means the unit can have its battery replaced without powering down — a workflow continuity advantage in 24/7 operations — while the CK67's larger fixed cell targets users who can complete a shift on a single charge without needing to swap. The Memor 35 weighs 327 g (0.72 lbs); the CK67 weighs 516 g (18.2 oz / 1.14 lbs), reflecting its larger battery and ruggedized chassis dimensions of 220×83×37 mm versus the Memor 35's 78.5×168×17.8 mm.
Which should you choose: the 944900004 or the CK67-X1N-58A1C1G?
Our take: The 944900004 is the stronger choice when the deployment prioritizes a larger, high-resolution display, a lighter form factor, safe-swap battery flexibility, wireless charging, and a documented Android upgrade path to Android 18. The Memor 35 delivers a 2160×1080 6.0-inch screen versus the CK67's 800×480 4.3-inch panel, weighs 189 g less (327 g vs 516 g), and supports hot-swappable batteries — critical for uninterrupted 24/7 shifts. The CK67-X1N-58A1C1G is the stronger choice when deployment demands maximum single-charge runtime (7,000 mAh vs 4,680 mAh), a named variable-distance scan engine (S0703 FlexRange) for mixed-range warehouse scanning, confirmed 5G mmWave support, and a verified operating temperature floor of -20°C. Buyers in cold-chain, logistics, or high-volume scan-centric environments should favor the CK67; buyers running data-rich field applications requiring screen real estate, lighter carry weight, or hot-swap continuity should favor the Memor 35.
Side-by-Side Comparison
Spec-for-spec, from manufacturer data.
| Specification | Datalogic 944900004 | Honeywell CK67-X1N-58A1C1G |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm QCM4490 Octa-Core 2.4 GHz | Qualcomm QCS4490 Octa-Core 2.0 GHz |
| RAM | 6 GB or 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Internal Storage | 128 GB UFS | 128 GB Flash |
| Storage Expansion | microSD up to 2 TB | microSD (capacity not specified) |
| Operating System | Android 13 with GMS (upgradable to Android 18) | Android with GMS (version not specified) |
| Display Size | 6.0 in | 4.3 in |
| Display Resolution | 2160 × 1080 (Full HD+) | 800 × 480 |
| Display Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 7 |
| Scan Engine | 1D/2D Area Imager (model not specified) | S0703 FlexRange Imager (1D/2D, variable distance) |
| 5G WWAN | 5G (band detail not specified in provided data) | 5G Sub-6 GHz + mmWave |
| SIM | Not specified in provided data | Nano SIM + eSIM |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6/6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (integrated reader) |
| IP Rating | IP65/IP68 | IP65/IP68 |
| Drop Rating | MIL-STD-810H | 2.4 m |
| Operating Temperature | Not specified in provided data | -20°C to 50°C (-4°F to 122°F) |
| Battery Capacity | 4,680 mAh (safe-swap, wireless charging) | 7,000 mAh Li-Ion |
| Weight | 327 g (0.72 lbs) | 516 g (1.14 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 78.5 × 168 × 17.8 mm | 220 × 83 × 37 mm |
| Rear Camera | 13 MP | 13 MP |
| Front Camera | 8 MP | Not specified in provided data |
| USB | USB 3.2 Type-C | Not specified in provided data |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which should you choose: the 944900004 or the CK67-X1N-58A1C1G?
The 944900004 is the stronger choice when the deployment prioritizes a larger, high-resolution display, a lighter form factor, safe-swap battery flexibility, wireless charging, and a documented Android upgrade path to Android 18. The Memor 35 delivers a 2160×1080 6.0-inch screen versus the CK67's 800×480 4.3-inch panel, weighs 189 g less (327 g vs 516 g), and supports hot-swappable batteries — critical for uninterrupted 24/7 shifts. The CK67-X1N-58A1C1G is the stronger choice when deployment demands maximum single-charge runtime (7,000 mAh vs 4,680 mAh), a named variable-distance scan engine (S0703 FlexRange) for mixed-range warehouse scanning, confirmed 5G mmWave support, and a verified operating temperature floor of -20°C. Buyers in cold-chain, logistics, or high-volume scan-centric environments should favor the CK67; buyers running data-rich field applications requiring screen real estate, lighter carry weight, or hot-swap continuity should favor the Memor 35.
Is the 944900004 or the CK67-X1N-58A1C1G better for workers scanning barcodes all day in a warehouse?
The CK67-X1N-58A1C1G has an advantage here on two counts: its S0703 FlexRange imager is specified for variable-distance scanning without refocus — a concrete feature for mixed-range warehouse aisles — and its 7,000 mAh battery is rated for 8–12 hour shifts on a single charge. The 944900004's scan engine type and working range are not specified in the available data, and its 4,680 mAh battery is smaller, though the safe-swap design allows battery exchange without powering down the unit.
Which device is lighter and easier to carry for workers who hold it for extended periods?
The Datalogic Memor 35 (944900004) is substantially lighter at 327 g (0.72 lbs) compared to the Honeywell CK67-X1N-58A1C1G at 516 g (1.14 lbs) — a 189 g difference. The Memor 35 is also physically slimmer at 17.8 mm thick versus 37 mm for the CK67. For roles where the device is held continuously, the Memor 35's form factor is meaningfully less fatiguing.
Can either device operate in sub-zero cold-storage environments?
The Honeywell CK67-X1N-58A1C1G has a specified operating temperature range of -20°C to 50°C (-4°F to 122°F) with storage rated to -30°C, making it a confirmed candidate for cold-storage and freezer environments. The Datalogic 944900004 does not include operating or storage temperature specifications in the provided data; buyers targeting sub-zero deployments should consult the full Datalogic Memor 35 datasheet before specifying that unit.
More Mobile Computer Comparisons
- Datalogic 944850001 vs Honeywell CK67-X0N-5EC1C2G
- Datalogic 944850001 vs Honeywell CK67-X1N-58A1B1G
- Datalogic 944850001 vs Honeywell CK67-X1N-58A1A1G
- Datalogic 944850001 vs Honeywell CK67-X1N-58A1C1G
- Datalogic 944850001 vs Datalogic 944950001
- Datalogic 944850001 vs Datalogic 944900004
Mobile Computer Buying Guides
Get a Second Opinion on Your Camera Choice
Share your site layout, coverage goals, and budget. Our team will validate the camera selection, flag anything we would change, and recommend products that match the use case.

